
White House freezes $108m in funding to Duke University over allegations of racial discrimination
The National Institutes of Health reportedly halted the funding to the private university in North Carolina, said the person who spoke to the Associated Press on Wednesday on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. CNN and ABC News also reported the funding freeze.
The development came as, earlier this week, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education issued a joint letter to Duke, stating that it had been made aware of allegations of what it called racial preferences in Duke's 'hiring, student admissions, governance, patient care, and other operations'.
Duke is the latest institution to have its federal funding held up as the government investigates allegations of antisemitism and policies that support greater diversity, equity and inclusion that the Trump administration alleges are unlawful. It follows other investigations by the administration into top-flight private universities, including the Ivy League's Harvard, Columbia and Cornell.
Duke did not immediately comment on the reported funding freeze.
In Monday's letter to Duke, the Trump administration states that it has been made aware of allegations that Duke University and Duke Health are engaged in practices that, 'if true, would violate Titles VI of the Civil Rights Act and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, and render Duke Health unfit for any further financial relationship with the federal government'.
'These practices allegedly include illegal and wrongful racial preferences and discriminatory activity in recruitment, student admissions, scholarships and financial aid, mentoring and enrichment programs, hiring, promotion, and more,' the letter from the government states.
The letter does not provide any specific examples.
'Racism is a scourge when practiced by individuals, but it is especially corrosive when enshrined in the nation's most eminent and respected institutions,' the letter, signed by the US health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, and the education secretary, Linda McMahon, adds.
The letter ordered Duke to end any practices at its health system that give 'benefits or advantages' based on race.
Saying Duke is unlikely to be capable of an 'honest and trustworthy review', the letter takes the unusual step of requesting a new merit and civil rights committee that would be approved by the government and authorized by the school's board of trustees.
The panel would be tasked with identifying and ending any racial preferences. If problems remained after six months, the administration would pursue legal enforcement, the letter said.
The education department separately opened an investigation into the Duke Law Journal on Monday over allegations that it gave advantages to prospective editors from underrepresented groups.
The Trump administration has used federal research funding as leverage in its unprecedented effort to reshape universities that Trump has described as hotbeds of liberalism.
Sign up to This Week in Trumpland
A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration
after newsletter promotion
It has presented a crisis for universities that rely on federal grants as a major source of revenue, spurring some to take on debt and find other ways to self-fund research.
Duke University spent $1.5bn on research last year, with nearly 60% coming from federal sources, according to the university's website.
Even before the latest funding freeze, Duke faced financial turmoil. Last week, university leaders said almost 600 employees had accepted voluntary buyouts but that layoffs would still be needed. Officials said they needed to reduce costs amid uncertainty around federal research funding and a hike to the university's federal endowment tax.
The Trump administration has been ratcheting up pressure on universities in hopes of striking deals such as one that Columbia University signed last week.
The Ivy League school agreed to pay a $200m settlement over three years to the federal government and make changes to admissions, hiring, student discipline and more in exchange for regaining access to federal funding, among other things.
In exchange for Columbia's concessions, the White House will reinstate $400m in federal funding it had stripped from the university earlier this year over allegations that it allowed antisemitism to fester on campus.
The Columbia deal was met with mixed reactions from students, faculty and alumni.
The administration has described it as a template for other universities including Harvard, which has been in talks with the administration even as it battles the White House in court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Caffeine craze warning after pouches gain in popularity with teens
While the use of caffeine pouches among teenagers remains relatively rare, experts and educators are concerned that may be about to change. Marketing aimed at teenagers of such products is spreading on social media. A school resource officer for the Boise County Sheriff's Office in Idaho, David Gomez, began noticing the use of caffeine pouches last spring, according to NBC News. The pouches can contain more than 200 milligrams of caffeine, and students have been using them along with nicotine pouches such as Zyn. Gomez noted that students would use the pouches as a disguise for nicotine pouches or they'll use both. 'They'll use the Zyn pouches that they put in their lip, and then they'll take a caffeine pouch,' said Gomez. 'They don't care what it is they're putting in their lip.' Richard Mumby is a marketing executive who was part of the launch of the e-cigarette Juul, which has been accused of initiating a wave of teen vaping. He's now back with a caffeine pouch startup known as Wip. A growing market is now trying to sell Americans on pouches as an alternative to caffeinated beverages. Mumby told NBC News that caffeine is part of 'the fabric of many Americans' everyday lives.' But he said there's room to improve. Wip and other companies are marketing caffeine pouches as a portable and affordable alternative to caffeinated drinks. It's a mix between nicotine pouches and energy drinks, placed between the lip and the gums to deliver the caffeine. Pouches, most of which do not contain nicotine, tend to last between 20 minutes and an hour, but their effect can go on for longer. Wip's flavors include mint, strawberry kiwi, and sour cherry, and each comes with 100 or 200 milligrams of caffeine, which is the same as about two cups of coffee. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, that's half the amount of caffeine an adult can safely consume in an entire day. 'We take responsible caffeine consumption and responsible marketing of our product seriously,' a spokesperson for Wip told NBC News. 'While there are no legal age restrictions on caffeine products, we have adopted marketing guidelines that exceed the age-related standards set by the American Beverage Association for most common energy drinks. Wip is not intended for use by anyone under the age of 18, and our guidelines ensure the product is marketed responsibly.' Exercise and nutrition sciences professor at George Washington University 's Milken Institute School of Public Health, Rob van Dam, studies caffeine. He shared concerns about the potency of some of the pouches being sold. 'It may be a bit different than coffee,' he told NBC News. 'It may hit faster, and you may overdose, in a way, more quickly.' Another worry is the possible popularity among teens, as nicotine pouches and energy drinks are already widespread. Zyn maker Philip Morris has previously told NBC News that 'Zyn's marketing is directed toward legal age nicotine users who are 21+.' The American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended that teens don't consume more than 100 milligrams of caffeine per day. The chair of the AAP's Committee on Nutrition, Dr. Mark Corkins, told NBC News that it would be better if teens avoided caffeine altogether. 'Caffeine, in general, is an area we are very concerned about,' he said. 'Pouches are just another delivery form.'


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk staged secret $15M plot to desperately win back Trump after falling out
Elon Musk attempted a peace offering with Donald Trump after the ex-'First Buddy' split from the White House, giving $15million to Trump and Republican causes. The donations were made after the former DOGE chairman's ugly feud with Trump upon his departure, but before Musk announced plans to launch the independent 'America Party.' Musk gave $5million to three different super PACs supporting both the president and his party. According to Federal Election Commission filings, he gave to MAGA Inc., the Senate Leadership Fund and the Congressional Leadership Fund on June 27. Just eight day later, Musk launched the 'America Party,' which he said was formed 'to give you back your freedom.' Musk has donated $45 million in 2025 to his own America PAC which was largely spent on an unsuccessful Wisconsin Supreme Court election. The Daily Mail has reached out to the White House for comment. Musk announced the foundation of the America Party on his X social media platform just after Independence Day. It came after Musk created an online poll on July 4 asking his followers whether to establish the new party. The results came back 65.4 percent in favor, leading Musk to make the announcement. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Musk had been elevated to a prestigious role within the White House acting as a special advisor to the president and overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency. But in recent months a rift has emerged and the two former friends have been embroiled in embarrassing public spats played out over social media. Many had predicted that Trump and Musk's rosy bromance wouldn't last long and some pointed to betting markets on when they would turn on each other. Betters heavily favored a fallout before July 1, 2025, less than six months after Musk joined Trump's administration as a special advisor. In just a matter of months Musk went from spending $288 million for Trump's election campaign, to slinging insults about him online, including suggesting Trump was in The Epstein files. The bust up occurred after Musk stepped down from DOGE over Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' which ends tax breaks for electric vehicles, which are Tesla CEO Musk's passion project. Musk also argued that the bill undercut DOGE's cost-cutting efforts by increasing the deficit. The rift deepened after the president rescinded his nomination offer to Musk-ally Jared Isaacman for NASA administrator over donations he made to the Democrats. Since then Trump and Musk have engaged in public mudslinging against each other. Musk accused the president of ingratitude and claimed he would have lost the election without him, while Trump branded him 'crazy '. Since their public break-up, Musk has threatened to start a new, third political party and buttress the reelection campaign of Republican Rep. Thomas Massie, one of the no votes on Trump's big bill. Trump recently outed himself as the person who leaked details about Musk's alleged drug use, according to author Michael Wolff, who penned the eye-popping book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House. The New York Times reported that during the 2024 presidential campaign, the billionaire used so much ketamine he was having bladder problems and also used Ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and what appeared to be Adderall.


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gavin Newsom may call special election to redraw California congressional maps
California's governor, Gavin Newsom, may call a special election in November to begin the process of redrawing the state's congressional maps in response to Texas's plans to change its own maps to help Republicans keep their majority in the House of Representatives. Donald Trump is pushing Texas and other Republican-dominated states to carry out mid-decade redistricting that will favor the GOP and potentially stop Democrats from retaking control of the House in next year's midterm elections. Governors in Democratic-led states have responded by warning they will move to redo their own maps if Texas goes ahead with its plans, which could create an additional five Republican-leaning districts. California is viewed as the best opportunity for Democrats to pick up seats through gerrymandering, but voters will first have to approve changes to an independent redistricting commission that was given the power to draw congressional districts in 2010. Speaking at a Thursday press conference, Newsom said 'a special election would be called, likely to be the first week of November' to approve the changes. 'We will go to the people of this state in a transparent way and ask them to consider the new circumstances, to consider these new realities,' the governor added. The party out of power typically regains control of the House in a president's first midterm election, as the Republicans did under Joe Biden in 2022 and Barack Obama in 2010, and Democrats did during Trump's first term in 2018. Newsom argued that another two years of unified Republican control of Congress would be especially harmful for California, noting that Los Angeles residents were still waiting for lawmakers to approve aid from the wildfires that ravaged the region earlier this year. 'They're doing a midterm rejection of objectivity and independence, an act that we could criticize from the sideline, or an act that we can respond to in kind – fight fire with fire,' Newsom said. While Republicans could gain the most seats by redrawing Texas's maps, Ohio, another red state, must also redraw its maps before next year's election, and there's talk of redistricting to the GOP's advantage in Missouri and Indiana. Democrats are seen as having a more difficult path to improving their odds of winning the House majority through redistricting, often due to their states' embrace of independent commissions intended to draw fair congressional amps. Voters created the California citizens redistricting commission in 2008 to draw its legislative maps, and in 2010 expanded its powers to congressional districts. Newsom said, 'We're not here to eliminate the commission,' but rather to respond to what he described as 'the rigging of the system by the president of the United States. 'And it won't just happen in Texas. I imagine he's making similar calls all across this country. It's a big deal. I don't think it gets much bigger,' Newsom said.