Intel Panther Lake-H CPU hits max turbo power of 64W — mobile chips' leaked specs point to substantial power draw
Hardware leaker Jaykihn has shared what's believed to be the preliminary power specifications for Intel's upcoming Panther Lake-H CPUs, which are set to be used later this year in a new slate of laptops and mobile devices, which were previously shown off at CES 2025.
The alleged preliminary spec details three variants of chips within the series, denoting performance, efficiency, and Xe3 cores. These chips are set to be based on Intel's upcoming Celestial architecture. They will likely materialize as Intel's Core Ultra 300H series, and the alleged preliminary power specifications allow some speculation about the kinds of devices the company will target.
The first variant shows off a 16-core chip with a 4+8+4 configuration. Assuming this means four performance cores, eight efficiency cores, and four GPU cores. This specific configuration will likely reside in systems alongside a dedicated GPU. PL1 (Performance Base Power - PBP) and PL2 (Maximum Turbo Power - MTP) in both baseline and performance power modes will pull 25W and 64W- respectively.
The 4+8+4 configuration has notably fewer efficiency cores than its previous-gen counterparts. The same can be said for the second variant listed, featuring a 24-core configuration split into 4+8+12. This may indicate its suitability for a higher-end device with four performance cores, eight efficiency cores, and 12 GPU cores. The PBP is listed at a baseline of 25W, with an MTP of 55W. In the 'performance' mode, this changes to 25W and 64W, respectively.
The cTDP Max headroom on both chip configurations lists higher wattages, up to 80W MTP. This might imply that both chips have some headroom built for burst-heavy tasks like rendering. However, they are also set to be more efficient than the Core Ultra 200H series, which could boost into 100W+ territory.
The final listing is for a seemingly lower-end eight-core chip with a configuration of 4+0+4. This will likely be the Core Ultra 300U chip, set to be used in entry-level devices or gaming handhelds. This configuration can run with a PBP of just 15W and an MTP of 44W under the 'baseline' power mode, while it boosts up to a similar 25W PBP and 55W MTP under the 'performance' mode.
This tells us that Intel is starting to get serious about efficiency in its mobile chips. While AMD has long held the efficiency crown for x86 mobile devices, this initial power spec may be a step in the right direction for Intel. AMD has gained ground on Intel in both the desktop and laptop CPU market, with competition fiercer than ever. Intel's Panther Lake H CPUs will be produced in volume on the company's 18A (1.8nm-class) process in 2H 2025. The products are expected to be on shelves in early 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Even more details of the Pixel Watch 4 have leaked, including some key upgrades
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. More Pixel Watch 4 information has leaked We can see new sensors and charging contacts The wearable should launch on August 20 The Pixel Watch 4 is almost certainly going to be unveiled alongside the Pixel 10 series and the Pixel Buds 2a on Wednesday, August 20 – though Google has only confirmed the date, not what's being launched – and a new leak gives us more information on the wearable. Images posted to Reddit (via 9to5Google) show what look to be official marketing slides for the Pixel Watch 4, detailing features such as improved durability, battery life, and activity tracking accuracy – courtesy of a "Gen 3 sensor hub". That would be an upgrade on the sensors we saw with the Google Pixel Watch 3, and should mean better precision in readings such as heart rate – though we won't know for sure until we've actually had an opportunity to try it out. We also get another look at the rather unusual side charging system that showed up in an earlier leak, with charge contacts positioned on the side of the watch casing: it would appear this is how you'll be able to charge up the Pixel Watch 4. 'Technological advancements' There's plenty of positive phrasing in these marketing materials, as you would expect. The watch apparently brings "significant technological advancements" over its predecessor, together with a "premium crafted design". The battery life is listed as reaching 30 hours between charges, which is said to be a 25% boost over the current model. Better battery life had already been mentioned in previous leaks, so we're hopeful in that particular department. There's also mention of the two expected watch sizes, 41 mm and 42 mm, while Gemini integration is mentioned, as well as "dual frequency" GPS – which suggests the wearable will be more accurate and faster in reporting its location. Together with the rest of the leaked information that's also emerged in recent days, it looks as though the Pixel Watch 4 could be an appealing prospect, when it's finally confirmed – and perhaps worth a spot on our best smartwatches list. You might also like The Pixel Watch 4 could improve repairability These are the best Android smartwatches You may have to wait to buy the Pixel Watch 4
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
After testing 10 fitness trackers this year, here's the one I can't live without
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As TechRadar's resident fitness guinea pig, I'm on the hook every time a new fitness gadget needs to be tested in-house. Consequently, I've tried loads of new fitness gadgets, from the best heart rate monitors to smart rings, and if I'm not at my laptop in TR Towers, I can usually be found in the gym or on a run. However, by far the most common categories are fitness trackers and smartwatches, wrist-based devices used to track exercise, sleep and recovery. So far, I've tried 10 of these in 2025. I've reviewed many of the best smartwatches and best fitness trackers released this year, but those I haven't, I've still worn for at least a few days to gauge the effectiveness of their fitness and health tracking features. In no particular order, the trackers I've tested (which have been released this year so far) are: Garmin Instinct 3 Garmin Venu X1 Suunto Run Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Samsung Galaxy Watch8 Classic Whoop MG Honor Watch 5 Ultra OnePlus Watch 3 Amazfit Active 2 This encompasses a variety of price points, formats, and features. There are cheap fitness trackers like the Fit 3 and Active 2, expensive ones like the Venu X1 and Watch8 Classic, and a screenless recovery band in the Whoop MG. The one I'm still wearing? The Samsung Galaxy Watch8 and Whoop MG both made very strong cases to occupy that coveted regular spot on my wrist. The Watch8 has excellent smartwatch features, great running metrics, and like the Venu X1, is lovely and slim. However, I'm often not using a Samsung phone, so I don't get the best of the Watch8, and the Venu X1 has a few extra tools like its built-in torch and the Primary Race widget that give it the edge. The Whoop MG's comprehensive recovery metrics and detailed health analysis are rich, and offer great scope for workouts, particularly the gym with its excellent workout builder. However, its lack of GPS and screen means that for detailed running and route analysis, it's not the all-in-one solution I look for. The Garmin Venu X1 has the best of all of the above. The running insights and route creation mechanics are great, its recovery tools such as the Training Readiness score are useful, and it's chock-full of fun little tools like the built-in LED torch and full-color maps. It's slim and the fabric strap, combined with the cambered stainless steel back, curves and sits comfortably on my wrist. Without the always-on display enabled, you get a full week of battery life between charges, more than either the Watch8 or Whoop MG. Overall, I find myself wearing it more than any of the 10 new trackers I've tried so far this year. That's not to say the others aren't worth buying: quite the opposite. But as a runner looking for a slim fitness tracker with detailed route management and recovery metrics, the 4.5-star Venu X1 hits the spot for me. You might also like... Do you struggle on hikes? Here are 5 essential gym moves to strengthen your legs, glutes and core Fresh Google Pixel Watch 4 leaks may give us our best look yet at the upgraded sensors and charging system Garmin Venu X1 review: The most innovative Garmin watch in years, and a genuine Apple Watch Ultra rival
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 of the best fitness trackers without a paid-for subscription tier – which means no Garmins or Fitbits
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Anyone who's interested in getting a fitness tracker could probably tell you how tough it is to pick one at the moment. Choosing one of the best fitness trackers or best smartwatches means doing a lot of research – for example, which devices will work with your phone? Out of those devices, which are best-suited to track your favorite exercises? How do you avoid overpaying, and why do you need to pay for a subscription after buying a watch? Many people buy a fitness tracker or watch not realizing they're only buying partial access to their data. While most fitness trackers come with a certain amount of free features, you can often unlock more comprehensive analysis or new tools via one of those monthly subscriptions. Don't get me wrong: Fitbit Premium is a first-rate app, and we gave it 4.5 stars in our official review. Likewise, Whoop, a fitness tracker that is only available as part of an ongoing premium subscription, is extremely comprehensive (and for many people, worth the high price paid in perpetuity). Oura, one of the best smart rings, has a membership program that allows you to get the best of its features, including an AI-powered Advisor service. However, Garmin introduced its new Garmin Connect Plus premium tier, and that certainly didn't go down well with its users. Storing data is expensive, especially in the age of AI, and I can understand why smart tech companies would like an additional revenue stream. But there are plenty of users who don't want access to their own data sold back to them, and instead wish for a device that works as advertised at the point of purchase. That's why below, I'm recommending a trio of fitness trackers that I really like, and have personally used, without a subscription tier. Whether you're after a cheap, mid-tier or premium fitness tracking option, picking up one of these will ensure you only need to pay once for a top-notch tracking experience. 1. Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 By far the cheapest fitness tracker on our list at $59 / £49 / AU$139, the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 is an impressive Fitbit alternative: it's cheaper, packs in loads of features, and Samsung Health requires no subscription. Fitbit, on the other hand, has a free app, but you only unlock all the features with a monthly or yearly payment. We gave the Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 four stars out of five in our review, citing its "simply brilliant value, though, with a lovely screen, clear stats and encouraging insights to help you improve your everyday health". It's worth noting there's no GPS here, so might not be the best option for dedicated runners. It's also worth noting Samsung Health's subscription-free status also applies to all the best Samsung watches and the Samsung Galaxy Ring, so if you're looking for a smartwatch or smart ring, you have subscription-free options there too! 2. Coros Pace 3 While its closest competitor Polar has recently introduced a subscription-based Fitness Program, Coros continues to fly the 'pay once and be done with it' flag. There are plenty of outstanding Coros devices available, from seriously chunky adventure watches like the Vertix 2 to arm-mounted heart rate monitors, but my personal favorite is the Coros Pace 3, which we named our best cheap running watch and has continued strong in this capacity for nearly two years. It represents outstanding value as a low-power fitness tracker, with an extremely light weight, comprehensive running and recovery metrics, and a staggering 24-day battery life. It's not really a lifestyle smartwatch, but as a fitness tracker for runners, it's devilishly hard to beat in terms of value at $229 / £219 / AU$399. 3. Apple Watch Ultra 2 The cream of the crop: one of the best smartwatches in recent memory, and our top choice for the best Apple Watch overall. While Apple does have a subscription in Apple Fitness+, that is purely to access its library of follow-along workout content on your phone or smart TV: when it comes to analyzing your data, or creating new on-watch features, Apple has kept its Health and Fitness apps completely subscription-free. Of course, that also apples to the more affordable Apple Watch SE 2 and Apple Watch Series 10 watches too, which in addition to the Ultra make up Apple's current wearables line-up. However, in keeping with the theme of cheap-to-middle-to-premium, if you want the best, you need the Watch Ultra 2. While the battery might not be much to write home about, its wealth of features, slick-to-use operating system, the ability to add the watch to your data plan, and its smorgasbord of third-party fitness apps and integrations make it an obvious premium pick. You might also like... I review fitness trackers for a living – here's the best one I've tried in 2025 My biggest marathon regret was not paying attention to my training plan, and it cost me my time – twice Do you struggle on hikes? Here are 5 essential gym moves to strengthen your legs, glutes and core
