logo
Barcelona and Villarreal's LaLiga clash in United States moving closer

Barcelona and Villarreal's LaLiga clash in United States moving closer

Glasgow Times3 days ago
The Spanish football federation (RFEF) confirmed it had given approval to a request from the clubs on Monday.
The federation said in a statement: 'After receiving and checking the documentation received, and after the approval of the board of directors, the RFEF will submit to UEFA the request to begin the procedures for the subsequent authorisation by FIFA for the match to be played at the Hard Rock Stadium in Miami on December 20, 2025, in accordance with the FIFA international match regulations and the implementing rules approved by the RFEF.'
If LaLiga is successful, it will become the first of Europe's 'Big Five' leagues to stage one of its matches outside its own territory.
🚨 𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 | La RFEF dará traslado a UEFA y FIFA de la solicitud para la disputa de un partido de Primera División en Miami
➡️ La Junta Directiva de la RFEF ha dado su visto bueno a la tramitación de la solicitud realizada por @FCBarcelona y @VillarrealCF para la… pic.twitter.com/e9O2B5XVfa
— RFEF (@rfef) August 11, 2025
Premier League chief executive Richard Masters said in April last year his competition had no plans to move matches overseas but accepted FIFA moves to review the rules meant the 'door was ajar' for other leagues to do so.
FIFA first said it was considering changing its authorisation rules on such matches in a statement following a settlement it agreed with Relevent Sports in a court case in the United States in April 2024.
The following month, FIFA said it was forming a working group to 'consider a revised legal framework' governing the authorisation of matches played overseas.
Supporter groups associated with Barcelona and Villarreal issued a post on social media alongside the Spanish football supporters' association (FASFE), saying they wanted to 'express our absolute, total and firm opposition' to playing the match overseas.
They urged the Spanish football federation and the national sports council (CSD) to 'stop this madness'.
The fan groups' statement concluded by warning that, if the project went ahead, they would 'take appropriate legal action to prevent it'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man City trial: what are the 115 Premier League charges?
Man City trial: what are the 115 Premier League charges?

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Man City trial: what are the 115 Premier League charges?

The Premier League investigation that led to 130 charges — it was originally thought there were 115 separate alleged breaches, but there are in fact 15 more — being brought against Manchester City for alleged breaches of its financial rules obtained evidence that was not available to Uefa in its case against the club, or that the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruled inadmissible due to it being time-barred. Almost a year after the hearing started, no verdict has been forthcoming. Here are some of the issues surrounding the case. The Premier League's charges against City include ten of breaching rules 'requiring a member club to include full details of player remuneration in its relevant contracts with its players' over the seasons 2010-11 to 2015-16 inclusive. For each season, two rule breaches are alleged but it has not been confirmed which player or players they relate to. One of those rules says: 'Particulars of any image contract payment in respect of the players shall be set out in the contract with his club.' The other states: 'Full details of a player's remuneration including all benefits to which he is entitled whether in cash or in kind shall be set out in his contract.' In April 2022, eight months after the CAS overturned Uefa's two-year ban, the German publication Der Spiegel published another tranche of emails and documents which raised questions over image rights payments. They included copies of two contracts between an offshore company, DS Management Ltd — owned by Dimitri Seluk, then the agent of the former City midfielder Yaya Touré — and the Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG) which owns City, in relation to image rights. The contracts set out payment schedules of first €4million (£3.45million) and then another £4million due over several years. The Der Spiegel leak also included an invoice asking for the payments to be made to DS Management's Swiss bank account. Sources with knowledge of usual practices have told The Times that if the payments were to cover Touré's image rights, then it should have been City making the payment and not ADUG. In February 2023 Seluk, who no longer works for Touré, told The Guardian there had not been any secret payments to him, adding: 'No, everything was transparent, there was nothing on the back side. I am interested to see what happens as this was a surprise. Yaya paid everything — tax and everything. It was all transparent.' The Premier League charges include eight alleged rule breaches relating to 'full details of manager remuneration in its relevant contracts with its manager' from 2009-10 to 2012-13, when Roberto Mancini was manager of the club. In 2022 Der Spiegel published contracts relating to the employment of the Italian. They showed that his first contract with City was for a base salary of £1.45million — net of tax — but his company in Italy was also paid £1.75million annually for him to work as a consultant for the Abu Dhabi-based club Al-Jazira, for which he had to commit to coaching at the club for four days a year. Emails released by Der Spiegel appear to show his company Italy International Services (IIS) issued quarterly invoices to City, who sent the money to the ADUG, which then passed it on to Al-Jazira to pay it. The leaked documents show the deal with Al-Jazira was witnessed by Simon Pearce, a City director and an adviser to the Abu Dhabi ruling family. Mancini has previously declined to comment when asked about the Al-Jazira contract. There are two main deals involved, one with the UAE telecoms company, Etisalat, and another with the airline, Etihad. Uefa's adjudicatory committee concluded 'it was comfortably satisfied' that Etisalat had been paying £1.5million, which rose to £16.5million, with two payments of £15million in 2012 and 2013 coming as equity funding from ADUG. City insisted that Etisalat repaid ADUG in 2015 but that was not accepted by the committee. However, these charges were ruled as time-barred by the CAS. In relation to the Etihad case, Uefa's adjudicatory committee concluded that the airline paid only £8million towards sponsorship deals worth £35million, £65million, and £67.5million in the 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2015-16 seasons, with the rest coming from ADUG. The majority of the CAS panel decided there was insufficient evidence for the charges to be proven. Critics of Uefa's role in the case have questioned several aspects including: Uefa said that it 'was satisfied with the way the procedure was conducted', adding 'it was imperative to move quickly as Uefa routinely makes every effort to ensure that CAS proceedings related to exclusion are expedited to receive final decisions within the time available. This also aligned with the wishes of the nine Premier League clubs which applied to intervene in the proceedings and were keen that a CAS decision was taken before the start of the 2020-21 season.' Uefa said in a statement that it 'sought a legal opinion regarding a potential appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal. That opinion indicated that the chances of obtaining a 'request for revision' was low and that even in the remote chance that it was granted, Uefa would have limited chances of the appeal itself being successful'. Uefa said: 'Given the CAS decision replaces the CFCB decision of February 2020, it rendered the publication of the CFCB decision moot and it has not been published on the Uefa website, in line with Uefa's consistent publication policy for decisions overturned by CAS. That said, the CAS decision does set out in detail the reasoning of the CFCB decision.' In July 2022, after Der Spiegel had released more emails following the CAS decision, the club said in a statement: 'The questions and matters raised by Der Spiegel appear to be a cynical attempt to publicly re-litigate and undermine a case that has been fully adjudicated, after detailed proceedings and due process, by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. 'Manchester City's policy remains not to comment on out of context materials purported to have been criminally obtained from City Football Group and Manchester City personnel.' In February last year, after the announcement of the Premier League's 115 charges, City said in a statement: 'The club welcomes the review of this matter by an independent commission, to impartially consider the comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence that exists in support of its position. As such we look forward to this matter being put to rest once and for all.' City have previously stated that 'the attempt to damage the club's reputation is organised and clear'. • Britain's Biggest Football Scandal?

Liverpool told Mikel Arteta to blame for transfer heartache after secret Arsenal chat
Liverpool told Mikel Arteta to blame for transfer heartache after secret Arsenal chat

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Liverpool told Mikel Arteta to blame for transfer heartache after secret Arsenal chat

Arsenal completed the signing of Martin Zubimendi from Real Sociedad this summer, but the Spain international was on the verge of joining Liverpool 12 months ago Jamie Carragher thinks Mikel Arteta is the reason Martin Zubimendi didn't sign for Liverpool last year. The Spanish midfielder, who sealed a move to Arsenal this summer, had been on the brink of signing for the Reds in 2024. ‌ Liverpool had arranged a £51million deal with Real Sociedad and agreed personal terms with Zubimendi. Everything was ready to go - until the 26-year-old abruptly pulled the plug on the move at the eleventh hour. ‌ Publicly, Zubimendi claimed his choice was rooted in loyalty to his boyhood team. Carragher, however, suspects a different story. He believes Arteta subtly persuaded the player to wait for Arsenal, planting the seeds for a move to north London long before it was confirmed. ‌ "I'm convinced now that Arteta stole him from Liverpool," Carragher told the Stick to Football podcast. "He'd agreed to come to Liverpool. He said he was coming - and at the last minute he said, 'I don't want to come. I'll have another year [at Sociedad].' "Arteta's from the Basque area. There's no doubt he's been into him and said, 'We're signing [Mikel] Merino this season, we'll come for you next season.' "The deal was done about halfway through the season. He definitely stopped [Liverpool's] deal. That's why Zubimendi didn't go to Liverpool. I think Arteta got into him." Arteta was born in San Sebastian - home to Real Sociedad - and even played briefly for the club, joining from Rangers in 2004 before leaving for Everton just six months later. Fast forward to late 2024, and he was reportedly working discreetly with his former side to secure Zubimendi for £55m. The transfer became official in July, with the Spaniard now expected to feature alongside Declan Rice and Martin Odegaard in a potentially formidable Arsenal midfield. ‌ Missing out on Zubimendi was a major disappointment in an otherwise subdued Liverpool summer transfer window 12 months ago. Federico Chiesa was their only major signing, and the Italian forward found minutes hard to come by. Still, it hardly derailed them - Arne Slot led Liverpool to a dominant Premier League triumph, finishing 10 points ahead of Arsenal to claim the club's 20th league title. ‌ This year, Arteta and Zubimendi aim to close that gap, though Liverpool's heavy summer spending of nearly £300m - on Florian Wirtz, Jeremie Frimpong, Milos Kerkez, Hugo Ekitike, and with deals for the likes of Marc Guehi, Giovanni Leoni, and Alexander Isak potentially to come - makes that challenge steeper. That said, Liverpool's campaign began with a stumble in the Community Shield, losing to Crystal Palace on penalties after a 2-2 draw. Goals from Ekitike and Frimpong, along with an eye-catching display from Wirtz, gave a glimpse of what Slot's retooled side might deliver, but there are perhaps one or two tactical kinks to iron out first.

Rashford status shows Barça plight before La Liga's English-tinged title race
Rashford status shows Barça plight before La Liga's English-tinged title race

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Rashford status shows Barça plight before La Liga's English-tinged title race

La Liga begins again in Girona on Friday evening, a five-day weekend to start it off, and for the first time the division's biggest clubs, every side competing for the title, share a vital weapon: they all have Englishmen in their team. Trent Alexander-Arnold, just Trent now on his No 12 shirt, has joined Jude Bellingham at Real Madrid. Nine players have left Atlético Madrid, but Conor Gallagher isn't one of them. Marcus Rashford has landed in Barcelona, 39 years after Gary Lineker. And Oviemuno Ejaria has just signed a two-year deal at Real Oviedo. Or, if you prefer your obvious jokes to have a slightly different bias, another team for the punchline, Tyrhys Dolan has joined Espanyol. Ejaria is the last in, a three-week trial convincing the coach, Veljko Paunovic, to give him an opportunity at a club returning to the first division 24 years later, joining on the same salary as teammate Santi Cazorla: the €195,000 (£168,100) minimum wage. Alexander-Arnold was the first, two months ago and on 75 times more having arrived for free until Madrid decided they needed him at the Club World Cup and spent €10m to get him an early release. Dolan's arrival intrigues. But Rashford is likely to command the most attention this weekend. If, that is, he plays. If he does not, his will not be the only absence. Not among the Englishmen – Bellingham has finally had an operation on his shoulder and will be out for a couple of months – and probably not among Barcelona's new signings either. Like Dolan and Ejaria, like more than 50 players across the league, Rashford has not yet been registered, a familiar summer story. Many, but not all, should have their paperwork completed in time; Barcelona, who have always found a way to eventually get their players registered, hope they will too. For some of their signings, at least. 'I'm calm; I trust that the club will sort it out,' Rashford said at the start of August as he headed off on pre-season, a new opportunity. 'I'm just concentrating on training and getting in good shape to start the competition.' Two days before his team do in Mallorca – and two weeks before the market closes, margin to balance books – he was still waiting. And if he was confident, part of the reason he has arrived in Catalonia is that not everyone felt the same way. Barcelona wanted to sign Nico Williams, meeting his €58m buyout clause at Athletic Club, but they could not guarantee he would be registered in advance. Rashford was more affordable, less demanding and a player they long admired. Rashford's arrival brings variety and versatility. Able to play in any of the positions across the front – 'my favourite position is on the left … but [it's] a bit of everywhere really' – he offers cover for Lamine Yamal, Raphinha and Robert Lewandowski, who is a week from his 37th birthday. That addresses a feeling that last season they found few alternatives – Ferran Torres apart – to a front three that was superb but also had to play huge amounts of minutes; that perhaps paid for it in the end. Across a whole campaign, that could be significant. Yet in the short term, Rashford's registration was not Barcelona's most pressing, immediate priority. On Wednesday night, none of their summer signings had yet been cleared by the league's strict financial fair play rules, including Joan García, the goalkeeper signed for €25m from Espanyol, or Wojciech Szczesny, the story of last season and any season. Convinced to come out of retirement to win every domestic title, Szczesny has now been convinced to stay on as a sub. As Marc-André ter Stegen is injured, Barcelona face going into the opening game with just one available goalkeeper: Iñaki Peña, who has not played a minute in pre-season. Ter Stegen's injury, though, was more a solution than a problem: if his injury could be judged to be long term, Barcelona will be able to 'use' up to 80% of his salary to register another player, which would be García. That had been the source of conflict: Ter Stegen, seemingly wishing to avoid facilitating his own replacement, refused to authorise the release of his medical details to the league committee making the judgment. Stripped of his captaincy, he eventually backed down, had the armband returned and even gave the speech before Barcelona's club's traditional season curtain raiser – played at the training ground because the Camp Nou is not ready, another deadline missed. On Wednesday night, the league's commission confirmed that they considered the injury long term; Barcelona immediately announced the registration of García, another obstacle overcome. That night Joan Laporta admitted he couldn't be sure that they would get everyone registered for the start of the season but that they were working on it. In the end, with the club waiting on the auditors' clearance of the sale of VIP seats at the new stadium and a sponsorship deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with departures still to be confirmed, he and his board may need to put up personal bank guarantees. Yet if the summer has been difficult off the pitch, missed amid the drama is a steady strengthening, and on it has been different. While there will be a defensive balance to attend to, Hansi Flick expressing frustration at how they let the Inter semi-final escape them last season, Barcelona have continued to blow everyone apart, scoring at five a game in pre-season. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion 'You see how good they were last year but they have that motivation and determination to improve,' Rashford told The Rest is Football podcast. 'They won so many trophies but everyone has forgotten about that now.' At the end of the previous campaign, Lamine Yamal said: 'I told my mum there's another Champions League next year.' Which might not be a promise, exactly, but almost. Which won't be easy, either; in Europe or domestically, even if Lamine Yamal is just about the most exciting player around, handed a new contract, the No 10 and the future. Real Madrid have spent €200m, their biggest outlay in six years, but they have not really had a pre-season, playing only one game since the Club World Cup. The enthusiasm for the structural shifts seen at that tournament was hit hard by their destruction at the hands of Paris Saint-Germain, Xabi Alonso quick to say that match belonged to last season, not this. Shifting a culture is not simple, combining Vinícius Júnior and Kylian Mbappé doesn't appear to be either, and there is still a gap in the middle of their midfield, which they are trying to fill with Arda Güler adapting to a new role. Meanwhile Álex Baena, the outstanding player outside the big three last season, creating more chances than anyone, has joined their rivals across the capital and he didn't come alone. Atlético have spent €175m, a second summer in a row of heavy spending, demanding a challenge that lasts into the spring this time. Gallagher didn't just survive the cut; he appears poised to play a more central role. It is six years since anyone won a title two years running and almost 20 since anyone other than Barcelona did it, last season's certainties tending to slip away swiftly and opponents invariably coming back for more. One thing is for sure and if it's a bold prediction you're after, try this; by the time May comes round, in some corner of a foreign field, an Englishman will lift the league title. Tyrhys, it is your time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store