logo
Misleading ATO statement could have put trio in jail for a decade

Misleading ATO statement could have put trio in jail for a decade

The Age15-07-2025
A misleading witness statement tendered to court by an ATO officer that could have sent three innocent Australians to jail has been uncovered.
The document was discovered by businessman Jae Jang through Freedom of Information laws and will now form part of an independent investigation by the Tax Ombudsman into a decade-long case first exposed by A Current Affair and published by this masthead.
ATO officer Anthony Rains was the lead investigator in the criminal prosecution of Jang and two of his employees, Gold Coast-based Debbie and Bill Ingleton.
The trio were charged in late 2017 with conspiracy to defraud the Australian Taxation Office, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years' jail.
Jang was arrested just days before Christmas that year, and may have spent three weeks in jail had extradition to Queensland been successful.
After 2½ years with strict bail conditions, the charges were dropped with 'no evidence to offer'.
It can now be revealed that a witness statement, tendered by another ATO officer, appears to have had a crucial line added to it by Rains.
'Anthony Rains is the criminal investigator taking witness statements, he should be independent,' Jang said.
'However, in this case, it's clearly shown that he has actually written that for the witness, which, in my view, is totally wrong.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NT government expands role of G4S private security guards to support overcrowded watch houses
NT government expands role of G4S private security guards to support overcrowded watch houses

ABC News

time9 hours ago

  • ABC News

NT government expands role of G4S private security guards to support overcrowded watch houses

In an expansion of private prison staff responsibilities in the Northern Territory, Department of Corrections employees have heard the duties performed by private security firm G4S will be increased. In March, the NT government signed a six-month contract with G4S to manage the transfer of Darwin prisoners. G4S security guards currently help to transfer inmates between prisons and the courts, as territory correctional staff face record prisoner numbers. Despite a recruitment drive for 202 new corrections officers to be employed inside prisons this financial year, NT Corrections Minister Gerard Maley has previously acknowledged the prison population is growing and that the government needs to expand the workforce. In an internal memo seen by the ABC, corrections staff were told Corrections Commissioner Matthew Varley had signed a work order to expand the duties carried out by private security guards. "As we shape this next phase, we are working closely with G4S to determine what a Northern Territory-based G4S staffing model could look like." The United Workers Union (UWU), which represents corrections officers, has been strongly opposed to the NT's six-month arrangement with G4S since it began in March. UWU NT branch secretary Erina Early said although G4S guards had been assisting with prison transfers since that time, corrections staff had not seen any improvement to their working conditions. "It hasn't made much change to our correctional officers at all because the [prisoner] numbers are increasing," she said. "Bringing in G4S may relieve a couple of shifts, but it's not having the outcome that the government [is] hoping for." Ms Early said union members were worried for "the safety of the prisoners and also safety of the police" — who have a different skillset to correctional officers — and held concerns the expansion of G4S's services signalled growing privatisation in the NT's corrections system. "They've been saying this since it was announced by Commissioner Matthew Varley, that G4S were coming in — as soon as you have them in, it's like a cancer, they will spread," she said. "They have been taking more and more roles." Corrections Minister Gerard Maley last month told the ABC that privatising the entire NT prison system was not on the government's radar. "There are private firms that run prisons in their entirety, that's not our plan at all," he said. "Our plan is to make sure that we have highly trained officers behind the wire, and then independent contractors such as G4S doing the services outside that." The NT's corrections department has been housing a growing number of prisoners in police watch houses in recent months, due to capacity constraints at territory prisons. Earlier this week, there were about 100 people being held inside the Palmerston police watch house, including overflow corrections prisoners. G4S is part of American private security giant Allied Universal, which employs more than 800,000 people internationally and generates about $20 billion in annual revenue. The company describes itself as a "global leader in security". Security guards employed by G4S in Australia mainly work in prisons and detention centres. The firm has operated Victoria's largest maximum security prison, Port Phillip Prison, since it opened in 1997. A 2018 report by the Victorian auditor-general's office found "serious incidents" at Port Phillip Prison, including assaults and drug use, and "exposed weaknesses in how G4S … manage safety and security risks". A Victorian coroner recently recommended G4S improve staff training following the "preventable" 2022 death of an Aboriginal man in his prison cell. Port Phillip Prison is due to close by the end of this year. Last year, G4S reached a confidential settlement with the parents of an Iranian asylum seeker, who was fatally bashed by guards at a Manus Island offshore detention centre in 2014. The company was also fined over its role in the death of an Aboriginal elder, who overheated in the back of a prison van in remote Western Australia in 2008. It is not yet clear how much the NT government's contract with G4S has cost the public.

The $200 trick criminals use to turn some Australians into 'money mules'
The $200 trick criminals use to turn some Australians into 'money mules'

SBS Australia

time11 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

The $200 trick criminals use to turn some Australians into 'money mules'

Criminals are offering Australians as little as $200 to rent out their bank accounts, turning people into "money mules". The Australian Federal Police (AFP) warned this week that renting, selling or sharing your bank account details is illegal and can expose you to serious risk, even if you don't realise a crime is being committed. The AFP said in many cases, people are offered between $200 and $500, or promised a cut of the transferred funds, simply for receiving and passing on money through their personal bank accounts. That money is often funnelled through cryptocurrency platforms or withdrawn in cash to make it harder to trace. AFP detective superintendent Marie Andersson said criminals rely on everyday Australians to help move their money. "It is illegal to rent, buy or sell bank accounts, and doing so supports the criminal ecosystem," Andersson said. "Your account may be housing money derived from scams, extortion, drug trafficking and terrorism." The AFP said a 26-year-old woman was jailed in April this year as part of a money laundering syndicate which used money mules in Sydney and Melbourne to pick up and deposit cash — which was alleged to be the proceeds of criminal activity — into bank accounts. These accounts were used to launder $3.8 million in proceeds of crime, which were ultimately transferred overseas. Mule accounts a 'key tactic in a criminal's playbook' According to the Commonwealth Bank, many people who act as money mules are not aware they are doing anything wrong. Some are recruited through job scams or social media ads offering easy income, while others are approached by friends or acquaintances. Young people, students and new arrivals to Australia are often targeted. An example of a money mule scam text message. Source: Supplied / Commonwealth Bank Australian Banking Association CEO Anna Bligh said mule accounts were a key part of a scammer's business model and banks were focused on identifying, investigating and shutting them down. "Using mule accounts to hide and move stolen money around is a key tactic in a criminal's playbook," Bligh said. "I urge Australians to steer clear if you've seen an advertisement or are approached to rent or sell your bank account. There's a good chance you're being recruited to hide the profits of criminal activity." To stay safe, the AFP and banks recommend: Never sharing your bank account or login details with anyone Avoiding job offers that involve receiving and forwarding money. Reporting anything suspicious to your bank, Scamwatch or ReportCyber.

Bruce Lehrmann's claim phone call recordings were 'illegally obtained' in Toowoomba rape case dismissed
Bruce Lehrmann's claim phone call recordings were 'illegally obtained' in Toowoomba rape case dismissed

ABC News

time14 hours ago

  • ABC News

Bruce Lehrmann's claim phone call recordings were 'illegally obtained' in Toowoomba rape case dismissed

Former Liberal Party staffer Bruce Lehrmann will not pursue a claim that recordings of phone calls between his former lawyers and Queensland police were "illegally obtained". Mr Lehrmann is facing two counts of rape which are alleged to have occurred in Toowoomba in October 2021. He was not present in the Toowoomba District Court for a pre-trial hearing on Friday where his Sydney-based lawyer Zali Burrows appeared on his behalf. Ms Burrows's application for a "declaration that intercepted phone calls between the 30-year-old's lawyers and Queensland Police Service (QPS) [were] illegally obtained" was due to be heard in the court today. But within 40 minutes of the hearing getting underway, Ms Burrows withdrew the claim, which was then formally dismissed by order of Judge Benedict Power. The defence application related initially to four telephone conversations — two between a police officer and Mr Lehrmann's former lawyers and two between a police officer and legal receptionist. Ms Burrows's decision to withdraw the application came after Judge Benedict Power put a set of propositions to her including that it was quite usual for police and defence lawyers to discuss a matter. Ms Burrows agreed with all of his points. She also agreed there might be circumstances in which a defence lawyer may unknowingly breach legal privilege in such a conversation. Judge Power asked Ms Burrows if she agreed that to succeed in her application, the recording of the conversation must be illegal under either Queensland or federal law -- which it is not. Ms Burrows replied that in future she would not enter into any phone conversations with any Queensland officers and would confine all communication to writing. Judge Power asked Ms Burrows whether she no longer wished to press her claim. "Yes, Your Honour … I will simply refuse to speak to police on the phone and confine it to writing," Ms Burrows replied. The Sydney-based lawyer repeated this outside court, telling reporters: "All I can say is it's another world in the state of Queensland. " Ms Burrows denied it had been a legal tactic. "It wasn't a legal move, but can I just say we got some very important material today received on return of subpoena which will certainly support our stay application." In court, Ms Burrows also told Judge Power that her client was yet to decide whether to pursue a jury or judge-alone trial. "Mr Lehrmann has not made a decision yet," Ms Burrows said. Judge Power urged Ms Burrows and the parties to move to set a trial date for the matter. But before that can occur there are more hearings related to defence applications to receive unredacted versions of police notebooks and diary entries and from the forensic download of the complainant's mobile phone. Mr Lehrmann will also pursue a permanent stay of the charges against him when the matter returns to court next month. The case has been before the Toowoomba District Court on numerous occasions amid wrangling between the Crown and defence over disclosure of the police brief of evidence against Mr Lehrmann. He has not yet been required to formally enter a plea to the indictment, but it is understood he will defend the charges. The matter returns to court for mention on July 31 and for a hearing on August 28.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store