Joke or no joke, FEMA staff confused, concerned about budget cuts
Show Caption
Hide Caption
NOAA, FEMA cuts will impact hurricane season, experts warn
The Trump administration's budget cuts at NOAA and FEMA will have an adverse affect on how the U.S. responds to hurricanes, experts warn.
A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, FEMA's parent agency, said the comment was a joke and that FEMA is prepared for hurricane season.
Richardson was appointed as the new chief of FEMA last month after his predecessor, Cameron Hamilton, was abruptly fired.
As the Atlantic hurricane season gets underway, storms are swirling again around the Federal Emergency Management Agency, tasked with helping communities recover from natural disasters.
The latest erupted June 2 after reports surfaced that the agency's acting chief, David Richardson, said in a meeting with staff ‒ later explaining that it was a joke ‒ that he didn't know hurricane season had begun.
Hurricane season starts June 1 and runs until Nov. 30 every year. This is expected to be an active season, and follows at least two dozen landfalling hurricanes in the mainland U.S. since 2016.
News of Richardson's remark prompted outrage from former FEMA officials, Democrats in Congress and others concerned about the agency's ability to respond to disasters this year after more than a third of its staff was decimated by Trump administration and its Department of Government Efficiency cuts.
Asked if Richardson would like to respond, FEMA sent USA TODAY a statement attributed to an unnamed DHS official.
Under the leadership of Kristi Noem, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and the efforts of Richardson, FEMA is "fully activated in preparation for Hurricane Season," the statement read. 'Despite meanspirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this Hurricane Season. FEMA is laser focused on disaster response, and protecting the American people."
FEMA in the crosshairs
In a statement to Reuters, Representative Bennie Thompson, the ranking Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee, said "disaster response is no joke."
"If you don't know what or when hurricane season is, you're not qualified to run FEMA," he stated. "Get someone knowledgeable in there."
FEMA's future has been uncertain for months and the apparent joke in Monday's meeting is just the latest incident. President Donald Trump criticized the agency on the campaign trail last year and has called for it to "go away." The president told victims of the Hurricane Helene-related disaster in North Carolina after his January inauguration that residents needed "a good state government" rather than FEMA.
Former acting administrator Cameron Hamilton was fired by Noem in early May after telling a House committee that it would not be his recommendation to abolish FEMA. After being appointed to replace Hamilton, Richardson told staff in his first meeting that he would "run right over" anyone who resisted change.
In its response to criticism of Richardson, the adminstration again complained about FEMA: "It's not a secret that under Secretary Noem and Acting Administrator Richardson, FEMA is shifting from bloated, DC-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens," the statement read. "The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades."
Joking or not, cuts are real
One former FEMA official told USA TODAY on June 3 that even if Richardson was joking in the meeting, it's worrisome the staff couldn't tell.
"People were immediately confused," said Jeremy Edwards, a former FEMA deputy director of public affairs and now a communications advisor at the Century Foundation.
The staff has voiced concerns about whether the agency is prepared for what may come this year and "we've seen internal memos that indicated the same," he said. "They've fired or laid off 2,000 of 6,000 employees, and they've created a culture of fear and toxicity where they've administered lie detector tests to employees."
The current environment has prompted other senior employees to leave, he said. "How could they be prepared when they have top-level people leaving en masse? You're losing tons of expertise and knowledge based on the direction they're taking."
Also on June 2, Richardson told staff they were going to scrap a draft strategic plan that had been expected to be released in May and revert back to the strategic plan used last year, Edwards said.
The budget request put forward by the White House during the last week of May proposed cutting FEMA's budget by almost half from a year earlier.
Carrie Speranza, a disaster executive who serves as president of the USA Council of the International Association of Emergency Managers, said she's hopeful state and local officials can successfully make their case to Congress about the need to restore FEMA's funding.
"As the shock of grant reductions takes hold, remember this is a budget request. It is NOT the FY 2026 budget," Speranza said in a June 2 post on LinkedIn. "Think of it as the President's initial negotiation with Congress."
The cuts pose a "tremendous risk, degrading public safety and national resilience," she said. "My key takeaway? We're still in the fight, and it's Congress's turn to up the ante."
The administration's take on the agency's future
Trump's 2025 budget does include $26.5 billion in disaster relief, the largest request ever, Speranza noted.
During a June 3 briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said FEMA is taking hurricane season seriously.
"Contrary to some of the reporting we have seen based on jokes that were made and leaks from meetings, Secretary Kristi Noem and the FEMA leadership are all over this," Leavitt said. "They are committed to ensuring that federal resources and tax dollars are there for Americans in need."
However, she added: "The president has made it clear we're not going to enable states to make bad decisions with federal tax dollars and then have the federal government later have to bail these states out."
Dinah Voyles Pulver, a national correspondent for USA TODAY, writes about hurricanes, violent weather and other environmental issues. Reach her at dpulver@usatoday.com or @dinahvp on Bluesky or X or dinahvp.77 on Signal.
Reuters contributed to this report.
This story has been updated to add new information.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump administration halts visas for people from Gaza after Laura Loomer questions arrivals
WASHINGTON (AP) — A day after conservative activist Laura Loomer posted videos on social media of children from Gaza arriving in the U.S. for medical treatment and questioning how they got visas, the State Department said it was halting all visitor visas for people from Gaza pending a review. The State Department said Saturday the visas would be stopped while it looks into how 'a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas' were issued in recent days. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday told 'Face the Nation' on CBS that the action came after 'outreach from multiple congressional offices asking questions about it.' Rubio said there were 'just a small number' of the visas issued to children in need of medical aid but that they were accompanied by adults. The congressional offices reached out with evidence that 'some of the organizations bragging about and involved in acquiring these visas have strong links to terrorist groups like Hamas,' he asserted, without providing evidence or naming those organizations. As a result, he said, 'we are going to pause this program and reevaluate how those visas are being vetted and what relationship, if any, has there been by these organizations to the process of acquiring those visas.' Loomer on Friday posted videos on X of children from Gaza arriving earlier this month in San Francisco and Houston for medical treatment with the aid of an organization called HEAL Palestine. 'Despite the US saying we are not accepting Palestinian 'refugees' into the United States under the Trump administration,' these people from Gaza were able to travel to the U.S., she said. She called it a 'national security threat' and asked who signed off on the visas, calling for the person to be fired. She tagged Rubio, President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, GOP Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. Trump has downplayed Loomer's influence on his administration, but several officials swiftly left or were removed shortly after she publicly criticized them. The State Department on Sunday declined to comment on how many of the visas had been granted and whether the decision to halt visas to people from Gaza had anything to do with Loomer's posts. HEAL Palestine said in a statement Sunday that it was 'distressed' by the State Department decision to stop halt visitor visas from Gaza. The group said it is 'an American humanitarian nonprofit organization delivering urgent aid and medical care to children in Palestine.' A post on the organization's Facebook page Thursday shows a photo of a boy from Gaza leaving Egypt and headed to St. Louis for treatment and said he is 'our 15th evacuated child arriving in the U.S. in the last two weeks.' The organization brings 'severely injured children' to the U.S. on temporary visas for treatment they can't get at home, the statement said. Following treatment, the children and any family members who accompanied them return to the Middle East, the statement said. 'This is a medical treatment program, not a refugee resettlement program,' it said. The World Health Organization has repeatedly called for more medical evacuations from Gaza, where Israel's over 22-month war against Hamas has heavily destroyed or damaged much of the territory's health system. 'More than 14,800 patients still need lifesaving medical care that is not available in Gaza,' WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Wednesday on social media, and called on more countries to offer support. A WHO description of the medical evacuation process from Gaza published last year explained that the WHO submits lists of patients to Israeli authorities for security clearance. It noted that before the war in Gaza began, 50 to 100 patients were leaving Gaza daily for medical treatment, and it called for a higher rate of approvals from Israeli authorities. The U.N. and partners say medicines and even basic health care supplies are low in Gaza after Israel cut off all aid to the territory of over 2 million people for more than 10 weeks earlier this year. 'Ceasefire! Peace is the best medicine,' Tedros added Wednesday.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
GM's quarterly results illustrate the folly of tariffs
General Motors, a cornerstone of American industry, is suffering the consequences of President Trump's unconstitutional 25 percent tariffs on imported vehicles and auto parts. In the second quarter of 2025, GM suffered a $1.1 billion tariff blow to its operating income, slashing the company's profit margin from a healthy 9 percent to just 6.1 percent. Net income plunged by 36.1 percent from the prior quarter and by a staggering 40.7 percent compared to a year ago. Although the estimated tariff impact for the full year of $4 billion to $5 billion is less than 3 percent of GM's overall revenue, that cost represents more than half of the typical annual income for the company over the past decade. The consequences extend far beyond GM's balance sheet. Tariffs, paid by importers to the federal government, are partly absorbed by companies and partly passed to consumers. We've especially seen this in import-sensitive sectors including furnishings, appliances, clothes and toys. Men's shirts and sweaters, for instance, rose 4.9 percent in June alone. When businesses 'eat' the cost, as GM tried to do last quarter, the fallout is no less severe. Diminished earnings mean less capital for investment in better technology or expanded operations, slowing broader economic growth, fewer resources for pay raises or new jobs — hardly the boon for workers that tariff advocates promise. The data confirms this. Nationwide, 14,000 manufacturing jobs disappeared in the past two months, erasing all gains in 2025. In June, real average weekly earnings dropped by 0.4 percent, an annualized loss of nearly 5 percent. Shareholders are also feeling the pinch. Stock valuations track a company's expected future earnings. Since 2012, GM's stock price increased by more than 200 percent. GM's price-to-earnings ratio today stands at 6.83, almost identical to 2012 levels. Stock prices increased alongside earnings. A sustained $5 billion annual hit, wiping out over half of GM's annual net income, could erase more than $20 billion in market capitalization if valuations adjust. With tariffs eroding profits, is it any wonder that GM's stock has slid 8 percent since its post-2024 election peak and now languishes 13 percent off its 2021 highs? This affects millions of middle-class Americans and retirees with pensions and savings invested. More broadly, lower dividends and diminished returns discourage investment, starving companies of the capital needed to expand. The result: slower growth, fewer jobs and weaker wage gains. GM, to its credit, is fighting to offset 30 percent of this burden by boosting U.S. production, cutting costs and increasing domestic content to comply with the USMCA trade agreement's labyrinthine rules. Yet even if successful, the net impact of $2.8 billion to $3.5 billion will devour a significant slice of GM's already thin margins. Profit margins at GM — as in most other sectors — are far less than conventional wisdom. GM's net profit margin over the past decade has averaged less than 5 percent. In other words, a $30,000 vehicle yields less than $1,500 in profit. GM's plans to shift some production to U.S. plants and rework supply chains is a testament to private enterprise's resilience. But make no mistake: These shifts sacrifice efficiency for compliance. Restructuring operations in a free market in pursuit of efficiency yields more profit, consumer benefit and economic growth. Doing so under duress to escape arbitrary tariffs may result in survival, but without these benefits. Resources that could have fueled innovation or lowered prices are now squandered on navigating artificial trade barriers. As an important sidenote, roughly half the tariff's cost stems from GM's South Korean operations, a stark reminder of the folly of taxing trade with allies. Rather than strengthening ties with democratic partners through bold free-trade agreements, these tariffs risk pushing nations like South Korea toward China, America's chief adversary. Far from economic strategy, it is geopolitical shortsightedness. Politicians sometimes prefer tariffs to other forms of taxation because they are less visible than taxes on income or sales. This makes it easier to dodge accountability by blaming 'greedy' corporations. For this reason, Trump called Jeff Bezos to deter Amazon from listing tariff costs on purchases. The White House press secretary labeled this a 'hostile and political act by Amazon.' Regardless, protectionism is not cost-free. Sustained tariffs will raise prices, shrink profits, erode real wages and slow economic growth. GM's quarterly results are a warning.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Top Armed Services Democrat calls Trump-Putin summit ‘very disappointing'
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said he was very disappointed by the historic summit between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. In an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday,' Smith criticized the U.S. president for appearing to emerge from his meeting more aligned with Putin in pushing for an end to the war in Ukraine without first agreeing to a ceasefire. 'The summit in Alaska was very disappointing,' Smith said in the interview. 'We took the demand for a ceasefire off the table in exchange for nothing.' Smith also criticized Trump's 'deference' to the Russian leader, contrasting that approach with the antagonism on display during the explosive Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in February. 'The deference that President Trump showed to Putin—never once just stating the basic notion that Ukraine has a right to exist as a sovereign, democratic country and that the invasion was illegal, unlawful,' Smith said. 'And you contrast that with the way President Trump and Vice President Vance treated Zelensky when he was in the West Wing back in February — it sends the wrong signal if we're trying to force Putin to the table and get a negotiated end to this war,' he continued. Smith said it 'makes sense' for Trump to be trying to get Putin and Zelensky in a room together, saying, 'I applaud that effort, but you have to understand what Putin wants out of this.' 'Putin wants all of Ukraine, and he's just trying to play President Trump and buy time to get in a better position to do that,' he continued. 'That's the calculation of Putin that has to be changed.'
