logo
The laws around driverless cars in the UK, explained

The laws around driverless cars in the UK, explained

Yahoo20-05-2025

Uber has said it is ready to launch driverless taxis in the UK. Andrew Macdonald, a vice-president at the company, told the BBC: "We're ready to launch robotaxis in the UK as soon as the regulatory environment is ready for us."
Exactly one year ago, Rishi Sunak's government passed the Automated Vehicles Act into law, declaring "self-driving vehicles could be on British roads by 2026".
The then Conservative government declared that travel would be "revolutionised" by the £42 billion sector, promising to increase road safety and "unlocking opportunities for those who currently can't drive". Deaths and injuries from drink driving, speeding, tiredness and inattention could, they said, be drastically reduced
This week, however, the new Labour government said that the 2026 target would come and go and that it would be another year before fully driverless are approved.
But what exactly are the laws on driverless cars - and when could they hit British roads.
The Automated Vehicles Act passed under the previous government outlined the legal framework for autonomous vehicles.
It requires self-driving vehicles to "achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or higher than, that of careful and competent human drivers" and for road safety in Britain to "be better... than it would otherwise be" as a result of these cars being in use.
Human error contributes to nine in 10 road collisions.
The transport secretary - now Heidi Alexander - is the person who can authorise self-driving cars for use once they are satisfied safety requirements have been met.
Under the law, the person behind the wheel - labelled as the 'user-in-charge' - would not be held responsible for the actions of a vehicle while in self-driving mode. Businesses such as insurers, manufacturers and software developers would be liable if something goes wrong.
This week, the Department for Transport told the BBC: "We are working quickly and will implement self-driving vehicle legislation in the second half of 2027.
"We are also exploring options for short-term trials and pilots to create the right conditions for a thriving self-driving sector."
Trials of autonomous vehicle technology have been ongoing across the UK, such as by Wayve in London and Oxa in Oxford.
But Dr Siddartha Khastgir, head of safe autonomy at Warwick Manufacturing Group at the University of Warwick, told Yahoo News that if the government does approve self-driving cars in 2027, it will be 2028 - at the earliest - before they are actually on the roads.
"It's a hard thing to do, to approve an automated driving system. There is a lot of scientific evidence needed to create the policy, which takes time. That's why I think the government is right to ask for more time, because we do not want to approve unsafe systems.
"It's a three-step process: regulation being published, [manufacturers] understanding the regulations and then seeking approval, and then actually having products on the road.
"I don't see that happening any time before 2028."
Paul Newman, founder of Oxa, an autonomous vehicle software developer, and professor of information engineering at the University of Oxford, also told BBC Radio 4's Today programme self-driving cars will have to be "rock solid" in terms of safety before they are rolled out.
"The UK is leading in regulation and legislation around autonomous vehicles being allowed on our roads.
"I don't think anyone's in a rush to do something until we can be sure, and have assurance and insurance, and absolutely rock solid safety arguments, to earn that trust around the use of AI in... changing the way people and goods move."
YouGov polling last year suggested 37% of Britons would feel "very unsafe" in a driverless car.
I went for a ride in a self-driving taxi to see Britain's future (The Telegraph)
LA tech entrepreneur nearly misses flight after getting trapped in robotaxi (The Guardian)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?
Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Will Musk's explosive row with Trump help or harm his businesses?

When Elon Musk recently announced that he was stepping back from politics, investors hoped that would mean he would step up his involvement in the many tech firms he runs. His explosive row with President Donald Trump - and the very public airing of his dirty White House laundry - suggests Musk's changing priorities might not quite be the salve they had been hoping for. Instead of Musk retreating somewhat from the public eye and focusing on boosting the fortunes of Tesla and his other enterprises, he now finds himself being threatened with a boycott from one of his main customers - Trump's federal government. Tesla shares were sent into freefall on Thursday - falling 14% - as he sounded off about President Donald Trump on social media. They rebounded a little on Friday following some indications tempers were cooling. Even so, for the investors and analysts who, for months, had made clear they wanted Musk off his phone and back at work, the situation is far from ideal. Some though argue the problems for Musk's businesses run much deeper than this spat - and the controversial role in the Trump administration it has brought a spectacular end to. For veteran tech journalist Kara Swisher, that is especially so for Tesla. "Tesla's finished," she told the BBC on the sidelines of the San Francisco Media Summit early this week. "It was a great car company. They could compete in the autonomous taxi space but they're way behind." Tesla has long attempted to play catch-up against rival Waymo, owned by Google-parent Alphabet, whose driverless taxis have traversed the streets of San Francisco for years - and now operate in several more cities. This month, Musk is supposed to be overseeing Tesla's launch of a batch of autonomous robo-taxis in Austin, Texas. He posted to X last week that the electric vehicle maker had been testing the Model Y with no drivers on board. "I believe 90% of the future value of Tesla is going to be autonomous and robotics," Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives told the BBC this week, adding that the Austin launch would be "a watershed moment". "The first task at hand is ensuring the autonomous vision gets off to a phenomenal start," Ives added. Who is Elon Musk? How the Trump-Musk feud erupted But with Musk's attention divided, the project's odds of success would appear to have lengthened. And there's something else to factor in too: Musk's own motivation. The talk in Silicon Valley lately centres less on whether Musk can turn things around and more on whether he even cares. "He's a really powerful person when he's focused on something," said Ross Gerber, President and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management. "Before, it was about proving to the world that he would make EVs - the tech that nobody else could do. It was about proving he could make rockets. He had a lot to prove." A longtime Tesla investor, Gerber has soured on the stock, and has been pairing back his holdings since Musk's foray into right-wing politics. He called Thursday an "extremely painful day." "It's the dumbest thing you could possibly do to think that you have more power than the president of the United States," Gerber said, referring to Musk's social media tirade against Trump. The BBC reached out to X, Tesla, and SpaceX seeking comment from Mr Musk but did not receive a response. A particular problem for Musk is that, before he seemingly created an enemy in Donald Trump, he already had one in the grassroots social media campaign against his car-maker. Protests, dubbed #TeslaTakedown, have played out across the country every weekend since Trump took office. In April, Tesla reported a 20% drop in car sales for the first three months of the year. Profits plunged more than 70%, and the share price went down with it. "He should not be deciding the fate of our democracy by disassembling our government piece by piece. It's not right," protestor Linda Koistinen told me at a demonstration outside a Berkeley, California Tesla dealership in February. Koistinen said she wanted to make a "visible stand" against Musk personally. "Ultimately it's not about the tech or the Tesla corporation," said Joan Donovan, a prominent disinformation researcher who co-organized the #TeslaTakedown protests on social media. "It's about the way in which the stock of Tesla has been able to be weaponized against the people and it has put Musk in such a position to have an incredible amount of power with no transparency," Donovan added. Another aspect of Musk's empire that has raised the ire of his detractors is X, the social media platform once known as Twitter. "He bought Twitter so that he had clout and would be able to - at the drop of a hat - reach hundreds of millions of people," Donovan said. There is another possibility here though. Could Musk's high-profile falling out with Trump help rehabilitate him in the eyes of people who turned against him because of his previous closeness to the president? Patrick Moorhead, chief analyst at Moor Insights & Strategy, thinks it could. "We're a very forgiving country," Moorhead says in a telephone interview. "These things take time," he acknowledges, but "it's not unprecedented". Swisher likened Musk's personal brand to that of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates more than two decades ago. She said Gates was once regarded as "the Darth Vader of Silicon Valley" because of his "arrogant and rude" personality. Today, despite his flaws, Gates has largely rehabilitated his image. "He learned. He grew up. People can change," Swisher told me, even though Musk is "clearly troubled." The problem for Musk is the future for him and his companies is not just about what he does - but what Trump decides too. And while Trump needed Musk in the past, not least to help fund his presidential race, it's not so clear he does now. Noah Smith, writer of the Noahpinion Substack, said Trump's highly lucrative foray into cryptocurrencies - as unseemly as it has been - may have freed him from depending on Musk to carry out his will. "My guess is that this was so he could get out from under Elon," Smith said. In Trump's most menacing comment of the day, he suggested cutting Musk's government contracts, which have an estimated value of $38 billion. A significant chunk of that goes to Musk's rocket company SpaceX - seemingly threatening its future. However, despite the bluster, Trump's warning may be a little more hollow than it seems. That's because SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft ferries people and cargo to the International Space Station where three NASA astronauts are currently posted. It demonstrates that SpaceX has so entrenched itself in the US space and national security apparatus, that Trump's threat could be difficult to carry out. You could make a similar argument about Musk's internet satellite company, Starlink. Finding an alternative could be easier said than done. But, if there are limits on what Trump can do, the same is also true of Musk. In the middle of his row with Trump, he threatened to decommission the Dragon - but it wasn't long before he was rowing back. Responding to an X user's suggestion he that he "cool down" he wrote, "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." It's clear Musk and Trump's friendship is over. It's less certain their reliance on each other is. Whatever the future for Musk's businesses is then, it seems Trump - and his administration's actions - will continue to have a big say in them. Trump and Musk trade insults as row erupts in public view Tesla shares tumble as Trump-Musk feud erupts Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers

Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Tesla's largest EV plant in the world suffers eighth straight month of declining demand as May sales sink 15%
Tesla's largest EV plant in the world suffers eighth straight month of declining demand as May sales sink 15%

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla's largest EV plant in the world suffers eighth straight month of declining demand as May sales sink 15%

Outbound volumes from Tesla's GigaShangai factory, which includes exports, sank 15% in May. The drop follows similarly bleak figures out of most of Europe. Although Tesla is increasingly viewed as an AI company, roughly three-fourths of its revenue and gross profit come from selling cars. With two-thirds of the second quarter now in the books, the chance Tesla's EV sales could rebound from its terrible start to the year is swiftly waning. On Thursday data continued to pour in from across the world showing demand for Elon Musk's cars is shrinking in most major markets. One sign of that emerged out of China, where aggregate sales of EVs made in Tesla's largest manufacturing plant worldwide suffered an eighth straight month of declines. According to China's CPCA industry association, outbound volumes from its GigaShangai factory, including exports, sank 15% in May to 61,662 vehicles. It follows similarly bleak figures out of most of Europe. Tesla may have successfully rebranded itself as an AI and robotics company in the eyes of investors, but EV sales still matter because they pay the bills. Its core business accounted for 72% of both revenue and gross profit in the first three months of this year, when volumes dropped to their lowest level in three years. Yet just as sales are crashing, the stock is paradoxically ballooning, with the price rallying by a third since April's terrible Q1 earnings. At $1 trillion, Musk's company is now the ninth most valuable company in the world, worth more than the next 15 largest global carmakers combined. Multiples well above 100 times next year's consensus earnings estimates, like Tesla's, are typically reserved for companies about to see stratospheric earnings growth. In this case, it reflects optimism that Musk is poised to capture Uber and Lyft's ride-hailing market with its robotaxi service scheduled to roll out in the second half across much of the United States. Yet there is no evidence its driverless technology already matches, let alone outperforms, autonomous vehicle leader Waymo, and one well-known Tesla bull sold the remainder of his stockholdings as a result. Citing valuation 'disconnected from underlying fundamentals', Future Fund money manager Gary Black said late last month he exited his position for the first time since 2021 given the risks are firmly to the downside. There are a few bright spots for Tesla car sales, like Norway, the world's most EV-friendly country, that remains loyal to the brand. Australia, a key market where Tesla must compete directly with Chinese brands for western consumers without the help of steep tariffs, likewise saw a 9% gain in May amid soaring demand for the refreshed Model Y. But these individual data points are not reflective of the broader Tesla trend. In most other parts of the world, the picture looks radically different. On Thursday, the United Kingdom followed Germany with an identical 36% decline in Tesla registrations for last month. That leaves Tesla EV sales trackers such as TroyTeslike, one of the most reliable, warning Q2 will likely see a drop of 11% to 395,000 cars in a best-case scenario for Tesla. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store