Eligible voters of cooperative society have no right to seek list of voters when law mandates publication of ineligible voters list: Karnataka High Court
Noticing that it is only at the time of elections that the electoral roll is prepared, the court said that the list of eligible voters cannot be provided on submission of application merely because some members want to plan their campaign.
Justice Suraj Govindaraj passed the order while dismissing a petition filed by H.M. Vishwanath and three others, all members of various primary agriculture credit cooperative societies in Tumakuru district.
The petitioners had moved the court as the Tumkuru District Central Cooperative Bank had not entertained their applications filed in June for providing provisional eligible and ineligible voters lists of primary credit cooperative societies; taluk agricultural producers cooperative marketing society; Group C and D primary credit cooperatives societies, and women's self-help group cooperatives societies.
Stating that it is not for the petitioners to espouse the cause of ineligible voters by filing the present petition, the court said that if at all, the person named in the ineligible voters list has any grievances regarding the same, they have their own remedy under the rules as the society publishes the list of ineligible voters on its notice board.
'They could always verify who are the members of the society and, being aware of who the ineligible voters are, they can plan their campaign as regards the other members whose names are not found in the ineligible list,' the court said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Pollution Control Boards have power to impose restitutionary damages under Water, Air Acts, says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 4, 2025) gave Pollution Control Boards more teeth by declaring their power to impose and collect restitutionary damages to completely restore polluted air and waterbodies back to their original, pristine selves in an ecosystem. 'We direct that Pollution Control Boards can impose and collect as restitutionary and compensatory damages fixed sums of monies or require furnishing bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure towards potential environmental damage in exercise of powers under Sections 33A and 31A of the Water and Air Acts,' Justice P.S. Narasimha, who authored the judgment, held. The judgment came on an appeal filed by the Delhi Pollution Control Committee against a Delhi High Court decision that it was not empowered to levy compensatory damages in exercise of powers under Section 33A of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 31A of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The Bench, also comprising Justice Manoj Misra, further directed that the power to impose or collect restitutionary or compensatory damages or the requirement to furnish bank guarantees as an ex-ante measure under the Water and Air Acts should be enforced only after issuing the necessary subordinate legislation in the form of rules and regulations under both statutes. The rules must incorporate the basic principles of natural justice. 'According to the polluter pays principle, the responsibility for repairing the damage is that of the offending industry… The focus has to be on restoration of the ecosystem as close and similar as possible to the specific one that was damaged,' Justice Narasimha observed. The judgment said the payment of restitutory damages was distinct from charging punitive damages. 'Bringing the culprits to face the proceedings is a different matter and restoration of the damage already done is a different matter,' the court distinguished. Enormous responsibilities Justice Narasimha held that the Pollution Control Boards had expansive powers and 'enormous responsibilities' under the Water Act and the Air Act. They had a broad statutory mandate to prevent, control and abate water and air pollution. The provisions under these statutes bestowed the Boards with the power to direct closure, prohibition or regulation of any industry, operation or process. Further, this power extended to directing the stoppage or regulation of supply of electricity, water or any other service. The laws allow the Boards significant flexibility in deciding the nature of directions. 'Our constitutionalism bears the hallmark of an expansive interpretation of fundamental rights. But such creative expansion is only a job half done if the depth of the remedies, consequent upon infringement, remain shallow. In other words, remedial jurisprudence must keep pace with expanding rights and regulatory challenges. It is not sufficient that courts adopt injunctory, mandatory and compensatory remedies… Remedial powers or restitutionary directives are a necessary concomitant of both the fundamental rights of citizens who suffer environmental wrongs and an equal concomitant of the duties of a statutory regulator,' Justice Narasimha wrote.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Report on Karnataka SC population presented to CM Siddaramiah, internal quota decision likely at cabinet meeting
The Congress Government in Karnataka will take a decision on the findings of a survey report on the population of various subcastes in the Scheduled Caste community in the state in a Cabinet meeting on August 7, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced on Monday after receiving the survey report. In March, the Justice H N Nagamohan Das Commission recommended the survey of subcastes of Scheduled Castes to facilitate internal reservation among the Dalits in Karnataka. 'A report on the internal reservations has been given by Justice Nagamohan Das and his team. They met me today. We will place the report before the Cabinet in a meeting to be held on August 7,' Siddaramaiah said after meeting the commission. The survey was undertaken against the backdrop of the Supreme Court decision of August 1, 2024, allowing sub-categorisation of the SC community in the country to award internal quotas on the basis of the backwardness of the different Dalit communities. 'Sub-categorization is an extension of social justice. The state government has the power to grant internal reservations. Sub-categorization does not exclude anyone who is experiencing reservation. Necessary data should be collected and subspecies should be classified,' the state government said in a statement regarding the survey report. In January 2025, the Karnataka Government constituted a commission under the chairmanship of Justice H N Nagamohan Das to study and submit a report on the internal reservation for Scheduled Castes in the state. The commission submitted an interim report on March 27 and requested a fresh survey due to the lack of accurate data in the state. The door-to-door survey was conducted from May 5 to July 6, 2025. The survey has covered 27,24,768 Scheduled Caste families and 1,07,01,982 people, a report on the survey said. The survey reportedly received poor responses in urban areas. The Supreme Court has suggested classification of subcastes on the basis of educational backwardness, lack of representation in government employment, and social backwardness. 'The available reservation (15 per cent) has been distributed by classifying the sub-castes of the Scheduled Castes as per the instructions of the Supreme Court, after analyzing the data collected in the survey and collected from government institutions. The report, survey data, and appendices total approximately 1,766 pages and six recommendations,' the Justice Nagamohan Das Commission said on Monday. The survey has seen Scheduled Caste leaders calling for community members to clearly state their subcastes among the 101 SC castes in Karnataka. The survey of subcastes is part of efforts of the Congress Government to fulfil an electoral promise to provide internal reservations for socially weaker subcastes within the 15 per cent SC quota umbrella in the state. Nearly 43 per cent of respondents in the last census had designated themselves as belonging to the broad categories of Adi Dravida, Adi Karnataka, and Adi Andhra – without specifying which of the 101 SC subcastes – like Madigas, Holeyas and others – they belong to. Among those who have generally identified themselves under the broad SC umbrella of Adi Karnataka, Adi Andhra, and Adi Dravida – instead of the actual subcaste that designates aspects like touchability and untouchability in the Hindu caste system – are the street sweepers and garbage cleaners in urban areas in Karnataka. In Karnataka, the SC community is broadly classified under four heads – the SC Left (the most backward like the Madigas, who were considered untouchables in the caste system): the SC Right (like the Holeyas, who are less backward and accepted by other castes); the touchable communities such as Banjaras and Bhovis (who are tribes in other states); and dozens of small SC communities classified as others. The caste survey of SC communities is needed to ascertain the numbers in each of the subcastes under the broad SC categories to decide the division of the 15 per cent SC quota in government jobs, education, and political representation, which is now reportedly hogged by upwardly mobile social groups in the SCs – like the Holeyas in the SC Right, and the touchable groups of Banjaras and Bhovis. The Justice Nagamohan Das commission was set up in November 2024 by the Congress Government to submit recommendations on internal reservation for the SC communities in the wake of the previous BJP Government arriving at an ad hoc number. In its term between 2019 and March 2023, the BJP Government enhanced the SC quotas in the state from 15 to 17 per cent in 2022 and announced internal reservation for SC communities in March 2023 by providing 6 per cent of the total of 17 per cent of SC quotas to the SC Left group comprising mostly of the Madigas, 5.5 per cent to the SC Right, 4.5 per cent to the touchables and one per cent to other SC groups. The BJP Government fixed the internal quota on an ad hoc basis by considering the 2011 caste census numbers and by considering some aspects of the 2012 Justice A J Sadashiva Commission report on internal quotas – while rejecting the report. The most backward Dalit groups like the Madigas have been demanding the implementation of the Justice Sadashiva Commission report on account of the commission recommending 6 per cent for the most backward SC Left group, 5 per cent for the backward SC Right, 3 per cent for the SC 'Touchable' group (Lambani, Bhovis, Korachas, Kormas), and 1 per cent for others. Among the essential findings of the Justice A J Sadashiva Commission, which were made known through a press release in 2012, is that the Madiga community or the SC Left, who are considered untouchables in the caste hierarchy in India, were more socially backward than the SC Right like the Holeyas, who are considered more acceptable in society. The commission also found that the majority of the 15 per cent reservation for 101 subcastes of Dalits in Karnataka was being cornered by the 'Right' Dalits like Holeyas and new SC groups like Bhovis, Lambanis, while the most backward groups like the Madigas remained deprived. Holeyas and Madigas are considered to make up nearly one-third each of the SC population in Karnataka, with the numbers of the Madigas being about two per cent higher than that of Holeyas, the Justice Sadashiva Commission indicated in 2012 – based roughly on census data. The BJP scheme of 2022-23 was seen as a mid-way scheme from the Justice Sadashiva recommendations to appease all SC groups. The scheme, however, backfired to some extent with the touchable groups in the SCs like the Bhovis and Banjaras revolting against the BJP in the 2023 polls over the reduced internal quota of 4.5 per cent allotted to them. The BJP scheme was, however, not implemented since the mandate for changing internal quotas was vested with the Union Government prior to the August 2024 Supreme Court order, which said the granting of internal reservation is a constitutional measure and that states can implement internal quotas for castes on the basis of empirical data. The Karnataka Government decided in November 2024 not to issue any fresh notification for government jobs until the finalisation of the internal reservation system for SCs. The thinking in the Government while constituting the Justice Nagamohan Das Commission was that internal reservations for SCs based on population numbers – like in the Sadashiva Commission report – are likely to be struck down by the courts for want of proper data. 'In the wake of three decades of continuous demands and pressures for internal reservation in the state, the state Cabinet has agreed in principle to internal reservation in Scheduled Castes. There are 101 subcastes in the Scheduled Castes and the Government has decided to take all of them into confidence and scientifically implement internal reservation,' Siddaramaiah said in 2024 when the Cabinet decision for the new commission was taken. The Karnataka chief minister has indicated that the Telangana Government had already constituted a commission on the same model for implementation of internal reservation and that data is required for scientific implementation of internal reservation as directed by the Supreme Court. In a political sense, the SC internal quotas issue is a tricky subject for the Congress in Karnataka, which has traditionally drawn its support from the SC Right group, to which many of its prominent leaders – Mallikarjun Kharge, G Parameshwara, H C Mahadevappa – all belong. While the SC Left has supported the Congress in the past, many of these communities have moved towards the BJP on account of the general neglect by the Congress in terms of political representation and opportunities. The most prominent SC Left leader in the Congress is K H Muniyappa, a seven-time MP and former Union minister. The 'touchables' in the SC group – like the Banjaras and Bhovis – who were aligned with the BJP in the past are seen as having moved towards the Congress in 2023 after the BJP's unfulfilled internal quota exercise of 2022-23.
United News of India
3 hours ago
- United News of India
'If you were a true Indian, you would not say this," SC raps Rahul Gandhi over Army remarks
New Delhi, Aug 4 (UNI) The Supreme Court today pulled up Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his alleged remarks against the Indian Army during the 2022 Bharat Jodo Yatra, questioning the veracity and propriety of his statements. The Court said such comments were unbecoming of a 'true Indian' and sought to know the basis for his claims regarding Chinese incursions. A Bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice AG Masih was hearing Gandhi's plea challenging a defamation case filed over his December 16, 2022, remarks made after a border clash between Indian and Chinese troops in Arunachal Pradesh. 'If you were a true Indian, you would not say all these things,' Justice Datta observed during the hearing. The Bench questioned Gandhi's claim that 2,000 km of Indian territory had been occupied by China. 'Are you there? Do you have any credible material? Why would you make these statements without anything?' Justice Datta questioned the credibility of statements and said that public figures have a responsibility when making sensitive statements. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi, argued that the remarks were political in nature and made in the public interest. He read out the actual statements made by Gandhi and contended that the defamation complaint was politically motivated. 'There is a technique now, become an MP and file defamation for any criticism,' Singhvi submitted, arguing that the complaint was an abuse of the legal process. However, the Court appeared unconvinced, and Justice Datta further asked why such comments were made via social media instead of being raised in Parliament. Senior Advocate Gaurav Bhatia, appearing for the complainant Uday Shankar Srivastava, opposed the plea and submitted that the High Court had already examined the issue. He stated that relevant materials and statements were on record justifying the continuation of proceedings. The defamation case arises from Gandhi's statement, 'Chinese soldiers are beating up Indian Army personnel,' which the complainant claimed was defamatory and demoralising to the armed forces. Earlier, on March 29, 2025, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court had dismissed Gandhi's plea challenging the Magistrate Court's summons in the matter. Despite the scathing observations, the Supreme Court today issued notice and granted an interim stay on further proceedings in the defamation case. The matter will be heard again after three weeks. Separately, on May 27, a special MP-MLA court in Varanasi dismissed a petition against Gandhi over his reference to Lord Ram as a "fictional character" during a speech at a US university. The complaint, filed by Advocate Harishankar Pandey, was rejected as 'non-maintainable' under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. In another defamation case related to Gandhi's remarks against freedom fighter Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, the Supreme Court on April 24, 2025, had stayed the Allahabad High Court's order refusing to quash the summons. During that hearing, Justice Datta had warned Gandhi against making 'further irresponsible statements,' cautioning that the Court may take up the matter suo motu if required. The Apex Court had extended the stay on that case on July 25. UNI SNG AAB
