Fear of a global recession is now the main economic worry among Irish households
It has jumped ahead of both the cost of housing and rent, and inflation, as a major worry for consumers, according to the latest Bank of Ireland's Savings and Investment Index.
Plans by US president Donald Trump to impose tariffs and the threats to economic growth from the conflict in the Middle East mean geopolitical events are taking centre stage for householders.
Bank of Ireland's Savings and Investment Index for the second quarter of this year shows concern about a global recession was the number-one worry for 21pc of those surveyed.
This is up 8pc on the last survey in the first three months of the year.
Housing and rental costs continue to dominate concerns faced by younger age groups
The concern is highest among those aged 30 to 59, and among professional/managerial groups.
Housing and rental costs continue to dominate concerns faced by younger age groups. Some 28pc of 16 to 29-year-olds cited the cost of housing/rent as their biggest worry.
Another 24pc of this age group view inflation and the cost of living as their biggest concern.
There was a fall in the proportion of people who say they are saving and in those who believe they are saving enough.
The Savings and Investment Index dropped to 87, down from 94 in the first three months of this year.
Investing habits remained largely unchanged, with an increase in the amount being invested compared with last quarter. Despite this, more than half of consumers believe stock markets will be lower in the next six months.
Chief investment strategist at Bank of Ireland Kevin Quinn said: 'The increase in concerns about global recession comes at a time when geopolitics has taken centre stage, so it's the first time we've seen this come to such prominence in our survey.'
Mr Quinn said global investment markets had experienced a steep downturn in April and headlines about an effective trade embargo had dominated those weeks.
'Markets have recovered significantly since then with a powerful rally from mid-April onwards, but that hasn't moved the dial for Irish households yet,' he said.
'With tariffs dominating public discourse up until quite recently and the Israel-Iran conflict now to the fore, it's little surprise that these concerns are prominent.
'It's also no surprise to see housing concerns and the cost of living remaining uppermost amongst younger age groups.'
Having reached a recent high in the first quarter of this year, attitudes to saving dropped in the second three months.
There was a drop in those saying they are saving
The Savings Index was 87 in the second quarter, down nine since the first quarter.
There was a drop in those saying they are saving and a drop in those who think they are saving enough, a near-term low.
Mr Quinn said that after eight interest rate cuts from the European Central Bank, many savers may feel that the rewards on offer are likely to drop.
In addition, it is possible Irish households are saving less and spending more, with an eye on what tariffs might do to import prices.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
23 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Advisors key to business restructuring
Financial distress rarely arrives overnight. Margins erode, cash weakens, and boardroom optimism obscures early signs of danger. It is in these moments, before insolvency sets in, that expert advisors make the difference between survival and shutdown. Legal and restructuring specialists agree: the earlier the intervention, the wider the recovery options. Shane Harron, partner at Dillon Eustace. 'The biggest mistake companies make is leaving it too late,' says Shane Harron, partner at Dillon Eustace. 'They often hope to trade their way out of difficulty, but that usually leads to more trouble than may have been necessary.' This reluctance is especially acute among SME directors, who may hesitate to incur advisory costs even when solvency concerns are already visible. Under Irish law, the test for insolvency remains simple: can the company pay its debts as they fall due? If not, directors are required to act in the interests of creditors, not just shareholders. 'This has now been given a statutory footing since 2022,' Harron notes. 'If directors become aware of insolvency, they must act to preserve assets for the benefit of creditors.' Red flags and missed signals There is no single indicator of distress, but signs often compound. Harron points to declining profits or difficulties in meeting essential services like rent or electricity. More subtle signals include late payments to key suppliers or unexpected tax arrears. 'Some of the early warning tools include the strategic maintenance of accounting records, regular financial projections, and a consistent analysis of debts and liabilities,' he says. These steps form part of the Companies Act's early warning framework, aimed at alerting directors to financial danger before it escalates. Alan Large, partner in EY's Turnaround and Restructuring Strategy group, adds: 'Typical early warning signs include breaches of financial covenants, deterioration in EBITDA performance, and sustained negative cash flows.' He also cites key non-financial triggers such as unplanned management departures or persistent customer churn. Stephen Scott, head of Restructuring & Recovery at S&W. David O'Connor, partner at BDO, points to behavioural clues. 'Margins may decline, staff turnover might spike, or creditors go unpaid, but often companies don't connect the dots. They just hope it's a bad month.' Stephen Scott, head of Restructuring & Recovery at S&W, is clear: 'Businesses do not fail because of short-term lack of profitability, they fail because they run out of cash.' Yet many companies continue operating without updated forecasts or real-time visibility of their working capital. That can turn a salvageable situation into a terminal one. David O'Connor, partner at BDO. The case for early external advice All four advisors are unanimous: bring in professionals early. 'Ideally, if directors are apprehensive about solvency, they should engage an experienced insolvency practitioner as soon as possible,' says Harron. Delay reduces strategic options and can increase legal exposure. 'Companies may only face one major crisis in a generation. We deal with them all the time,' says O'Connor. That perspective allows advisors to help with prioritisation, from critical payments and staff communications to negotiations with banks and landlords. Scott notes that for SMEs especially, outside advisors can break decision-making deadlock. 'Directors may feel that nobody knows the business better than them, but expert advice brings not just restructuring knowledge but also a third-party perspective that cuts through noise.' Early advisor engagement also protects directors. Large explains: 'If a business continues to trade while insolvent and incurs further losses, directors may face restriction or disqualification. Professional guidance helps avoid that.' Assessment and Triage The first phase of any restructuring advisory engagement is diagnosis. Harron explains: 'We investigate the company's financial affairs, taking account of assets, liabilities, income and obligations. We assess whether insolvency has occurred, and what rescue options may be available.' O'Connor's team focuses on operational fit. 'We examine whether the company is structured for today's market, not yesterday's. You'd be surprised how many firms carry legacy overhead from products or divisions they no longer run.' That mismatch often emerges in underused space, bloated wage bills or historic debt that no longer reflects business realities. 'You might have €500k in rent but only two-thirds of the space in use. Or staff working legacy roles in departments that have shrunk. That needs to be rebalanced quickly,' O'Connor says. Formal Rescue Options Where viable, companies can enter formal rescue procedures. In Ireland, examinership and the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (SCARP) dominate. Both give legal protection from creditor action while a survival plan is developed. The difference lies in scale and cost. 'Examinership is court-led and suited to larger companies,' Harron explains. 'SCARP is more streamlined and avoids court unless objections arise. It's designed for SMEs.' The process begins with the appointment of an independent expert. 'We provide the initial report in both examinership and SCARP,' says O'Connor. 'That assessment determines whether there is a reasonable chance the company can survive as a going concern.' If accepted, creditors are grouped into classes and vote on a rescue plan. Once approved, by court or process adviser, those classes are bound, including dissenters. Executing the plan Execution demands discipline. 'Advisors play a key role in identifying non-essential expenditure that can be reduced or eliminated,' says Large. Often this includes exiting loss-making contracts, trimming staff costs, or negotiating revised terms with suppliers. Scott highlights the importance of cash control. 'We help businesses strengthen credit procedures, engage constructively with lenders, manage phased supplier payments, and prepare detailed short-term cash forecasts.' Forecasting has become non-negotiable. 'Many companies operate in an information vacuum,' says Scott. 'That's no longer acceptable in a restructuring context.' Common mistakes Restructuring is not linear. It can unravel if boards are divided or if directors fall into wishful thinking. 'We sometimes see directors continue trading in the hope of a miraculous turnaround,' says O'Connor. 'That usually just deepens the hole.' Large adds that hostility between directors, shareholders or lenders often derails otherwise viable plans. 'Restructuring requires cooperation and transparency. A confrontational approach delays progress.' Another risk is poor record-keeping. Harron warns: 'Directors must maintain clear board minutes showing the rationale for decisions taken. Those records become critical if the process fails and leads to liquidation.' Insolvency proceedings often trigger scrutiny of directors' conduct, something legal advisors are best placed to manage. As Harron says: Where a company goes into insolvent liquidation or receivership, the liquidator must file a report with the CEA (Corporate Enforcement Authority) and consider whether to bring restriction proceedings against the directors.' These proceedings assess whether directors acted 'honestly and responsibly' in the lead-up to insolvency. If they are found lacking, courts can impose a five-year restriction on holding directorships, or in more serious cases, disqualification. Harron emphasises the importance of pre-emptive action. Directors should keep accurate books and records, seek professional advice at the earliest sign of financial trouble, and document decisions thoroughly. These steps form a crucial defence if proceedings are later initiated. While there is no legal obligation to place an insolvent company into liquidation at the first sign of distress, delay increases exposure. Harron notes that 'the strategic maintenance of accounting records, regular financial projections and a consistent analysis of debts and liabilities' form part of the Companies Act early warning framework, tools that, if properly used, can guide directors through uncertainty and reduce personal risk. Strategic outcomes Sometimes the path is salvage. O'Connor shares a recent case: 'A national food chain entered examinership. We prepared the independent expert report, and the court appointed an examiner. That gave them space to restructure. It protected jobs and kept the brand alive.' Other times, value is recovered even in liquidation. Harron notes a case where the company had lost its overseas licence. 'The liquidator reinstated the licence, completed manufacturing, and extracted higher value than by simple asset sale. Creditors benefitted.' Governance, ESG and structural complexity Modern restructuring involves more than cash and contracts. Governance, ESG and tax efficiency now feature prominently. 'Governance failures are closely examined in formal processes,' says Large. 'Sophisticated lenders now ask about ESG and strategic alignment before funding.' Group structures also require scrutiny. 'Even mid-sized businesses can have overly complex structures that add cost and risk,' says Scott. 'Restructuring presents a chance to streamline and unlock value.' Strategic restructuring is about timing, clarity and decisive action. Directors who confront distress early and engage advisors improve their odds of recovery. Those who delay may find that the path to rescue has narrowed or closed entirely. In today's climate, where cash runs tighter and lender tolerance is thinner, that distinction can be fatal.
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Astellas invest €129 million in its Kerry and Irish operations
Astellas is currently building a new €330 million facility in Tralee and has an existing facility in Killorglin. It is one of Japan's largest life sciences companies and a leading developer and manufacturer of pharmaceutical products globally. Minister Foley welcomed the investment in its Irish operations in Kerry and Dublin over the next three year. Astellas is starting the process of building a new drug product fill facility in Tralee, creating 120 new jobs. Additionally, more than 500 workers will be involved in the construction phase. The new facility will accelerate the expansion of Astellas' in-house production capabilities and ensure a stable supply of high-quality medicines to patients around the world. The facility will also be fully digitally enabled and will adhere to high energy and environmental standards. 'I'm really pleased to welcome this multi-million euro investment by Astellas, supported by the Government through IDA Ireland,' Minister Foley said. 'This is a real boost of confidence, in addition to the €330 million invested for a state-of-the-art facility in Tralee and the fantastic existing facility in Killorglin. It is a great, positive story for all involved. Thank you to Astellas for their unstinting commitment to Kerry,' she added. Astellas say it will undertake a comprehensive plan to equip employees in Tralee with skills to address strategic challenges, focusing on leadership development, digital literacy, environmental sustainability, innovation, and compliance. The company will set up a research and development project in Tralee to enhance the production of antibody-drug conjugates and monoclonal antibodies, aiming to establish a high-efficiency, low-waste, multi-product biologics facility. Moreover, Astellas will have a Green Capital project in Tralee to reduce energy use and lower CO₂ emissions. The planned upgrades include heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems, a woodchip boiler, solar panels, and an on-site wastewater treatment plant. Astellas Killorglin will implement several initiatives to significantly reduce energy consumption and CO₂ emissions. These measures include wind turbines, woodchip boiler economisers, chiller upgrades, BioLPF/HVO tanks, water heat pumps, and energy metering systems. Speaking from Tokyo, Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, Peter Burke, who met with members of the Astellas senior leadership team, stated that the announcement by Astellas highlights Ireland's role in the global life sciences sector. 'Our ongoing investment in education, infrastructure, and innovation continues to create the optimum environment for companies to thrive. Astellas' decision to grow its footprint in both Kerry and Dublin highlights the strength of Ireland's offering and our commitment to supporting enterprise development across all regions,' he said.
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What does NATO's 5% spending deal really mean?
NATO leaders are set to sign off at their Hague summit on a defence spending pledge to satisfy US President Donald Trump's demand for a headline figure of five percent of GDP. Here are the details of what NATO is signing up to: Five percent? Not really Trump has insisted NATO countries hit the five-percent bar -- well beyond the current two percent baseline level currently required by the alliance. Only a handful of allies - such as Poland and the Baltic states - are coming close to five percent at the moment, with the United States itself under 3.4 per cent in 2024. NATO's 32 nations have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate 3.5 percent to core military needs by 2035, and 1.5 percent to broader "defence-related" areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. That gives Donald Trump the win he craves while granting cash-strapped European governments some wiggle room. Nevertheless, it is still a major ask for many governments and will add hundreds of billions to budgets in the coming years. 3.5 per cent on what? The bulk of the spending is still required to go on NATO's key focus area: raw military might. Alliance members last month signed up to new targets for all the hardware they need to face off against the threat from Russia. The exact details are secret but it will involve the biggest ramp-up in capabilities since the Cold War. NATO chief Mark Rutte said it envisions a five-fold increase in the alliance's air defences and adding thousands more tanks and armoured vehicles to arsenals. Countries will also likely keep counting the billions of dollars in military aid they give to Ukraine in this category. And the 1.5 percent? The rest of the pledge covers a far broader array of areas from bridges and roads, to cybersecurity. NATO says these items - while not immediately evident - are also crucial to helping defend against any attack. "If you can't get tanks to the front lines because the roads or bridges or rail can't handle those tanks and their weight, then obviously they're worthless," US NATO ambassador Matthew Whitaker said. NATO officials admit that much of this spending will already be on the books of national governments - and will just need to be redesignated. Italy for instance has said it believes a long-planned bridge it wants to build linking Sicily to mainland should fall under that category. Will anyone check? Ensuring countries stick to the deal is a key element, as previous NATO pledges have often not been respected. Officials had originally floated a plan to have NATO members commit to increases of 0.2 percentage points a year until they hit the target. That was eventually dropped in the face of opposition from governments who didn't want to have their feet to the fire. Now countries will have to submit reports each year to NATO showing that they are stepping up and buying what is needed. There will also be a review of sorts in 2029 when NATO comes up with new targets for arms needed and the demands could be adjusted. And looming over everyone's shoulder if they don't make good on their promise will be the unpleasant prospect of upsetting Donald Trump. Is anyone exempt? It depends who you ask. Spain - which has been one of NATO's lowest spenders - claims it won't have to hit the five percent target after striking a side deal with Mark Rutte. But the NATO chief has insisted that there is no "opt-out" from the agreement and every country will have to step up to the levels set.
