At least five killed in 'intense' Russian strikes hit Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia regions
One person was killed in a strike targeting the city of Lozova in the Kharkiv region that hit critical infrastructure, including high-rise buildings and a residential area, the city's mayor said, calling it the "most intense attack" on the town since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in early 2022.
"Sadly, people have been injured, including two children. Rescue workers, medics and emergency services are working at the scene. We are documenting the consequences," Serhii Zelenskyi said.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russia launched a ballistic missile and nearly 50 UAVs against Ukraine, the majority of which were Iranian-made Shaheds and their Russian equivalents.
More than 25 hit Lozova in eastern Ukraine, he added. The strikes damaged a railway, including a depot and a station and left parts of the city without electricity.
In the Zaporizhzhia region, four people were killed and three injured, according to Governor Ivan Federov.
Russia carried out "431 strikes on 16 settlements" in the Zaporizhzhia region, Federov wrote on Telegram, saying the attack struck residential buildings, homes, commercial buildings and warehouses.
Zelenskyy said two people were injured in the village of Bilenke. "Once again, the Russian army is hunting civilians in an attempt to terrorise frontline cities and communities," the Ukrainian president added in a post on X.
The strikes come as Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff is set to travel to Russia, days before the end of the deadline for Moscow to reach a ceasefire deal with Ukraine or face significant US tariffs.
Trump has ramped up pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a truce as Moscow continues to strike Ukrainian towns and cities, shortening a previous deadline of 50 days to 8 August.
Despite this, Russia has continued to strike Ukraine overnight with additional attacks on the Odesa and Sumy regions, Zelenskyy said.
"Pressure must be increased, and this will undoubtedly contribute to peace," he stated. "We look forward to meaningful and decisive steps." — Euronews
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
5 minutes ago
- Arab News
G7 under growing scrutiny on its big birthday
The international relations landscape this summer has been unusually busy — from the Trump tariffs to geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Yet, underneath the global radar screen, one of the world's longest-standing institutions, the G7, has celebrated the half-century of its founding. While the G7 has its critics, in many respects it has been a successful institution during the five decades since the club's first summit in 1975. Alongside other bodies, including NATO, it has helped underpin in the post-1945 era one of the longest periods of sustained peace in the West's modern history. However, in the period since at least Donald Trump's first US presidency from 2017 to 2021, tensions within the club have become more apparent, giving rise to the moniker of the 'G6 plus 1.' This was shown in 2018 when Canada hosted a hugely disruptive, tumultuous year of G7 diplomacy. In June that year at the club's leadership summit, Trump refused to endorse the end of summit G7 communique, and called for Russia's re-entry into the club of advanced industrial democracies when it was the G8. Yet, other G7 members are opposed to this. So, there is little sign that Moscow, which joined the G8 summits from 1997 to 2014, will be invited back into the club while Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in office. Burden sharing has long been a sore spot Andrew Hammond On a range of issues from trade to climate change, the US is dividing from key Western partners at a time of significant geopolitical and international economic turbulence. While these fissures within the G7 did not begin with Trump, they have been exacerbated by his presidencies. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, there have been a series of intra-Western disagreements over issues ranging from the Middle East, including the Iraq War opposed in 2003 by France and Germany, through to the rise of China, with some European powers and the US disagreeing over the best way to engage the rising superpower. There have been disputes over burden sharing, which has long been a sore spot, not least as the US has paid for about two-thirds of total NATO defense spending. US presidents other than Trump have previously urged all NATO allies to boost military expenditure. Yet, despite occasional discord, key Western nations generally continued to agree around a broad range of issues until the Trump presidency. These include international trade under the WTO rules-based system; backing for a Middle Eastern peace process between Israel and the Palestinians along the so-called Oslo Accords from 1993; plus strong support for the international rules-based system and the supranational organizations that make this work. Today, however, more of these key principles are being disrupted during Trump's second term, which, if anything, is more disruptive than his first presidency. This includes trade tariffs, where the US is at odds with all of its G7 partners: Canada, the UK, Japan, France, Germany, and Italy. In the midst of this important change, the G7 has also evolved as an organization. Its original mandate in the 1970s was to monitor developments in the world economy and assess macroeconomic policies. Trump's presidencies have widened divisions Andrew Hammond However, it has become a key security lynchpin over time. At the recent G7 meeting, for instance, geopolitical topics included Ukraine's long-term prosperity and security; regional peace and stability in the Middle East; cooperation to increase security and resilience across the Asia-Pacific region; building stability and resilience in Haiti and Venezuela; supporting enduring peace in Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo; and strengthening sanctions and countering hybrid warfare and sabotage. To be sure, economic issues were also on the agenda, but these often are shaped nowadays by security issues and are geoeconomic in nature. This included building energy security and accelerating the digital transition, including fortifying critical mineral supply chains. This agenda has come to higher prominence since Moscow's military invasion of Ukraine in 2022 which exposed the huge reliance of Europe, in particular, on Russian energy. Since then, there has been an intensified emphasis by advanced industrialized economies to diversify dependence for raw materials driving a recent series of major trade deals, including the EU-Mercosur agreement. Reflecting this global focus, a wider range of world leaders have been invited to summits in recent years. Other attendees at this year's G7 forum included Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, and India Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The G7's involvement in this multitude of geopolitical dialogues is not without controversy given its original macroeconomic mandate. For instance, Beijing strongly objects to G7 discussion of security issues in Asia, let alone internal issues in China. It is sometimes asserted, especially by non-Western countries, that the G7 lacks the legitimacy of the UN to engage in these international security issues, and/or is a historical artefact given the rise of new powers, including China. However, it is not the case that the international security role of the G7 is new. An early example of the lynchpin function the body has played here was in the 1970s and 1980s when it helped coordinate Western strategy toward the Soviet Union. Moreover, following the September 2001 terrorist attacks, the then G8, including Russia, assumed a key role in the US-led 'campaign against terrorism.' Taken together, the G7 can claim some big successes on its 50th birthday, despite the splits within the club. While some of these pre-date Trump, his presidencies have widened these divisions into what have become the largest strains in the G7's long history. • Andrew Hammond is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics.
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
US Backs Israel's Gaza Offensive Amidst Global Concern
US President Donald Trump has placed the responsibility for Gaza's future squarely on Israel's shoulders, indicating that Washington is providing tacit support for Israel's plans to intensify its military offensive in the war-torn Palestinian territory. While many European and Arab leaders urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to reconsider his approach, Trump has effectively granted him the freedom to act, regardless of potential backlash from the international community. Israel's Military Strategy Against Hamas After nearly two years of devastating conflict, Israel's security cabinet approved Netanyahu's strategy to 'defeat' Hamas following the attack on southern Israel on 7 October, 2023, which triggered the current war. When asked about supporting such a plan, Trump emphasized his focus on increasing humanitarian aid to Gaza, stating, 'As far as the rest of it, I really can't say — that's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday echoed Trump's sentiments, asserting, 'Ultimately, what Israel needs to do for Israel's security will be determined by Israel.' These comments reflect a clear US strategy: since ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas collapsed, Washington has aligned closely with Israel's perspective. This shift followed US envoy Steve Witkoff's visit to Israel last week. While the US has increased pressure on Israel to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza, it has also insisted on the release of all Israeli hostages held by Hamas. US Vice President JD Vance articulated these goals during discussions with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, stating, 'We want to make it so that Hamas cannot attack innocent Israeli civilians ever again, and we think that has to come through the eradication of Hamas.' Challenges in Securing a Ceasefire Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has consistently supported Israel, even while advocating for improved humanitarian assistance. However, he appears to have abandoned efforts to secure a ceasefire after repeated mediation failures. Talks in Doha collapsed last month when Hamas refused to agree to a deal for releasing hostages. Currently, Hamas holds 49 Israeli hostages, with 27 presumed dead. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, known for his provocative remarks, criticized those who oppose Israel's Gaza strategy. He questioned whether Israel should 'surrender to Hamas' while its hostages suffer. Huckabee's comments came in response to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who labeled Netanyahu's approach as 'wrong.' In his EWTN interview, Rubio acknowledged the media's focus on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He expressed concern over the lack of attention given to the plight of the remaining Israeli hostages. As the situation evolves, Washington has sharply criticized international efforts to formally recognize a Palestinian state, particularly those led by French President Emmanuel Macron. US officials argue that such recognition could embolden Hamas and hinder peace efforts. Short link : Post Views: 23
Saudi Gazette
5 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Russia confirms Putin-Trump summit Aug. 15 in Alaska
MOSCOW — Russian presidential aide Yury Ushakov confirmed Saturday that Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump will meet on Aug. 15 in the U.S. state of Alaska to discuss options for achieving lasting peace in Ukraine. Ushakov highlighted the logistical advantages of Alaska as the summit venue, citing its proximity to Russia across the Bering Strait. 'The American side has just announced an agreement reached to arrange a meeting between the presidents of Russia and the U.S., Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, on Aug. 15, Friday, in Alaska. Russia and the U.S. are close neighbors, sharing a common border. It seems quite logical for our delegation simply to fly across the Bering Strait and for the important and anticipated summit of leaders of these two countries to take place precisely in Alaska,' he told reporters in Moscow. Trump earlier announced on Truth Social that he would meet Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15, marking their first in-person meeting since Trump returned to the White House in January. Ushakov noted that Alaska and the Arctic region are natural areas of shared interest for both nations, with the potential for large-scale bilateral projects. Still, he said, the focus will be on Ukraine. Preparations for the summit are already underway, with both sides committing to what Ushakov described as 'a challenging process' of intense political and logistical coordination. The Kremlin said it expects the next presidential meeting after Alaska to take place in Russia, adding that an invitation has already been extended to Trump. — Agencies
