Why supermarkets are being urged to change how they sell potatoes
This means Britons are spending £17bn on food that is thrown away (an average of £1,000 a year for a typical household).
The scale of waste has lead to calls for wholesale changes in food packaging.
According to a new report by campaign group WRAP, food waste slightly declined between 2021 and 2022 – but that was mainly due to temporary factors such as the end of COVID restrictions leading to more people eating out, and the cost of living crisis causing food prices to spike.
Read more: The plastic bag tax started 10 years ago to stop pollution. But is it actually working?
Nonetheless, 4.4 million tonnes of edible food was wasted, equivalent to 470,000 bin lorries or 3,500 Olympic sized swimming pools.
And WRAP says that changing the way supermarkets sell food could make an enormous difference to how much we throw away.
"Selling items loose could save 100,000 tonnes of fruit and avoid 13,000 tonnes of single use plastic film," Estelle Herszenhorn, head of food system transformation at WRAP, said. 'Around 40% of wasted food in the home is because it isn't used in time, so enabling people to buy closer to their needs and equipping them with good storage information is key.
'Changes like reviewing dairy products like milk and yogurt to change from use by to best before dates – wherever possible – and offering smaller format bread at comparable prices could all help us avoid common food waste at home.'
In 2022, local authorities spent around £500m disposing of food waste that was not properly placed in special food bins, but instead thrown away in normal black bins.
As a result, 83% of food waste in our rubbish bins was incinerated or sent to landfill.
WRAP has called for specific items that are commonly sold in multipacks to be phased out and sold loose instead.
Read more: Drinking water map shows where toxic 'forever chemicals' are found in the UK
Plastic wrapping and trays (which contain multiple vegetables, rather than one) mean that people over-buy food such as potatoes, which then go to waste.
Bananas, apples, broccoli and cucumbers are also among five of the most commonly wasted foods, according to WRAP.
Every day in the UK, households waste 1,300 tonnes of potatoes, which is equivalent to 8.2 million potatoes, along with 130 tonnes of bananas (equivalent to 1.1 million bananas) and 90 tonnes of apples (equivalent to 1.3 million apples).
If sold loose, these could prevent 100,000 tonnes of food waste in the UK and remove 10,300 tonnes of plastic packaging.
Supermarkets have taken steps to reduce plastic packaging, including on fruit and vegetables, but argue that plastic packaging helps to preserve food and prevent waste in-store.
Using film to wrap a cucumber extends its life in-store from three days to 14 days, and packaging grapes in plastic boxes cuts in-store wastage by 20%.
Read more: Is it cheaper to run an electric vehicle or a petrol car?
"Packaging plays an important role, acting as a safety barrier against contamination and increasing the shelf life of many food products, reducing food waste," Naomi Brandon-Bravo, sustainability adviser at the British Retail Consortium, told Yahoo News.
"Retailers are committed to reducing unnecessary and single-use plastic packaging, and have worked together across the UK to eliminate problem plastics and increase recycling, as demonstrated in the Plastics Pact, an initiative endorsed by the four UK governments."
Pact members aim to eliminate problem plastics and also reduce the total amount of plastic packaging on shelves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Government turns to TikTokers to advise on cosmetic surgery abroad
The government is partnering with TikTok influencers to warn people about the risks of travelling abroad for cosmetic procedures. There's growing concern over the rise in Britons seeking overseas treatments such as hair implants and dental work, often lured by lower costs and shorter waiting times. Medical content creators will urge viewers to talk to a UK doctor first, take out travel insurance and avoid package holidays that include procedures. The move is part of a wider government campaign to curb so-called medical tourism, as well as tighten regulations for cosmetic practitioners in England. When it comes to cosmetic surgery abroad, the lowest price can come at the highest cost, the campaign warns. It aims to raise awareness of the risks, protect patients and avoid the NHS paying to fix botched procedures. Medical influencers like Doc Tally and Midwife Marley - who have 240,000 and 38,000 followers on TikTok respectively - will produce videos offering guidance on how to make trips as safe as possible. They will include a checklist to consider before booking a procedure. Health minister Karin Smyth warned that "too many people are being left with life-altering injuries after going abroad for medical procedures, without access to proper advice or safeguards." She said the partnership with TikTok would help people "make safer and more informed choices before they go under the knife – wherever that may be." Things to check before you book: Do thorough research about the procedure Check the clinic's regulation and the surgeon's credentials Know the full cost and understand the aftercare Ask the vital question - if it goes wrong, who will fix it? When cosmetic procedures go wrong, the consequences can be devastating for patients. Two years ago, Leah Mattson travelled to İzmir in Turkey to have gastric sleeve surgery. While the surgery was initially successful and helped her lose weight, last year the 27-year-old returned to the same company to remove excess skin. This time, the procedure left her with a lopsided belly button, deep scarring on her arms and stomach area that she says left her feeling worse. After seeing the results of her surgery, Leah said she burst into tears. "I just wanted to cry and I feel like I actually disliked my body more than when I was overweight." Leah found the clinic on social media and was encouraged by other people's positive experiences with similar surgeries. "On apps like Instagram and TikTok, you search for weight-loss surgery and see the majority of people go to Turkey," she explained. "I was thinking well all these people have had great experiences so I'm going to go. "I just trusted them because I thought well if they're okay then I'll be okay and I didn't really pay much attention to the horror stories," she added. "I didn't think it would ever happen to me." Leah now documents her experience on social media, using her platform to inform others about the risks involved in similar procedures. The clinic which performed Leah's surgery in Turkey could not be reached for comment, but they previously issued a statement saying "plastic surgery isn't straight-forward and unfortunately some health issues or complications cannot be anticipated". Experts are urging people to think beyond the slick brochures and marketing, and to consider clinical standards, complication risks, and language barriers. The Foreign Office will also provide more detailed travel advice for those considering going overseas for such procedures. Foreign Office Minister Stephen Doughty said: "If you choose to travel abroad for medical treatment, it is vital you do your research and are fully aware of the risks involved." "We urge anyone considering a medical procedure abroad to review our travel advice, relevant guidance from the NHS and other professional bodies, and research foreign providers thoroughly to ensure they meet the highest standard of care." "Informed choices today can help avoid serious complications tomorrow." Ali Law, TikTok's UK public policy lead, said the platform was "committed" to helping users find "information from trusted sources when searching for topics related to physical and mental health." Earlier this month, ministers outlined plans to reduce unsafe cosmetic treatments in England. Under the new rules, only "suitably qualified" and regulated health workers will be allowed to deliver high-risk procedures such as Brazilian butt lifts. Clinics offering lower-risk procedures such as Botox and fillers will need a licence, and age limits will be introduced to stop children from copying dangerous beauty trends seen on social media. More on this story Seven UK patients died after Turkey weight loss surgery 'I paid £6k to feel worse than I did before surgery' Woman's three-year food nightmare after botched op
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alarming new study reveals overlooked factor that can lead to brain tumors: 'These findings point to a possible link'
Alarming new study reveals overlooked factor that can lead to brain tumors: 'These findings point to a possible link' Harmful gases can pose even more serious health concerns than respiratory problems. Researchers have found a link between exposure to ultrafine particles and aggressive brain tumors. What's happening? According to Euronews, a study by researchers from the Danish Cancer Institute indicates that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter, elemental carbon, nitrogen dioxide, and ultrafine particles contributes to the development of a common brain tumor. "While research on the health effects of ultrafine particles is still in its early stages, these findings point to a possible link between traffic-related ultrafine particle exposure and the development of meningioma," said Ulla Hvidtfeldt, one of the authors of the study. Though meningiomas are not typically cancerous, they cause neurological symptoms that impair brain function. The findings echo earlier reports, such as one linking PM2.5 exposures to brain damage, cancer, and premature death, and another tying toxic airborne substances to higher dementia risk. Why is this discovery important? This research shows how polluting particles affect more than just our lungs — they can harm the brain too. What makes this especially concerning is that these pollutants come from common sources such as traffic exhaust, smoke, and even ordinary household products, meaning regular, long-term exposure is more common than we realize. Children, older adults, and low-income communities face the greatest risks because of long-term exposure and limited access to clean-air infrastructure. Left unaddressed, this could translate into more cases of brain disease, rising health care costs, and irreversible neurological damage — all driven by an invisible yet largely preventable threat in the air we breathe. What's being done about the issue? While there are no findings that suggest cleaner air reduces the risk of brain tumors, improving air quality could still have public health benefits. That's why efforts to clean up the air, including advocacy within workplaces, are increasingly urgent. Do you worry about the quality of the air inside your home? Yes — often Yes — but only sometimes Only when it's bad outside No — I never do Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Governments around the world are taking steps to reduce air pollution. Europe is pursuing an action plan to reach a 55% decrease in premature deaths caused by air pollution, per the European Environment Agency. In Asia, countries are implementing air quality monitoring solutions, as the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation reported. Individuals can take local action and support community initiatives to improve air quality. People can also help reduce harmful gases in the air by choosing electric vehicles, using public transit, and installing solar panels at home. As scientists continue to investigate the connection between air quality and brain health, this study serves as a crucial reminder: A cleaner environment isn't just better for the planet — it may also help protect our brains. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Boy with fragile skin disorder given hope after new treatment
A boy with a rare skin condition which can cause damage with even the smallest amount of friction has been given hope after taking part in a trial for the first potential treatment for the genetic disorder. Gabrielius Misurenkovas, 12, from east London, was diagnosed with an inflammatory disease called recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) when he was a baby. Many symptoms of the painful condition have been alleviated thanks to a new trial in which he received certain stem cells via an intravenous drip. The rare genetic disease is severely debilitating. People with the condition have extremely fragile skin which is easily damaged, leading to blistering, deep wounds and scarring. About 150 children in the UK are affected by RDEB, which is painful and causes itchiness. With no disease-modifying treatment available, patients and their families manage symptoms by dressing wounds and applying eye ointments. Over time, the condition can lead to severe complications and many patients with the condition develop a type of skin cancer called squamous cell carcinoma when they are young adults – this is the most common cause of death for RDEB patients. Gabrielius has been under the care of medics at the world-renowned children's hospital Great Ormond Street (GOSH) since he was a baby. He said he jumped at the chance to join the clinical trial when it was suggested by his doctors. 'I wanted to take part in the trial as I was excited to see if it could help improve my condition and so I could do more of the things I enjoy, like playing football and spending time with my friends,' he said. The youngster, who can speak three languages and is a big fan of footballer Lionel Messi, needed his bandages changing three times a day, or more if he was injured. His mother, Jolita Cekaviciene, said: 'Gabrielius did really well on the trial. 'His wounds healed quicker, and his skin was less red and inflamed. 'His skin was also less itchy which also reduced him scratching. 'His sleep was also less disturbed as he didn't need to have his special wound dressings changed as often, so this was a great benefit.' She said Gabrielius has managed to do a few things that he was not able to before the treatment, including taking part in some sports at school, riding his bike in the park on the grass, and being able to play football with his friends, with a soft ball. Ms Cekaviciene said the trial has given her son more freedom than before, but he still needs to be careful in any activity to avoid falling over or bumps. Gabrielius was referred to GOSH as a baby after medics spotted a wound when he was born, and he was diagnosed with RDEB when he was two weeks old. Ms Cekaviciene said: 'The first two years were really hard as you had to watch him constantly – even rubbing his eyes could cause painful blistering. 'He couldn't even tell us how much pain he was in or where he was hurting.' RDEB is a genetic condition which is caused by a fault in the gene that makes a protein which holds layers of skin together – collagen VII. Medics wanted to assess whether regular infusions with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) improved symptoms for children with the condition, after studies suggested that MSC treatments could promote wound healing, reduce inflammation and stimulate tissue regeneration. In the trial, funded by NHS England, the National Institute for Health and Care Research and the charity Cure EB, children were given a treatment called CORDStrom, manufactured by INmuneBio. Gabrielius is one of 30 children who took part in the new clinical trial at GOSH and Birmingham Children's Hospital. Patients would go into hospital and have a drip which delivers the cells over 10 to 15 minutes. In the study patients were split into two groups, about half were given the treatment, which is made from umbilical cord tissue, as an infusion, twice over two weeks. The other half were given a placebo, also known as a dummy drug. They then had a nine-month gap, known as a wash-out period, where the group that were initially given the dummy drug were given the treatment, while the group that received therapy first were given a dummy drug. The study, published in the journal eClinicalMedicine, reported a positive outcome of the treatment. The largest effects were in children under the age of 10, and in the children with intermediate type of RDEB. Families involved in the study reported a positive impact on daily life and well-being, with a reduction in both pain and itching. The treatment was said to be well tolerated by the children. INmuneBio have agreed to provide CORDStrom free of charge for a year for all children who took part in the trial, so researchers can continue to study them, and patients are expected to get two infusions of the treatment every four months. The company is seeking regulatory approval for the treatment so it can be approved for use in the UK and other countries. Chief investigator of the study, Dr Anna Martinez, paediatric dermatologist at GOSH, said: 'Our study has demonstrated that CORDStrom was safe and can help reduce disease activity in some patients with RDEB. 'Administering the treatment early and at regular intervals appears to reduce itch and improve wound healing, which over time we hope will reduce inflammation, modify the condition and may reduce over time the future risk of squamous cell carcinoma. 'It's fantastic to see how the patients, like Gabrielius, had improvements in their symptoms and their quality of life.' She added: 'The 12-month open label study will allow us to collect more data to hopefully show an increased benefit from treatments administered in children and young people with RDEB, to continue research in support of the treatment being rolled out more widely.' Sharmila Collins, founder trustee of Cure EB, said: 'Since funding the first trial and by contributing to Mission EB we have been working towards bringing MSC infusions forward for all children in the UK with RDEB. 'We hope these cells will become part of routine clinical care to alleviate the significant suffering of children with this condition.'