Japan, US eye Ishiba-Trump summit in Canada on G7 margins+
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan and the United States plan to hold summit talks between Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and President Donald Trump in Canada on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders' meeting in mid-June, sources familiar with the matter said Tuesday.
Before the three-day G7 gathering from Sunday, Japan's chief tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is expected to visit Washington for the sixth round of ministerial-level negotiations on the Trump tariffs, to take place on Friday, setting the stage for the meeting between their two countries' leaders, according to the sources.
The Japanese government had another option for Ishiba to travel to the United States before the G7 summit in Kananaskis, and meet in person with Trump, depending on progress on negotiations at the ministerial level.
But the past rounds of negotiations failed to resolve differences between the two nations and Akazawa, who is a close aide to Ishiba, aims to continue with his efforts to bridge the gap over Trump's tariff policy.
Akazawa will head to Canada following the ministerial meeting to continue communicating with Ishiba until the last minute. The minister for economic revitalization will return to Japan on June 18, according to the sources.
Japan has demanded that the Trump administration remove its tariffs on cars, steel and aluminum, along with a 10 percent baseline levy as part of what is called a "reciprocal" tariff. It is also opposed to the 14 percent country-specific portion of the reciprocal tariff, which has been suspended for 90 days from early April as negotiations continue.
But Tokyo has begun to consider whether it will accept reduced tariff rates as the United States has consistently refused to eliminate the duties, according to sources with knowledge of the talks.
Japan and the United States are aiming to reach a deal at the earliest possible time.
Ishiba has repeatedly underscored the need for the longtime allies to focus on boosting investment and creating jobs in the United States. Trump is seeking to reduce his country's massive trade deficit with Japan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
40 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Tariffs May Remain in Effect While Appeals Proceed, US Appeals Court Rules
Reuters file photo U.S. President Donald Trump holds a chart next to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 2, 2025. June 10 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower-court decision blocking them on grounds that he had exceeded his authority by imposing them. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and Mexico. The appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the duties to remain in place while the appeals play out. The Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of 'exceptional importance' warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July 31. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature, have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term pause. The May 28 ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties, and the other by 12 U.S. states led by Oregon. Jeffrey Schwab, an attorney for the small businesses that sued, said Tuesday's federal appeals court decision was disappointing, but it did not mean that the Trump administration would win in the end. 'It's important to note that every court to rule on the merits so far has found these tariffs unlawful, and we have faith that this court will likewise see what is plain as day: that IEEPA does not allow the president to impose whatever tax he wants whenever he wants,' Schwab said Tuesday. The White House and state of Oregon did not immediately respond to requests for comment after normal business hours on Tuesday. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their assets. Trump is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit. The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.
an hour ago
Honda Motor Eyes Investment in Chipmaker Rapidus
News from Japan Economy Technology Jun 11, 2025 12:29 (JST) Tokyo, June 11 (Jiji Press)--Japan's Honda Motor Co. is considering investing in Rapidus Corp., a Tokyo-based chipmaker working to realize domestic production of next-generation semiconductors. With the investment, the automaker aims to domestically procure such semiconductors, to be used for automated driving systems, to enhance its supply chains, sources have said. Rapidus has received investments also from another Japanese automaker Toyota Motor Corp. and electronics and entertainment giant Sony Group Corp. The chipmaker is asking shareholders and financial institutions to make fresh investments in the company. Honda's investment would make it easier for Rapidus to procure more funds from the private sector and secure clients. Rapidus plans to start mass production of cutting-edge chips with a circuit line width of 2 nanometers at its plant in Chitose in the northernmost prefecture of Hokkaido from 2027. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
‘Come and Get Me': Gavin Newsom Has Entered the Meme War
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has found himself in the center of the internet's spotlight after squaring off with President Donald Trump on social media over the deployment of military troops to counter protesters in Los Angeles. While police deployed tear gas and shot at protesters in Los Angeles with rubber bullets on Monday, Newsom shared a screenshot on TikTok of a Washington Post headline reporting that California would sue Trump over the National Guard's presence, paired with a trending sound sampled from the movie 'Mean Girls. ' The video was captioned 'We will not stand while Donald Trump illegally federalizes the National Guard' and was liked more than 255,000 times. In another video, posted Friday to X, Newsom talks right into a phone camera with the attached message: 'Let's do a simple Econ 101 lesson for @realDonaldTrump.' That post grabbed 1.7 million views. Newsom's clapbacks catapulted to meme status as posters on the left and the right devoured each new beat in the Newsom-Trump showdown. During the back and forth, Newsom grew his TikTok following by almost 50 percent, to 897,000 as of Tuesday, and gained 60,000 new followers on X. While Newsom didn't ask for the military response in L.A. that ignited tension with the president over the weekend, he responded to the sudden attention with internet-savvy posts that borrow strategies from professional creators, such as speaking straight to camera, shooting vertically and using trending sounds on TikTok to reach more viewers. Audiences responded with Newsom-related memes of their own, introducing his political persona to throngs of young people online. In a political economy that's increasingly beholden to the incentives and payoffs of social media, political experts say Newsom's online strategy could rally support for his position on the L.A. protests and bolster his profile among younger, more online voters. 'This sort of meme-posting with clever comments back and forth probably isn't helpful with swing voters, but it could be effective at making him more popular among Democrats,' said Jon Ladd, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University. Before police clashed with protesters during anti-ICE demonstrations on Saturday, Newsom was already taking aim at Trump on social media over the president's alleged plans to cancel federal funding to California. But the tone between Newsom and Trump grew more aggressive as the president deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the weekend. Newsom took to his official gubernatorial TikTok account on Sunday to announce he would sue the Trump administration over the deployment, which he called illegal and chaotic. The post, which has been viewed more than 8 million times, was set to the hip-hop song 'Sticky' by Tyler The Creator and included a meme with the words 'f – around' and 'find out.' Comments on the post expressed shock and delight that the governor, known as a moderate Democrat, would share something so tongue-in-cheek and antagonistic. After Trump's border czar Tom Homan said in an interview with NBC on Sunday that he wouldn't rule out arresting elected officials including Newsom if they 'harbor illegal aliens' or defy law enforcement, Newsom again shot back on TikTok: 'Come and get me, tough guy. I don't give a damn,' his personal account shared alongside a clip of the governor speaking about Homan's comments. Meanwhile, Trump and his allies attacked Newsom on Truth Social and other platforms. 'The very incompetent 'Gov.,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, President Trump, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR,' Trump wrote Monday in a Truth post that got 52,000 likes. Right-wing media networks boosted the clash, with Valuetainment Media owner Patrick Bet-David using his popular YouTube channel to criticize Newsom – and promote his company's branded flip flop sandals, 'for Newsom, who's flip-flopping.' Newsom, who will run for reelection in November, could benefit from the attention generated by a public feud with Trump even if it puts him and his constituents in the administration's crosshairs, said Karen North, a professor of digital social media at the University of Southern California. Newsom's approval ratings are already surging among potential voters in California from 44 percent in October to 52 percent in March, according to data from the Public Policy Institute of California. Feuds, meanwhile, are known to funnel attention toward online influencers, from YouTube gossipmongers to internet-era celebrities such as the Kardashians. The same holds true for politicians, said North, who increasingly style themselves after popular online creators in hopes of building a brand that resonates with voters. 'Newsom's approach to this extremely contentious situation creates an opportunity for him to lock horns with Donald Trump, but he's not doing it in the standard manner of having a hard, flat negotiation, rather in a way that plays to the shareability of social media,' she said. Thanks to algorithmic feeds that prize outrageous material and must-share content, memes travel faster than messaging, North said. To win elections or even solve serious political conflicts such as the Los Angeles showdown, politicians such as Newsom now drum up support by feeding into trending narratives online, she added. They also rely more on new media channels such as podcasts and video talk shows that share clips on social media – which Trump's digital strategists leveraged successfully in the 2024 election. Beyond the news media, there's a second ecosystem of online takes and commentary that's often more powerful than traditional channels for communicating with constituents, North said, and political figures are eager to break in. Representatives for Newsom didn't respond to a request for comment on his recent posting. Even the most fervent online meme-ing doesn't always translate to political success. In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, spectators awed at the popularity of Kamala Harris memes on TikTok, which is known for its younger audience. At the polls, however, the coconut memes and 'Brat summer' edits didn't tip the scales in her favor.
