The real story behind teenage pimples and how it can change future acne treatment
Ever wondered why acne strikes in your teenage years and lingers for some, while others breeze through with clear skin?The answer may lie not just in hormones, but in the invisible world of bacteria living on your face.A new study by researchers at MIT, published in Cell Host & Microbe, has uncovered fascinating insights into how bacteria on our facial skin evolve, especially during the teenage years. And their findings could reshape how we think about, and treat, acne.advertisement
THE SKIN MICROBIOME MYSTERYOur skin, especially on the face, is home to a bustling community of microbes.Among them, two bacteria dominate: Cutibacterium acnes (previously known as Propionibacterium acnes) and Staphylococcus epidermidis. For years, scientists knew these bacteria played a role in skin conditions like acne and eczema, but exactly how and when they settle in remained unclear.This new research reveals that during the early teenage years, a time when oil production in the skin skyrockets, new strains of C. acnes begin to arrive and multiply rapidly. These strains then tend to stay put for years, forming a stable, personalised bacterial signature on each person's face.
Our skin, especially on the face, is home to a bustling community of microbes. ()
advertisementThat stability, it turns out, is a double-edged sword."If we had a strain that we knew could prevent acne, these results would suggest we should apply it early, during the transition to adulthood, so that it has a better chance to settle in,' explained Dr. Tami Lieberman, senior author of the study and associate professor at MIT.WHY TIMING MATTERSThe study tracked the skin microbiomes of 30 children and 27 parents. By collecting samples over time and sequencing individual bacterial cells, the researchers discovered that teenagers acquire many new C. acnes strains.But once a person reaches adulthood, the microbiome becomes mostly fixed, making it harder for new strains, even helpful probiotic ones, to take hold.This suggests a crucial takeaway: the early teenage years may be the ideal window to introduce acne-preventing probiotic treatments, when the face is still open to "welcoming" new strains."It's like planting seeds. The soil is more fertile during adolescence," said Lieberman.
Once a person reaches adulthood, the microbiome becomes mostly fixed, making it harder for new strains, even helpful probiotic ones, to take hold. ()
The study also found that Staphylococcus epidermidis, the other major skin resident, behaves quite differently. Its strains tend to come and go, living for less than two years on average. Interestingly, even people living in the same house don't share many of the same strains.Why this happens isn't fully understood. It may be due to individual skin care routines, genetics, or the bacteria themselves blocking new ones from moving in.WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE FUTURE OF ACNE TREATMENTCurrent acne treatments often rely on antibiotics or retinoids, which can irritate the skin and have limited long-term benefits. But what if we could treat acne by tweaking the skin microbiome during its most vulnerable and flexible phase, adolescence?While this study doesn't offer a cure for acne yet, it points to a new direction: understanding when and how to introduce "good" bacteria to support skin health. The idea isn't far-fetched. Several companies are already exploring topical probiotics for acne. This study offers a clue: apply them early, before the skin's bacterial population solidifies.For teenagers struggling with acne, it's a reminder that their skin is undergoing a major transformation, one that could be better supported with well-timed, personalised treatments in the near future.advertisementThe research also sheds light on why some people get acne and others don't, even if they live together and use the same products. The answer may lie in what strain of C. acnes they carry and how their immune system responds to it.The next step for the MIT team is to understand whether the timing of these bacterial takeovers affects long-term skin health—and how to use that information to design better treatments."We're each walking around with a unique skin microbiome, shaped by early events in our lives. If we can understand that better, we may be able to guide it toward healthier outcomes," said Lieberman.Trending Reel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 hours ago
- Business Standard
Harvard gains support from top US universities in Trump funding battle
A group of 18 leading US research universities, including Princeton, MIT, Caltech and Johns Hopkins, asked a federal judge for permission to file legal arguments in support of Harvard University in its high-stakes showdown with the Trump administration over more than $2 billion in frozen grant money. The institutions have all received millions of dollars from the federal government for research that has 'advanced scientific knowledge, safeguarded national security, strengthened the American economy, and saved countless lives,' they said in a court filing Friday in Harvard's lawsuit. Harvard sued in April, claiming the government freeze violates the university's First Amendment guarantee of free speech and federal law governing administrative rulemaking. The fight is part of a broad-based effort by President Donald Trump to force sweeping changes at Harvard and other elite US universities. The government has also frozen or is reviewing federal funding to Princeton, Cornell, Northwestern and Columbia universities, among others. Harvard claims in its suit, filed in Boston federal court, that the Trump administration illegally suspended its funding in retaliation for its refusal to bow to 'unconstitutional demands' to overhaul governance, discipline and hiring policies, as well as diversity programs. The president claims Harvard, the nation's oldest and richest university, has failed to combat antisemitism on campus and encourage viewpoint diversity. 'The cuts will disrupt ongoing research, ruin experiments and datasets, destroy the careers of aspiring scientists, and deter long-term investments at universities across the country,' the universities said in a request to file amicus curiae or 'friend of the court' arguments supporting Harvard's case against the government. The request to support Harvard also comes from Boston University, Brown University, Colorado State University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, Oregon State University, Rice University, Rutgers University, Tufts University, University of Maryland at College Park, University of Oregon, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh and Yale University. A group of states led by Massachusetts, where Harvard is located, also asked to file arguments in support of the university on Friday. The case is President and Fellows of Harvard College v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 25-cv-11048, US District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston).
Mint
13 hours ago
- Mint
Harvard Gets Other Universities' Backing in Trump Funding Fight
A group of 18 leading US research universities, including Princeton, MIT, Caltech and Johns Hopkins, asked a federal judge for permission to file legal arguments in support of Harvard University in its high-stakes showdown with the Trump administration over more than $2 billion in frozen grant money. The institutions have all received millions of dollars from the federal government for research that has 'advanced scientific knowledge, safeguarded national security, strengthened the American economy, and saved countless lives,' they said in a court filing Friday in Harvard's lawsuit. Harvard sued in April, claiming the government freeze violates the university's First Amendment guarantee of free speech and federal law governing administrative rulemaking. The fight is part of a broad-based effort by President Donald Trump to force sweeping changes at Harvard and other elite US universities. The government has also frozen or is reviewing federal funding to Princeton, Cornell, Northwestern and Columbia universities, among others. Harvard claims in its suit, filed in Boston federal court, that the Trump administration illegally suspended its funding in retaliation for its refusal to bow to 'unconstitutional demands' to overhaul governance, discipline and hiring policies, as well as diversity programs. The president claims Harvard, the nation's oldest and richest university, has failed to combat antisemitism on campus and encourage viewpoint diversity. 'The cuts will disrupt ongoing research, ruin experiments and datasets, destroy the careers of aspiring scientists, and deter long-term investments at universities across the country,' the universities said in a request to file amicus curiae or 'friend of the court' arguments supporting Harvard's case against the government. The request to support Harvard also comes from Boston University, Brown University, Colorado State University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, Oregon State University, Rice University, Rutgers University, Tufts University, University of Maryland at College Park, University of Oregon, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh and Yale University. A group of states led by Massachusetts, where Harvard is located, also asked to file arguments in support of the university on Friday. The case is President and Fellows of Harvard College v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 25-cv-11048, US District Court, District of Massachusetts . This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Following last year's trend, JEE topper leaves IIT to join MIT, citing better opportunities overseas
Devesh Bhaiya, who secured All India Rank 8 in JEE Advanced 2025 , has chosen to study at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States instead of joining any of the Indian Institutes of Technology. Devesh is following a growing trend among India's top engineering talent opting for international universities, especially MIT , a TOI report stated. Not the first to make the shift Last year's JEE Advanced topper , Ved Lahoti, who scored 352 out of 360 — the highest in recent years — is also leaving IIT Bombay after one year to join MIT on a fully funded scholarship. In earlier years, students like Chirag Falor (JEE 2020) and Chitraang Murdia (JEE 2014) made similar decisions. Murdia spent a year at IIT Bombay before moving to MIT and later completed his PhD from the University of California, Berkeley. "It seems like MIT trusts the rigour of JEE Advanced and the promise of our Olympiad stars," said Prof Vijay Singh, former professor at IIT Kanpur and retired faculty at the Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education. Olympiad medals open global doors Devesh Bhaiya has an academic record beyond the JEE rank. He has won three gold medals — two at the International Junior Science Olympiad (2021, 2022) and one at the International Chemistry Olympiad in 2024. He also received the Bal Shakti Puraskar in 2020. At the age of 12, he authored a paper on light pollution. Though Devesh had already secured admission to MIT in March 2025, he still took the JEE Advanced exam as a backup option. Live Events You Might Also Like: JEE Advanced 2025 Results and Toppers List: Rajit Gupta from IIT Delhi zone tops the exam; Check names of toppers here A growing list of students transferring Ved Lahoti said, 'I'm fully satisfied with IIT Bombay. But it lags in research. Globally, it's not even in the top 100. So, I applied to MIT — and when it came through, I took it. A lot of students have taken transfer to MIT and when I asked them, they said the transfer was truly worth it.' Several other top rankers have taken the same route. Nishank Abhangi spent a year at IIT Bombay in 2019–2020 before moving to MIT. Mahit Gadhewala, who secured All India Rank 9 in 2022, also transferred after one year at IIT Bombay. According to Prof Singh, the first student to set this trend was Raghu Mahajan. He studied at IIT Delhi for a year, moved to MIT, completed his PhD at Stanford, and is currently spending a year at the International Centre for Theoretical Sciences in Bengaluru. "He was very committed to coming back to India," said Prof Singh. Ved Lahoti expressed a similar sentiment: "I have no plans to settle in the USA." You Might Also Like: Kota's Rajit Gupta, first JEE topper from the IIT coaching hub, shares secret success mantra learned from his mom (The article was originally published in TOI)
