Charles Hoskinson's Long-Standing Crypto Prediction Is Playing Out
As U.S. banking giants move toward launching a unified stablecoin, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson is taking a quiet victory lap.
The outspoken blockchain pioneer has long warned that traditional financial institutions would eventually co-opt crypto infrastructure—and now, it's happening.
Following recent reports from The Wall Street Journal, JPMorgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citigroup are reportedly in talks to create a bank-issued stablecoin, with backing from payment giants like Zelle and The Clearing House. The initiative aims to produce a fully regulated digital asset that could rival established players like Tether and Circle.
Hoskinson responded with a simple 'As predicted' on X—three words that echoed loudly across crypto circles.
The move comes at a moment of regulatory clarity, as the GENIUS Act gains traction in the U.S. Senate, offering a framework for stablecoin compliance. With a pro-crypto White House under President Trump and a $243 billion stablecoin market ripe for disruption, the stage is set for banks to finally enter the digital currency arena.
For Hoskinson, this isn't just validation—it's a warning. He's frequently cautioned that unless the crypto space stays decentralized and vigilant, it risks being absorbed by the very institutions it sought to disrupt.
While the banking sector's embrace of blockchain could drive mainstream adoption, some fear that this shift will come at the expense of decentralization. A bank-backed token may win on trust and liquidity, but it also raises concerns about gatekeeping, censorship, and financial centralization—all issues that early crypto founders, Hoskinson among them, hoped to eliminate.
As the stablecoin wars heat up, Hoskinson's voice remains a reminder that the future of crypto isn't just about adoption—it's about who controls the rails.
READ SOURCE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
JP Morgan's CEO warns of a bond crisis like the Covid crash
JP Morgan's CEO warns of a bond crisis like the Covid crash originally appeared on TheStreet. Crypto analysts are taking a dig at Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase after he raised the alarm on FOX Business TV about the real risk that the U.S. bond market may unravel due to increasing federal debt, which lowers investors' confidence in U.S. assets. Although Dimon did not provide a date, he indicated, "It will happen again… I just don't know exactly when." Dimon focused on more than $35 trillion in U.S. securities held by foreign investors and an additional $30 trillion in private U.S. assets as significant pressure points. If global investors begin to "vote with their feet," warned Dimon, the dollar could lose its prized position, and credit spreads could widen significantly, similar to the chaos seen in 2020 with the COVID crash, but this time, it may not be that quickly. The ramifications extend far beyond Wall Street. @stackinsats93, a pseudonymous crypto analyst said, 'Jamie's not saying 'buy Bitcoin,' but he's basically screaming it between the lines. If the bond market 'unravels' like he says, there's nowhere else to hide but BTC.' For the crypto markets, this kind of alert confirms a long-held thesis: that Bitcoin and decentralized assets can act as a hedge when trust in fiat systems is eroding. During periods of sovereign debt turmoil, crypto supporters often claim that blockchain-based options are safer stores of value. In 2021, as another debt ceiling standoff loomed, Bitcoin experienced a volatile price ride, reaching around $43,000. While it wasn't behaving as a true haven, the heightened focus brought it into the mainstream of macroeconomics. Yet the yield on the 30-year rose back above the 5% mark in May, and the benchmark 10-year bond reached 4.5%, as part of a global selloff in bond markets. Bitcoin hit an all-time high in a similar timeframe. On May 22, Bitcoin came close to $112,000. "Based on M2 alone, Bitcoin should reach $140,000 this year. After the US Treasury downgrades, investors are shifting to BTC for safety," said Steven McClurg, CEO of Canary Capital, to the New York Post. Arthur Hayes, a prominent voice in the industry, also agreed to Bitcoin's status as a hedge against inflation in April. Recently, Dimon also said, "U.S. should stockpile bullets and tanks, not Bitcoin". Longtime Bitcoin skeptic and gold advocate Peter Schiff used Jamie Dimon's warning to minimize the U.S. dollar. Schiff's view depended on a faster timeline, implying that without changes in fiscal policy, the reserve currency status of the dollar might disintegrate in four years. Though Schiff dismisses Bitcoin as a viable asset, his alarmist tone often reflects institutional interest in the cryptocurrency. JP Morgan's CEO warns of a bond crisis like the Covid crash first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
JPMorgan sees the US facing a 'stagflationary episode.' Investors should monitor these 5 headwinds.
JPMorgan warns S&P 500 gains could slow due to US-China trade tensions and stagflation. Slow growth and rising inflation could set the backdrop for a stagflationary episode. JPMorgan flagged five headwinds for investors to monitor in the market. May was a strong month for the market, with the S&P 500 marking its best monthly performance since November 2023, but JPMorgan isn't confident that the winning streak will continue. The bank sees renewed US-China trade tensions, softening consumer sentiment, and growing chatter around the "S-word" — stagflation — as signs that the stock market's momentum will slow this summer. "Post the recent bounce, we think softer leg is in store next, which could resemble a bit of a stagflationary episode, and during which trade negotiations play out," JPMorgan equity strategists, led by Mislav Matejka, wrote in a note on Monday. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon also recently flagged the risk of stagflation, which economists have said can be worse than a recession. That's because central bankers would be unable to stimulate growth by lowering interest rates due to fears of exacerbating inflation. Torsten Sløk, Apollo's chief economist, also thinks the groundwork for stagflation has already been laid. JPMorgan identified five headwinds for stocks that investors should be on the lookout for. The gap between soft and hard data While recent inflation prints have started to come down closer to the Fed's 2% target, consumer sentiment has been weak, indicating a disparity between backwards-looking economic data and forward-looking sentiment. Many on Wall Street are also skeptical that cooler inflation is a durable trend, and strategists suspect inflation is likely to pick up in the back half of this year as tariffs are felt in the economy more fully. JPMorgan believes there's room for the soft data to deteriorate further after consumers and businesses front-loaded purchases in the beginning of the year. "Past front-loading of orders in the run-up to tariffs is likely to have a payback, there will be some weakening in consumer due to squeeze in purchasing power, and even with dramatic backpedalling, the current tariffs picture is worse than most thought at the start of the year," the bank wrote. Bond yields could creep back up Increased inflation concerns, combined with the growing deficit, could send bond yields rising and stall a rally. The Moody's downgrade of the US debt and Trump's tax bill, which is projected to add trillions to the deficit, have caused bond yields to spike in recent weeks, while deficit concerns could also lead to a weaker US dollar. The 10-year US Treasury yield is about 4.4%, down from recent spikes, but JPMorgan believes it's likely that bond yields move up again due to inflationary pressures. According to a survey of institutional investors conducted by Evercore ISI, 45% of respondents said a 10-year yield of 4.75% would halt stock market gains. Downwards earnings revisions Looking forward, the Wall Street consensus on earnings-per-share growth seems overly optimistic, JPMorgan said. Consensus estimates project 10% growth this year and 14% growth next year, which the bank believes is too aggressive. Expect negative EPS revisions to materialize, the bank predicts. Higher input costs and interest costs are likely to eat into profit margins. Historically, S&P 500 earnings growth has required above 2% GDP growth, which is unlikely in a period of stagflation. US stocks remain expensive At 22x, the forward price-to-earnings of the S&P 500 is elevated, which might not be sustainable for the long term in light of inflation and tariff concerns. International stocks were a bright spot in the market as tariff concerns roiled the S&P 500, and JPMorgan thinks international strength could continue. While US stocks have typically been the best performers in times of market volatility, the bank believes stagflationary pressures could allow international stocks to shine. "If markets relapse into weakness, the US has typically held up better than other regions during risk-off periods, but this time around Tech and USD might not be the 'safe' havens," the bank wrote. US households hold record amounts of stock Retail investors have been flooding the market recently as they buy the dip, but retail enthusiasm could be a contrarian signal for the stock market, as it's often seen as a sign that the market is overbought. Right now, US households' stock ownership is approaching 30% of total assets, higher than the peak in 2000 before the dot-com crash. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Digg's founders explain how they're building a site for humans in the AI era
The rebooted version of social site Digg aims to bring back the spirit of the old web at a time when AI-generated content is threatening to overwhelm traditional social media platforms, drowning out the voices of real people. This presents an opportunity to build a social site for the AI era, where the people who create content and manage online communities are given a bigger stake in a platform's success, Digg's founders think. A Web 2.0-era news aggregation giant, Digg was once valued at $175 million at its height back in 2008 and is now being given new life under the direction of its original founder, Kevin Rose, and Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian. The two recently teamed up to announce a new vision for Digg, which will focus on enabling discovery and community, the way that the early internet once allowed for. Speaking at The Wall Street Journal's Future of Everything conference on Thursday, the founders offered more insight as to how they plan to accomplish that goal with the Digg reboot. Initially, the two touched on problems they encountered in the earlier days of social media, with Ohanian recalling how he chose to resign from Reddit's board over disagreements about the company's approach to hate speech that he felt was bad for society and the business. For instance, the company was allowing a forum on Reddit called "r/WatchPeopleDie" to continue operating up until the Christchurch mass shooting, which caught the attention of the media, he said. It was only then that Reddit decided to adjust its policies around violence and gore on the platform. After Reddit, Ohanian went on to found venture capital firm Seven Seven Six, where he says he's focused on building businesses that are more "values-aligned." He said he sees Digg as another step in that direction. Rose reflected on the early days of machine learning, where the technology was often used to reward posts on which people would rant about the "most obscure, kind of fringe-y weirdness," he said. "Sometimes that can be good, but oftentimes it's pushing really weird agendas. And that's not even getting into the whole bot and AI side of things that are also pushing those agendas," Rose said. With Digg, the founders want to create a new community focused on serving real people, not AI or bots, they said. "I've long subscribed to the 'dead internet theory,'" Ohanian said, referencing the idea that much of what we see online is not created by actual humans, but bots. Ten years ago, this was more of a conspiracy theory, but with the rise of AI, that's changed, he said. "Probably in the last few years -- since we've blown past the Turing test -- [the dead internet theory] is a very real thing." "I think the average person has no idea just how much of the content they consume on social media, if it's not an outright bot, is a human using AI in the loop to generate that content at scale, to manipulate and evade," he added. To address the rise of bots, the founders are looking toward new technology, like zero-knowledge proofs (aka zk proofs), a protocol used in cryptography that could be used to prove that someone owns something on a platform. They're envisioning communities where admins could turn the dials, so to speak, to verify that a poster is human before allowing them to join the conversation. "The world is going to be flooded with bots, with AI agents," Rose pointed out, and that could infiltrate communities where people are trying to make genuine human connections. Something like this recently occurred on Reddit, where researchers secretly used AI bots to pose as real people on a forum to test how AI could influence human opinion. "We are going to live in a world where the vast, vast majority of the content we're seeing is in … some shape or form, AI-generated, and it is a terrible user experience if the reason you're coming to a place is for authentic human connection, and it's not with humans -- or it's with people masquerading as humans," Ohanian said. He explained that there are a number of ways that social sites could test to see if someone is a person. For instance, if someone has owned their device for a longer period of time, that could add more weight to their comment, he suggested. Rose said that the site could also offer different levels of service, based on how likely someone was to be human. If you signed up with a throw-away email address and used a VPN, for example, then maybe you would only be able to get recommendations or engage in some simpler ways. Or if you were anonymous and typed in a comment too quickly, the site could then ask you to take an extra step to prove your humanity -- like verifying your phone number or even charging you a small fee if the number you provided was disposable, Rose said. "There's going to be these tiers that we do, based on how you want to engage and interact with the actual network itself," he confirmed. However, the founders stressed they're not anti-AI. They expect to use AI to help in areas like site moderation, including de-escalating situations where someone starts to stir up trouble. In addition to verifying humans, the founders envision a service where moderators and creators financially benefit from their efforts. "I do believe the days of unpaid moderation by the masses -- doing all the heavy lifting to create massive, multi-million-person communities -- has to go away. I think these people are putting in their life and soul into these communities, and for them not to be compensated in some way is ridiculous to me. And so we have to figure out a way to bring them along for the ride," Rose said. As one example, he pointed to how Reddit trademarked the term "WallStreetBets," which is the name of a forum created by a Reddit user. Instead, Rose thinks a company should help creators like this who add value to a community, not try to take ownership of their work as Reddit did. With the combination of improved user experience and a model that empowers creators to monetize their work, the founders think Digg itself will benefit. "I want to believe the business model that will make Digg successful is one that aligns all those stakeholders. And I think it is very, very possible," Ohanian said. This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
