logo
Israel Killed at Least 14 Scientists in an Unprecedented Attack on Iran's Nuclear Know-How

Israel Killed at Least 14 Scientists in an Unprecedented Attack on Iran's Nuclear Know-How

Yomiuri Shimbun6 hours ago

PARIS (AP) — Israel's tally of the war damage it wrought on Iran includes the targeted killings of at least 14 scientists, an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program that outside experts say can only set it back, not stop it.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it 'almost' impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by U.S. stealth bombers.
'The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the program by a number of years, by quite a number of years,' Ambassador Joshua Zarka said.
But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place. European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest.
'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon,' U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the House of Commons.
Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program was peaceful, and U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon.
Here's a closer look at the killings:
Chemists, physicists, engineers among those killed
Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who 'basically had everything in their mind.'
They were killed 'not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon,' he said.
Nine of them were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said. It said they 'possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons' and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists.
Zarka spoke Monday to the AP. On Tuesday, Iran state TV reported the death of another Iranian nuclear scientist, Mohammad Reza Sedighi Saber, in an Israeli strike, after he'd survived an earlier attack that killed his 17-year-old son on June 13.
Targeted killings meant to discourage would-be successors
Experts say that decades of Iranian work on nuclear energy — and, Western powers allege, nuclear weapons — has given the country reserves of know-how and scientists who could continue any work toward building warheads to fit on Iran's ballistic missiles.
'Blueprints will be around and, you know, the next generation of Ph.D. students will be able to figure it out,' said Mark Fitzpatrick, who specialized in nuclear non-proliferation as a former U.S. diplomat. Bombing nuclear facilities 'or killing the people will set it back some period of time. Doing both will set it back further, but it will be reconstituted.'
'They have substitutes in maybe the next league down, and they're not as highly qualified, but they will get the job done eventually,' said Fitzpatrick, now an analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London think tank.
How quickly nuclear work could resume will in part depend on whether Israeli and U.S. strikes destroyed Iran's stock of enriched uranium and equipment needed to make it sufficiently potent for possible weapons use.
'The key element is the material. So once you have the material, then the rest is reasonably well-known,' said Pavel Podvig, a Geneva-based analyst who specializes in Russia's nuclear arsenal. He said killing scientists may have been intended 'to scare people so they don't go work on these programs.'
'Then the questions are, 'Where do you stop?' I mean you start killing, like, students who study physics?' he asked. 'This is a very slippery slope.'
The Israeli ambassador said: 'I do think that people that will be asked to be part of a future nuclear weapon program in Iran will think twice about it.'
Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged.
Previous attacks on scientists
Israel has long been suspected of killing Iranian nuclear scientists but previously didn't claim responsibility as it did this time.
In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun.
'It delayed the program but they still have a program. So it doesn't work,' said Paris-based analyst Lova Rinel, with the Foundation for Strategic Research think tank. 'It's more symbolic than strategic.'
Without saying that Israel killed Fakhrizadeh, the Israeli ambassador said 'Iran would have had a bomb a long time ago' were it not for repeated setbacks to its nuclear program — some of which Iran attributed to Israeli sabotage.
'They have not reached the bomb yet,' Zarka said. 'Every one of these accidents has postponed a little bit the program.'
A legally grey area
International humanitarian law bans the intentional killing of civilians and non-combatants. But legal scholars say those restrictions might not apply to nuclear scientists if they were part of the Iranian armed forces or directly participating in hostilities.
'My own take: These scientists were working for a rogue regime that has consistently called for the elimination of Israel, helping it to develop weapons that will allow that threat to take place. As such, they are legitimate targets,' said Steven R. David, a professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University.
He said Nazi German and Japanese leaders who fought Allied nations during World War II 'would not have hesitated to kill the scientists working on the Manhattan Project' that fathered the world's first atomic weapons.
Laurie Blank, a specialist in humanitarian law at Emory Law School, said it's too early to say whether Israel's decapitation campaign was legal.
'As external observers, we don't have all the relevant facts about the nature of the scientists' role and activities or the intelligence that Israel has,' she said by email to AP. 'As a result, it is not possible to make any definitive conclusions.'
Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel.
'It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium,' he said.
But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is 'not that simple,' he said. 'These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan, NATO agree to collaborate on Iran, Ukraine, N Korea issues
Japan, NATO agree to collaborate on Iran, Ukraine, N Korea issues

Japan Today

time24 minutes ago

  • Japan Today

Japan, NATO agree to collaborate on Iran, Ukraine, N Korea issues

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, right, and Japans Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya speak with the media on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on Tuesday. Japan and NATO agreed Tuesday to closely collaborate to address "security challenges" such as the Middle East crisis, Russia's war against Ukraine and North Korea's past abductions of Japanese nationals. During their talks in The Hague, Japanese Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also affirmed that they would work to elevate their cooperation to "a new height" in various fields including defense industries, the Japanese Foreign Ministry said. The talks came as the United States, a NATO member and Japan's close ally, conducted airstrikes on key Iranian nuclear facilities amid the conflict between Israel and Iran, although the regional rivals said earlier Tuesday they had agreed to a cease-fire. Russia and North Korea have been strengthening their military partnership as Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine -- which began in 2022 -- drags on and Pyongyang continues its missile and nuclear development. NATO has been stepping up cooperative ties in recent years with its Indo-Pacific partners of Japan, Australia, New Zealand and South Korea, sharing the view that security in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific regions is inseparable. Iwaya met with Rutte on the sidelines of an ongoing NATO summit as a stand-in for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who canceled his planned visit to the Dutch city at the last minute due to the absence of other Indo-Pacific leaders and concerns over the Middle East situation. © KYODO

Trump says China can buy Iranian oil, but urges it to purchase US crude
Trump says China can buy Iranian oil, but urges it to purchase US crude

Japan Today

time2 hours ago

  • Japan Today

Trump says China can buy Iranian oil, but urges it to purchase US crude

An aerial view shows a crude oil tanker at an oil terminal off Waidiao island in Zhoushan, Zhejiang province, China January 4, 2023. China Daily via REUTERS/File Photo By Timothy Gardner U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that China can continue to purchase Iranian oil after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, a move that the White House clarified did not indicate a relaxation of U.S. sanctions. "China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran. Hopefully, they will be purchasing plenty from the U.S., also," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, just days after he ordered U.S. bombings of three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump was drawing attention to no attempts by Iran so far to close the Strait of Hormuz to oil tankers, as a closure would have been hard for China, the world's top importer of Iranian oil, a senior White House official told Reuters. "The president continues to call on China and all countries to import our state-of-the-art oil rather than import Iranian oil in violation of U.S. sanctions," the official said. After the ceasefire announcement, Trump's comments on China were another bearish signal for oil prices, which fell nearly 6% on Tuesday. Any relaxation of sanctions enforcement on Iran would mark a U.S. policy shift after Trump said in February he was re-imposing maximum pressure on Iran, aiming to drive its oil exports to zero, over its nuclear program and funding of militants across the Middle East. Trump imposed waves of Iran-related sanctions on several of China's independent "teapot" refineries and port terminal operators for purchases of Iranian oil. "President Trump's greenlight for China to keep buying Iranian oil reflects a return to lax enforcement standards," said Scott Modell, a former CIA officer, now CEO of Rapidan Energy Group. In addition to not enforcing sanctions, Trump could suspend or waive sanctions imposed by executive order or under authorities a president is granted in laws passed by Congress. Trump will likely not waive sanctions ahead of coming rounds of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, Modell said. The measures provide leverage given Tehran's demand that any deal includes lifting them permanently. Jeremy Paner, a partner at law firm Hughes Hubbard & Reed, said if Trump chooses to suspend Iran oil-related sanctions, it would require lots of work between agencies. The U.S. Treasury would need to issue licenses, and the State Department would have to issue waivers, which require Congressional notification. Oil traders and analysts in Asia said they did not expect Trump's comments to have a near-term impact on Chinese purchases of oil from either Iran or the U.S. Iranian oil accounts for roughly 13.6% of China's oil purchases this year, with the discounted barrels providing a lifeline to margin-squeezed independent refineries. U.S. oil accounts for just 2% of China's imports, and Beijing's 10% tariffs on U.S. oil deter further purchases. PRESSURE ON CHINA China has long opposed what it has called Washington's "abuse of illegal unilateral sanctions." China's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Trump's post. Larger purchases of Iranian oil by China and other consumers could upset U.S. ally Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter. The impact of U.S. sanctions on Iran's exports, however, has been limited since Trump's first administration when he cracked down harder on Tehran. Trump has "flashed the Glock" this year with sanctions on Chinese trading companies and terminals, Modell said, referring to revealing a gun. But the results have been far more "minimum pressure" than maximum, Modell added. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters that Trump had signaled what he wanted to happen and that his administration is focused on delivering that. She would not say what the process would entail. "But clearly we are focused on making sure that (the) guiding hand of President Trump prevails and moves this government forward, so we will have to wait and see when it comes to what that ends up looking like," Bruce said. © Thomson Reuters 2025.

Israel-Iran Ceasefire Agreement: Still a Long Way to Easing Tensions
Israel-Iran Ceasefire Agreement: Still a Long Way to Easing Tensions

Yomiuri Shimbun

time2 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Israel-Iran Ceasefire Agreement: Still a Long Way to Easing Tensions

Israel and Iran, which have been exchanging attacks, have agreed to a ceasefire, U.S. President Donald Trump has announced. If implemented, this would be an important step toward avoiding an all-out war between these two military powers in the Middle East. Both countries are strongly urged to exercise restraint, so as not to slide back into fighting. Trump said in a social media post that the two countries had agreed to a 'Complete and Total CEASEFIRE' and indicated that he expected the fighting would end as early as June 25. Iran's foreign minister also announced that Iran would not continue retaliating if Israel stopped its attacks. Prior to the announcement of the ceasefire, Iran launched a missile attack on Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. base in the Middle East. Iran claimed the attack was in retaliation for the U.S. military's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, but the United States and Qatar were notified in advance and no casualties were reported. By limiting the attack to a restrained one, Iran may have signaled that it did not want a further escalation in the fighting, while still saving face by having retaliated against the United States. The Israeli side also is believed to have accepted the ceasefire sought by the United States, as it has succeeded to a certain extent in destroying nuclear facilities and military bases in Iran with the support of the U.S. military. The hope is that the two countries will stop attacking each other, and the spread and intensification of warfare in the Middle East will be halted. However, while Trump was quick to announce the ceasefire, both countries were slow to express their positions. The situation does not warrant optimism, as there is no clear path toward the implementation of the ceasefire and the abandonment of Iran's nuclear development. There is no doubt that Trump led the way in this ceasefire. During an emergency meeting at the U.N. Security Council, the United States argued that the U.S. military attack on Iran constituted an exercise of the right of collective self-defense to protect its ally Israel. Although the U.N. Charter prohibits the use of force in principle, it approves of U.N. members exercising the right of self-defense as an exception. For that reason, Washington asserted that its action did not violate the charter. However, even though Iran was promoting nuclear development, may it be said that the threat was not so obvious and imminent that Israel and the United States would be forced to invoke the right of self-defense? They also did not call in advance for a resolution authorizing the use of force at the Security Council. Even if the method of wielding the U.S. military's overwhelming military power to bring the other side to its knees is temporarily effective, it will not lead to a long-term solution unless accompanied by diplomatic efforts. This could set a precedent for countries other than the United States to use the threat from another country as an excuse to use force. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 25, 2025)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store