Netanyahu says Israel is considering 'alternative' means to achieve Gaza goals, in apparent end to ceasefire talks
By Maayan Lubell
Israel and its U.S. allies are now considering "alternative" options to bring their hostages home from Gaza and end the rule of Hamas in the territory, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday, apparently calling an end to ceasefire talks.
The remarks echoed statements made overnight by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff after Israel and the United States pulled their delegations out of the talks in Doha, mediated by Egypt and Qatar.
Witkoff said Hamas was to blame for an impasse. Netanyahu said Witkoff had got it right, and that Hamas was the obstacle to a deal.
Hamas, which had given its response to a U.S.-backed ceasefire proposal on Thursday, has disputed Witkoff's characterisation of the talks and said the negotiators were making progress.
The proposed ceasefire would have lasted 60 days during which additional aid would be allowed into Gaza, and some of the remaining 50 hostages held by militants there would be freed in return for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.
© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
13 minutes ago
- Japan Today
Trump plans 100% tariff on computer chips, unless companies build in U.S.
President Donald Trump makes an announcement about Apple in the Oval Office, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) By JOSH BOAK and MICHAEL LIEDTKE President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he will impose a 100% tariff on computer chips, raising the specter of higher prices for electronics, autos, household appliances and other essential products dependent on the processors powering the digital age. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. "But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge." The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. The Republican president said companies that make computer chips in the U.S. would be spared the import tax. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Investors seemed to interpret the potential tariff exemptions as a positive for Apple and other major tech companies that have been making huge financial commitments to manufacture more chips and other components in the U.S.. Big Tech already has made collective commitments to invest about $1.5 trillion in the U.S. since Trump moved back into the White House in January. That figure includes a $600 billion promise from Apple after the iPhone maker boosted its commitment by tacking another $100 billion on to a previous commitment made in February. Now the question is whether the deal brokered between Cook and Trump will be enough to insulate the millions of iPhones made in China and India from the tariffs that the administration has already imposed and reduce the pressure on the company to raise prices on the new models expected to be unveiled next month. Wall Street certainly seems to think so. After Apple's stock price gained 5% in Wednesday regular trading sessions, the shares rose by another 3% in extended trading after Trump announced some tech companies won't be hit with the latest tariffs while Cook stood alongside him. The shares of AI chipmaker Nvidia, which also has recently made big commitments to the U.S., rose slightly in extended trading to add to the $1 trillion gain in market value the Silicon Valley company has made since the start of Trump's second administration. The stock price of computer chip pioneer Intel, which has fallen on hard times, also climbed in extended trading. Inquiries sent to chip makers Nvidia and Intel were not immediately answered. The chip industry's main trade group, the Semiconductor Industry Association, declined to comment on Trump's latest tariffs. Demand for computer chips has been climbing worldwide, with sales increasing 19.6% in the year-ended in June, according to the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics organization. Trump's tariff threats mark a significant break from existing plans to revive computer chip production in the U.S. that were drawn up during the administration of President Joe Biden. Since taking over from Biden, Trump has been deploying tariffs to incentivize more domestic production. Essentially, the president is betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for mobile phones, TVs and refrigerators. By contrast, the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that Biden signed into law in 2022 provided more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. The mix of funding support, tax credits and other financial incentives were meant to draw in private investment, a strategy that Trump has vocally opposed. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The Diplomat
42 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
How Trump's Tariffs Upended BYD's Mexico EV Gambit
Intensifying China-U.S. trade tensions are reshaping EV supply chains across the Americas, redirecting Chinese investments toward more politically receptive markets like Brazil. In 2023, Chinese automaker BYD announced an ambitious project to build a 150,000-unit electric vehicle (EV) plant in Mexico, epitomizing the promise of nearshoring. Mexico's low labor costs, robust supply chains, and duty-free access to North America under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) made it a strategic gateway for Chinese manufacturers aiming at the booming U.S. EV market. Two years on, this vision has collapsed. In July 2025, BYD indefinitely shelved the project. Executive Vice President Stella Li cited 'geopolitical issues significantly impacting the automotive industry,' signaling the project's suspension amid rising China-U.S. tensions. The immediate catalyst was the tariffs put in place by U.S. President Donald Trump. In September 2024, Trump – then a former president and the Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election – proposed a prohibitive 200 percent tariff on Chinese-brand vehicles assembled in Mexico. He explicitly said such a tariff would be designed to make Chinese cars built in Mexico uncompetitive in the U.S. market. Otherwise, the U.S. 'will not have any [automobile] manufacturing plants,' Trump warned. 'China is going to take over all of them because of the electric car.' Trump's proposed tariff dwarfed the existing 100 percent levy the Biden administration had just added to Chinese EVs at the time. While he hasn't implemented the change since re-entering the White House, Trump did implement an additional 25 percent tariff on all automotive imports, although close allies like Japan and South Korea won lower rates in trade negotiations. The tariff burden has effectively frozen BYD's $3 billion investment, disrupting negotiations with Mexican states such as Puebla and Jalisco, and creating uncertainty across the automotive sector. Before the latest iteration of Trump's trade war, Mexico offered clear advantages for Asian automakers, including BYD and other Chinese firms. Auto industry wages average about $4 per hour, significantly lower than comparable U.S. wages. Yet USMCA allowed tariff-free exports to the U.S. if 75 percent of vehicle content is sourced in North America. Mexico also benefits from extensive transport infrastructure, including dual-ocean ports and rail connections to major U.S. markets, significantly reducing transit times compared to direct shipments from Asia. For Chinese companies, Mexico also represented a hedge against increasing U.S. and European antidumping investigations. Companies such as BYD, SAIC MG, and Chery expanded dealership networks, while JAC Motors began local assembly operations as early as 2017. However, the growing bipartisan consensus in Washington now views Chinese EVs as strategic threats. Trump's tariffs effectively weaponized border access, forcing automakers to reconsider their production strategies. Even before Trump's escalation, Beijing had expressed reservations. China considers its companies' strength in the EV sector to be a key plank of its economic security plan. In March 2025, China's Ministry of Commerce reportedly delayed approval for BYD's Mexican venture due to security concerns about proximity to the U.S., potentially exposing sensitive battery and software technologies to IP theft. Instead, Chinese authorities are now encouraging investment in Belt and Road partner countries such as Brazil, Hungary, and Thailand. This aligns with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's statement from November 2024, indicating that her administration had not received an official investment proposal from BYD. In other words, the factory never got past the theoretical stage – even before Trump was re-elected. Privately, Mexican officials recognize their dilemma: they can either attract billions in Chinese investment or maintain harmonious relations with their primary trading partner, especially with USMCA scheduled for review in 2026. The most immediate impact will be to diminish Mexico's prospect of becoming Latin America's primary EV hub. Tesla has also postponed its Nuevo León gigafactory, as Trump's administration moved to revoke consumer credits for EV purchases. Mazda, Nissan, and Stellantis have similarly placed investments on hold. Suppliers who ramped up for EV production, like Querétaro-based wiring harness maker Nexxus and lithium-ion cathode startup Trina in Sonora, now face uncertain futures. Conversely, Brazil stands to gain significantly. BYD has already begun constructing a $1 billion plant in Bahia for assembling passenger cars and electric trucks targeting South America. SAIC MG expanded its São Paulo factory, while GAC Motor is exploring Rio de Janeiro as an assembly location. Brazil's modest 4 percent tariff on electric-powertrain imports makes it increasingly attractive compared to the steep potential duties facing Mexico. Alberto de la Fuente, president of Mexico's National Auto Parts Industry, emphasized the economic impacts, noting that each additional tariff percentage erases roughly $150 in profit per compact EV, severely impacting competitiveness. This trend risks creating a divided Latin America, with Mexico retaining traditional combustion-engine manufacturing for North America, and Brazil emerging as the region's leading EV production base for Mercosur and African markets. 'It makes little sense for BYD to enter Mexico without tariff-free access to U.S. markets,' explained Gregor Sebastian, a senior analyst at Rhodium Group. 'Until trade uncertainties resolve, Chinese investments will likely favor Brazil and Southeast Asia.' The effects extend to the entire supply chain for electric vehicles and EV batteries. Sonora's lithium industry, which expected investments from major Chinese battery makers, may now default to raw exports to China, limiting regional value-added jobs. Initiatives such as Nuevo León's T-MEC rail line and Jalisco's dry port at Ocotlán, designed as EV export hubs, now face uncertain prospects. Mexican technical colleges that introduced EV-specific training programs risk oversupplying graduates in a shrinking local market. 'Once tariffs reach prohibitive levels, they transform corporate calculus,' noted Maaike Okano Heijmans from the Clingendael Institute, 'forcing companies to reconfigure global manufacturing footprints.' BYD's halted Mexican venture underscores the global trend of clean-tech supply chains fracturing along geopolitical fault lines. Asia-Pacific companies now navigate competing blocs. The United States and its allies are enforcing stringent industrial policies against Chinese components, while China-driven networks are being fostered by Belt and Road funding. The European Union and select middle powers are attempting neutrality while concerned about subsidized Chinese competition. Going forward, Mexico has a few options. It can choose to prioritize manufacturing batteries over EVS. Collaborations with battery manufacturers like CALB and LG Energy Solutions, supplying multiple automakers, are politically safer investments. Mexico can also seek to tap into U.S. International Development Finance Corporation grants designed to 'friend-shore' critical mineral projects, such as Mexico's lithium developments. The government could also seek to negotiate a solution that will allow it to build an EV manufacturing industry with an eye toward the future, when tariff policies might moderate. This might involve agreements to limit Chinese EV production exclusively for local markets, employing digital tracking to prevent re-export to the United States. It's not clear how attractive this would be to Chinese firms, however. For now, as long as Trump's tariffs persist, Chinese automakers will avoid Mexico, even while U.S. companies look to expand domestic production amid higher consumer costs. More broadly, the EV market will continue to fracture, with Chinese manufacturers dominating emerging markets while U.S., Japanese, and Korean brands solidify their positions in North America, and Europe remains contested. BYD's withdrawal underscores that geopolitical strategies now define industrial development as significantly as traditional factors like cost and logistics. Until tariff uncertainties subside, Mexico's role in global EV production remains vulnerable to political shifts, reaffirming that global business decisions increasingly hinge upon geopolitical landscapes rather than economics alone.
Japan Today
2 hours ago
- Japan Today
Japan's offer to take in foreign students from U.S. universities faces major stumbling blocks
The administration of President Donald Trump has been cracking down on the issuance of student visas to U.S. institutes of higher learning. It has been particularly keen on refusing entry to those supporting the Palestinian cause or who engage in acts of antisemitism. In addition, those with links to the communist party of China have come under greater scrutiny. Writing in Shukan Post (Aug 8), business consultant Kenichi Ohmae observes that major national universities in Japan, including the University of Tokyo, Kyoto University, Osaka University and other institutions have announced temporary provisions for taking in such students. According to the Ministry of Education, as of June 5, some 90 universities in Japan have decided to fast-track the students' admission as well as offer them scholarships and other forms of support. A survey of foreign students found that as of May 1, 2024, Japan had 336,708 students from abroad, a year-over-year increase of 57,434. Broken down by nationality, China led the list with 123,458 students, followed by Nepal (64,816), and Vietnam (40,323). More students have also been coming from other Asian countries, including Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Mongolia and others. Nevertheless among these numbers not very many could be regarded as "outstanding students." "There are a number of factors for this," writes Ohmae, "but the greatest barrier to matriculating at Japanese institutions is that they do not provide instruction in English, the global language. And acquiring the Japanese language is extremely difficult for foreigners." If the University of Tokyo is to accept students from the U.S., Ohmae doubts that top-level students and researchers (other than Japanese nationals) will take up Japan on its offer to study here. "Most of the students that Trump has forced out of the U.S. are likely to transfer to other English-speaking countries such as the UK, Australia and Canada." he writes. "Other candidates will be universities in the European Union, Singapore, Hong Kong and elsewhere." Singapore is a small country with a high standard of living, but living costs there represent a high hurdle. Hong Kong on the other hand has become a "control society" dominated by China, with heavier restrictions on academic freedom, discouraging applicants. In a nutshell, Japan's greatest handicap is its communications ability. "Once when I was involved in negotiating a merger involving an Indian IT company, I was told by many Indian technicians, 'Sorry, but I don't want to work in Japan,' their reason being the poor English environment and high Japanese language barrier," Ohmae relates. The language problem also works in reverse. In a recent survey of 400 male and female Japanese members of Gen Z (the 19-to-25 year age group) conducted by the Japan Tourism Agency, nearly 60% of respondents stated they had no desire to travel abroad. One of the reasons given for their lack of interest was their inability to speak English. In Ohmae's view, until we move so far as to "teach in English" -- rather than just "teaching English" -- no cure for Japanese people's complex over English will be forthcoming. However, money is not the problem. The government has allocated ample funds to fix the situation. With the aim of becoming a "excellent internationalized research university," Tohoku University announced it would devote 30 billion yen over the next five years, with plans to attract 500 high-paid researchers. But it's not a matter of funding, says Ohmae. As long as the right environment for English is not created, top-notch human resources will not come to Japan. If Japan doesn't change its policy toward English and treat familiarity of English as a natural component of education -- perhaps through adoption of a system similar to Malaysia's, in which from primary school to university Japanese would be the language of instruction for the humanities, and English the language of instruction for math and science -- even efforts to attract outstanding human resources will fail. © Japan Today
