logo
We're Only Seeing the Beginning of the Texas Floods' Deadly Toll

We're Only Seeing the Beginning of the Texas Floods' Deadly Toll

Yahoo18-07-2025
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
July has been the month of the flash flood. The floods in Texas were particularly devastating: more than 130 deaths, 101 people still missing, and an estimated $18 billion to $22 billion in damage. Those were followed by floods in North Carolina, New Mexico, Chicago, and New York. More are forecast for the coming week, including in areas already hard-hit.
Even in places where the floods have let up, the storm isn't over: Floods can lead to excess deaths long after the actual event. 'The health impacts of flooding aren't just immediate,' wrote Katelyn Jetelina last week in her newsletter, Your Local Epidemiologist. 'They often unfold over weeks and months.'
Indeed, a recent study found that between 2000 and 2020 across the U.S., there were an estimated 22,000 additional deaths attributable to flooding. For reference, the National Weather Service estimates that there are around 127 deaths per year from flooding—that adds up to a little more than 2,500 direct deaths during that 20-year period. These 22,000 excess deaths, on the other hand, were caused by heart attacks, strokes, respiratory disease, and infectious diseases as much as a year out from the actual flood event. Another global study that looked at floods in 761 communities across 35 countries also found increased mortality risks, including cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, in the two months after the flooding event.
Floods—like other natural disasters—cause emotional stress for people who have been displaced or lost loved ones, and that stress can take a physical toll. Then there's the fact that flooding can lead to mold growth in homes, which leads to increased risks for all sorts of things, including respiratory diseases and neurological disorders. Infectious diseases can spread after a flood if overwhelmed sewage systems contaminate local bodies of water. And people who have been displaced due to a natural disaster may lose access to necessary medications and health care. (Somewhat oddly, floods were associated with a decrease in deaths related to dementia and hypertensive diseases, possibly due to fewer diagnoses in the wake of a disrupted health care system or hastened death by another cause.)
Older populations tend to be more vulnerable to these delayed impacts, as well as people with lower income or in less developed areas. In the 2000–2020 study, the causes varied by racial background: While white people represented the largest percentage of lives lost overall, Black and Hispanic people were more affected by external causes, such as lack of access to health care as a result of the flood.
These insidious side effects linger and lurk, and it's thanks to studies that look at long-term associations that they don't go entirely uncounted. But those studies all share another takeaway: There need to be more of these studies. As a review of cardiovascular impacts following extreme storms noted, while 'a growing body of evidence suggests that victims of hurricanes have increased incidence of cardiovascular disease,' there's a 'lack of rigorous long-term evaluation of hurricane exposure,' and an absence of exploration into the mechanisms that might lead to worsened cardiovascular outcomes.
In other words, a flood's death toll extends long past when we usually stop counting. As flooding and other natural disasters get worse due to climate change, the lives lost will eventually feel incalculable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Millions Urged To Monitor Wheezing, Dizziness
Millions Urged To Monitor Wheezing, Dizziness

Newsweek

time3 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Millions Urged To Monitor Wheezing, Dizziness

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Air quality alerts were in effect for nine states on Friday, with officials urging residents in some affected areas to monitor for potential health effects caused by pollution. Why It Matters According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), studies have linked particle pollution exposure to various health effects, including respiratory symptoms—such as coughing and wheezing, the development of asthma and increased susceptibility to respiratory infections. Regarding ozone pollution, the EPA says exposure to ozone may irritate the respiratory tract, cause airway inflammation and aggravate existing conditions—such as asthma, emphysema and chronic bronchitis. What To Know The alerts spanned the entirety of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and Iowa as well as an eastern portion of Nebraska and the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri because of smoke from wildfires in Canada. "Monitor for symptoms such as wheezing, coughing, chest tightness, dizziness, or burning in nose, throat, and eyes," an alert relayed by the National Weather Service (NWS) said. "Reduce or eliminate activities that contribute to air pollution, such as outdoor burning, and use of residential wood burning devices," it continued. In Minnesota, local authorities said northerly winds would carry heavy smoke from wildfires across Manitoba and Saskatchewan into the state, lingering through Saturday afternoon, when some improvement was forecast. Meanwhile, air quality alerts had been issued for Colorado and Texas because of ozone pollution. These covered Colorado's Douglas, Jefferson, Denver, western Arapahoe, western Adams, Broomfield, Boulder, Larimer and Weld Counties. In Texas, the Dallas-Fort Worth area was affected. In Colorado, ozone concentrations that were potentially unhealthy for sensitive groups—including children, older adults and those with preexisting medical conditions—were most likely from the western suburbs of Denver, northward along the foothills and the I-25 urban corridor to the Fort Collins area, officials said. In Texas, weather conditions were predicted to be conducive to high levels of ozone air pollution in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Residents were advised to take steps to help prevent pollution, such as reducing vehicle use. What People Are Saying The National Weather Service in Omaha/Valley, Nebraska, wrote on X on Thursday: "The hazy skies today are a result of Canadian wildfire smoke, which is expected to linger in the area through Friday afternoon. The smoke is leading to moderate to unhealthy air quality, especially for sensitive groups." NWS Chicago wrote on X on Thursday: "Poor air quality due to wildfire smoke is expected to continue through tomorrow and will be at unhealthy levels for everyone in some locations. Consider limiting prolonged outdoor activity." NWS Twin Cities, Minnesota, wrote on X on Wednesday: "Wildfire smoke sticks around through the beginning of the weekend, before storm chances return late Sunday into Monday." AccuWeather meteorologist Brandon Buckingham previously told Newsweek: "Ozone is a secondary pollutant, meaning it's not emitted directly from sources, but is formed through chemical reactions. These reactions require sunlight and higher temperatures, making warmer months more prone to ozone formation. When air is stagnant, pollutants don't get dispersed, allowing ozone to build up to unhealthy levels." What Happens Next At the time of writing, the latest of the alerts were in effect through Saturday. The NWS issues regular forecast updates on its website.

Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands
Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands

Fox News

time17 hours ago

  • Fox News

Banned chemicals found in American shampoo, sunscreen and tampons across major brands

From shampoo and sunscreen to tampons, many personal care products on American shelves contain chemicals linked to cancer, infertility, and hormone disruption—ingredients that are banned or restricted in the European Union and other countries. Despite these alarming associations, no federal law in the U.S. requires companies to disclose potentially harmful ingredients. Only California mandates limited transparency, leaving most Americans in the dark about what they're putting on—and absorbing into—their bodies. For Tiah Tomlin-Harris, a two-time survivor of triple-negative breast cancer, that lack of transparency was a wake-up call. Diagnosed before age 40 with no genetic predisposition, Tomlin-Harris began asking hard questions: Where is this coming from? Genetic testing came back negative, placing her among the 80–90% of breast cancer patients whose illness isn't linked to family history. Her background as a chemist in the pharmaceutical industry gave her a unique perspective—and a critical eye for labels. "I started to dig into the causations," she told FOX. "The first thing I did was remove every single product in my house—from hair care to dish detergent. I went back to grandma's remedies—baking soda, vinegar—because I didn't know what was safe anymore." As she researched, she realized just how many widely used beauty and hygiene products are packed with potentially harmful chemicals. While Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has pushed for the removal of toxic additives in processed foods, he has yet to tackle the personal care industry. FDA Commissioner Marty Makary admits the agency is in a "deregulatory mindset," saying, "[We've] been regulating too much." That mindset has led to an explosion of consumer-driven tools like Yuka and Clearya, apps that scan barcodes and analyze ingredient safety using AI. "Most people are shocked," said Julie Chapon, Yuka's co-founder. "They assume green packaging means safety." Tomlin-Harris emphasized the disproportionate impact on women of color, particularly Black women. "We spend nine times more on beauty products than any other demographic, yet these products often contain the most harmful ingredients—parabens, phthalates, formaldehyde, benzene. These aren't just linked to cancer. They're weakening chemotherapy drugs. They're disrupting hormones. They're impacting fertility—for men and women." A Consumer Reports investigation found carcinogens in 10 of the top braiding hair brands, many of which are marketed to Black women and girls. Janet Nudelman, Director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at Breast Cancer Prevention Partners, agrees that consumers are often left choosing "between protecting against skin cancer versus increasing their risk of breast cancer" because of harmful ingredients. Dr. Leonardo Trasande, whose studies highlight the health hazards of common chemicals, called the current system "rigged to produce chemical exposures that are toxic to our hormones." The consequences, he warns, are societal: higher healthcare costs and lifelong reproductive and developmental health problems. The federal government is slowly responding. The Safer Beauty Bill package, reintroduced in Congress, seeks to ban toxic ingredients, increase ingredient disclosure and protect vulnerable populations like hairstylists, nail technicians, and women of color. But for now, consumers are largely left to protect themselves. FDA Commissioner Makary insists change is coming: "We're doing an inventory of all chemicals in the food supply to see how we can make it safer." Still, advocacy groups say the U.S. is far behind the EU in regulating cosmetic safety. Industry representatives push back. The Personal Care Products Council asserts: "PCPC and our member companies are fully committed to upholding the highest standards of safety, quality and transparency." But for advocates like Tomlin-Harris, promises aren't enough. "This isn't just a women's issue," she said. "It's a people's issue. Men are affected. Children are affected. Our entire population is being exposed to chemicals we didn't consent to, and we're paying the price." Her message is clear: "We need transparency. We need regulation. And we need accountability from the companies creating these products. It's time to detox our routines, demand safer alternatives and prioritize our health."

Your heart could be aging faster than you are
Your heart could be aging faster than you are

UPI

time17 hours ago

  • UPI

Your heart could be aging faster than you are

The research team theorizes that telling folks their heart age might help spur them to healthier lifestyles and treatment. Photo by Adobe Stock/HealthDay July 31 (UPI) -- Researchers who have developed a new "heart age" calculator say many Americans have unhealthy hearts that are physiologically older than their chronological age, with men faring worse than women. The research team theorizes that telling folks their heart age might help spur them to healthier lifestyles and treatment. "Many people who should be on medicine to lower their risk for heart attack, stroke or heart failure are not on these medications," explained study senior author Dr. Sadiya Khan in a news release. "We hope this new heart age calculator will help support discussions about prevention and ultimately improve health for all people." The new heart age calculator, which is free to the public, is available online. Study findings were published Wednesday in JAMA Cardiology. Khan, a professor of cardiovascular epidemiology, and her colleagues at Northwestern University in Chicago, note that the calculator is based on the American Heart Association's PREVENT equations, which talk about a patient's heart risk in terms of percentages. For example, a doctor might use the equation to tell a patient, "8 out 10 people with your [cardiovascular] profile may have a heart event in the next 10 years." Khan's group hoped that expressing the heart's condition as an age might be easier for folks to grasp. To test the new heart age tool, they applied it to data on 14,000 nationally representative U.S. adults, ages 30 to 79, who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2011 and 2020. None of the participants had any prior history heart disease at the time of the analysis. In most cases, people's heart age was older than the number of candles on their birthday cake. For example, over the whole cohort, women had an average heart age of 55.4 years, compared to an average chronological age of 51.3, the study found. The news was worse for men: Their average heart age was 56.7, compared to an average chronological age of 49.7. Certain demographic factors were in play, Khan's group noted. Among men, for example, nearly a third of those who had achieved a high school education or less had a heart age that was 10 years or more older than their chronological age, the study found. For men and women alike, being Black or Hispanic also tended to widen the gap between heart age and chronological age. "Black men had a heart age 8.5 years older than their actual age, compared to 7.9 years for Hispanic men, 6.7 years for Asian men and 6.4 years for white men," a Northwestern University news release said. "The gaps were 6.2 years for Black women, 4.8 years for Hispanic women, 3.7 years for white women and 2.8 years for Asian women." The key to shrinking these health gaps is prevention, Khan said. She hopes the new tool can help motivate people. "We hope this tool helps doctors and patients discuss risk for heart disease more effectively so we can better inform what therapies can prevent heart attacks, stroke or heart failure events from ever happening," Khan said in the news release. "The important thing is that we have very good options available in our toolbox to help slow that aging down if we can identify it," she added. "This may be even more important in younger people who don't often think about their risk for heart disease." More information Find out more about keeping your heart healthy at the American Heart Association. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store