Media Watch: Monday 30/6/2025
NEW EPISODE
ABC NEWS
Current Affairs
Australian Watch
Article share options Share this on Facebook
Twitter Send this by Email
Copy link
Messenger
It's the show everybody loves until they're on it. Media Watch returns with a new host. Sitting in the hot seat will be four-time Walkley award-winner Linton Besser, an investigative reporter and former foreign correspondent.
New episodes available every Monday night. Add to your Watchlist so you don't miss an episode.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
20 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Adrian Portelli launches new Phillip Island comp after Block snub
Adrian Portelli has snubbed The Block and is switching teams, stripping almost all references to the Nine ratings powerhouse from his latest LMCT+ competition as he prepares to bankroll Channel 7's upcoming reality series My Reno Rules. The Melbourne entrepreneur — who has already splashed more than $30m buying Block homes — went all-in last year when he paid $15m for the entire set of five houses from the show's 2024 Phillip Island season, later giving them away through his LMCT+ empire in a headline-grabbing promotion. Now he's back with a fresh competition, this time offering up to five coastal homes on Phillip Island as separate prizes for multiple winners — but without a single mention of The Block. 'Welcome to LMCT+ World Phillip Island,' Portelli's competition page declares. 'Five sets of keys, up to five winners, five absolute dream homes ready to be claimed … No cash alternatives. No second chances.' The timing coincides with Portelli's confirmation he will defect to Seven's new show, hosted by Dr Chris Brown with celebrity agent Simon Cohen on the judging panel. Simon Cohen co-founded Cohen Handler, the same advocacy where Portelli's former Block ally Nicole Jacobs now heads Victoria. But while Portelli spruiks the campaign as a 'pure coastal takeover', Melbourne buyers' agents warn the reality-TV famous homes could quickly turn into financial traps. Convergence Buyers Agents director and Melbourne Property Podcast co-host Skye Hammer said his advice to any winner would be blunt: sell. 'The first thing we'd do is find the best local agent, sell it, and roll the money into three or four quality Melbourne assets,' Mr Hammer said. 'The land tax alone on these coastal mega-homes can be astronomical. 'Diversifying into blue-chip suburbs like Bentleigh or McKinnon will always deliver stronger growth.' Mr Hammer said Phillip Island lacked the depth to support trophy-home prices. 'Cowes currently has a median of 88 days on market — nearly three months to sell a home — and vendors are discounting by around six per cent to secure a deal,' he said. 'That's not a recipe for quick gains, these homes were designed for showbiz, not for financial security. 'They look amazing, but from an investment standpoint, they're liabilities. They're designed for showbiz, not for financial security.' M R Advocacy director Madeleine Roberts agreed the properties are a very poor investment. 'I wouldn't see them as an investment at all. It's completely emotional, there's no genuine financial upside. If I won one, I'd sell it immediately,' Ms Roberts said. 'A $4m property on the island would attract an annual land tax bill of about $58,000, rising to nearly $85,000 if valued at $5m. 'That's before council rates, insurance, water and maintenance. Ms Roberts said if you add Airbnb into the mix, you're paying cleaning, management, platform fees, and still facing long vacancy periods. People don't factor in just how expensive it is to hold prestige coastal property. 'Short-stay returns across Cowes average about $250-$300 a night with occupancy barely one-third of the year,' she said. 'Even high-end homes rarely exceed 50 per cent occupancy outside peak summer. 'A top-tier holiday home might gross $50,000-$70,000 annually, but once management fees and Victoria's new 7.5 per cent Airbnb levy are factored in, net income can fall closer to $35,000. The five Block homes in Cowes last year sold for $2.6m-$3.5m each, despite PropTrack data showing the suburb's median house price for July 2025 at just $730,000. Ms Roberts said Channel 9's rumoured decision to take The Block to Mt Eliza in 2026 made far more sense. 'Mt Eliza has booming demand, supply is tight, and you can't buy under $1.5m now,' she said. 'The homes will be in one of its best pockets, near top schools and the beach. 'That's a market that will actually grow.'
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
AFL's Snoop Dogg hypocrisy laid bare as Izak Rankine handed season-ending ban for homophobic slur
Warning: This article contains language that some readers may find offensive The AFL world has slammed the league's clear double standards in the wake of Crows star Izak Rankine reportedly being handed a season-ending ban. On Tuesday night it emerged that Rankine will reportedly be handed a five-match ban for an alleged homophobic slur towards a Collingwood player on Saturday night. And while the reported five-game ban will see him miss the remainder of the 2025 season, the same league is paying another man, who has used the same slur in his songs, millions to entertain fans at the AFL's showpiece event, this year's AFL Grand Final. has reached out to the AFL for comment on the situation following the impending Rankine ban. The AFL has long claimed, and rightfully so, that homophobia has no place in its game. But many pointed out it is incredibly hypocritical to ban a star forward for a premiership contender, all while holding a musical artist to a totally different set of standards. Snoop Dogg, real name Calvin Cordozar Broadus Jr, has previously been banned from entering Australia as a result of his long criminal record and music littered with homophobic and misogynistic language. In his song Doggz Gonna Get Ya, his lyrics include the slur that is set to cost Rankine dearly. 'I can't believe that Dogg would dis me, that f****t that punk he soft or sissy,' Snoop says in his 1998 hit. And it has led to former Australian cricketer turned broadcaster KG Cunningham teeing off on the AFL. 'I don't agree for one moment when these comments are made that the players should not be penalised,' he told Adelaide Now. 'But the AFL have done themselves no favour at all when on the one hand their leading artist, on the biggest day in the season, uses these lyrics and has done so many, many times. 'Yet on the other hand, they now see fit to potentially penalise another AFL player for doing exactly the same thing. 'So, where does the AFL stand on this? They're either for it or against it.' AFL fans echoed a similar sentiment on X. 'The AFL is going to cause Izak Rankine to miss a Grand Final for using a word. At that same GF, the AFL is going to be paying Snoop Dogg millions to sing his songs,' one user wrote. 'His songs contain that exact same word. Plus many other offensive words. The AFL's hypocrisy is breathtaking.' While another said: 'So the AFL ban Rankine for the finals for using a homophobic slur a week after booking Snoop Dogg for the finals for $5 million, who uses the same slur in internet posts and lyrics in his songs. Couldn't make it up.' Izak Rankine reportedly handed season-ending ban In Saturday's clash between Collingwood and Adelaide, Crows star Rankine allegedly called his opponent a f****t. It led to the AFL launching an investigation into his conduct, which reportedly concluded on Tuesday, with the league determining the conduct was deserving of a season-ending ban. However, as of Wednesday morning, the AFL has not formally revealed the outcome of the investigation. But Footy presenter Eddie McGuire claimed he had the early mail on the call on Channel 9's Footy Classified on Tuesday night that the Crows star's season was over. 'Izak Rankine's season is over,' he said. 'Tonight the AFL will send a letter to Adelaide and my understanding is the suspension is for five weeks. His season is finished in 2025. 'The Adelaide Football Club will have the opportunity to appeal the sanction, because they could argue it is unjust.'
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Nearly died': AFL WAG Tayla Broad slams price of common cafe item
Influencer and AFL WAG Tayla Broad has sparked fierce debate on social media after slamming the price of the humble babycino. The 28-year-old, who is married to Richmond player Nathan Broad, with whom she shares two-year-old daughter Samara - took to Instagram to share her gripe with the rising price of the children's beverage - which is a cappuccino, sans coffee. Ms Broad, who has over 400,000 followers on Instagram, said that parents of toddlers would be aware that they 'very quickly' become obsessed with the cups of frothed milk. 'I've been pretty much all over my local area and I'm getting a stock standard price of $3.50,' she said. Ms Broad argued that the cost of what' is essentially a few teaspoons of milk is 'insane'. 'That is what they're charging for a babycino for three teaspoons of milk,' she said. 'Is that not just out of this world?' The mum argued that everyone needs to 'band together' to get the prices down, pointing out that a whole litre of milk costs around the same. Ms Broad also shared she has started making babycinos at home to save money, joking: 'I've never sounded more like my father.' A number of other mums remarked that Ms Broad's experience rang true, given the prevalence of cafe culture in everyday life. 'I paid $4 for other day for one. Nearly died,' one shared. 'There needs to be a standard price. In my area it ranges from free with purchase to $4,' another said. A third person described babycino prices as 'robbery', arguing the drink was basically just leftover milk from actual coffees, meaning it should cost $2 at most. Not everyone, however, found Ms Broad's complaint relatable, given her place of relative privilege during a cost-of-living crisis. 'How great must your life be if you're whinging about that? Be grateful,' one said. 'First world problems,' another said. 'Some people would be happy they could afford a babycino,' one wrote, adding Ms Broad should show some 'humility' and claimed the complaint was 'entitled' coming from a WAG.
