U.N. agencies warn that Israel's plans for aid distribution will endanger lives in Gaza
Palestinians struggle to obtain donated food at a community kitchen in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, Friday, May 9, 2025. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
By WAFAA SHURAFA, JAMEY KEATEN and SARAH EL DEEB
International aid agencies warned on Friday that Israeli plans to control aid distribution in Gaza, including a U.S.-backed proposal, will only increase suffering and death in the devastated Palestinian territory, calling on Israel to lift its blockade on food and other supplies, now in its third month.
The U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, said that the new U.S.-devised aid system would be launched soon, urging the U.N. and other aid groups to participate. So far, the U.N. has rejected the new system, saying it 'weaponizes aid,' threatens to cause mass displacement of Palestinians, violates principles of neutrality and simply won't be able to provide the scale of aid needed.
In what has become a daily scene of desperation in Gaza, thousands of Palestinians crowded a charity kitchen in the southern city of Khan Younis, jostling and waving their pots to receive scoops of pasta. Such kitchens are virtually the only source of food left for the territory's 2.3 million people, but dozens have shut down in recent days as food supplies run out under Israel's blockade. Aid groups say more closures are imminent.
Raed al-Zaharna and his children walked away emptyhanded after the day's meals ran out. 'I'm thinking now, 'What will I feed them?' I can't find anything,' he said.
Israel has blocked food, medicine, fuel and other supplies from entering Gaza since March 2, saying it's trying to pressure Hamas into releasing hostages and disarming. It also shattered a ceasefire deal with Hamas, relaunching bombardment across Gaza and seizing large swaths of the territory. Rights groups have called the blockade a 'starvation tactic' and a potential war crime.
Israel has said it won't resume aid until it installs a new distribution mechanism, replacing the massive operation led by the U.N. and independent relief groups throughout the 19-month-old war. Israel accuses Hamas and other militants of siphoning off aid, though it hasn't presented evidence for its claims. The U.N. denies significant diversion takes place, saying it monitors distribution.
'Humanitarian aid should never be used as a bargaining chip,' UNICEF spokesperson James Elder said in Geneva. 'There is a simple alternative. Lift the blockade, let humanitarian aid in, save lives.'
Huckabee said details of the new U.S.-backed system would be announced in the coming days, with deliveries set to begin 'very soon,' though he gave no time frame.
He depicted it as independent from Israel, which he said wouldn't be involved in distribution. He said private companies would provide security, while Israel's military would secure the perimeters from afar. He echoed Israel's claims that it was necessary because Hamas was stealing aid.
'I will be the first to admit it will not be perfect, especially in the early days,' Huckabee said.
A new group supported by the U.S., called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, has proposed implementing an aid distribution project along the lines of Israel's demands, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. The group is made up of American security contractors, former government officials, ex-military officers and humanitarian officials.
In its proposal, GHF said that it would initially set up four distribution sites, guarded by private security firms. Each would serve 300,000 people, covering only about half of Gaza's population. Huckabee said that the system will be scaled up 'as soon as it is possible.'
Aryeh Lightstone, a senior member of U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff's team, was involved in briefing U.N. agencies and aid groups about the foundation in Geneva on Thursday, according to one person who attended, Joseph Belliveau, executive director of Medglobal, a medical humanitarian group operating in Gaza. He said that he and other attendees pressed back saying the new model shouldn't replace the current, independent and neutral system led by the U.N.
Belleveau said that aid groups had been working for years 'with strict due diligence processes ... in a way that avoids diversion' of aid.
"What we need is to be just allowed (to work). We need that blockade lifted,' he said.
Israel has given no details publicly about the new aid mechanism. The U.N. says that what Israel has outlined to it so far in private discussions violates humanitarian principles.
Elder, of UNICEF, said that the plan as presented in the GHF document appears 'designed to reinforce control over life-sustaining items as a pressure tactic.'
Aid workers say Palestinians would be forced to move to the distribution hubs or walk for miles to reach them, triggering a forced displacement depopulating large parts of Gaza. Though hub locations haven't been set, aid workers say that according to briefings they received, it appears none will be located in northern Gaza, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are located.
Throughout the war, Israel has repeatedly called for Palestinians to leave the north, including Gaza City, saying it's for their safety as troops battle Hamas militants.
Elder said that the plan would entrench forced displacement 'for political and military purposes.' The most vulnerable, including children, older people and those suffering from illness, may not be able to get to the hubs, he said.
In a statement last month, 20 aid groups operating in Gaza said the plan would force Palestinians into 'de facto internment conditions' in pockets around the hubs.
Israel has also told U.N. officials it wants to vet aid recipients, aid workers say, raising fears it could withhold aid from some for political or military reasons, though the GHF proposal says aid would be distributed according to need.
Elder also warned civilians will be endangered as they seek aid in militarized areas.
'More children are likely to suffer and risk death and injury as a consequence of this plan,' Elder said.
Aid officials say the new system also simply won't provide enough aid. Relief groups have operated hundreds of distribution points around Gaza distributing food, water, shelter supplies and other goods, even as they support medical centers, run shelters and implement other programs.
The operation has been led by UNRWA, the main U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees. Israel banned the agency last year, alleging its staff have been infiltrated by Hamas. UNRWA, which employs more than 10,000 people in Gaza, said that it acts quickly to remove anyone suspected of militant ties, and that Israel hasn't given it evidence of its claims.
UNRWA spokesperson Juliette Touma said the agency has 'the largest reach' and 'it is very, very difficult to imagine any humanitarian operation without UNRWA.'
Ruth James, Oxfam regional humanitarian coordinator, said large networks are needed to get aid to everyone. 'That takes time and expertise,' she said. 'Any new system that comes in this quickly and without humanitarian expertise and trust from communities will not be able to do that.'
Huckabee called on U.N. agencies and aid groups to join the new mechanism.
Jens Laerke, spokesperson for the U.N. humanitarian office, said Friday that U.N. concerns have not been addressed in multiple meetings with Israeli officials. He dismissed claims that theft of aid was significant in scale.
'The problem is the blockage of hundreds of aid trucks that should go into the Gaza Strip every single day. That is the root cause of the humanitarian crisis.'
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
44 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Netanyahu sees redemption in Iran war, but Gaza looms large
After months of political turmoil, war and plummeting popularity, Israel's powerful strike on Iran is likely to reframe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's legacy, allies and analysts say. During a 12-day air assault ordered by Netanyahu, Israel bombed nuclear sites deep inside Iran, eliminated many of its archfoe's top military commanders and scientists, and targeted multiple missile facilities across the country. Both nations agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday, and although they accused each other of violating the deal in the hours after it was announced, Netanyahu was swift to claim total victory. "The State of Israel has accomplished great historic achievements and positioned itself side-by-side with the world's superpowers," the government said. The jubilant tone was a far cry from October 7, 2023, when a surprise attack by Hamas militants out of Gaza handed Israel the deadliest security failure in its history, dealing a devastating blow to Netanyahu's carefully crafted reputation as the nation's guardian and triggering a collapse in his public support. Netanyahu's recent rhetoric has "completely erased Oct. 7. He's just talking about Iran," said Dr. Gayil Talshir, a political scientist at Hebrew University. However, the war against Hamas in Gaza is still grinding on, a constant reminder of the 2023 blunders, and pressure is likely to build quickly on Netanyahu to reach a deal that will end the fighting and secure the release of all remaining hostages. Palestinians search for survivors and casualties in the rubble of the Abu Nadi home, which was hit in an Israeli strike west of Jabalia, in the northern Gaza Strip, on Monday. | AFP-JIJI "A comprehensive agreement to return all the hostages is the call of the moment," said Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan is among the 20 hostages in Gaza still believed to be alive. "The annals of history are being written now, one chapter is still missing, the chapter of October 7. Netanyahu, it's up to you," she wrote on X. Redrawing the Middle East Despite the cloud of Gaza, the political benefits of the Iranian mission are already being felt. A survey released last week said 83% of Jewish Israelis supported the assault on Iran and pollsters said they expected Netanyahu's Likud party, which had long been predicted to lose power in any national election, would now gain ground. "I think there'll be less of a movement to punish him for Oct. 7," said Mitchell Barak, an Israeli pollster who worked for Netanyahu in the 1990s. "He's definitely in a strong position." The Iranian operation marks a dramatic change in Israel's regional position, which has been evolving at dizzying speed over the past 20 months. During that time, Israeli forces have severely weakened its enemy Hezbollah in Lebanon, inflicted heavy losses on Hamas in Gaza, decimated air defenses in Syria, and now struck directly at Iran — once considered too risky a move. Netanyahu also managed to convince U.S. President Donald Trump to join the attack and hit Iranian nuclear sites with bunker-busting bombs that only the U.S. Air Force possesses — a coup for the Israeli leader who had previously spent years fruitlessly trying to persuade Washington to strike Iran. Trump gave the conflict added significance on Tuesday by calling it "The 12-day War" — recalling the Six Day War of 1967, when Israel launched a preemptive strike on neighboring Arab states and captured the Sinai Peninsula, Gaza Strip, West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Golan Heights. Some of Netanyahu's allies have been pushing a new narrative to recast the OCt. 7 attack not as a failure, but as a necessary wake-up call, which finally jolted the nation into confronting its regional foes head-on, rather than attempting to contain them. "Oct. 7 saved the Israeli people," Aryeh Deri, a partner in the right-wing ruling coalition, told Channel 14 TV station. Political reckoning Netanyahu will now face pressure to negotiate an end to the Gaza conflict, which has so far killed 56,000 Palestinians, according to local health authorities, most of them civilians. Opponents have accused him of prolonging the fighting to avoid a political reckoning over who was to blame for the conflict. Procrastination is no longer acceptable, they say. "Now Gaza," opposition leader Yair Lapid wrote on X on Tuesday. "It is the moment to close there as well. To bring back the captives, to end the war. Israel needs to start rebuilding." U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu waves following a meeting at the White House in Washington in April. | REUTERS Israel has become increasingly isolated over its actions in Gaza, where it cut off aid for weeks, shrugging off warnings of famine, and reduced much of the enclave to rubble. Trump himself in recent weeks has called on Israel to wrap up the fighting, having promised during his election campaign last year to bring peace to the region. However, inside Netanyahu's government, there appeared little willingness on Tuesday to compromise or negotiate. "Now with all our strength to Gaza, to complete the work, to destroy Hamas and return our hostages," Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a far-right coalition partner, wrote on X. Smotrich and other Cabinet hard-liners are pushing for a long-term military occupation of Gaza, including the re-establishment of Jewish settlements — something Palestinians and Western nations would fiercely oppose. Talshir described the coming talks over a ceasefire deal in Gaza as a competition between Smotrich and Donald Trump "over who has more leverage on Netanyahu," she said. Some analysts say Netanyahu might try to capitalize on the Iran operation by calling elections a year early, though pollster Barak said expanding his coalition's slim parliamentary majority made more sense. "Whenever you go to elections, it sounds great, (but) you go for a roll of the dice," he said.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
US Strikes Failed to Destroy Iran's Nuclear Sites, Intelligence Report Says
WASHINGTON/TEL AVIV/ISTANBUL, June 24 (Reuters) – U.S. airstrikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability and only set it back by a few months, according to a preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment, as a shaky ceasefire brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel. Earlier on Tuesday, both Iran and Israel signaled that the air war between the two nations had ended, at least for now, after Trump publicly scolded them for violating a ceasefire he announced at 0500 GMT. As the two countries lifted civilian restrictions after 12 days of war – which the U.S. joined with an attack on Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities – each sought to claim victory. Trump said over the weekend that the U.S. deployment of 30,000-pound bombs had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. But that claim appeared to be contradicted by an initial assessment by one of his administration's intelligence agencies, according to three people familiar with the matter. One of the sources said Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated, and the country's nuclear program, much of which is buried deep underground, may have been set back only a month or two. Iran says its nuclear research is for civilian energy production. The White House said the intelligence assessment was 'flat out wrong.' According to the report, which was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the strikes sealed off the entrances to two of the facilities, but did not collapse underground buildings, said one of the people familiar with its findings. Some centrifuges still remained intact after the attacks, the Washington Post said, citing an unnamed person familiar with the report. Trump's administration told the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday that its weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had 'degraded' Iran's nuclear program, short of Trump's earlier assertion that the facilities had been 'obliterated.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday that the attack on Iran had removed the threat of nuclear annihilation and was determined to thwart any attempt by Tehran to revive its weapons program. 'We have removed two immediate existential threats to us: the threat of nuclear annihilation and the threat of annihilation by 20,000 ballistic missiles,' Netanyahu said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said his country had successfully ended the war in what he called a 'great victory,' according to Iranian media. Pezeshkian also told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman that Tehran was ready to resolve differences with the U.S., according to official news agency IRNA. Israel launched the surprise air war on June 13, attacking Iranian nuclear facilities and killing top military commanders in the worst blow to the Islamic Republic since the 1980s war with Iraq. Iran, which denies trying to build nuclear weapons, retaliated with barrages of missiles on Israeli military sites and cities. 'GREAT VICTORY' Israel's military lifted restrictions on activity across the country at 8 p.m. local time (1700 GMT), and officials said Ben Gurion Airport, the country's main airport near Tel Aviv, had reopened. Iran's airspace likewise will be reopened, state-affiliated Nournews reported. A White House official said Trump brokered the ceasefire deal with Netanyahu, and other administration officials were in touch with the Iranian government. The truce appeared fragile: Both Israel and Iran took hours to acknowledge they had accepted the ceasefire and accused each other of violating it. Trump scolded both sides but aimed especially stinging criticism at Israel, telling the close U.S. ally to 'calm down now.' He later said Israel called off further attacks at his command. Israel's defense minister, Israel Katz, said he told his U.S. counterpart, Pete Hegseth, that his country would respect the ceasefire unless Iran violated it. Pezeshkian likewise said Iran would honor the ceasefire as long as Israel did, according to Iranian media. Whether the Israel-Iran truce can hold is a major question given the deep mistrust between the two foes. But Trump's ability to broker a ceasefire showed Washington retains some leverage in the volatile region. Israeli armed forces chief of staff Eyal Zamir said a 'significant chapter' of the conflict had concluded but the campaign against Iran was not over. He said the military would refocus on its war against Iran-backed Hamas militants in Gaza. Iran's military command also warned Israel and the U.S. to learn from the 'crushing blows' it delivered during the conflict. Iranian authorities said 610 people were killed in their country by Israeli strikes and 4,746 injured. Iran's retaliatory bombardment killed 28 people in Israel, the first time its air defenses were penetrated by large numbers of Iranian missiles. Oil prices plunged and stock markets rallied worldwide in a sign of confidence inspired by the ceasefire, which allayed fears of disruption to critical oil supplies from the Gulf. CEASEFIRE VIOLATIONS? Earlier in the day, Trump admonished Israel with an obscenity in an extraordinary outburst at an ally whose air war he had joined two days before by dropping massive bunker-buster bombs on Iran's underground nuclear sites. Before departing the White House en route to a NATO summit in Europe, Trump told reporters he was unhappy with both sides for the ceasefire breach but particularly frustrated with Israel, which he said had 'unloaded' shortly after agreeing to the deal. 'I've got to get Israel to calm down now,' Trump said. Iran and Israel had been fighting 'so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing.' Netanyahu's office acknowledged Israel bombed a radar site near Tehran in what it said was retaliation for Iranian missiles fired three-and-a-half hours after the ceasefire was due to begin. It did not explicitly say whether the strike on the radar site took place before or after they spoke. The Islamic Republic denied launching any missiles and said Israel's attacks had continued for an hour-and-a-half beyond the time the truce was meant to start. 'Who mediated or how it happened doesn't matter,' said Reza Sharifi, 38, heading back to Tehran from Rasht on the Caspian Sea, where he had fled with his family. 'The war is over. It never should have started in the first place.'
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Israel Killed at Least 14 Scientists in an Unprecedented Attack on Iran's Nuclear Know-How
PARIS (AP) — Israel's tally of the war damage it wrought on Iran includes the targeted killings of at least 14 scientists, an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program that outside experts say can only set it back, not stop it. In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it 'almost' impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by U.S. stealth bombers. 'The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the program by a number of years, by quite a number of years,' Ambassador Joshua Zarka said. But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place. European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest. 'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon,' U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the House of Commons. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program was peaceful, and U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon. Here's a closer look at the killings: Chemists, physicists, engineers among those killed Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who 'basically had everything in their mind.' They were killed 'not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon,' he said. Nine of them were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said. It said they 'possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons' and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists. Zarka spoke Monday to the AP. On Tuesday, Iran state TV reported the death of another Iranian nuclear scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, in an Israeli strike, after he'd survived an earlier attack that killed his 17-year-old son on June 13. Targeted killings meant to discourage would-be successors Experts say that decades of Iranian work on nuclear energy — and, Western powers allege, nuclear weapons — has given the country reserves of know-how and scientists who could continue any work toward building warheads to fit on Iran's ballistic missiles. 'Blueprints will be around and, you know, the next generation of Ph.D. students will be able to figure it out,' said Mark Fitzpatrick, who specialized in nuclear non-proliferation as a former U.S. diplomat. Bombing nuclear facilities 'or killing the people will set it back some period of time. Doing both will set it back further, but it will be reconstituted.' 'They have substitutes in maybe the next league down, and they're not as highly qualified, but they will get the job done eventually,' said Fitzpatrick, now an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London think tank. How quickly nuclear work could resume will in part depend on whether Israeli and U.S. strikes destroyed Iran's stock of enriched uranium and equipment needed to make it sufficiently potent for possible weapons use. 'The key element is the material. So once you have the material, then the rest is reasonably well-known,' said Pavel Podvig, a Geneva-based analyst who specializes in Russia's nuclear arsenal. He said killing scientists may have been intended 'to scare people so they don't go work on these programs.' 'Then the questions are, 'Where do you stop?' I mean you start killing, like, students who study physics?' he asked. 'This is a very slippery slope.' The Israeli ambassador said: 'I do think that people that will be asked to be part of a future nuclear weapon program in Iran will think twice about it.' Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged. Previous attacks on scientists Israel has long been suspected of killing Iranian nuclear scientists but previously didn't claim responsibility as it did this time. In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun. 'It delayed the program but they still have a program. So it doesn't work,' said Paris-based analyst Lova Rinel, with the Foundation for Strategic Research think tank. 'It's more symbolic than strategic.' Without saying that Israel killed Fakhrizadeh, the Israeli ambassador said 'Iran would have had a bomb a long time ago' were it not for repeated setbacks to its nuclear program — some of which Iran attributed to Israeli sabotage. 'They have not reached the bomb yet,' Zarka said. 'Every one of these accidents has postponed a little bit the program.' A legally grey area International humanitarian law bans the intentional killing of civilians and non-combatants. But legal scholars say those restrictions might not apply to nuclear scientists if they were part of the Iranian armed forces or directly participating in hostilities. 'My own take: These scientists were working for a rogue regime that has consistently called for the elimination of Israel, helping it to develop weapons that will allow that threat to take place. As such, they are legitimate targets,' said Steven R. David, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University. He said Nazi German and Japanese leaders who fought Allied nations during World War II 'would not have hesitated to kill the scientists working on the Manhattan Project' that fathered the world's first atomic weapons. Laurie Blank, a specialist in humanitarian law at Emory Law School, said it's too early to say whether Israel's decapitation campaign was legal. 'As external observers, we don't have all the relevant facts about the nature of the scientists' role and activities or the intelligence that Israel has,' she said by email to AP. 'As a result, it is not possible to make any definitive conclusions.' Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel. 'It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium,' he said. But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is 'not that simple,' he said. 'These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated.'
