
Nigeria's landmark Wildlife Protection Bill poised to disrupt global trafficking networks
When Dr Mark Ofua's father was a boy, he would sometimes be late to school — not because he was lazy, but because he had to wait for herds of elephants to finish crossing the road. That was only a generation ago. 'I grew up in the same community,' says Ofua, a Nigerian wildlife veterinarian, 'and there is not a single elephant left.'
On 28 May, Nigeria took a critical step toward preventing more such losses. Its House of Representatives passed the Endangered Species Conservation and Protection Bill, 2024 through its third reading. The Bill now moves to the Senate, with widespread support and expectations of speedy passage before the year ends.
It's a historic move for the country and, according to experts, for all of west Africa.
Nigeria has become a major global hub for wildlife trafficking. According to the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), the country has been linked to the smuggling of more than 30 tonnes of ivory since 2015 and more than 50% of the pangolin scales seized globally between 2016 and 2019. These products often flow through Nigeria from countries across west and central Africa and are exported to Asia.
'It all comes back to Nigeria,' says Ofua, who helped draft the Bill. 'Traffickers bring ivory and pangolin scales from all over West Africa — even the Congo — and ship it out from Nigeria. If we can change the game here, we can change the game for the whole region.'
Until now, wildlife crime in Nigeria has thrived under toothless legislation. According to Ofua, previous laws carried fines so paltry — less than a dollar in some cases — that traffickers saw them as little more than business costs. 'I would rather traffic elephant tusks, pay the fine when caught, and continue,' he says. 'There were no jail terms. No deterrents.'
Enforcement agencies, too, were limited. Some parts of the older legislation were adapted directly from international trade laws and didn't even cover domestic wildlife crimes. Even when seizures occurred, prosecutions frequently collapsed due to delays, undertrained judges or corruption. 'Cases would drag for years, until the person in charge retired, got transferred or died,' Ofua recalls.
Perhaps most demoralising of all were the scenes of impunity. 'You would see Nigerian police escorting foreign buyers into wet markets to purchase illegal wildlife products,' says Ofua. 'How do you convince the sellers it's a crime when the law enforcers themselves are involved?'
New era for Nigeria's biodiversity
Sponsored by Terseer Ugbor, the deputy chair of the House Committee on Environment, the legislation dramatically strengthens Nigeria's response to organised wildlife crime. In Ugbor's words, 'This Bill sends an unambiguously clear message that Nigeria will not tolerate the use of its borders for trafficking of illegal wildlife products, such as pangolin scales and ivory, to foreign markets.'
The Bill includes:
Stricter penalties, including custodial sentences of up to seven years and proportionate financial penalties for minor and major infractions;
Asset forfeiture provisions, allowing courts to recover profits gained through wildlife crime;
Environmental reparations, such as tree-planting and other restoration efforts;
Expanded investigative powers, enabling law enforcement to conduct intelligence-led probes and track financial transactions;
Faster judicial processes, aimed at ending the prolonged legal stagnation of wildlife cases; and
Alignment with international treaties, including Cites and the UN conventions on corruption and organised crime.
'It's a beautiful piece of legislation,' says Ofua. 'It addresses all the loopholes. It empowers investigators. It brings in financial tracking. And it puts teeth in the judiciary.'
The Bill has drawn praise from major conservation organisations. Tunde Morakinyo, the executive director of Africa Nature Investors Foundation, called it 'a testament to Nigeria's firm commitment to strengthening wildlife governance and combating trafficking.' EIA's Mary Rice said it 'demonstrates Nigeria's commitment to regional security and tackling international trafficking networks'.
Peter Knights, the CEO of Wild Africa, said: 'This is a great step forward for Nigeria to lead the region in combating wildlife crime.'
Enforcement readiness
Even the best law is only as strong as its implementation. But Ofua is optimistic. 'I have consulted for the Ministry of Environment and customs for over a decade,' he says. 'In the last year or two, I've seen a high level of readiness and commitment.'
Recently, he participated in a groundbreaking event: the release of two pangolins into a national park after they were seized at an airport. 'That had never been done before,' he notes. 'Customs officials brought them to me for rehabilitation and we released them together. That's the new Nigeria we want.'
Ofua says customs is currently working with Wild Africa and training new canine units for ports and borders.
'Until now, agencies were shackled by bad laws. But this new Bill clearly spells out their roles and promotes inter-agency cooperation. Once it's passed, they'll be free to act.'
The urgency is clear. Nigeria, like many parts of west Africa, has suffered catastrophic biodiversity loss. 'We used to have cheetahs, rhinos, even the Big Five,' says Ofua. 'In just one generation, much of it has vanished.'
He believes this legislation is the beginning of a long-overdue shift. 'I've been to southern and east Africa. It's like a spiritual recharge seeing wildlife thrive. But here in west Africa, we've been left behind. This Bill could change that.'
The next steps are Senate ratification and presidential approval. So far, the process has been unusually smooth, especially for Nigeria, where some environmental Bills have languished for more than 15 years.
'This Bill has not met any opposition yet,' says Ofua. 'The delays were only because of other national emergencies like flooding and security issues. But with the level of support we're seeing, I believe it will become law before the end of the year.'
And when it does, the ripple effects could be felt across the continent.
'This is Nigeria's chance to lead,' says Ofua. 'If we rise, others will follow. And maybe, one day, our children will see elephants again — not in books, but in the wild.' DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Gauteng MEC to visit Maponya Mall to assess ongoing tensions in public transport sector
Gauteng MEC to visit Maponya Mall to assess ongoing tensions in public transport sector Gauteng MEC for Roads and Transport, Kedibone Diale-Tlabela, will visit Maponya Mall on Thursday to assess ongoing tensions in the public transport sector, engage with affected stakeholders, and review the situation on the ground. This is according to the South African Government News Agency ( The visit follows a violent incident on Wednesday at the mall, allegedly involving taxi operators and e-hailing drivers, which resulted in one fatality and left two others injured. ALSO READ: One dead in suspected taxi violence at Maponya Mall In response to the growth of e-hailing services, President Cyril Ramaphosa signed an amended National Land Transport Act (NLTA) 5 of 2009 into law last year, allowing e-hailing operators to apply for operating licences in the same manner as other public transport providers. @sowetourbannews Community blocks roads following e-hailing violence at Maponya Mall, Soweto Protestors march in support of e-hailing drivers after a e-hailing driver was killed in a suspected taxi violence attack on August 13. Workers of Maponya Mall also came out in numbers in their uniform to join the protest. 📹: @ #maponyamall #klipspruit ♬ original sound – Soweto Urban News – Soweto Urban News The National Land Transport Act was originally presented to the president in 2020 but was returned to the National Assembly for reconsideration. The revised Bill updates the Act to reflect developments since its implementation, simplifies provisions, and resolves issues that have arisen. ALSO READ: WATCH: Community protests after the death and injuries of e-hailing drivers It also makes allowances for non-motorised and accessible transport and expands the minister's powers to introduce regulations and safety measures. The Gauteng Department of Roads and Transport continues to monitor the situation closely and aims to ensure the safety of commuters while maintaining order in the sector.

IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Macua demands urgent withdrawal of the Mineral Resources Development Bill
Members of the Mining Affected Communities United in Action (Macua) gathered outside the offices of the Mineral and Resources, in Pretoria, to make submission against the proposed Mineral Resources Development Bill. Image: Supplied The Mining Affected Communities United in Action (Macua) has called for the withdrawal of the current proposed Mineral Resources Development Bill, saying it should be restructured and rebuilt with the people at the centre. The organisation held a protest in five provincial offices of the Mineral and Resources across the country on Wednesday, to make submissions opposing the draft bill. The provinces include Pretoria (Gauteng), Klerksdorp (North West), Emalahleni (Mpumalanga), Polokwane (Limpopo), and Welkom in the Free State. The Bill was published for public comment on May 20, 2025, with a submission deadline of August 13, 2025. It aims to ensure policy and regulatory certainty, enhance investor confidence, reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies, and improve turnaround times for mining rights, permits, and regulatory approvals, as well as formally recognise artisanal mining and advance transformation in the mining sector. However, in its submission, Macua said this is no milestone for those who bear the brunt of mining's footprint, those who live with the dust, displacement, environmental degradation, and broken promises. The organisation said the Bill fails to deliver justice, equity, or transformation. The submission document stated that despite extensive, legally grounded submissions from Macua, the MPRDA Coalition, Centre for Applied Legal Studies (CALS), and other civil society partners, including constitutional benchmarks, legislative proposals, and community-authored clauses, core inputs have been ignored, and the result is a Bill that not only omits the tenets of post-apartheid justice but also reconfigures the regulatory architecture to entrench exclusion under the guise of reform. 'Nowhere is this betrayal more evident than in the Bill's refusal to enshrine Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) for communities residing on communal and customary land. The Constitution, IPILRA (Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act), and landmark rulings such as Maledu and Baleni affirm that land rights holders must provide informed consent, not merely be 'consulted', before mining can proceed,' said Macua, adding that the Bill entrenches a weak and discretionary consultation model that lacks enforceability. 'Worse, it omits any recognition of customary governance systems or collective land rights, ignoring the lived realities of rural, informal, and traditional communities,' the organisation said. Independent Media tried to get a comment from the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources, but spokesperson Johannes Mokobane said he was in the meeting and will revert. The submission also stated that this is not a legislative oversight, but a deliberate political choice and one that aligns with the interests of extractive capital rather than those of historically dispossessed communities. Macua said this paves the way for forced removals, land dispossession, and State-sanctioned displacement without community control. Macua added that the Bill was not based on meaningful public consultation and it has ignored the differential impact of mining on women and landless people, adding that it offers no impact analysis of removing community protections. 'Using such a shallow and exclusionary process as the evidentiary foundation of the law is indefensible.' The submission document stated that the Bill provides no framework for displacement, resettlement or restitution. Despite years of documented abuses, including relocations without compensation, dispossession of burial sites, and community fragmentation, the Bill sidesteps the issue entirely. 'This silence perpetuates spatial injustice, especially in the context of the government's Critical Minerals Strategy, which targets new zones for extraction in areas like the Waterberg, Sekhukhune, and Pondoland without safeguards,' said Macua. The organisation said it proposed statutory protections against forced removal, minimum compensation standards, as well as environmental and social planning obligations tied to land tenure, but all were ignored. Macua said the Bill introduces a new artisanal mining permit under Section 27A, but it is a deeply flawed and exclusionary instrument that fails to reflect the realities of informal mining communities or support meaningful transformation. According to Macua, while the Bill appears to empower the minister to identify areas for artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM), this authority is purely discretionary and is not accompanied by any procedural requirements, designation criteria, or support structures. The organisation said there is no legal obligation to map, consult, or designate zones where ASM can operate lawfully and sustainably.

IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Communities rally against the Draft Mineral Resources Development Bill, fearing increased marginalisation
The Mining Affected Communities United in Action (Macua) says the proposed draft Mineral Resources Development Bill, 2025, betrays the transformation objectives fought for during the liberation Struggle. Image: Supplied As South Africa is preparing to commemorate the Marikana Massacre, the Mining Affected Communities United in Action (Macua), says communities are still excluded from crucial decision-making related to mining and its impact on their lives, and that the proposed draft Mineral Resources Development Bill, 2025, would further perpetuate the assault. This exclusion perpetuates a cycle of marginalisation and inequality, where communities bear the brunt of mining's negative impacts without benefiting from the resources extracted from their land. The Draft Bill was published for public comment on May 20, 2025, with a submission deadline of August 13, 2025. The Bill aims to ensure policy and regulatory certainty, enhance investor confidence, reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies, and improve turnaround times for mining rights, permits, and regulatory approvals, as well as formally recognise artisanal mining and advance transformation in the mining sector. However, Macua said the Bill, as currently drafted, betrayed the transformation objectives fought for during the liberation Struggle. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The organisation said instead of advancing democratic participation and justice, the amendments entrench the power of mining companies and marginalise the voices of communities. Macua, which is expected to make a submission today (August 13), added that Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe and his department are failing in their constitutional duty to ensure meaningful consultation, participation, and protection for communities directly affected by extractive activities. 'We refuse to be treated as spectators to decisions that determine the fate of our land, our water, our health, and our economic sovereignty,' stated the organisation. The department on Monday said it was working on a response. Spokesperson Johannes Makobane on Tuesday said a response was going through internal processes. Macua spokesperson Tholakele Thabane said submissions would be made in five provincial offices of the Mineral and Resources. The provinces include Pretoria (Gauteng), Klerksdorp (North West), Emalahleni (Mpumalanga), Polokwane (Limpopo), and Welkom in the Free State. 'This submission and our collective resistance take place on the 13th anniversary of the Marikana Massacre, when 34 mineworkers were gunned down for demanding a living wage. It also comes just eight months after the state engineered the mass starvation and abandonment of over 100 artisanal mineworkers in Stilfontein, whose lives were treated as disposable,' said Thabane, who added that these moments are not isolated incidents, and that they are part of a broader pattern of the state-backed violence, neglect, and the criminalisation of poor, black mining communities. South Africa will commemorate the 13th anniversary of the Marikana Massacre on August 13, 2025. The tragedy happened at the Lonmin Platinum Mine in Marikana, North West, on August 16, 2012. The event, which involved a police shooting during a strike, resulted in the deaths of 34 miners and injuries to many more. By physically delivering its submissions to the Mineral and Petroleum offices, Macua said it is making it clear that it refuses to be sidelined, ignored, or tokenised. The organisation stated that this action is a collective refusal to accept the ongoing exploitation, marginalisation, and environmental destruction that the proposed Bill threatens to worsen. 'This is not just a symbolic gesture; this is a necessary act of resistance. It is a direct and deliberate intervention by communities to assert our constitutional rights to be heard, to be consulted, and to influence the laws that govern our land and resources. 'We are not merely stakeholders; we are the rightful custodians of the land, and our voices must shape the policies that impact our lives,' said Thabane. The organisation said the Bill also fails to reflect the lived realities of mining-affected communities and was compiled without genuine community participation, adding that it goes directly against the recommendations of the SA Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), which has repeatedly called for the full legal recognition of mining-affected communities and for mechanisms that guarantee community ownership, benefit-sharing, and protection from exploitation. 'Far from advancing transformation, the Bill removes critical protections and omits key obligations that previously existed, such as the requirement for community ownership under the Mining Charter. This exclusion, among others, strips communities of their economic agency and ensures they are left poorer and more vulnerable, while mining companies are further empowered,' said Thabane. He added that the Bill also fails to establish artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) as a viable and legitimate economic pathway for communities, and will continue with the criminalisation of artisanal miners, enabling state and police violence through laws that mirror operations like Vala Umgodi.