
UN Experts Urge Brazil To Halt Serious Regression On Environmental Licensing
'The bill introduces significant regressions to Brazil's environmental licensing system and threatens the human rights to life, health, an adequate standard of living, and a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment,' the experts said.
The approved licensing bill PL No. 2159/2021 includes measures such as simplified environmental licensing through developers' self-declarations and automatic renewal of permits. Several activities would also be exempt from licensing despite potentially severe environmental and human rights impacts, including industrial agriculture and energy-related infrastructure.
'These changes risk exacerbating the planetary crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, toxic pollution, and worsening inequalities. They would also weaken the rights to access to information, public participation, and access to justice, particularly for marginalised peoples and groups,' the experts said.
They stressed that the licensing amendments would disproportionately affect Indigenous Peoples, and Quilombola Afro-descendant communities, who are already severely impacted by environmental and climate harms, violating Brazil's obligations of non-discrimination.
'While procedural efficiency in environmental licensing is important, it must not be achieved at the expense of effective regulations, controls and monitoring, and accountability, and human rights and environmental protections,' the experts said.
They noted that Brazil's obligations to prevent significant environmental harm by public and private actors, including to prevent transboundary environmental harm, encompasses conducting comprehensive and integral environmental, social and human rights impact assessments before authorising any activity that threatens human rights or the environment.
'This legislative rollback contradicts Brazil's international legal obligations,' the experts said. 'It is paradoxical that this law might be enacted shortly after historic Advisory Opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which clarified States' obligations to adopt all necessary measures to respond to the climate emergency and prevent harm by all actors, including effective regulation and supervision relating to fossil fuels, agriculture and deforestation.'
The experts reaffirmed that the principle of non-regression is fundamental to international human rights and environmental law, requiring States to refrain from weakening existing legal protections. 'As the ICJ and the IACtHR underscored, States have an enhanced due diligence obligation to protect the climate system and the environment on which all human rights depend, and must prevent irreversible harm to the climate and life-supporting systems,' they said.
The experts warned that the bill would undermine Brazil's credibility as the host of the upcoming COP30, the 2025 UN Climate Change Conference in Belém. As a global climate leader, Brazil must ensure that its domestic legislation is aligned with its international commitments, including under the Paris Agreement.
We call on President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to veto parts of the licensing bill that contradict Brazil's constitutional and international obligations. Protecting the environment is essential to safeguarding the rights and dignity of present and future generations.
* Experts:
Astrid Puentes Riaño, the Special Rapporteur on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment;
Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation ;
Elisa Morgera, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change;
Bina D'Costa, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent;
Albert K. Barume, the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples;
Pichamon Yeophantong, the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Hostage videos show emaciated Israelis, Hamas blames Israel for starvation
David's sister, Ye'ela, said watching the clip of her emaciated brother felt like 'one million punches to the heart'. She pleaded with the public not to share the images, as her mother and other brother had not yet seen the footage. Earlier on Thursday, the Islamic Jihad terrorist group released a video of hostage Rom Braslavski, 21, also looking emaciated. The terror group claimed the six-minute video was recorded days before it lost contact with the captors holding Braslavski, saying it did not know what had happened to him. His mother, Tami, said the terrorists had 'broken' her son. 'They broke my boy. I want him home now. I know how many beatings he is taking. Look at him. Thin, limp, crying. All his bones are out. Don't cry over the children in Gaza. Cry for Rom. Have compassion for the hostages,' she told Israeli media Ynet. With two hostage videos released in 24 hours, both of which blame Israel for starving the people of Gaza, Hamas seeks to increase international pressure on the Israeli Government. Aid agencies, including the UN, are warning that hunger and malnutrition may have reached a tipping point, raising fears of mass starvation. Israel has denied accusations of starving Palestinians, instead pointing the finger at the UN for failing to collect and distribute the food that enters through border crossings. US President Donald Trump said this week that starvation was happening in Gaza, despite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's denials. 'You can't fake that,' he said on Tuesday, adding that he was 'not particularly' convinced by his ally. Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy, spent five hours visiting controversial aid distribution sites in the war-battered enclave on Friday. Witkoff, the first senior official to visit Gaza since the war began, said that what he learnt would help Washington 'craft a plan' to get more food and aid to Palestinians. On Friday, 126 aid packages, containing food for the residents of the southern and northern Gaza Strip, were airdropped by France, Spain, the UAE, Jordan, Egypt and Germany, the Israel Defence Forces said. Witkoff and Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador for Israel, toured one of the four sites run by the controversial Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Aid agencies have accused the foundation of contributing to the hunger crisis. More than 1300 people seeking aid in Gaza have been killed since GHF took over aid operations in late May, according to the UN, most of them shot by Israeli forces 'in the vicinity' of the aid hubs. GHF has denied the claims. Israel claims Hamas is looting aid for its own fighters, thus enabling accusations the Jewish state is deliberately starving Palestinians. Hamas denies this. Eli Sharabi, an Israeli former hostage, testified before the UN Security Council in March that 'Hamas eats like kings, while hostages starve'. Sharabi said: 'I saw Hamas terrorists carrying boxes with the UN and UNRWA emblems on them into the tunnels, dozens and dozens of boxes, paid for by your Government. They would eat many meals a day from the UN aid in front of us, and we never received any of it.'


The Spinoff
3 days ago
- The Spinoff
Calls grow for NZ to take a stand on Palestinian statehood
Canada, the UK and France are on the brink of recognising Palestine – so why is New Zealand still holding back, asks Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Pressure mounts as allies take a stand New Zealand is coming under increasing pressure to recognise Palestine as a state, as key allies signal they're preparing to do just that. On Wednesday, foreign minister Winston Peters joined 14 other counterparts in signing a statement declaring their 'willingness or positive consideration' of Palestinian recognition. But Peters, backed by prime minister Christopher Luxon, made clear that formal recognition won't happen any time soon, reports RNZ's Craig McCulloch. In parliament this week, Peters argued that 'if we are to recognise the state of Palestine, New Zealand wants to know that what we are recognising is a legitimate, representative, viable political entity'. His caution hasn't stemmed the growing chorus of criticism. Former prime minister Helen Clark said that on the statehood issue, New Zealand has been hamstrung by its desire not to upset the US. 'That is no longer tenable,' she told Morning Report. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson was more blunt: 'History will judge Aotearoa if we fail to do what is right at this pivotal moment. It's time for the government to make a clear stand for human rights and for justice, and recognise Palestine as a state.' A shifting international tide New Zealand's hesitation comes as other liberal democracies move towards recognition. Canada on Thursday became the third country in a week to announce it will recognise Palestine, following similar pledges from France and the UK. Britain's promise is conditional on Israel allowing more aid into Gaza, ending its annexation plans and committing to a two-state peace process. As the UK foreign secretary David Lammy pointed out in a speech to the UN this week, Britain carries a particular responsibility to Palestine due to its colonial-era role in shaping the modern Middle East, beginning with the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Support for a two-state solution, he said, should be viewed as part of that legacy. Currently, 147 of the UN's 193 member states recognise Palestine; that number is poised to grow in the coming months. In Australia, prime minister Anthony Albanese is 'preparing the ground' for recognition, reported the ABC, but has indicated he wants to choose a moment that will have the most impact on peace prospects. The case for economic pressure In a powerful article for The Spinoff this week, New Zealand journalist Cole Martin – currently based in a refugee camp in the occupied West Bank – accused the government of offering only 'empty rhetoric' in the face of Israel's ongoing assault on Gaza. While New Zealand has signed joint statements and imposed targeted travel bans on a handful of Israeli officials, Martin says it has taken no significant action in 21 months to deter what he describes as 'genocidal' violence and apartheid policies. Martin argues that 'meaningful disruption is essential', and that economic pressure – including divestment, sanctions and boycotts – is among the most effective non-violent tools available. 'Global economic sanctions played a pivotal role in ending apartheid in South Africa,' he wrote. 'The same tools must now be applied to Israel.' What else can New Zealand do? While sanctions and trade restrictions are the most obvious tools available, they're not the only ones. Auckland University law professor Treasa Dunworth, writing for The Conversation, outlines several other ways New Zealand could demonstrate its opposition to Israel's conduct and support for Palestinian rights. These include creating a special visa pathway for Palestinians seeking family reunification, launching an inquiry into New Zealand's intelligence-sharing with Israel via the Five Eyes network, and withdrawing from Operation Prosperity Guardian, the US-led naval coalition in the Red Sea. Dunworth also points out that New Zealand could act unilaterally to refer Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court for the use of starvation as a weapon of war. Each of these steps, she argues, is legally and diplomatically feasible – but all require political will. The question now, as more peer nations act, is whether New Zealand's government is willing to move beyond words.

RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Scientists urge coalition not to weaken methane target
The group has written to Climate Change Minister Simon Watts setting out the legal and trade consequences of a lower methane target. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Climate scientists have urged the Climate Change Minister to not weaken the country's methane target, after a landmark ruling out of the United Nations' highest court. Last week, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found countries can be held responsible for paying reparations for damage caused by their greenhouse gases. At the time, Lawyers for Climate Action said the ruling put further pressure on the government's climate plans, including any changes to the biogenic methane target. The group has now written to Simon Watts, cc'ing the prime minister, foreign affairs minister and trade minister, setting out the legal and trade consequences of a lower target. In the letter, they say reducing the target would breach New Zealand's obligations under the Paris Agreement, as well as its free trade agreements with the United Kingdom and the European Union. They maintain it's "highly arguable" local agricultural exporters would have an unfair advantage over European producers if New Zealand lowered its methane target, putting around $635 million of export revenue at risk. They also say a lower target would see New Zealand join the likes of Russia and the United States in being one of the few countries to weaken its emissions reduction targets since the Paris Agreement was signed in 2016. "Any such decision could have significant reputational, trade, and economic consequences for New Zealand, as our major trading partners continue to push forward on their Paris Agreement commitments," the letter says. Asked if the government planned on reducing the methane target, Watts said Cabinet hadn't made any decisions and he'd have more to say about it "soon". "Our methane target must be scientifically based and practical, ensuring we don't shut down kiwi farms," he said. Lawyers for Climate Action chief executive Jessica Palairet said the EU had the ability to take trade sanctions against New Zealand if it thought it had breached its climate commitments. "That's why this matters so much and the reason we wrote last week is because for the first time, we had authorised guidance from the world's top court on what it might mean for a party to effectively implement Paris, what it might mean to take an action that materially affects the object and purpose of Paris. "We're concerned that a weakening of New Zealand's methane targets would do just that and expose New Zealand to the risk of trade sanctions." Palairet said an earlier letter , in which 26 international climate change scientists accused the government of "ignoring scientific evidence", showed the strength of concern felt in her community. "It underscores the level of international concern and concern from the scientific community and how worrying this decision is. This isn't a decision that's being made on the basis of science. "It's a decision that's being made on the basis of politics to try and weaken New Zealand's ambition on methane in the face of international independent scientists advising the government not to do this." Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Green Party has been critical of the National-ACT coalition agreement to review what a methane target based on a "no additional warming" principle would look like. Co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said the fact the government would not rule out weakening the country's methane target after this review was "deeply concerning". "We said at the time that they were setting up a smoke screen for downgrading climate ambition and unfortunately given the minister's lack of ability to rule things out it is pretty clear that they are intending to downgrade our climate ambitions. "If they were to downgrade our biological gasses target that would mean either that they are downgrading ambition as a whole or that they are expecting all of the rest of the economy and households to pick up the slack." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.