Future Of ‘Grand Old Lady' In Hands Of Commissioner
Masterton will likely find out next month whether its century-old town hall will be demolished or whether it will be given a stay of execution.
Commissioner Alistair Auburn heard passionate arguments for and against the demolition last week and would likely make his decision on granting demolition consent before the end of May.
The town hall was closed in 2016 after it was deemed to be earthquake-prone.
The council voted last year to demolish the town hall and municipal buildings and build anew at a cost of no more than $25 million.
However, it needed resource consent to do so as the building was listed as a heritage item in the Wairarapa Combined District Plan.
Former Masterton Mayor Bob Francis supported the case for demolition at the hearing and said there had been a lack of any progress for almost a decade and that now was the right time to progress a new town hall build.
He said what the council was proposing was achievable within budget and that he was already working on external fundraising options.
Developer David Borman also threw his support behind demolition at the hearing and said the structural issues with the town hall and municipal buildings meant it would cost more money to strengthen than to rebuild.
He said materials from the existing structures would be salvaged and incorporated into any new build.
'We have a council that was voted in to get things moving, which they have done,' he said.
'Nine years is too long. Let's get on with it.'
A majority of submitters spoke against demolition, including Robyn Prior who said the consent process felt like the council was 'steam rolling a pre-determined outcome'.
She said 'new doesn't mean better', and that this was not the financial climate to commit ratepayers to 'this sort of unnecessary expense'.
'First and foremost, this grand old lady adds to the ambience, spirit, and culture of our town, even as it is,' she said.
'If you allow it to be destroyed, you will take something irreplaceable away from us, and our community will be the poorer for it.'
Masterton Ratepayers and Residents Association president Lyn Riley said the ongoing debate over the town hall had been 'marked by controversy, complaints, protests, and frustration, alongside errors and anomalies'.
'It has stirred strong emotions and divided our community. But this issue is not merely about bricks and mortar—it is about the spirit of Masterton: our shared identity, history, and the legacy we pass to future generations.
'Once these buildings are gone, they are lost forever. No modern structure or architectural drawing can replicate their historical value or the deep connection they provide to those who came before us.'
She said demolition was not necessary for public safety, and that there was no imminent danger.
'Alternatives do exist that are both financially comparable and more culturally respectful. So why is demolition being pursued so urgently?
'Proceeding without a firm plan for what comes next is simply poor leadership.
'The only reason they need to demolish is for the purpose of constructing a new building. A new building where there are no plans, and unlikely to come in under $25m.'
She asked the Commissioner to decline the demolition consent.
If the consent was approved, she asked for some conditions to be attached, which included no demolition before there was confirmation that the project could be delivered within the $25m budget, and clear plans for offsetting ratepayer costs through fundraising.
She also asked that there be no demolition until the Government's Earthquake-Prone Building System Review was completed.
– LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
28-05-2025
- Scoop
Masterton Town Hall Demo Given Green Light
After almost a decade in limbo, Masterton's town hall and municipal buildings will be wiped from the town's streetscape. Independent commissioner Alistair Aburn has granted resource consent for the council to demolish its century-old civic buildings. It followed several turbulent years of consultation and decision-making marked by controversy, public complaints, and protests. Masterton Mayor Gary Caffell said he felt a mixture of 'relief and trepidation' with the outcome. 'Relief because it could bring to a conclusion a debate which seems like it has gone on forever without any sign of resolution; trepidation because there is always the chance that the decision will be appealed and we will have to go through this latest process all over again.' He said it had been the most emotionally difficult decision he had experienced in his 15 years on council. He had previously fought to save the town hall, then he fought to retain the façade, both of which could not be done at a reasonable cost to ratepayers. 'At the end of the day you have to base your decision around what is best for the community both in terms of cost and viability, and I believe we have done that.' Masterton Ratepayers and Residents Association president Lyn Riley said residents had asked for 'vision' from the council but instead 'got a bulldozer'. 'Demolishing our iconic town hall ignores heartfelt community concern, lacks a business case, and leaves ratepayers with more long-term debt when they are facing costly water reforms. 'No modern structure or architectural drawing can replicate their historical value or the deep connection to those who came before us. 'This is not progress – it's erasure.' How we got here In 2016, the town hall was closed after it was found to be earthquake-prone. In 2019, Masterton District Council consulted on building a new civic facility and this direction was agreed upon the next year. As part of its 2021-31 Long-Term Plan process, the council locked in a budget of $26.8 million it would borrow to build the new civic facility, and $4 million from external sources. A site at the northern end of Masterton had been earmarked for this new build. On the day the 2021-31 Long-Term Plan was adopted, an estimated 1000 people gathered at the town hall site for the 'Hands Around the Hall' protest. Attendees wanted the town hall to be strengthened or rebuilt on the same site and the façade retained. Former council chief executive Kath Ross had been caught on CCTV ripping down a poster promoting the event and later resigned. Residents protested again in 2022, this time at the recreation centre site that had been earmarked for a potential build. That same year, the Auditor-General found there were flaws in the council's record keeping over the civic facility location decision and looked into whether councillors had dealt with conflicts of interest appropriately. The Ombudsman was also involved in determining whether consultation on the project had been rigorous enough and found in favour of the council. Later that year, the project was placed on hold after estimates put the cost of the new civic facility at more than $70 million, inclusive of contingency. A new council was elected later that year and in 2024, this council voted to demolish the town hall and municipal building and build anew on the same site for a cost of no more than $25 million. A resource consent application to demolish the buildings was lodged at the end of the year and a hearing was held in April. What the commissioner said In his decision, released on Monday, Commissioner Alistair Aburn said the demolition of the buildings was 'an appropriate use of physical resources'. He said the council had undertaken 'a sufficiently robust assessment of alternative options' which could not be pursued. He also said the retention of the façade was unlikely to be financially viable. 'The demolition of the town hall, a scheduled heritage building, will have more than minor heritage effects,' Aburn said. 'However, when regard is had to the other matters requiring assessment ... including the positive effects of removing an earthquake-prone building thereby enhancing public safety and enabling the future construction of a fit for purpose town hall built to 100% of the new building standard (NBS), I consider loss of historic heritage values has been offset to an acceptable degree.' At the hearing, Aburn expressed concern that the site would be left vacant after the demolition and had set conditions to mitigate this risk. He said a 'public space activation plan' prepared by a suitably qualified landscape architect or designer would need to be approved before demolition works began. The plan would need to include the design of an interim landscaped open space that activated the site, maintained visual amenity, and encouraged safe public use once demolished. The council would need to provide an indicative timeline or project plan for the design of the replacement building, as well as draft concept plans before demolition. Another condition of the consent was the preparation of a full inventory of materials that may be salvaged for reuse or sale and that there be an installation of interpretative material and memorabilia in the replacement building, which would allow the public to engage with the history of the site and the buildings which originally existed there. The council would also need to obtain an archaeological authority from Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 prior to any demolition works commencing. The resource consent would be valid for five years from the date it was granted. Next steps Caffell said the council had decided that a new build be pursued once the site was demolished. The budget for the demolition and build had been set at $25 million. 'No one can deny that will be a challenge,' he said. 'I am encouraged though by the fact that there are developers and people within the construction industry who believe it can de done and we will obviously be leaning on their expertise along the way.' A fundraising group led by former Masterton Mayor Bob Francis had been established and had some 'innovative plans', Caffell said. 'It is probably worth noting too that while council is not now supporting the retention of the façade, there remains the possibility that some parts of it could still be incorporated in any new design. 'That is still very much in the exploration stage but personally I get quite excited about what we might be able to achieve there.' He said the 'cheeky' side of him saw value in approaching neighbouring councils for financial support for the facility as it was likely to hold a crowd 'twice as big as any currently available in the Wairarapa'. 'This will mean that some of the bigger shows which have to give this region a a miss because of their size will have the opportunity to come to Masterton, and the entire region will benefit as a result.' Now that a decision on the demolition consent has been made, appeals can be lodged to the Environment Court within 15 working days of May 26. Council infrastructure and assets manager Maseina Koneferenisi said the council was pleased with the outcome and would start to engage with relevant experts to work through condition requirements.
Scoop
17-05-2025
- Scoop
Doubts Remain Over Proposed Joint Water Entity
'If in doubt, opt out now.' This was the advice former Masterton mayor Lyn Patterson gave councillors at this week's Local Water Done Well hearing, held at Waiata House. Although 58% of Masterton submissions were in favour of a Wairarapa-Tararua water services model, some stipulated their support was conditional on there being no standardisation of prices between districts. About 39% supported a Masterton-only enhanced status quo approach, and about 3% did not support either option. Patterson, who was one of several submitters who presented to council on Wednesday, said the council should not have limited people's choices to only two options and was concerned there was no guarantee of non-standardisation once a Wairarapa-Tararua water entity was established. 'Given you have to act in the best interests of present and future Masterton generations, you really don't have a choice,' she said. 'Please err on the side of caution as there is too much at stake. 'Be bold, be courageous, and if in doubt opt out now and support standalone, unless there is a legal watertight guarantee to no standardisation.' Amber Craig, who submitted on behalf of Rangitāne o Wairarapa Incorporated, supported the Masterton-only option and said joining with other councils watered down the voice of whānau, hāpu, marae, and iwi. Meanwhile, Rangitāne Tū Mai Rā Trust, the post-settlement governance entity for Rangitāne o Wairarapa and Rangitāne o Tamaki nui-ā-Rua, made a submission supporting the Wairarapa-Tararua option. Masterton Ratepayers and Residents Association president Lyn Riley said there was too much uncertainty in choosing the Wairarapa-Tararua option. The group's biggest concerns were financial fairness, lack of detail, and loss of local control, she said. There were 'way too many unanswered questions' about governance, cost-sharing, ringfencing, shareholder agreements, and asset control. 'The devil is always in the detail, or in this case, the lack of detail,' Riley said. Submitter Chris Blunden supported the Wairarapa-Tararua option and said pooling together resources across the districts into one organisation would increase resilience and safeguard resources and staff expertise. Erica Jar from Sustainable Wairarapa said her organisation supported the Wairarapa-Tararua model in principle but had concerns about the level of uncertainty that came with the option. Submitter Robbie Hullena supported the Masterton-only option and said standardisation would be a constant threat for Masterton shareholders. Because of this, and other unknowns, he said a 'safe vote' would be for the Masterton-only option. Submitter Peter Debney said the Wairarapa-Tararua option was the 'only affordable option' but also said he wanted to believe standardisation was 'not a possibility'. Submitter Jamie Falloon said the biggest risk in the Wairarapa-Tararua option was standardisation and that the process that had been prescribed by the government and followed by councils was 'distinctly average'. He was uncomfortable with the council agreeing on an idea, binding ratepayers to it, and then negotiating to 'see what happens'. Masterton councillors would deliberate on all submissions on May 21. The proposal Masterton District Council consulted on was the Wairarapa-Tararua option. Its consultation document said each council would have different investment requirements and costs of service and that there was no requirement for water charges to be standardised across the districts. The proposal's projected costs were based on water charges not being standardised and were an average of $2305 per Masterton connection by Year 10. The council also included information on pricing over time in its consultation document to show what a standardised cost could look like 'compared to the cost under the Proposal without standardised costs'. This standardised price was $3620 per connection by Year 10. – LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Scoop
24-04-2025
- Scoop
Future Of ‘Grand Old Lady' In Hands Of Commissioner
Masterton will likely find out next month whether its century-old town hall will be demolished or whether it will be given a stay of execution. Commissioner Alistair Auburn heard passionate arguments for and against the demolition last week and would likely make his decision on granting demolition consent before the end of May. The town hall was closed in 2016 after it was deemed to be earthquake-prone. The council voted last year to demolish the town hall and municipal buildings and build anew at a cost of no more than $25 million. However, it needed resource consent to do so as the building was listed as a heritage item in the Wairarapa Combined District Plan. Former Masterton Mayor Bob Francis supported the case for demolition at the hearing and said there had been a lack of any progress for almost a decade and that now was the right time to progress a new town hall build. He said what the council was proposing was achievable within budget and that he was already working on external fundraising options. Developer David Borman also threw his support behind demolition at the hearing and said the structural issues with the town hall and municipal buildings meant it would cost more money to strengthen than to rebuild. He said materials from the existing structures would be salvaged and incorporated into any new build. 'We have a council that was voted in to get things moving, which they have done,' he said. 'Nine years is too long. Let's get on with it.' A majority of submitters spoke against demolition, including Robyn Prior who said the consent process felt like the council was 'steam rolling a pre-determined outcome'. She said 'new doesn't mean better', and that this was not the financial climate to commit ratepayers to 'this sort of unnecessary expense'. 'First and foremost, this grand old lady adds to the ambience, spirit, and culture of our town, even as it is,' she said. 'If you allow it to be destroyed, you will take something irreplaceable away from us, and our community will be the poorer for it.' Masterton Ratepayers and Residents Association president Lyn Riley said the ongoing debate over the town hall had been 'marked by controversy, complaints, protests, and frustration, alongside errors and anomalies'. 'It has stirred strong emotions and divided our community. But this issue is not merely about bricks and mortar—it is about the spirit of Masterton: our shared identity, history, and the legacy we pass to future generations. 'Once these buildings are gone, they are lost forever. No modern structure or architectural drawing can replicate their historical value or the deep connection they provide to those who came before us.' She said demolition was not necessary for public safety, and that there was no imminent danger. 'Alternatives do exist that are both financially comparable and more culturally respectful. So why is demolition being pursued so urgently? 'Proceeding without a firm plan for what comes next is simply poor leadership. 'The only reason they need to demolish is for the purpose of constructing a new building. A new building where there are no plans, and unlikely to come in under $25m.' She asked the Commissioner to decline the demolition consent. If the consent was approved, she asked for some conditions to be attached, which included no demolition before there was confirmation that the project could be delivered within the $25m budget, and clear plans for offsetting ratepayer costs through fundraising. She also asked that there be no demolition until the Government's Earthquake-Prone Building System Review was completed. – LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
