Shell to face High Court trial over legacy oil pollution in 2027
Oil giant Shell will now face a full trial in London's High Court in 2027 over allegations it was legally responsible for legacy oil pollution in Nigeria.
Shell Plc and a Nigerian-based subsidiary of the company, now known as the Renaissance Africa Energy Company, are being sued by members of the Bille and Ogale communities in the Niger Delta.
The legal action is led by the claimant law firm Leigh Day, which began legal action in 2015.
The claim contains allegations that years of chronic oil spills have left the communities, which have a combined population of 50,000, without access to clean water, unable to farm and fish, and with a serious ongoing risk to public health.
The case has been through several courts, including the High Court in 2017 and the Court of Appeal in 2018. Both courts ruled that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care.
However, the Supreme Court overturned those in 2021, viewing that there was a 'real issue to be tried'. The High Court went on to green-light the legal battle in November 2023.
The parties went to a preliminary issues trial between February and March this year at the court, where Mrs Justice May had to rule on several issues, including Shell's rejected argument on liability and concluded that the oil giant can still be liable for these spills.
Shell argued that there was a strict five-year limitation period. However, the judge, in her 102-page judgment, rejected the argument and left it open for the communities to claim compensation for oil spills that occurred more than five years ago.
She stated that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified,' and despite it being launched 10 years ago, she added that this case was 'still at a very early stage'.
The judge also found that Shell could be liable for damage resulting from bunkering or illegal refining if it failed to protect its infrastructure, particularly if there is evidence that its staff have been complicit in the illegal activities.
Leigh Day partner Matthew Renshaw said: 'Shell's attempts to knock out or restrict these claims through a preliminary trial of Nigerian law issues have been comprehensively rebuffed.'
'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining,' he added.
A spokesperson for Shell said the company welcomed this judgement.
'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs.'
'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining. These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up.'
'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities.'
'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA,' the spokesperson added.
The trial, which will be closely watched, is set to take place over four months from March 2027.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 hours ago
- Forbes
Hormuz On A Knife‑Edge: Qatar's LNG Warning Sends Insurance And Freight Costs Exploding
Qatar's Energy Minister and CEO of QatarEnergy Saad Sherida al-Kaabi speaks during a press ... More conference in Doha on September 1, 2024. (Photo by KARIM JAAFAR / AFP) (Photo by KARIM JAAFAR/AFP via Getty Images) Fresh alarm. In a 20 June Reuters exclusive, Doha confirmed that it hauled ExxonMobil, Shell and TotalEnergies into a closed-door meeting two days earlier, warning that one stray missile in the Strait of Hormuz could instantly wipe out one-fifth of global LNG supply. Asian spot prices obeyed the signal—jumping 11 percent to $14/mmBtu before London markets had fully digested the headline. One narrow waterway still moves the world. Hormuz pinches to 21 nautical miles at its choke and carries roughly 20 million barrels of oil—about one-fifth of global seaborne supply—plus a similar share of LNG every day. Close the channel and power stations from Houston to Hong Kong scramble for fuel while tanker queues lengthen by thousands of nautical miles. Chokepoint concentration. The International Energy Agency calculates that only about 6.5 million barrels a day can shift quickly to Fujairah, SUMED or inventories; the balance simply waits. Price-shock amplitude. Additional-war-risk premiums (AWRP) on very-large crude carriers have rocketed from 0.05 percent to 0.25 percent of hull value—roughly a US $225 000 surcharge on each $90 million ship—and forward Brent markets now build in triple-digit scenarios for any prolonged disruption. Policy bandwidth. True spare capacity inside OPEC clocks in near three million barrels a day and sits inside the same blast zone, leaving diplomacy—so far untested in open conflict—to carry most of the burden. Backup pipes replace only a sliver. Saudi Arabia's East-West line and the UAE's Habshan–Fujairah bypass together provide about 2.6 million barrels a day of spare capacity, barely one-eighth of normal Hormuz throughput. Even a coordinated drawdown of strategic storage could not keep two-thirds of Gulf exports moving if the strait closed for a week. Insurance costs shout before oil charts whisper. Since 13 June, tanker underwriters have priced the region as an active war zone. A five-fold jump in AWRP lands before a single barrel is lifted, signalling risk faster than futures curves can. For a refiner, those premiums flow straight into delivered crude costs within days. Freight rates leap in lock-step. Gulf-to-Asia VLCC rates hit $2.14 per barrel on 17 June—60 percent higher in just five days—and charterers now fix ships day-to-day rather than locking in multi-month contracts. The volatility premium migrates down the supply chain, raising break-even prices for refiners, airlines and petrochemicals alike. Qatar's tankers loiter outside the Gulf. QatarEnergy has instructed LNG carriers to remain east of Hormuz until the day before loading. AIS data confirm a multi-year low in Persian-Gulf-bound empty tankers—evidence of growing caution even as contractual volumes continue to flow. Spare capacity sits where missiles can reach it. RBC Capital Markets pegs genuine OPEC spare capacity at roughly three million barrels per day, nearly all within Hormuz's threat ring. Every new headline—whether a cease-fire whisper or another drone strike—moves Brent and insurance quotes long before drilling rigs or pipelines can respond. Economic ripples extend well beyond crude. Higher tanker premiums bleed into LNG freight, lifting electricity costs that keep AI data centres humming. European refiners, already paying roughly €70 per tonne of CO₂, see margins flip negative once reroute costs stack up; Asian importers instead burn through stockpiles that last weeks, not months. Insurance leverage unseen since the late 1980s now shows up in airline ticket prices and industrial power bills. Numbers translate geopolitics into P&L. U.S. energy-agency models suggest each $10 oil shock trims about one-tenth of a percentage point from U.S. GDP. BloombergNEF freight curves add another $1.60 per barrel for a Cape of Good Hope detour plus $0.80 in bunker fuel. War-risk elasticity studies show that 70 percent of an insurance premium embeds into headline freight within a fortnight—effectively turning geopolitical anxiety into everyday costs at the pump. Strategic takeaway remains uncomplicated. Boards cannot micromanage every contingency, but they can widen risk limits, diversify shipping lanes and co-fund a GCC–EU 'Hormuz Alternative Route Task-Force.' The planning bill is trivial next to today's $225 000 voyage surcharge. In the absence of bold collective action, every forward-freight contract will continue to price a toll for geopolitical complacency. Better to pre-empt that charge than pay it in arrears.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shell to face High Court trial over legacy oil pollution in 2027
Oil giant Shell will now face a full trial in London's High Court in 2027 over allegations it was legally responsible for legacy oil pollution in Nigeria. Shell Plc and a Nigerian-based subsidiary of the company, now known as the Renaissance Africa Energy Company, are being sued by members of the Bille and Ogale communities in the Niger Delta. The legal action is led by the claimant law firm Leigh Day, which began legal action in 2015. The claim contains allegations that years of chronic oil spills have left the communities, which have a combined population of 50,000, without access to clean water, unable to farm and fish, and with a serious ongoing risk to public health. The case has been through several courts, including the High Court in 2017 and the Court of Appeal in 2018. Both courts ruled that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care. However, the Supreme Court overturned those in 2021, viewing that there was a 'real issue to be tried'. The High Court went on to green-light the legal battle in November 2023. The parties went to a preliminary issues trial between February and March this year at the court, where Mrs Justice May had to rule on several issues, including Shell's rejected argument on liability and concluded that the oil giant can still be liable for these spills. Shell argued that there was a strict five-year limitation period. However, the judge, in her 102-page judgment, rejected the argument and left it open for the communities to claim compensation for oil spills that occurred more than five years ago. She stated that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified,' and despite it being launched 10 years ago, she added that this case was 'still at a very early stage'. The judge also found that Shell could be liable for damage resulting from bunkering or illegal refining if it failed to protect its infrastructure, particularly if there is evidence that its staff have been complicit in the illegal activities. Leigh Day partner Matthew Renshaw said: 'Shell's attempts to knock out or restrict these claims through a preliminary trial of Nigerian law issues have been comprehensively rebuffed.' 'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining,' he added. A spokesperson for Shell said the company welcomed this judgement. 'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs.' 'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining. These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up.' 'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities.' 'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA,' the spokesperson added. The trial, which will be closely watched, is set to take place over four months from March 2027.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shell boss warns of ‘huge impact on trade' if Israel-Iran conflict escalates
An escalation in the Middle East conflict could have a 'huge impact on global trade', the boss of the oil company Shell has warned, as Donald Trump suggested the US could enter the air war between Israel and Iran. Shell, one of the biggest traders of oil and natural gas in the world, said it had contingency plans in case the conflict disrupted flows from the region. There is a risk that a blockage in the strait of Hormuz could shock the energy market. Speaking at an energy conference in Tokyo, Wael Sawan, the chief executive of Shell, said: 'If that artery is blocked, for whatever reason, it has a huge impact on global trade… We have plans in the eventuality that things deteriorate.' About a quarter of the world's oil trade passes through the strait of Hormuz, which links the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. Oil prices have risen over the last week as the conflict has escalated. On Thursday, Brent crude rose nearly 1% to more than $77 (£57) a barrel. Interactive 'What is particularly challenging right now is some of the jamming that's happening,' said Sawan, referring to the interference in navigation signals in and around the Persian Gulf. The growing risk in the area has also more than doubled the price to charter large oil tankers through the strait of Hormuz, according to figures from the data and analytics firm Clarksons Research, reported by the Financial Times. The daily price to charter a very large crude carrier, which is capable of carrying 2m barrels of oil, from the Gulf to China rose from $19,998 two days before Israel's attack on Iran last week to $47,609 on Wednesday. The sharp rise in costs far outpaces the 12% increase in the wider Baltic Dirty Tanker index over the same period. The index tracks crude oil tanker rates across the world. Meanwhile, global stocks slipped slightly on Thursday, as investors bought assets that are typically more stable during volatile periods such as gold and the US dollar. The precious metal ticked up 0.1% to $3,372.36 an ounce, while the dollar rose against the euro, as well as the Australian and New Zealand dollars. Trump said on Wednesday he had not yet made a final decision about the US entering the war. 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' the president said. Kyle Rodda, a senior financial markets analyst at said: 'Market participants remain edgy and uncertain. Speculation remains rife – fed probably strategically by the Trump administration – that the US will intervene, something that would mark a material escalation and could invite direct retaliation against the US by Iran.' 'Such a scenario would raise the risk of a greater regional conflict, with implications for global energy supply and probably economic growth,' Rodda added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
