
Trump and tariffs are (kind of) on the ballot today in Canada. Here's how the race is shaping up in the district north of Spokane
The center-left Liberal Party of Canada had fallen in popularity under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but the party has resurged in the polls since Trump was elected and began referring to the Commonwealth nation as the 51st state and launched a trade war.
The parties agree tariffs are bad for Canada, but propose different visions for the way forward.
Projections favor the Liberals to win a majority of seats in Parliament, but recent polls show their margins tightening.
In British Columbia, a recent collapse of the progressive New Democratic Party is expected to help the Liberal vote. Even in the safely Conservative southeast, projections by 338Canada and Smart Voting show the Liberals overtaking the New Democrats in the Columbia-Kootenay-Southern Rockies riding (similar to a U.S. district), which borders Eastern Washington, Idaho, Montana and Alberta.
For the last election in 2021, the Conservatives won the riding with 43.6% of the vote, the New Democrats had 36.6% and the Liberals had just 9%. Even with a redrawn map that includes New Democrat-leaning Trail, those projections are flipped this year with the Liberals expected to outperform the New Democrats by a similar margin, but the center-right Conservative Party is still expected to win the majority.
Conservative incumbent Member of Parliament Rob Morrison, who was first elected in 2019, said he is concerned about tariffs, but it's not his top issue. Rather, he sees it as part of a larger problem of affordability and inflation.
"Affordability was already a big problem, especially cost of housing," Morrison said at a campaign barbecue Wednesday in Salmo, British Columbia, a town 15 miles north of the border of Pend Oreille County, Washington. "Our biggest issue here is people just want to have more money in their pocket to be able to afford to feed their kids."
Like most Canadians of any political persuasion, Morrison is baffled why Trump picked a fight with his closest ally seemingly unprovoked. He says the best way to deal with it is to put a Conservative government in control to send a delegation to Washington, D.C., to work out a proper negotiation. But even if they come to an agreement, Morrison acknowledges, there's still doubt whether Trump would honor it. After all, the two countries already had a free-trade agreement, the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement, which Trump signed during his first term.
"It's not good for either side," Morrison said. He lives in Creston, about 5 miles north of the Idaho border, and says it's hurting small businesses the most. While Canada negotiates, it should expand to other markets overseas.
Morrison said the "51st state" epithet is insulting, but not a serious threat.
"I'm not afraid that he will bring a tank up to the border," Morrison said. "I'm not worried about that at all. That's not going to happen."
Allan Muus, a Morrison supporter and Creston resident, said the government has overstepped the past 10 years under Trudeau.
"Trump, what he's doing right now, is he's flexing his muscles, throwing a bit of a stick into the world economy," Muus said. "I think the 51st state comment was to wake us up. It's not a nice comment, but in a way it woke us up."
Morrison's Liberal opponent, Reggie Goldsbury, agrees Trump has been a wake-up call, but he takes the threat against Canada's sovereignty more seriously.
"It's not just the threat of tariffs and the economic uncertainty that's ahead," Goldsbury said during an interview in Trail. "It's how the threats of annexation have really driven this movement that we have in Canada."
The former owner of a restaurant in Balfour who now works in the social investment office for the Ktunaxa Nation Council in Cranbrook, Goldsbury said Canada cannot be absorbed into the U.S. and stay the same.
The country is more of a mosaic than a melting pot, and its cultures, ways of life and institutions must be preserved.
"Canadians have pride in that we haven't melted to become American," Goldsbury said.
Mark Carney, the Liberal prime minister, is the right person at the right time to lead the country through the crisis, Goldsbury said. Carney is an economist and central banker who helped manage Canada's response to the 2008 recession, and he has already taken important actions in his first six weeks in office by countering the U.S. tariffs.
"With the tariffs that are coming from the United States, it's making us re-evaluate how we do trade and how we're going diversify because we have to stand strong against the threats of annexation."
Goldsbury said it makes no sense to fight an external trade war without growing trade within Canada by bringing down cumbersome trade barriers between provinces.
"We have free -trade agreements across many countries in the world," Goldsbury said. "However, we don't have free -trade agreements with provinces."
Goldsbury's mother and campaign manager, Robin Goldsbury, who ran as the Liberal candidate in 2019 and 2021, said she has been encouraged by a shift on the ground as Canadians unite against the tariffs.
"Canadians recognize this isn't most Americans," Robin Goldsbury said. "But people in Canada are really worried. It makes me sad because we have been allies and friends. But we have to look out for ourselves. Not that we want to, but we are forced to."
James Hanlon's reporting for The Spokesman-Review is funded in part by Report for America and by members of the Spokane community. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
a few seconds ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
NATO defense chiefs hold virtual meeting on Ukraine security guarantees
NATO defense chiefs were due to hold a virtual meeting Wednesday, a senior alliance official said, as countries pushing for an end to Russia's war on Ukraine devise possible future security guarantees for Kyiv that could help forge a peace agreement. Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone, chair of NATO's Military Committee, said that 32 defense chiefs from across the alliance would hold a video conference as a U.S.-led diplomatic push seeks to end the fighting. U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO's supreme allied commander Europe, will take part in the talks, Dragone said on social platform X. U.S. President Donald Trump met last Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and on Monday hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and prominent European leaders at the White House. Neither meeting delivered concrete progress. Trump is trying to steer Putin and Zelenskyy toward a settlement more than three years after Russia invaded its neighbor, but there are major obstacles. They include Ukraine's demands for Western-backed military assurances to ensure Russia won't mount another invasion in coming years. 'We need strong security guarantees to ensure a truly secure and lasting peace,' Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post Wednesday after Russian missile and drone strikes hit six regions of Ukraine overnight. Kyiv's European allies are looking to set up a force that could backstop any peace agreement, and a coalition of 30 countries, including European nations, Japan and Australia, have signed up to support the initiative. Military chiefs are figuring out how that security force might work. The role that the U.S. might play in is unclear. Trump on Tuesday ruled out sending U.S. troops to help defend Ukraine against Russia. Attacks on civilian areas in Sumy and Odesa overnight into Wednesday injured 15 people, including a family with three small children, Ukrainian authorities said. Zelenskyy said the strikes 'only confirm the need for pressure on Moscow, the need to introduce new sanctions and tariffs until diplomacy works to its full potential.'


Newsweek
a few seconds ago
- Newsweek
Nikki Haley: Trump Needs To Rebuild U.S.-India Relationship
In July 1982, President Ronald Reagan welcomed Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to a state dinner at the White House. Toasting the friendship between our "two proud, free peoples," he said: "although our countries may travel separate paths from time to time, our destination remains the same." Four decades later, the U.S.-India relationship is at a troubling inflection point. To achieve the Trump administration's foreign policy goals—outcompeting China and achieving peace through strength—few objectives are more critical than getting U.S.-India relations back on track. The last few weeks have seen an explosive series of events. The Trump administration has threatened India with 25 percent tariffs for purchasing Russian oil, on top of the 25 percent President Donald Trump already slapped on Indian goods. These developments followed months of rising tension, including over the U.S. role in India-Pakistan ceasefire negotiations. Trump is right to target India's massive Russian oil purchases, which are helping to fund Vladimir Putin's brutal war against Ukraine. India has also traditionally been among the most protectionist economies in the world, with an average tariff rate more than five times the U.S. average in 2023. But India must be treated like the prized free and democratic partner that it is—not an adversary like China, which has thus far avoided sanctions for its Russian oil purchases, despite being one of Moscow's largest customers. If that disparity does not demand a closer look at U.S.-India relations, the realities of hard power should. Scuttling 25 years of momentum with the only country that can serve as a counterweight to Chinese dominance in Asia would be a strategic disaster. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley announced that she would vote for former President Donald Trump during an event at the Hudson Institute on May 22, 2024 in Washington, DC. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 22: Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley announced that she would vote for former President Donald Trump during an event at the Hudson Institute on May 22, 2024 in Washington, the short term, India is essential in helping the United States move its critical supply chains away from China. While the Trump administration works to bring manufacturing back to our shores, India stands alone in its potential to manufacture at China-like scale for products that can't be quickly or efficiently produced here, like textiles, inexpensive phones, and solar panels. When it comes to defense, India's expanding military ties with the United States, Israel, and other American allies make it a crucial asset to the free world's security, and a rapidly growing market for U.S. defense equipment and cooperation. India's growing clout and security involvement in the Middle East could prove essential in helping to stabilize the region as America seeks to send fewer troops and dollars there. And India's location at the center of China's vital trade and energy flows could complicate Beijing's options in the case of a major conflict. In the longer term, India's significance is even more profound. Home to more than a sixth of humanity, India surpassed China as the world's most populous country in 2023, with a young workforce that contrasts with China's aging one. It is the world's fastest-growing major economy—soon to eclipse Japan as the world's fourth largest. India's rise represents the most significant geopolitical event since China's, and is among the greatest obstacles to China's goal of reshaping the global order. Simply put, China's ambitions will have to shrink as India's power grows. Yet, unlike Communist-controlled China, the rise of a democratic India does not threaten the free world. Partnership between the U.S. and India to counter China should be a no-brainer. India and China are unfriendly neighbors that have conflicting economic interests and ongoing territorial disputes, including a lethal skirmish over contested borders as recently as 2020. It would serve America's interests to help India stand up to its increasingly aggressive northern neighbor, both economically and militarily. And it would be a massive—and preventable—mistake to balloon a trade spat between the United States and India into an enduring rupture. If that were to happen, the Chinese Communist Party would be quick to play India and the United States against one another. For its part, India must take Trump's point over Russian oil seriously, and work with the White House to find a solution. As for the United States, the most urgent priority should be to reverse the downward spiral, which will require direct talks between President Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The sooner the better. The administration should focus on mending the rift with India and giving the relationship more high-level attention and resources—approaching what the U.S. devotes to China or Israel. Decades of friendship and good will between the world's two largest democracies provide a solid basis to move past the current turbulence. Navigating challenging issues like trade disagreements and Russian oil imports demand hard dialogue, but difficult conversations are often the sign of a deepening partnership. The United States should not lose sight of what matters most: our shared goals. To face China, the United States must have a friend in India. Nikki Haley, the Walter P. Stern Chair at the Hudson Institute, was US ambassador to the United Nations and governor of South Carolina. Bill Drexel is a fellow at the Hudson Institute. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.


CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
Southern border wall will be painted black to deter people from climbing it during hot weather, DHS secretary says
The wall along the southern border will be painted black in an effort to make the structure too hot to climb, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced Tuesday, saying the suggestion came from President Donald Trump. 'It's tall, which makes it very, very difficult to climb, almost impossible. It also goes deep into the ground, which would make it very difficult, if not impossible, to dig under. And today we are also going to be painting it black,' Noem said during a news conference Tuesday in Santa Teresa, New Mexico, as she stood before the slatted steel structure. 'That is specifically at the request of the president, who understands that in the hot temperatures down here, when something is painted black, it gets even warmer, and it will make it even harder for people to climb,' she said. The black paint will also prevent rust on the steel, said US Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks. The move to paint the wall comes as the Trump administration claims there were just over 6,000 apprehensions at the southern border in June, 15% lower than a previous record in March. The southern border wall was a centerpiece of Trump's hardline immigration stance during his first term. Now in his second term, Trump's focus has largely shifted to deportations and heightened enforcement within the US. Noem didn't say how much it would cost to paint the wall, but the administration secured about $46.5 billion in funding through the Trump-backed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to modernize the border barrier system, including completing construction on 700 miles of primary wall. The government is building approximately half a mile of barrier each day, Noem said Tuesday. 'The border wall will look very different based on the topography and the geography of where it is built,' she explained. Noem also noted the department's deployment of 'water-borne infrastructure' and advanced technology, such as cameras and sensors.