Anger at Anzac Day backfire holds lessons for cultural warriors
The far-right hecklers who disrupted the Welcome to Country ceremonies at Friday morning's Anzac Day services in Melbourne and Perth were quickly condemned as fringe actors.
But what they shouted – 'We don't need to be welcomed,' according to reports – has become a common refrain. It is repeated with rising frequency in conservative debates about Welcomes to Country on social media, in Sky News segments and even the Senate.
The Coalition stoked this debate earlier this year, when it brought the phrase into mainstream politics by pledging to wind back spending on Welcomes to Country if it formed government.
'Welcomes to Country should be reserved for rare occasions, especially when the taxpayer is being asked to pick up the tab,' the opposition's Indigenous affairs spokeswoman, Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, said in February this year.
Clive Palmer's $100 million ad blitz has kept the issue alive ahead of next weekend's election, with banners that declare: 'We don't need to be welcomed to our own country.' The ad ran in metropolitan newspapers on Anzac Day, including this masthead.
Loading
Then, on Friday, neo-Nazis agitators hijacked the conversation.
Josh Roose, an academic at Deakin University who specialises in extremism, said it demonstrated the latest tactics of far-right extremists, who are seeking to appropriate 'anti-woke' talking points for their own ends as they stage attention-seeking stunts during this year's election campaign.
'What they're tending to do is tie their extreme views into a wider backlash from a small but vocal minority on the right, who stand against the Welcome to Country. In so doing, they attempt to cast themselves as standing against woke politics, but what is really behind this is a hate-filled ideology,' Roose said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
21 minutes ago
- The Age
Albanese's class of 2025 tightens prime minister's grip on Labor Party
Many in the current ministry were supported by Albanese on their way up, such as Skills and Training Minister Andrew Giles, Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy and Communications Minister Anika Wells, Emergency Management Minister Kristy McBain and Bennelong MP Jerome Laxale. Many of the new MPs have similar ties to the PM, such as former Tasmanian Labor leader Rebecca White, who has been appointed assistant minister for women, Anne Urquhart, who Albanese encouraged to quit her position in the Senate to run for the Tasmanian seat of Braddon, and Rowan Holzberger, who was elected in the Queensland seat of Forde. Albanese also heavily backed the pre-selection of Matt Smith, the former Cairns Taipans basketball player, whose electorate he visited several times during the 2025 campaign. Smith said the PM's campaign message of centrist policymaking and stability in an uncertain world would be a marker of success. 'Stability is the aim of any government. You set out to deliver what you said, and that was a strength of the Albanese government coming into this election, and then I think was reflected in the results. 'Having played sport for so long, when you've got that clear message and everyone's pulling in the right way, that's when you have success.' Labor won 12 seats from the Liberals or Liberal National Party in Queensland, three from the Greens and one from ex-Liberal MP Ian Goodenough, who quit the party during the previous term and contested the election as an independent, as well as securing an inaugural victory in the new seat of Bullwinkel in Western Australia. ANU Australian historian Frank Bongiorno said landslide election wins such as the Menzies government's in 1949 and Bob Hawke's in 1983 have had long-lasting impacts on the political landscape. Bongiorno said John Howard's big win in 1996, when the Coalition gained 26 seats, launched a number of significant careers such as those of Warren Entsch, Joe Hockey, Sharman Stone, Danna Vale, Joanna Gash and Jackie Kelly and established a new demographic target for the Coalition in the mortgage belts of Howard battlers. Loading 'It brought some very, very significant women into the parliament and also, I think, crafted that idea of western Sydney being very critical,' he said. However, Bongiorno said the shock results in formerly safe Labor seats of Bean in the ACT and Fremantle in Western Australia, which the government won by razor-thin margins, showed the unpredictability of elections given the collapse in primary votes of major parties. 'Things have changed in terms of how votes translate into seats and majorities these days. It's a very different world even from 1996,' he said. 'So we're dealing obviously with a really significant number of MPs who, even if they've got what look like reasonably solid margins, are going to have to work very hard to protect them because the idea of the traditional safe seat does seem to be in decline.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Former US bomber pilot Mark Weatherington assesses American strikes targeting Iranian nuclear sites
A former American bomber pilot has provided a detailed breakdown into the type of attack the United States performed on Iran over the weekend, and what kind of damage he believes it caused. The US launched strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, with a US official telling Reuters that B-2 bombers were involved in carrying the attacks out. The action came after Israel and Iran had been engaged in more than a week of aerial combat, which resulted in deaths and injuries in both countries. President Donald Trump declared it a "very successful attack" and has repeatedly claimed Iran's nuclear sites had been "completely destroyed". However, Mark Weatherington, a retired US Air Force lieutenant general who served from 1990 to 2023, said it would take a while before the full extent of the damage could be properly determined. "It's going to take days, weeks, months for us to fully understand the damage at Fordow and how far that program may have been set back. So it's possible that an operation like this can be very decisively ordered, which I think it was, and it can be well executed, which I think was, and still not achieve the desired results," he told Sky News' Sharri Markson on Wednesday. "There's a lot of unknowns. It appears to me that the weapons performed the way they were supposed to perform, arrived on the aim points precisely and did the damage that they were supposed to, but whether it caused that damage that we were looking for, we just don't know." Mr Weatherington said the weight of the bombs being dropped from the B-2 bomber aircraft would "certainly" be felt and that it would have an effect on the flight. He said they would be dropped from a medium altitude, meaning the weapon would take about a minute to fall and hit the ground. "The (pilots are) not going to really realise any of the effects, whether that's a shockwave or a flash or anything like that," he said. The B-2 aircraft carries a two-person crew, and would have had several air refuelings during the strikes "going into the target area and coming out of the target areas". "Each one of those is about 20 minutes where they're piloting the large aeroplane, about 12 feet behind and beneath another very big aircraft transferring fuel," he said. "So it's a very, very important aspect of the mission and one where they really have to be focused and prepared." According to the former lieutenant general, there needed to be people on the ground to ascertain if the nuclear sites had been destroyed completely. "You're going to need to be able to exploit that site, probably with someone there on the ground. There may be some clandestine sources that you can use. There's probably some measures and signals intelligence and other things that will help build that complete picture," he said. "Unless you're really at the site and you can see that damage firsthand, it's hard to make a full assessment."
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
NSW Labor's biggest Achilles heel? Hubris
When NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey heard that his third budget was widely being described as boring, it would have been a relief. Mookhey is known for his colourful frames, eclectic music taste and a penchant for the quirky, but he would take 'boring' over most other descriptors that could be thrown at his budget. No big cash splashes, no reckless spending. Indeed, Mookhey even forecast a slim surplus (yes, just $1 billion) in coming years – a lofty promise that may well not materialise. It's contained in the budget papers, nonetheless. But also in those budget papers is a clear signal that NSW Labor's pious stance in opposition is starting to take a different turn since it found itself in power. Hubris has started to seep into NSW Labor as it settles into government. Here's a good example. In opposition, Labor boasted it would stop a treasurer from spending on a whim. The Coalition government had seen pork-barrelling, in the words of former premier Gladys Berejiklian, as 'not illegal'. It pork-barrelled to curry favour with voters. Labor vowed to do things differently, as a matter of principle. A Labor government would abolish a little-known but long-existing 'Advance to the Treasurer', which allowed for a pot of money to be set aside for whoever held that office to deal with unforseen expenses. 'The Labor Party will promote stronger budgeting and clean up imprudent ad hoc spending,' the ALP boasted in its election costing request to the Parliamentary Budget Office, 'by eliminating the Advance to the Treasurer.' Loading Scrapping that advance, according to the budget office, would save $50 million, although it warned that it would 'reduce the government's capacity to undertake unexpected discretionary expenditures'. Axe it and the government would need to find savings elsewhere in the budget. In the Coalition's final budget, delivered by then-treasurer Matt Kean, $120 million was set aside in the treasurer's advance for state contingencies, although it was not all spent before they were turfed from power. Labor stuck to its word, and there was no advance in its first budget. By its second budget, however, an eerily similar fund emerged in its appropriation bill. Called a ' special appropriation for the treasurer', $322 million was set aside in last year's budget for state contingencies, essential services and 'expenditure related to the government's election commitments'. No specifics but a big pot of money. In this budget, that has ballooned to $868 million, again to be used on such things as election commitments.
