Former US bomber pilot Mark Weatherington assesses American strikes targeting Iranian nuclear sites
A former American bomber pilot has provided a detailed breakdown into the type of attack the United States performed on Iran over the weekend, and what kind of damage he believes it caused.
The US launched strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, with a US official telling Reuters that B-2 bombers were involved in carrying the attacks out.
The action came after Israel and Iran had been engaged in more than a week of aerial combat, which resulted in deaths and injuries in both countries.
President Donald Trump declared it a "very successful attack" and has repeatedly claimed Iran's nuclear sites had been "completely destroyed".
However, Mark Weatherington, a retired US Air Force lieutenant general who served from 1990 to 2023, said it would take a while before the full extent of the damage could be properly determined.
"It's going to take days, weeks, months for us to fully understand the damage at Fordow and how far that program may have been set back. So it's possible that an operation like this can be very decisively ordered, which I think it was, and it can be well executed, which I think was, and still not achieve the desired results," he told Sky News' Sharri Markson on Wednesday.
"There's a lot of unknowns. It appears to me that the weapons performed the way they were supposed to perform, arrived on the aim points precisely and did the damage that they were supposed to, but whether it caused that damage that we were looking for, we just don't know."
Mr Weatherington said the weight of the bombs being dropped from the B-2 bomber aircraft would "certainly" be felt and that it would have an effect on the flight.
He said they would be dropped from a medium altitude, meaning the weapon would take about a minute to fall and hit the ground.
"The (pilots are) not going to really realise any of the effects, whether that's a shockwave or a flash or anything like that," he said.
The B-2 aircraft carries a two-person crew, and would have had several air refuelings during the strikes "going into the target area and coming out of the target areas".
"Each one of those is about 20 minutes where they're piloting the large aeroplane, about 12 feet behind and beneath another very big aircraft transferring fuel," he said.
"So it's a very, very important aspect of the mission and one where they really have to be focused and prepared."
According to the former lieutenant general, there needed to be people on the ground to ascertain if the nuclear sites had been destroyed completely.
"You're going to need to be able to exploit that site, probably with someone there on the ground. There may be some clandestine sources that you can use. There's probably some measures and signals intelligence and other things that will help build that complete picture," he said.
"Unless you're really at the site and you can see that damage firsthand, it's hard to make a full assessment."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
33 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Fury inside Trump administration after classified US intelligence leak minimises Iran airstrike success
White House officials are hunting the suspected 'low-level paper pusher' who leaked a preliminary Pentagon intelligence assessment questioning the scale of destruction after Saturday's US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites - as the CIA released its own finding that the attacks set the theocracy's nuke development back 'years'. The controversial Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment, first reported Tuesday by CNN, stated with a low level of confidence that the US attacks may only have disrupted Iran's progress toward an atomic weapon for a few months. The DIA report was circulated Sunday, just hours after B-2 bombers dropped 'bunker busters' on the Fordow enrichment site, and says it was compiled without input from other intelligence agencies, sources told The Post. That suggests the report authors did not use CIA or other assets inside Iran to verify the extent of the damage nor rely on audio or online communications that may have been intercepted by the National Security Agency. The assessment refrained from making a firm conclusion about the strikes' impact on Iran's nuclear program, but was nonetheless labeled 'top secret', administration insiders relayed. 'It was based on intel from one day, and it was the day after the strike, so clearly it wasn't anywhere near a complete assessment,' one official said. 'The actual assessment admits that it was not coordinated with the intelligence community.' The leak enraged President Donald Trump by minimizing the impact of the airstrikes, which had a major geopolitical effect, prompting Iran to agree to a cease-fire Monday to end its nearly two-week conflict with Israel. CIA Director John Ratcliffe released an agency assessment Wednesday afternoon concluding that immense damage was done to the three sites hit by US airstrikes, including the Fordow enrichment center housed beneath a mountain. '[A] body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes,' Ratcliffe said in a statement. 'This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' The International Atomic Energy Agency's director, Rafael Grossi, similarly said Tuesday the US strikes set back Iran's program 'significantly'. The FBI is leading the inquiry into the leak, and the Justice Department is expected to throw the book at the person if they're caught. Neither agency offered comment on this story. 'The president does not tolerate leakers. That's part of what made this operation so successful … no one knew about it,' one official said of the surprise attack. The mission was the first-ever operational use of America's 30,000-pound bombs - after Israeli 2,000-pound bombs failed to finish off the Iranian sites during the 12-day conflict. President Trump said Wednesday that he believes 900 pounds of enriched uranium was buried beneath '30 stories' of rubble at Fordow and that Tehran will no longer seek nuclear technology. The uranium, whose whereabouts remain in doubt, is believed to be enriched to 60 per cent purity, less than the 90-93 per cent needed for nuclear weapons. The president also said following the annual NATO summit in The Hague that 'scum' in the media were 'trying to make this unbelievable victory into something less'. 'This person is going to get prosecuted,' said one US official of the leaker. Another source close to the administration noted that many unauthorized disclosures have been investigated since Trump reclaimed power in January, and said they expected this probe to be 'in overdrive' because the culprit 'leaked one early-stage low-confidence report in hopes to undermine a successful mission and bet against America'. It's unclear how many officials had access to the report before its contents were shared. Administration officials suspect the leaker of acting out of anti-Trump bias - rather than whistleblowing - and have taken note of the fact that the story was broken by Natasha Bertrand of CNN. Bertrand, then at Politico, also first reported in October 2020 that 51 intelligence agency veterans claimed Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop, which contained evidence of Democratic candidate Joe Biden's involvement in his family's foreign business dealings, could be Russian disinformation. The story allowed Biden to fend off Trump's debate-stage attacks on alleged corruption involving China and Ukraine. Most major news outlets eventually corroborated The Post's reporting on the laptop files, but only after Biden narrowly defeated Trump in that year's election. Originally published as Fury inside Trump administration after classified US intelligence leak minimises Iran airstrike success

Sky News AU
39 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
‘The site was obliterated': Trump humiliates ‘fake news' CNN's Kaitlan Collins
US President Donald Trump corrects a CNN journalist during a NATO summit press conference about the status of the Iranian nuclear facilities the US struck. 'We collected additional intelligence and spoke to people who have seen the site, and the site is obliterated,' Mr Trump said during a NATO summit press conference. 'We think everything nuclear is down there – they didn't take any of it.'

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Should be fired': Trump and his admin demolish ‘fake news' CNN Iran story
US President Donald Trump and his administration have unleashed on CNN following a story about Iran. The anger from Trump's administration follows a story from CNN which reported the US strikes on Iran's nuclear program did not destroy it. CNN National Security correspondent Natasha Bertrand has been caught in the crosshairs of Trump's administration for her story. Taking to Truth Social, the US president slammed CNN and called for Betrand to be 'fired' from the network. 'I watched her for three days doing Fake News. She should be immediately reprimanded, and then thrown out 'like a dog',' The President said. 'She lied on the laptop from hell story, and now she lied on the Nuclear Sites Story, attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look back when, in fact, they did a great job and hit 'pay dirt' – total obliteration!' 'She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN. It's people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network." 'Her slant was so obviously negative; besides, she doesn't have what it takes to be an on-camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!'