Nicola Sturgeon book compared to Barack Obama memoir. Really?
Sturgeon the new Obama? If only. And what does 'stylishly open' mean? That it's got more holes in it than Rab C Nesbitt's vest?
JK Rowling has added to the excitement by offering to review the book for free, as long as newspaper editors don't edit out the swear words.
The book's [[pub]]lication was always going to be a three-ring circus (insert tent jokes here). But you might have thought with the Sandie Peggie tribunal going on that some restraint, sensitivity even, was called for. Alas, no. What we got instead was a spectacularly clumsy intervention from former SNP MP and Sturgeon pal Hannah Bardell.
Read more
The occasion was the newspaper review on BBC Radio Scotland's The Sunday Show, presented by Graham Stewart. What follows is an account of what happened, edited for brevity and my sanity. You know, there were an awful lot of you knows, you know?
In the papers was Brian Leishman MP, recently stripped of the Labour whip for serially rebelling, or what one party wag called 'persistent knobheadery'. Bardell said she had 'a lot of respect for Brian' and his principled stands.
As an [[SNP]] MP she had been in the fortunate position of agreeing with most of what the party stood for. 'But if you're in the situation where you believe in certain values that your party should hold … and you see it veering off to the right, I think fair play, stay and fight. I know it's a thorn in Keir Starmer's side, but that's the kind of people we need in politics.'
Asked if that had worked for Joanna Cherry, Bardell replied: 'Joanna caused a huge amount of upset and distress to a huge number of people, particularly in the trans community. Our party should have been stronger on that… because there are people, vulnerable communities, particularly the trans community, that are facing widespread ostracisation in the media, from very senior people, and Joanna has been one of those. I find that heartbreaking.'
This 'stuff', continued Bardell, was having a 'profound impact' on society. 'I think it's the last post of bigotry as well. We would not now discriminate against people because of their race, or their religion, or their sexuality. We used to, but we don't any more. In 15 to 20 years, hopefully sooner, we will look back and say what a shameful thing to have done. Where did we lose our humanity?'
Stewart, still taking shots at an open goal, said Nicola Sturgeon had upset a lot of people on the other side of the debate by linking them with 'right-wing bigots'. Was that necessarily helpful language?
Bardell: 'I think unfortunately it's true. I don't think it's the case that everybody who is anti-trans is necessarily recognised as a bigot, nor should they be, because there's a lot of misinformation and disinformation out there. But we're in the situation that people are being radicalised. People have become obsessed with folks' genitalia, what's in their pants. Where have we got to? Scotland has been the world over a nation that believed in humanity. We're all Jack (sic) Jock Tamson's bairns according to Robert Burns. We need to get back to those fundamentals.'
Dear Lord, where do you even start? Radicalised? Saying people are too stupid to know misinformation and disinformation when they encounter them? A nation obsessed with what's in people's pants? To think Bardell describes herself on LinkedIn as 'a problem solver with excellent negotiation, leadership and communication skills'. Yes, you and Mr Blobby, mate.
Ordinarily, Joanna Cherry KC might have been all over Bardell's comments like the pattern on an Orla Kiely bag, but she chose to rise above them, saying on X: 'If I sued everyone who defamed me for standing up for the rights of women & lesbians I wouldn't have time to get on with my life which has improved immeasurably away from the poisonous atmosphere Sturgeon fostered within the SNP".
Now there's an example we might all follow as this 'debate' rumbles on, possibly to the Holyrood elections and beyond given the speed at which John Swinney is not moving. That's a long haul and then some. Even then, as with the independence referendum, we will never be completely done with it. Resentments are festering, not healing.
In the meantime, the rest of us will keep stumbling on, trying to do the right thing, sometimes getting it wrong like the flawed humans we are, and all the time fearful of being called out by one side or the other. Who wants to live like that?
Now, if you'll excuse me, I shall be heading back to 2014, that more innocent time when the most terrifying words you might hear were 'Hello, I'm Jim Murphy.' If that doesn't work I'll be joining the lad from Essex in the 1940s. Rest assured: we'll meet again soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Good Morning Britain's Richard Madeley makes ITV return and viewers all have same reaction
Good Morning Britain viewers were left unimpressed as Richard Madeley made his return to the ITV show alongside Kate Garraway on Monday Good Morning Britain viewers all said the same thing as Richard Madeley returned to the programme on Monday. During the opening of Monday's (August 11) instalment of the popular ITV show, Richard sat alongside co-presenter Kate Garraway The TV duo brought audiences up to speed with the day's current affairs. They explored whether motorists aged over 70 might face road bans if they don't pass mandatory vision checks, plus the possibility of installing blade detectors in all British schools. Richard and Kate also delved into the surge in retail theft nationwide as part of the ongoing headlines. Studio guest Laura Tobin delivered regular meteorological bulletins, whilst Marverine Cole handled the remaining daily headlines. Whilst tuning in, numerous ITV watchers spotted that this marked Richard's first appearance following his three-week summer holiday, as reported by the Mirror. One viewer posted on Twitter: "Madeley's back," with someone else commenting: "Madeley back on presenting." A third remarked: "Oh Joy. Madeley," whilst a fourth audience member similarly posted: " Richard Madeley back on @gmb." A fifth supporter mirrored this feeling, stating: "Happy Days, our own Walter Mitty Richard Madeley." The previous month saw Richard confirm his upcoming getaway, just a few days after main presenter Susanna Reid declared her summer hiatus from the programme. GMB has subsequently featured different presenters filling their roles, including Charlotte Hawkins, Ranvir Singh, and Adil Ray. On Monday's programme, August 11, Richard and Kate discussed Former First Minister of Scotland Nicola Sturgeon's exclusive ITV News interview before the launch of her forthcoming memoir. In conversation with Julie Etchingham, Nicola pondered on the day she was arrested in 2023, alongside her sexuality and previous legislative decisions. Yet, GMB viewers seemed less than impressed by the prominence of the interview on the show, with one viewer commenting on Twitter: "Christ, is there any news?". Another chimed in with: "Any other news?" while a third queried: "Why is an interview with Sturgeon a big thing?". In an excerpt of her new memoir, Frankly, published by The Times, the former first minister of Scotland spoke about some of the hardest moments of her life, as well as conflicted feelings over motherhood and sexuality. The former First Minister has opened up about her arrest, describing in her new book how mentally testing the police investigation was - and saying she thought about disappearing into the North Sea. She said it was one of the toughest days she had ever had when she was arrested and questioned by the police following the arrest of her ex-husband and the Scottish National Party (SNP) treasurer. Peter Murrell, the former chief executive officer of the SNP, was arrested in 2023 and later charged with embezzlement, after his and Ms Sturgeon's home was searched by police looking into what happened to £660,000 of donations to the party.
Daily Record
2 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Nicola Sturgeon brands Nigel Farage 'odious' and claims Reform leader 'not particularly comfortable around women'
The former first minister made the comments on a high-profile ITV News interview set to be broadcast tonight. Nicola Sturgeon has branded Nigel Farage "odious" and claimed the Reform UK leader is someone "not particularly comfortable around women". The former first minister made the comments on a high-profile ITV News interview to be broadcast at 7pm tonight. The programme coincides with the publication of Sturgeon's long-awaited political memoir, Frankly. During her grilling with ITV presenter Julie Etchingham, the former SNP leader recalled coming across Farage when they appeared on a televised debate ahead of the 2015 general election. Asked by Etchingham about describing Farage as 'odious' in her memoir, Sturgeon responded: "This is my impression, other people might have a different view of him. He just comes across as somebody who's got a very, very fragile ego. Somebody who's not particularly comfortable, particularly around women. "In the 2015 leaders debate just before we went on air that night, I just remember hearing him tell somebody how much he'd had to drink, in the green room area beforehand, and it just felt this kind of bravado and just not very pleasant.' It comes after Sturgeon also admitted she 'didn't anticipate' how much criticism her gender reform legislation would garner. In an upcoming interview with ITV, Sturgeon said that in retrospect she should have paused the legislation for a time due to the strong backlash she received. The former SNP leader said: 'I didn't anticipate as much as I should, or engage as much as I should, on some of the concerns that might then be triggered. 'At the point I knew it was becoming, or felt it becoming, as polarised I should have said, 'Right, OK, let's pause, let's take a step back'. 'I fervently believe that the rights of women and the interests of trans people are not irreconcilable at all. 'I should have taken a step back and said, 'How do we achieve this?'' Sturgeon also discussed with ITV presenter Julie Etchingham her experience of being raided by police, rumours surrounding her sexuality, her relationship with Alex Salmond, and a miscarriage she previously suffered. Reliving her experience of being raided by police, she said: 'I don't really have a clear memory of that because I think I'd gone upstairs to get myself ready. 'I genuinely don't know whether the fact that I don't have a clear image of that in my head is because I didn't witness it or that I have kind of somehow blocked it out. 'It wasn't until I got to mum and dad's that I saw the pictures of my house looking like a murder scene effectively. 'It was just, sorry, I'm not really, I'm just working out… it's really hard to articulate how I felt that day. 'I had this sense of horror and upset and the kind of shame of it all.'
Scottish Sun
2 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
SNP needs to learn it's not their beliefs that matter – it's the laws they've spent our cash defying
HOW does it feel to see your taxes being spent on defying the law? That's exactly what the Scottish Government is doing following the Supreme Court ruling on gender in April, with SNP ministers and their officials using public resources to dig in their heels. 3 For Women Scotland celebrate their victory at the Supreme Court in April 3 John Swinney's government is dragging its heels over implementing the Supreme Court ruling 3 Chris says the Scottish Government should implement the law - or be nowhere near power The landmark judgment four months ago clarified that 'sex' means biological sex under equalities law — and not the gender a person says they are. As many had suspected, it turned out this had been misrepresented for years by those including Holyrood ministers, who fought to the bitter end to defend their stance. Two years earlier, the same Scottish Government had failed in its bid to bring in a system of gender self-ID, which amounted to an attempt to remove any form of gatekeeping on who can access women's spaces, or participate in female-only activities. SNP ministers wanted — and still want — a law where if you say you are female or male, then you legally become exactly that. As simple as that. The self-ID bid ultimately failed as the Holyrood Bill interfered with wider UK law. Nonetheless, the magical thinking persisted that a man can turn into a woman simply by saying so. In fact, it seemed to become as much a pillar of SNP wisdom as independence. With both indy and gender, the end always justifies the means. Any damage — no matter how plain to see — must be denied. Landmark UK Supreme Court rules 'woman' means biological female in humiliating defeat for SNP With independence, the end is a world where Scotland alone is in charge of its affairs. The means to this end may well be economic ruin but any risks must be rubbished, and any disbelievers vilified. It's similar with the transgender ideology so beloved of the SNP. The desired end is a world where anyone can be who they say they are. And while I have no doubt gender ideology is pursued by many in the name of kindness, this kindness can also be misplaced. One means to this end is, for example, the ruin of women and girls' ability to have spaces free from males, or to play sport without men muscling in. It's also the case that the idea a man can turn into a woman by signing a piece of paper is reality-denying madness, and arguably yet another sign of a society where child-like, narcissistic entitlement is increasingly pandered to. But as we've seen in recent years, anyone who dared point out the potential flaws — let alone insanity — of self-ID was demonised amid a groupthink orchestrated by Nicola Sturgeon and cronies including the now First Minister John Swinney. Perhaps we should not be surprised that — following April's Supreme Court ruling and clear guidance from regulator the Equality and Human Rights Commission — the Scottish Government has decided just to carry on regardless, and refused to alter its rules. Laughably, it claims it has 'accepted' the judgement, when its bureaucratic stalling shows the opposite to be true. It says it must wait for more detailed EHRC guidance, even though the watchdog says this is not the case. FRANKLY... Sturgeon ain't being frank IT is remarkable what one will say when one is trying to enrich oneself by flogging one's book. Well, almost say. In Nicola Sturgeon's case, it's things like almost admitting to being bisexual, by saying she doesn't think her sexuality is 'binary'. Or hinting that she thinks Alex Salmond leaked details about a probe into himself in a 'classic Alex' move, but not emphatically saying so. Or suggesting she was wrong for dismissing criticism of gender-self ID, but not conceding an inch about the fundamental principle. From extracts I've seen of her memoir, Frankly, left, there's a lot of what I call 'classic Nicola'. Deftly talking around a subject, giving people the impression something has been said, when in fact it hasn't quite. And keeping them guessing. And 'Frankly', that ain't being frank. It's the same old story. The Scottish Government's position is not just that of a sore loser, it flouts the Ministerial Code — which places an 'overarching duty on Ministers to comply with the law' — and leaves public bodies like schools and health boards open to legal action. It says any changes to policies will have to be 'consulted on in line with normal practice'. In other words, many more months of stalling. Others have already done what they are legally and morally obliged to. So, the SFA has said that only biological females will be permitted to play in competitive girls' and women's football. At the Scottish Parliament — run independently from government — all male and female toilets are now single-sex according to biological sex. Some have been designated as 'gender-neutral' to ensure facilities are available to all. Police Scotland fell into line last week, after years of drinking the gender ideology Kool Aid. But at the Scottish Government, guidance remains that 'Trans staff should choose to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. NHS Scotland rules are still based on the same principles which led us to a place where the word 'women' was replaced by 'anyone with a cervix' in public information ads about smear tests. In schools, too, the Scottish Government rulebook remains the same, including an insistence there is 'no law' which 'states that only people assigned male at birth can use men's toilets and changing rooms, or that only people assigned female can use women's toilets and changing rooms'. It's hard to see how this could be any more wrong given the April ruling and EHRC advice. Find out what's really going on Register now for our free weekly politics newsletter for an insightful and irreverent look at the (sometimes excruciating) world of Scottish Politics. Every Thursday our hotshot politics team goes behind the headlines to bring you a rundown of key events - plus insights and gossip from the corridors of power, including a 'Plonker' and 'Star' of the Week. Sign up now and make sure you don't miss a beat. The politicians would hate that. SIGN UP FOR FREE NOW The section of schools guidance relating to sport also says pupils 'should be allowed to take part in the group which matches their gender identity'. Worryingly, the document supports the use of breast binders for female pupils who identify as boys, saying they can have 'a positive impact on a young person's mental health' — the line after admitting they 'can lead to shortness of breath, can be painful during physical exertion and there are health risks associated with binders'. In effect, an adolescent's ruined body is collateral damage in the war against reality. 'Being kind' is often cited as a reason for affirming someone's chosen gender but, especially with children, the opposite argument is easily as compelling. Should we not be comforting a child that they were not born into the wrong body, that they are perfect as they are, rather than cementing a belief they are somehow defective? It may be hard, impossible even, to change beliefs, and SNP ministers are unlikely to. But it is not beliefs that matter here. It is following the law. If those running the government are unwilling to do so, they should be nowhere near power.
