logo
How Trump's real estate obsession has defined his presidency

How Trump's real estate obsession has defined his presidency

On Aug. 11, while delivering the news of a federal takeover of Washington, D.C. police, Trump shared pearls of real-estate wisdom imparted by his father on the importance of first impressions. He might have thought of it as curb appeal.
"I had a wonderful father, very smart, and he used to say, 'Son, when you walk into a restaurant and you see a dirty front door, don't go in,'" said Trump. "'Because if the front door is dirty, the kitchen's dirty also.' Same thing with the capital. If our capital's dirty, our whole country is dirty, and they don't respect it."
Casting Washington, D.C. as America's "front door" in need of a major wipe down, he went on describe his plan of action.
A clean-up crew of 800 National Guard troops would be dispatched to clear out "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor" from the capital. The spruce-up project also has a deadline: 30 days.
"It's a natural instinct," he said on Aug. 11. "As a real estate person, I was very good at that and I was very good at fixing things up."
Trump has a track record of displaying an obsession with the physicality of things: whether it is people (Arnold Palmer, Rosie O'Donnell), places (cities, countries and spaces) or objects (portrait frames and ceiling moldings).
He's been on a redecorating and remodeling binge in and around the White House - from a golden overhaul of the Oval Office to ripping up the sod in the Rose Garden to pave it over with white stone. He's also planning on adding a 90,000-square-foot ballroom in the East Wing.
Trump has also shared his enthusiasm for the White House Vault, from which he selects "great pictures and artwork" to be placed around the house.
"I picked it all myself. I'm very proud of it," he said.
But framing intractable issues in terms of real estate also appears to be how he orients himself - a way to process and understand.
For instance, he's made a habit of describing war-torn areas through the prism of development potential. During the Washington event, he said he would try to "get back" some of Ukraine's "oceanfront property" during talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15.
"Russia has occupied a big portion of Ukraine. They've occupied some very prime territory. We're going to try and get some of that territory back for Ukraine," he said.
"They have taken largely - in real estate, we call it oceanfront property. That's always the most valuable property," Trump said, describing the land Russia usurped during its three-year war on Ukraine.
Talking to reporters about possible "land swaps" between Russia and Ukraine - an idea Ukraine has rejected - he said his mission was to negotiate an agreement.
"I make deals," he said. In Trump's telling, the negotiations seemed to be about a land deal, and he made no mention of any security guarantees for Ukraine.
Back in February, during a visit by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - the first world leader to visit Trump during his second term - Trump spelled out his vision for Gaza amid talks of an Israel-Gaza ceasefire.
He said the United States should take over the war-torn seaside Palestinian territory and turn it into the "Riviera of the Middle East."
"The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip. We'll do a job with it. We will own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous bombs and other weapons," he said. "We will level it out, create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area."
But Trump has found that some of his land acquistion pitches, such as buying Greenland from Denmark, do not go over well in the world of international diplomacy.
When Trump hosted Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office in May, he brought up his desire to annex the United States' northern neighbor and make it the 51st state.
Trump, once again, brought up his professional builder bonafides.
"I'm a real estate developer at heart. When you get rid of that artificially drawn line (the U.S.-Canada border), somebody drew that line many years ago... like with a ruler, just a straight line right across the top of the country," Trump said during the meeting.
"When you look at that beautiful formation, when it's together - I'm a very artistic person - but when I looked at that beaut, I said, 'That's the way it was meant to be,"" he said.
Carney was quick to swat away the suggestion.
"You know, from real estate, there are some places that are never for sale," said Carney. "Having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign last several months, it's not for sale."
Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska?
What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska?

Metro

time27 minutes ago

  • Metro

What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska?

The stakes are high for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin when the pair meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. The US President and his Russian counterpart will sit down at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in the largest US state – a site chosen due to its close proximity to Russia. Addressing reporters at the White House last week, Trump suggested an agreement would involve some exchange of land between Ukraine and Russia. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both,' the Republican president said. But Volodymyr Zelensky has pushed against that, saying Ukrainians 'will not gift their land to the occupiers'. In a video address to the nation posted on his Telegram channel on Saturday, the Ukrainian President said any decisions without Ukraine would be decisions against peace. He added: 'They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work.' When Trump revealed his plans for a meeting with Putin last week, he also floated a potential second meeting where Zelensky would join them. Following a virtual chat with European and Nato leaders yesterday afternoon, the US President again suggested the trilateral could take place soon after the Alaska summit. Trump and Putin would use their initial tete-a-tete to 'find out where we are and what we're doing', he said, adding: 'We'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' The Kremlin has confirmed additional details of the summit between the two leaders on Friday. Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov said they will initially meet one-on-one with interpreters at 11.30am local time, which is 8.30pm UK time. Afterwards, five additional members from each delegation will join Trump and Putin. The pair will then hold a joint press conference. Donald Trump notoriously promised he would be able to bring the war between Russia and Ukraine to an end on day one after being re-elected. Of course, that didn't happen – and after some success in bringing violence to a stop between Israel and Iran as well as other countries, he may see this conflict as something like a white whale. Negotiations between US and Russian officials so far this year have failed to bring the bloodshed in Ukraine to an end. Trump is a big believer in his deal-making talents, and he thinks getting himself into a room with Putin may present the best shot at nailing down a result. The meeting will also touch on co-operation and trade between the US and Russia, so the two presidents may be hoping for broader results. The likelihood of the trilateral taking place may depend heavily on the outcome of the Friday bilateral. Trump has said there will be 'very serious consequences' if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire, though he did not specify what they were. If the long-awaited three-way meeting does take place, one of the leaders will come to the table at a significant disadvantage, according to British Foreign Policy Group think tank director Evie Aspinall. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Aspinall said Trump is 'feeling relatively confident about the situation' after weeks of trumpeting his role in stopping conflicts between Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan, and several other regions around the world. She told Metro: 'I think in his mind, he's managed to bring Putin to the table, and he's going to use it as an opportunity to really cement himself as this deal maker and as someone that is able to secure peace in the world. 'And so what he wants, really, is a ceasefire. He wants an end to the war in Ukraine. His intent is fairly straightforward. He wants to see the war end, and he wants to be seen as the man that makes that possible.' Ultimately, the summit is 'as much as anything, an image thing' for Trump, she argued, as it would also mean disentangling the US from a global conflict. Putin, meanwhile, is 'making huge progress militarily' in Ukraine and is able to use the meeting to secure two big objectives – demonstrating to Trump he is 'reasonable' enough to negotiate, and buying time on the battlefield. Aspinall said: 'Putin will be building up his resources so that he is in the best position possible for when a ceasefire or full negotiation then happens. 'He wants to use this as an opportunity to show that he's on Trump's side.' The US President may have appeared to sharpen his stance against his Russian counterpart in recent weeks, notably hitting India with punitive tariffs for buying Russia's oil. But Aspinall explained it's likely a shrewd move from Putin to sit down for talks at this point in time. She said: 'I think Putin is playing quite well for the Russians. By coming to negotiating table, he's managed to get Trump to wait, step back from the threats of sanctions for now. 'What he'll be hoping is that he presents himself as reasonable in these meetings, and then Trump doesn't go on with the sanctions that are supposed to hit imminently.' For Zelensky, the summit will be much more of a high-wire act with far more risks. Aspinall said: 'I think there is possible progress. The problem with the progress is it will be on Putin's terms, rather than Zelensky's terms. 'I think there is a world in which you see Trump and Putin come out saying, 'This is a deal that would work,' and then you have Europe and Ukraine pushing back very heavily on that, and a negotiation over that deal.' The Ukrainian President's best bet might be to challenge Putin's position as the 'reasonable actor' in the negotiations by pressing hard on the Russian leader's red lines – such as agreeing to Ukraine joining Nato. This could 'push Putin into a corner', suggested Aspinall, which might be Zelensky's best chance at leverage. More Trending But she was clear Ukraine has more to lose in a likely deal. Russia could be flexible on territory swaps, and offer them in exchange for Putin's bigger prizes: blocking Ukrainian Nato membership, shrinking the size of its military, and forcing elections that would 'inevitably be biased by Russian disinformation'. Aspinall said: 'the Territory part is the part that they will probably be softer on, as a way for Trump to come out and say, we're not giving Putin everything. We've got the territory back, for example. 'But Putin can sell it as you know, we no longer have an aggressor on our doorstep. We have a supporter and ally of Russia on our doorstep.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump and Putin to discuss 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic gains MORE: Fans slam iconic 80s rockers for calling Trump appointment 'great honour' MORE: Keir Starmer embraces Volodymyr Zelensky on Downing Street ahead of Trump-Putin meeting

Obama intel chief rushed debunked Trump-Russia report, documents claim
Obama intel chief rushed debunked Trump-Russia report, documents claim

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Obama intel chief rushed debunked Trump-Russia report, documents claim

The Trump administration released files showing Barack Obama's director of national intelligence rushed a 2017 report on Russia election interference despite warnings it could compromise findings. President Donald Trump's Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard (pictured), ordered the release of classified documents on Wednesday that show how Obama's top intelligence staffers debated how to proceed with a 2017 intelligence assessment she deems 'politicized,' alleging Russia 'aspired' to benefit Trump by hacking that year's election. The declassified file contains an email thread between Obama's Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (pictured), FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan and then-Director of the National Security Agency Mike Rogers. The two-page document reveals how Rogers warned Clapper on December 22, 2016, that his team did not have enough time to assess intelligence relating to the Russia claims. 'I wanted to reach out to you directly to let you know of some concerns I have with what I am hearing,' Rogers writes to Clapper, Comey and Brennan. 'I'm concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren't fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments.' The then-head of the NSA warned the leaders of the DNI, FBI, and CIA that his staff had a lack of 'sufficient access' to the intelligence and not enough time to review it before signing off on the final report. But Clapper shot down Rogers' concerns and admitted the intelligence community may have to bend its own rules. 'We may have to compromise on our 'normal' modalities,' Clapper responded in an email, adding, 'more time is not negotiable.' 'It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page and are all supportive of the report—in the highest tradition of 'that's OUR story, and we're stickin' to it,' Clapper wrote. 'This is one project that has to be a team sport,' the former DNI continued. In the email, Clapper also notes how an 'ad hoc fusion cell' at the CIA had drafted an intelligence report that was to be circulated. The 'ad hoc' cell was a small team assembled by former CIA Director John Brennan to create the now-notorious 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) that was later used to instigate investigations into Trump, sources revealed to Fox News. In the 2017 ICA, the report stated that 'Russia was responsible for leaking data from the DNC and DCCC' and that 'the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump's election chances.' According to Gabbard, Clapper's email instructing everyone to get on board with the assessment that Russia interfered on behalf of Trump came just hours before intelligence officials sent a 'politicized' report to intel officials. 'The leading figures in the Russia Hoax have spent years deceiving the American public by presenting their manufactured and politicized assessments as credible intelligence,' Gabbard said on Wednesday. 'The email released today reinforces what we already exposed: the decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top.' 'Clapper's own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a 'team sport,'' she added. DNI Gabbard released additional documents this summer showing that Clapper had talking points drafted in early December 2016, weeks before the email thread with Rogers, Comey and Brennan, refuting claims that Russia interfered in the election. 'Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome,' a copy of Clapper's talking points from December 7, 2016, stated.

Israeli minister announces plans 'to prevent Palestinian state'
Israeli minister announces plans 'to prevent Palestinian state'

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Israeli minister announces plans 'to prevent Palestinian state'

Far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich has approved the so-called E1 project between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim, which has been frozen amid fierce opposition internationally and within Israel. The plan would effectively cut off the West Bank from occupied East Jerusalem. "The plan will bury the idea of a Palestinian state," Smotrich said. READ MORE: Glasgow independent bottler unveils first ever 'Buckfast' whisky "After decades of international pressure and freezes, we are breaking conventions and connecting Maale Adumim to Jerusalem. This is Zionism at its best – building, settling and strengthening our sovereignty in the Land of Israel." Settlements are considered illegal under international law. Aviv Tatarsky, a researcher at Israeli NGO Ir Amim who has submitted formal objections to the plan, said the Israeli government is 'openly announcing apartheid'. 'It explicitly states that the E1 plans were approved to 'bury' the two-state solution and to entrench de facto sovereignty,' he said. 'An immediate consequence could be the uprooting of more than a dozen Palestinian communities living in the E1 area. Indeed, over the last 10 days, Israeli authorities have issued dozens of demolition orders there. 'States now working to recognise a Palestinian state should understand that Israel is undeterred by diplomatic gestures or condemnations. If they are serious about the prospect of peace, they must take concrete action.' The E1 plan has not yet received final approval, which is expected next week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store