
How Labour is destroying the British village
The endearing charm and blissful way of life, however, is edging closer to extinction.
Labour's housebuilding drive threatens to 'bulldoze' Britain's villages to create mega-villages, loosening their sense of community and, perhaps, fracturing their soul.
In her quest for 1.5 million new homes by 2029, Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, has cranked up the pressure on rural communities to build, while relaxing targets for major cities, including London.
This could have a devastating effect on the unique nature of our villages. Blake Stephenson, Tory MP, recently told the Commons how villages in his Mid Bedfordshire constituency are at risk from the 'creeping spread of urban sprawl' that threatens to 'merge them into a conglomerate mass of development'.
His fears come amid the Government's plan to strip back development protections in the green belt. Villages would no longer be designated as 'historic', which grants them extra safeguards, while a block on 'unrestricted sprawl' around rural settlements will also be removed. In fact, the Government's proposals stipulate the importance of preventing neighbouring towns from merging, but do not offer the same protection for villages.
A bid to boost village protections was launched by opposition MPs last month, but the motion was voted down – paving the way for the identity and heritage of England's classic villages to be lost.
'Changing beyond recognition'
Two weeks after Stephenson outlined his concerns for Bedfordshire in Parliament, we're standing in the village of Steppingley, a sleepy green belt settlement where you'd half expect to bump into Midsomer Murders' DCI Tom Barnaby. Dog walkers stop to chat with each other, the church bells chime on the hour and the pub will open at midday.
The pub, church and village hall are clustered together, while an Indian restaurant lies on the periphery. The average house sold for £470,000 last year.
Home to little more than 200 residents and comprised of just a few roads, it is usually far from the news agenda. But with the Government determined to build millions of homes, Steppingley is one of the potential 'conglomerate mass' victims Stephenson fears for.
'It's places like this which are in danger,' he says. 'England is changing beyond all recognition and most villages are getting a lot of housing.'
In what was believed to be a record for public engagement, more than 5,000 objection letters were sent to Central Bedfordshire council over plans to build 170 homes on fields between the town of Flitwick and Steppingley.
The proposals, which would have shrunk the gap between the town and village to less than half a mile, were refused by the council's planning committee last month. But there is little cause for celebration.
'It will go to the Planning Inspectorate and be overturned,' Stephenson concedes. 'That's another final decision which will be taken out of the hands of the local community. It feels like the strong arm of the Government is going to take over any form of control.
'Once one field becomes housing, it sets a precedent. One is developed, and then the next and the next again. Flitwick is getting closer to Steppingley.'
Due to the Government's housebuilding narrative, villagers fear there is a 'sense of inevitability' that they will soon be swallowed up into one mega-village that has lost its identity.
'I feel like I could cry,' one declares. 'It feels wherever you go around here there is a threat of further development.'
'They've just built that monstrosity over there,' says 65-year-old Mark Gale, pointing to a care complex as he surveys the view across fields from Steppingley to Flitwick. 'Then there's a new ugly crematorium there, and they've just built a housing estate down the bottom there called Steppingley Gardens but it's nothing to do with Steppingley.
'I've been here 25 years and it's very nice living in a village, nice and peaceful. I don't want it to become like any other town.
'Without a doubt it would lose its identity. It's a tight-knit community and I don't think anyone here wants that to change.'
'Villages are losing their souls'
It is that sense of village community which feels endangered in modern day Britain – one that is becoming critically endangered thanks to an ever-growing population and the continued struggle for rural businesses and services.
The prospect of mass housebuilding in the village of Wolvey, Warwickshire, may spell the end for one of its local stores if a supermarket is built at one of three new estates proposed by Rugby Borough Council. 'We have worked hard to grow the shop at a time when many village stores are closing. Clearly we would not be able to compete with a multiple retailer outlet,' its manager Ian Nicholson posted on a village Facebook page.
Opponents claim the green belt village will balloon in size by 80pc should it become victim to housebuilding 'desecration' of 710 new homes put forward by the council in its proposed Local Plan.
Rugby Borough Council said it is 'following an evidence-based process of site selection... to bring forward a plan that can be sound and ensure development is properly planned'.
A spokesman said: 'For years in Rugby borough, most new housing has been built in the town, and rural housing would provide more housing choice in areas that are popular places to live.'
The concerns in Wolvey paint a picture for villages across the country. Councils are grappling with huge new housing targets imposed upon them by Westminster. Rural local authorities have been saddled with vast increases to their delivery numbers, while targets for major cities have retreated.
Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, told Parliament that 'raising targets by up to 400pc in rural areas while simultaneously reducing them by over 11pc in London, 30pc in Birmingham and Newcastle, and over 50pc in Coventry is unfair and wrong-headed.'
It is that added pressure on rural areas which will do little to safeguard the dwindling community feel. Village amenities are sparse and have been in a continual decline for decades. Only a third of the rural population now live within three miles of a bank, while closed shops are being taken 'away from public service provision' and transferred to private use, according to a recent Parliamentary research paper.
In his latest season of Clarkson's Farm, new publican Jeremy Clarkson bemoans how 'villages are losing their soul'.
'You don't have a village doctor any more. He's in a health centre 30 miles away and you can't get an appointment. There's no village bobby on the beat. There's no village vicar, there's no village shop, there's no village school.
'If we end up at a point where there's no village pub then what is a village? It's just some houses. Pubs are the hub and it should always be that way.'
While Clarkson has breathed new life into his pub in Asthall, others around the country are falling by the wayside.
A recent victim is The Crown in the Bedfordshire village of Shillington, a former local for Stephenson. '[Chancellor] Rachel Reeves's Budget didn't help at all, with National Insurance increasing. The cost of doing business just goes through the roof. Just look behind us, the evidence is there.' In what would have been peak lunchtime hours a few weeks ago, the only noise now is the swinging pub sign squeaking in the wind.
'Footfall is a challenge for village pubs, you've now got to be a destination pub. They are the centres of community, so it's such a shame they're closing.' Six pubs closed every week in 2024, according to the British Beer and Pub Association.
'We've got a gun to our heads over housing delivery'
In the Kent village of Littlebourne, three miles east of Canterbury, residents are fearful of the future.
Housebuilder Gladman had a 115-home project rejected by the previous Tory administration at Canterbury City Council in 2021 amid concerns over the 'urbanisation of the countryside'.
Fast-forward to today and the proposed scheme has almost trebled in size, swelling to 300 homes. The council, now led by Labour, conceded that the new homes would 'harm' the village aesthetic, yet an officer's recommendation of approval for the significantly larger scheme was sent to the planning committee in May.
At the meeting, one Tory councillor complained that the committee had 'a gun to our head to allow more of these houses' as a result of the nationwide push to build.
The council is in a 'state of presumption in favour of development' because of its failure to hit government housing targets in recent years. This means the authority has to look more favourably on housing applications they would otherwise refuse. A decision on the scheme was deferred until a later date as councillors await more mitigation details from the developers.
Peter Farrow, of Littlebourne Parish Council, said: 'The village has had a lot of extra housing in recent years and this would be a huge increase. There isn't a reasonable excuse for bearing down on us.
'There is a lot of pressure coming from the people in Westminster who are really pushing. So I suspect this Labour council probably feels under more pressure than the previous council did.'
And it's not just the pressure of housebuilding which is worrying England's villages. The ever-increasing spread of solar farms risks surrounding rural settlements.
Residents in 23 villages between Long Stratton and Diss in Norfolk are believed to have been sent letters, telling them their land may be 'required' for what would be the country's biggest solar farm.
As the plans are deemed a nationally significant infrastructure project the developer, Island Green Power, could have the power to compulsorily purchase land.
Carpets of solar panels are poised to be installed across almost 500 square miles of Britain between now and 2035, as Labour ramps up its net zero plans. Figures released by the Government show that central England will be hit hardest by the solar blitz, with the greatest concentration stretching from Lincolnshire to South Wales.
'Labour is going toe-to-toe with communities'
Pick almost any village in the country, and you'll likely hear tales of housebuilding woe and how it looks almost unrecognisable from years ago. Concerns over expansion aren't anything new.
Yet Stephenson believes the rhetoric from the Government is putting tails up.
Law changes proposed in the Planning and Infrastructure Billinclude the introduction of a national scheme of delegation. This will determine which planning applications should be decided by local officers, and which should go to a public committee. The changes are expected to lead to fewer applications being discussed in public to speed up the planning system and the housebuilding process.
Meanwhile, ecology surveys to mitigate the impact on Britain's dwindling wildlife will no longer be mandatory. Earlier this year, Reeves told developers that they need not worry about 'bats and newts' in a bid to cut red tape.
'You don't solve issues by having a fight with village communities, but that's exactly what Labour is doing,' Stephenson says. 'They are going toe-to-toe with communities, telling them 'we don't care what you think, we're going to build anyway'.
'They've decided they have the power, they have the majority, they can fight who they want.' And our villages may be the ultimate casualties.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘This is not action': MPs respond to David Lammy's condemnation of Israel
When David Lammy stood at the dispatch box to deliver a statement condemning Israel's killing of starving civilians in Gaza on Monday, he was met with anger from MPs. 'We want action, and this is not action,' thundered one Labour MP. 'Is this it?' another questioned. 'At what point does our basic humanity require us to take stronger action? Many of us think the red line was passed a long time ago,' a third said. The fury across the Commons was evident. 'Are words enough?' asked one veteran Tory. A second accused Lammy of 'complicity by inaction' and warned it could land him at The Hague. A Lib Dem highlighted that repeated UK expressions of regret had not prevented further carnage. A clearly despairing Lammy attempted to reassure the politicians the government was playing its part. 'Me raising my voice will not bring this war to an end. I lament that and I regret that. But am I sure that the UK government are doing everything in our power? Yes, I am.' But as international condemnation of Israel over the horrors it is inflicting on starving Palestinian civilians grows, Keir Starmer's government is struggling to convince the British public that it is doing enough. The outrage in the Commons is reflected across the country more widely, with the public increasingly regarding Israel's response since the October 7 attacks as disproportionate, as the atrocities continued. The government have been on the defensive, pointing out that it has restored funding to the UN agency UNWRA, provided millions in humanitarian assistance, sanctioned far-right Israeli ministers and those who committed settler violence, and broken off trade negotiations with Israel. But it has struggled to explain its export licensing regime. Ministers insist they have stopped the sale of arms, despite there still being more than 300 licences in operation. These include, they say, body armour sent to protect NGO workers, chemicals for Israeli universities and components for goods which are then transported to Nato allies. In particular, there is anger at the UK decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, which ministers argue is unavoidable because they are part of a global programme over which the UK does not have unilateral control. It exposes serious weaknesses in the regime and some believe the government should go further – with a fuller export embargo and an end to all military co-operation with Israel. Lammy has only recently sought to explain that RAF flights that overfly Gaza do not share information to help Israel conduct the war. 'We are not doing that. I would never do that,' he said this week. Starmer is also under pressure to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, both from his own back benches, within his cabinet and from the wider diplomatic community. Ministers say the UK will 'play its part' in working towards formal recognition, with a UN conference led by the French and Saudis later this month a key moment. Privately, they warn the move would only be symbolic unless there is a ceasefire first. But for many, who think the UK should be matching France's more hardline stance, that is not a good enough reason not to. 'If not now, then when?' one cabinet minister said. The government has stated it could issue more sanctions – with calls to do so against senior Israeli military officers, government ministers and even Benjamin Netanyahu himself. But that has not happened yet. Nor have suggestions it might expel the Israeli ambassador been heeded. 'That's unserious,' said one insider. The UK has also backed away from declaring that Israel has broken international law, insisting that while the government believes it is 'at risk' of doing so, it is up to the international courts to reach that judgment. Aides cite the same reason for avoiding the term 'genocide' to describe the horrors unfolding in Gaza. Back in the Commons on Monday, the criticism kept coming. 'The will of the House is clear on this matter: it wants action, not words. Why are you not hearing that?' a Labour MP asked. 'How could I not?' the foreign secretary responded. But while Lammy may have got the message, he appears to remain restricted by both the caution of the UK prime minister, and the realpolitik that there is only one foreign power that could single-handedly force an end to the conflict: the US. 'I wish we could, but the truth is … we are unable to do that just as the United Kingdom,' he told MPs. 'We have to work in partnership with our allies.' But for many, that will not be enough.


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Old Trafford chaos as Lancashire try to woo India but forget local fans
'Lancashire Cricket is playing its role in supporting bilateral trade talks between the UK and Indian governments.' What does this mean? George Balderson mediating discussions over whisky tariffs? Luke Wells flanking Keir Starmer during his handshake photo op with Narendra Modi? The line appears on the club's website, highlighting an event at Old Trafford in March to welcome a new Indian consulate in Manchester. It's undoubtedly odd but also nothing new. The push to develop Indian ties has been part of Lancashire's story for a while now, the journey beginning at India and Pakistan's clash in the city at the 2019 World Cup. The story goes that their chair at the time, the late David Hodgkiss, observed the passion in the ground and told the chief executive, Daniel Gidney, that Lancashire needed to look east. 'My aim is that, one day, everyone in India will see Lancashire as their second favourite team,' Gidney told ESPNcricinfo in 2020. If that sounds a bit big-hearted, then there is the practical element, too. 'Rooms in our hotel were selling for £3,500,' said Gidney, referring to the Hilton that is part of the ground. So it leads to all of this: Lancashire having its own channel on JioTV, an Indian streaming service; pre-season tours of the country; hosting a networking event in Bengaluru to promote tourism in Manchester; expressing the desire to have an Indian Premier League partner for the Old Trafford-based Hundred team. RPSG, which owns Lucknow Super Giants, was the winning bidder, acquiring a 70% stake in Manchester Originals. This feels like a big week for the county, who do not host a Test next summer and won't receive the substantial injection of a men's Ashes match in two years' time. A contest involving India is the one to capitalise on and another substantial advertisement for those watching abroad. It comes two weeks on from the first women's Twenty20 international held at Old Trafford in 13 years, India beating England by six wickets. Lancashire admitted to disappointing ticket sales for the Test visit of Sri Lanka last year, and rain meant an abandonment of an England-Australia men's T20 in September. Their opportunity to host India four years ago was ruined by a Covid outbreak and a controversial last-minute cancellation, though the England and Wales Cricket Board stepped in to cover ticket refunds. There might have been a brief moment of relief for the club's hierarchy when Chris Woakes sent the ball down to Yashasvi Jaiswal on Wednesday morning. Not that everyone got to see it, as queues outside the ground derailed the arrival of supporters. Lancashire released a statement that tried to shift some of the blame, before admitting the need to change arrangements for the remainder of the Test. 'We are aware that some supporters experienced queues getting into Emirates Old Trafford this morning, which we apologise for,' the club said. 'We saw nearly 9,000 supporters arrive at the ground very late despite encouraging early arrival, with all bags subject to searches on entry. 'The club will be looking at increasing the number of gates for the rest of the Test match. We strongly encourage ticket buyers to only bring bags if required, and if doing so to arrive as early as possible. Gates will be open at 9am for the rest of the game.' Build your brand overseas, but those at home deserve more love, too. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion Lancashire supporters may well agree. They do have plenty of things to celebrate this season – an upcoming men's Blast quarter-final, the women's T20 Cup victory, and the enduring presence of Jimmy Anderson – but there has largely been misery in the County Championship. Relegation last season was followed by a dire start this year, with Dale Benkenstein departing as head coach after seven winless games and Keaton Jennings stepping down as red-ball captain. Those who did beat the morning queues might have expected a bit of fire between the two teams: eyeballs, finger-wagging, stump-mic bleeps, the whole lot. After the tetchiness of the previous Test, Harry Brook had talked about England shedding their nice-guy image; Shubman Gill had continued to take umbrage with the hosts' time-wasting. But the morning lacked caffeine and any sunshine to boil tempers. Jaiswal and KL Rahul were watchful, Chris Woakes yearned for an outside edge to carry to the cordon, Jofra Archer stayed economical. Hostility was not the word to use. Maybe they were just playing their roles in supporting bilateral trade talks between the UK and Indian governments.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Fife councillor guilty of sex offences against teenage girl
A Fife councillor has been found guilty of sexual offences against a teenage girl over a seven-month Graham, who was suspended from the Labour party two years ago, groomed and sexually abused the girl at a variety of locations in the Fife and Edinburgh areas in 43-year-old was convicted of offences involving sexual activity with a girl aged between 13 and 15 following a trial at Kirkcaldy Sheriff is due to be sentenced on 19 August. Speaking after Graham's conviction, Fife Council leader David Ross said details of the abuse revealed at the trial had been "truly shocking".The Labour councillor added: "This is appalling behaviour by anyone, let alone an elected councillor - and the sentence will reflect the seriousness of this case. "Our sympathies go out to the young person involved."It is impossible to express how badly David Graham has let down his colleagues and the people he was elected to represent."A Labour Party spokesperson said: "The party is taking immediate action to exclude David Graham from membership of the Labour Party following his conviction."Police Scotland Det Insp Graham Watson described Graham as "a manipulative individual who groomed and sexually abused his teenage victim".The officer added: "He was well-known and in a position of power when the offending took place."I would like to thank the female for her assistance in bringing him to justice."