Alaska Republican senator stares down reporter after casting yes vote on Trump's tax bill
Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski stared down a reporter in a tense exchange that quickly went viral on social media, after she had voted in favor of President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill on July 1.
Murkowski was crucial to getting the legislation across the finish line in the Senate, as Senate Majority Leader John Thune could only afford to lose three votes. After pressure from Republican leadership, Murkowski ultimately voted yes on the bill, despite her concerns about Medicaid reform and cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Ryan Nobles, an NBC News correspondent, had asked Murkowski what she thought of Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul's criticism that Murkowski's vote was 'a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country.'
Murkowski then said, 'Oh my god,' before looking at Nobles, who remarked, 'That's what Senator Paul said.'
Murkowski stared Nobles down for more than 10 seconds before saying, 'My response is I have an obligation to the people of the state of Alaska, and I live up to that every single day.'
She noted that she didn't like the bill. But, she said, 'I tried to take care of Alaska's interests.'
Murkowsi had noted in a tweet after the vote that the bill included many advantages for Alaskans, including a larger child tax credit, investment in the Coast Guard, and enhancing border security.
However, she said she hopes the bill is not the final product and that both chambers work on it more 'to get this right.'
The bill is now in the House, where lawmakers must go over the changes from the Senate and give it a final stamp of approval before it heads to the president's desk. Trump and GOP leaders have a self-imposed deadline of July 4 for Congress to pass the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cornyn asks DOJ to probe groups tied to O'Rourke, others in Texas fight
Sen. John Cornyn (D-Texas) is asking the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate groups —including former Rep. Beto O'Rourke's (D) Powered by People — that have allegedly helped fund Texas Democrats who fled the state to stall a GOP mid-decade redistricting plan. 'I write to encourage the Department of Justice to open an investigation into potential violations of federal law committed by the Political Action Committees and special interest groups providing funding and assistance to members of the Texas House of Representatives who absconded from the state and violated their duties to the citizens of Texas,' Cornyn wrote in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi. 'I write today to encourage an investigation of the entities funding this charade. News reports make clear that PACs tied to Beto O'Rourke and megadonors such as George Soros are supporting the legislators, along with other campaign entities,' he continued. 'These outside groups appear to be acting in violation of federal public corruption and election laws.' More than 50 Texas state legislators left the Lone Star State earlier this month to break quorum, depriving the state House of the numbers it needs to move forward with a redistricting plan backed by President Trump. The proposal, which passed through the state Senate on Tuesday, would net Republicans five additional House seats and has triggered redistricting talks in other states on both sides of the aisle ahead of the 2026 midterms. Cornyn in his letter called out O'Rourke, alleging that his political group funded 'luxurious private jets' for the quorum-breaking lawmakers, along with food, lodging and logistical support from other groups. The latest move from the senator follows his recent call for the FBI to help track down quorum-breakers, comes as he seeks to fend off a conservative primary challenge from Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) in next year's election. Recent polling has shown Cornyn trailing Paxton, in some cases by double digits, though his team is projecting optimism that they'll be able to fend off the challenge. Paxton has also swung at O'Rourke and his group, which he's claimed engaged in unlawful fundraising activity to help the Democratic state lawmakers. He was granted a temporary restraining order last week, and is now seeking O'Rourke's arrest as he alleges that the order was violated. Meanwhile, Texas Democrats are trying to wait out the ongoing 30-day special session as their absence puts a pause on advancing the new Congressional map, but Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has said he planned to call another immediately afterward. The venture comes with hefty expenses. In addition to the costs of living away from their homes in Texas, the participating Democrats each face $500-a-day fines, along with the threat of arrest and removal from their seats. California's Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has pledged to redraw the Golden State's congressional maps in a move that could counter Texas's gains with five additional Democratic House seats, depending on whether Republicans move forward with redistricting.
Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
More Americans than ever don't drink alcohol, poll finds. What's behind shift?
The share of Americans who drink alcohol has fallen to a record low, according to a new Gallup poll. At the same time, a record-high share of Americans believe consuming alcohol, even in moderation, is unhealthy. The results come from Gallup's Consumption Habits survey, conducted July 7-21 with 1,002 U.S. adults. In the survey, 54% of respondents said they sometimes drink wine, beer or liquor, marking the lowest such figure since 1939, the first year Gallup asked Americans about their drinking habits. It continues a recent trend of declining alcohol consumption, with the share of drinkers standing at 58% in 2024, 62% in 2023 and 67% in 2022. In contrast, for most of the past eight decades, this figure has remained above 60%. It reached a high of 71% in 1976. When the latest results were broken down by demographic groups, some notable differences emerged. Men were more likely than women to report drinking — 57% vs. 51% — and white respondents were more prone to drink than respondents of color — 56% vs. 52%. Similarly, there were slight generational differences. Among adults 55 and older, 56% reported drinking alcohol, while 50% of 18- to 34-year-olds said the same. Democrats were also significantly more likely to consume alcohol than Republicans — 61% vs. 46%. This is a relatively new phenomenon, as the share of GOP respondents who drink fell 19 points since 2023, while the share of drinking Democrats only fell by 3 points. For the first time, a majority of respondents, 53%, now say drinking in moderation — defined as up to two drinks per day — is bad for health. Meanwhile, 37% said it makes no difference, and 6% said it is good for health. The findings reflect a continuing trend of more Americans viewing drinking as unhealthy. In 2024, 45% said alcohol is bad for health, up from 39% in 2023 and 28% in 2018. Young Americans were also significantly more likely than their older counterparts to view moderate drinking as detrimental. In the survey, which has a margin of error of 4 percentage points, 66% of 18- to 34-year-olds said moderate drinking is bad for health. Meanwhile, 48% of those 55 and older said the same. Similarly, women were more likely than men to say limited drinking is unhealthy — 60% vs. 47%. And Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say the same — 58% vs. 44%. The results come as emerging medical guidance indicates that drinking alcohol — even in moderate amounts — indeed poses health risks. The U.S. government's Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends limiting drinking to one or two servings per day. But, this advice is expected to be removed and replaced with a more general warning, according to a June report from Reuters, which notes that limited alcohol consumption has been linked to higher risks of certain types of cancer. 'The continuation of these trends may hinge on whether recent pronouncements about drinking's risks are the final word on the subject, similar to how the U.S. surgeon general's warnings about tobacco in the 1960s marked the start of a long-term decline in smoking,' Gallup concluded.
Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
FEMA abruptly disbands youth advisory council, but students say their climate advocacy won't stop
After a few frightening incidents seeing family and friends collapse in Phoenix's grueling heat , Ashton Dolce, 17, began to wonder why his country's leaders were not doing more to keep people safe from climate change. 'I was just dumbfounded,' Dolce said. He became active in his hometown, organizing rallies and petitions to raise awareness about extreme heat and calling for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to make such conditions eligible for major disaster declarations . Just before his senior year of high school in 2024, Dolce got the chance to really make his concerns heard: He became one of 15 students across the United States selected to join the FEMA Youth Preparedness Council , a 13-year-old program for young people to learn about and become ambassadors for disaster preparedness. 'It was this really cool opportunity to get involved with FEMA and to actually have a specified seat at the table where we could develop resources by and for youth,' Dolce said. Then came signs of trouble. On Jan. 16, the young people were told by email that a culminating summit in the nation's capital this summer was canceled. By February, the students stopped hearing from their advisers. Meetings ceased. After months of silence, the students got an email Aug. 1 saying the program would be terminated early . 'We were putting so much time and effort into this space,' he said, 'and now it's fully gutted.' In an email to students reviewed by The Associated Press, the agency said the move was intended 'to ensure FEMA is a lean, deployable disaster force that is ready to support states as they take the lead in preparedness and disaster response.' The council's dissolution, though dwarfed in size by other cuts, reflects the fallout from the chaotic changes at the agency charged with managing the federal response to disasters. Since the start of Republican President Donald Trump's second term, his administration has reduced FEMA staff by thousands, delayed crucial emergency trainings, discontinued certain survivor outreach efforts and canceled programs worth billions of dollars . Dolce said ignoring students undermines resilience, too. 'This field needs young people and we are pushing young people out,' he said. 'The administration is basically just giving young people the middle finger on climate change.' Larger federal programs related to youth and climate are also in turmoil. In April, the administration slashed funding to AmeriCorps, the 30-year-old federal agency for volunteer service. As a result, 2,000 members of the National Civilian Community Corps, who commonly aid in disaster recovery, left their program early . FEMA did not respond to questions about why it shut down the youth council. In an email bulletin last week, the agency said it would not recruit 'until further notice.' The council was created for students in grades 8 to 11 to 'bring together young leaders who are interested in supporting disaster preparedness and making a difference in their communities,' according to FEMA's website. Disinvesting in youth training could undermine efforts to prepare and respond to more frequent and severe climate disasters , said Chris Reynolds, a retired lieutenant colonel and emergency preparedness liaison officer in the U.S. Air Force. 'It's a missed opportunity for the talent pipeline,' said Reynolds, now vice president and dean of academic outreach at American Public University System. 'I'm 45-plus years as an emergency manager in my field. Where's that next cadre going to come from?' The administration's goal of diminishing the federal role in disaster response and putting more responsibility on states to handle disaster response and recovery could mean local communities need even more expertise in emergency management. 'You eliminate the participation of not just your next generation of emergency managers, but your next generation of community leaders, which I think is just a terrible mistake,' said Monica Sanders, professor in Georgetown University's Emergency and Disaster Management Program and its Law Center. Sanders said young people had as much knowledge to share with FEMA as the agency did with them. 'In a lot of cultures, young people do the preparedness work, the organizing of mutual aid, online campaigning, reuniting and finding people in ways that traditional emergency management just isn't able to do,' she said. 'For FEMA to lose access to that knowledge base is just really unfortunate.' Sughan Sriganesh, a rising high school senior from Syosset, New York, said he joined the council to further his work on resilience and climate literacy in schools. 'I thought it was a way that I could amplify the issues that I was passionate about,' he said. Sriganesh said he got a lot out of the program while it lasted. He and Dolce were in the same small group working on a community project to disseminate preparedness resources to farmers. They created a pamphlet with information on what to do before and after a disaster. Even after FEMA staff stopped reaching out, Sriganesh and some of his peers kept meeting. They decided to finish the project and are seeking ways to distribute their pamphlet themselves. 'It's a testament to why we were chosen in the first place as youth preparedness members,' Sriganesh said. 'We were able to adapt and be resilient no matter what was going on.'
