Cuba trans community sees glimmer of hope in proposed legislation, World News
HAVANA — Cuban transgender man Danny Ortiz has for years been stuck with his birth name "Daniela" — a name he does not want and that does not reflect his preference.
This month, that may finally change.
Cuban lawmakers are set to pass a landmark bill overhauling Cuba's civil registry in July that would allow trans people to officially change their name at will, eliminating bureaucratic hurdles that have long made the process difficult, if not impossible, for many.
"I have plans to get married and have children," the 25-year-old, born female, told Reuters in an interview alongside his girlfriend, Nahomis Matos, shortly after she administered him a shot of testosterone. "But first I need to change my name."
Trans people in Cuba interviewed by Reuters said they had previously been asked to provide, as evidence of the need for a name change, a sworn statement proving society already recognised the individual by their chosen new name, to have no criminal record, and even to present certificates from workshops or events in which the applicant participated under their preferred name.
The bill, likely to be passed before month's end, would mark a major step towards legal recognition of the LGBTQ community on the Caribbean island.
It follows the 2022 approval of Cuba's "Family Code", a law that greenlit same-sex marriage and adoption by gay couples, legislation widely hailed as a necessary step to combat long-held "machista" social mores.
Fátima Abdulá Ruiz, legal advisor to Cenesex, a state-run organisation that advocates for the LGBTQ community, said the bill, if passed, would task her group with issuing an multidisciplinary opinion certifying the person's desire to change his or her sex in the civil registry.
"(The bill) implements, for the first time, an expedited process," she said, calling the legislation "a step forward in the rights of trans people".
Previously, officials required a court order or proof of having undergone genital surgery ahead of changing a person's sex in the civil registry.
Cuban trans woman Mia Rochel Ramos — who was forced to give up a dream of becoming a nurse five years ago due to what she called "transphobia", said the new legislation offers hope.
"The next generations will have it (easier)," Rochel told Reuters.
While Cuba has long been hailed as the vanguard of Latin America's left, it had lagged behind regional neighbours on marriage equality, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Colombia, which moved more quickly in years past to approve gay marriage and other socially progressive reforms.
[[nid:688355]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
S. Korea's ex-PM Han accused of belatedly endorsing martial law decree, then destroying document
South Korea's former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo later requested that the documents be destroyed. PHOTO: REUTERS SEOUL - Former South Korean prime minister Han Duck-soo was found to have signed documents belatedly formalising former president Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law in late 2024. He later requested that the documents be destroyed, according to an ongoing investigation into Yoon's alleged insurrection and abuse of power, local media reported on July 1. The special counsel team, led by special prosecutor Cho Eun-suk, has reportedly acquired evidence of such actions during the questioning of Yoon's former aide Kang Eui-gu. Kang was a high-ranking official at the presidential office at the time who asked Mr Han to sign the document related to the emergency martial law declaration. Article 82 of the South Korean Constitution requires the signature of the prime minister and Cabinet members for such acts by the president, including those related to military affairs. But Mr Han's alleged signing of the documents took place after martial law was declared, and the initial declaration sent to the Cabinet did not bear Mr Han's signature. It was confirmed that Kang and Mr Han spoke by phone on Dec 5, 2024, a full day after martial law was lifted following a parliamentary vote demanding its repeal. Mr Han is believed to have signed the document – along with former Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun, a key figure in the alleged insurrection – but later requested that Kang discard it, saying that producing the document after martial law had already been imposed could lead to controversy. Yoon reportedly said he did not see how that could be an issue, but authorised the document to be destroyed anyway. Kang is also suspected of forging the official minutes of the Cabinet meeting where former President Yoon announced his plan to impose martial law. Though the meeting is believed to have lasted only about five minutes, the minutes made it look like it lasted for 40 minutes. Kang has told the prosecution that he called each minister to notify them of the unscheduled Cabinet meeting, but claimed that he had no knowledge of the imminent martial law declaration at the time. Whether Yoon and his aides violated the right of Cabinet members to deliberate on a presidential decision is a question linked to the charge of abuse of power. Yoon is currently under criminal investigation for allegedly leading an insurrection by illegally declaring martial law and abusing his power in the process. His impeachment was confirmed in April 2025, leading to his removal from office and an early election to choose the country's new leader in June 2025. THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Indian tech hub state pushes jail terms for 'fake news', sparks worries, Asia News
BENGALURU — Draft legislation by India's tech hub state of Karnataka that would impose jail terms of up to seven years for spreading "fake news" and other misinformation has stirred concerns among free speech activists that it could lead to censorship. With nearly one billion internet users, the stakes are high in a sprawling country of many ethnic and religious communities where fake news risks stirring deadly strife and AI deepfake videos have alarmed officials during elections. India's federal government already regulates social media content with legislation empowering it to order takedowns of disputed content. But some states such as Karnataka have begun taking their own measures. Karnataka's bill, the strictest of its kind yet, stipulates that those posting "fake news" and "anti-feminist" content, or "promoting superstition", would face imprisonment along with potential fines. The 11-page Karnataka Mis-Information And Fake News (Prohibition) Bill does not define such offences in practise, but said special courts and a regulatory committee would be set up to implement it. Free speech advocates have cited what they say would be the risk of selective enforcement arising from Karnataka's measure and flagged concerns that people posting memes or making honest mistakes online could be prosecuted. "Misinformation is fairly subjective and every person who uses the internet is susceptible to falling within the dragnet of this law," said Apar Gupta, founder of the Internet Freedom Foundation, a New Delhi-based digital advocacy group which first made the Karnataka draft legislation public. The state government of Karnataka, home to the city of Bengaluru that hosts the offices or branches of many Indian and foreign tech giants, has said the bill will be released for public consultation before implementation. Priyank Kharge, Karnataka's IT minister, said on Friday "there is a lot of misinformation on the proposed Misinformation Bill in public". He later added that the "sole objective is to address the growing digital information disorder" and the government's focus was to tackle misinformation and fake news, "and nothing beyond that". He did not immediately respond to Reuters calls seeking further comment on Monday. Karnataka's move could risk creating multiple regulations imposing conflicting obligations and regulatory challenges for companies, said Aman Taneja, partner at law and policy firm Ikigai. Some Indian media have sharply criticised the draft bill. The Deccan Herald newspaper on Monday titled an opinion piece "A remedy that's worse than the menace", saying the Karnataka government should "do away with the criminal provisions" in the legislation. India has over the years held talks with US tech giants like Google it sees as having been slow to remove fake news posts, and New Delhi in 2019 set up a "Fact Check Unit" to debunk what it sees as misinformation. [[nid:719675]]
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump suggests Doge look at Musk's companies to save money
Mr Musk's criticism of the Bill has caused a rift in his relationship with Mr Trump. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump suggested on July 1 that his efficiency department should take a look at the subsidies that Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies have received in order to save the federal government 'BIG' money. Mr Trump's comments come after billionaire Mr Musk renewed his criticism on June 30 of Mr Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending Bill, vowing to unseat lawmakers who backed it after campaigning on limiting government spending. 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa. No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!,' Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social. In response to Mr Trump's post, Mr Musk, in his own social media platform X, said 'I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now.' After weeks of relative silence following a feud with Mr Trump over the legislation, Mr Musk rejoined the debate on June 28 as the Senate took up the package, calling it 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on social media platform X. On June 30, he ramped up his criticism, saying lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill 'should hang their heads in shame!' 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Mr Musk said. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated 'that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' 'Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,' he wrote. Mr Musk's criticism of the Bill has caused a rift in his relationship with Mr Trump, marking a dramatic shift after the tech billionaire spent nearly US$300 million (S$381.62 million) on Mr Trump's re-election campaign and led the administration's controversial Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), a federal cost-cutting initiative. Mr Musk, the world's richest man, has argued that the legislation would greatly increase the national debt and erase the savings he says he has achieved through Doge. It remains unclear how much sway Mr Musk has over Congress or what effect his opinions might have on the bill's passage. But Republicans have expressed concern that his on-again, off-again feud with Mr Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. The rift has also led to volatility for Tesla, with shares of the company seeing wild price swings that erased approximately US$150 billion of its market value, though it has since recovered. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
