logo
Doctor practices while suspended, Punjab Medical Council complains to cops but revokes suspension

Doctor practices while suspended, Punjab Medical Council complains to cops but revokes suspension

Time of India12-05-2025

Representative image
The
Punjab Medical Council
(PMC) restored the licence of a surgeon who continued to practice while under suspension. This, despite having urged the police to act against the doctor on the grounds that doing so was illegal. Yet, the National Medical Commission refuses to take up the patient's complaint against this decision of the PMC.
The PMC declined to reveal if the suspended surgeon fulfilled the conditions its ethics committee had recommended for him to be allowed to resume practice - a root cause analysis of the death of two patients who he operated on, and a certificate showing that he had got himself trained in
laparoscopic hysterectomy
.
Operation Sindoor
'Our job is to hit target, not to count body bags': Air Marshal Bharti on Op Sindoor
Precautionary blackout imposed across parts of Rajasthan, Punjab
'Indian Navy was in position to strike Karachi': Vice Admiral on Operation Sindoor
TOI asked PMC why its Dec 2024 order restoring the licence of
Dr Praveen Devgan
cited the high court order of Nov 20, 2024 when the court had not ordered restoration of licence. In response, it produced yet another council order dated April 25, 2025, which claimed that the decision to restore the licence was taken in the general body meeting on Sept 25, 2024 after receiving an application from Dr Devgan at the end of the six-month suspension period. PMC was mum on Dr Devgan continuing to practice during the period of suspension.
"The case filed by Dr Devgan in July 2024 against his suspension was still pending on Sept 25. How did PMC take a decision to restore his licence before the court had decided the case?" asked the complainant, Gokul Aneja, who has alleged medical negligence in the death of his wife Sunita Aneja. She was diagnosed with multiple fibroids and underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy by Dr Parveen Devgan on Oct 1, 2018.
Dr Devgan's petition in HC was "disposed of as withdrawn" on Nov 20 last year because he had moved an application seeking to withdraw the petition. The court had neither stayed his suspension nor examined its merits.
In PMC's general body meeting held on July 21, 2023 "all the council members unanimously decided that Dr Parveen Devgan failed to demonstrate due skill and care towards patients". PMC's final order on Dec 21, 2023, suspended his registration for six months and debarred him from practice. The order cited the ethics committee' recommendations. These included that he be restrained from performing any laproscopic procedure in his own hospital or in any other hospital till he submitted a root cause analysis of the deaths, done by a higher institute like PGI Chandigarh doing and imparting training in laparoscopic hysterectomy, and that he get trained in laparoscopic hysterectomy from a recognised institute and submit the certificate to PMC. The committee stated that Dr Devgan should be initially restrained for a minimum of six months that could be extended further till he complied with the two conditions of root cause analysis and certificate of training.
When Dr Devgan applied to Fortis Hospital, Noida for training in laparoscopic hysterectomy along with other procedures in laparoscopy, the hospital informed him that he could not be trained in laparoscopic gynae procedures "as by NMC guidelines you do not possess required qualification of post-graduation in Obs & Gynae". "It is unethical and unlawful for a general surgeon to do gynaecological training or procedures as he/she does not have the required qualification to do so," stated the hospital letter in May 2024.
On receiving information that Dr Devgan was practicing despite suspension of licence, civil surgeon of Amritsar inspected the hospital on April 5, 2024, and found that he was performing operations. She informed the PMC and the police in Amritsar. The PMC urged the commissioner of police in Amritsar to take action as practising while his licence was suspended was illegal, and against the Punjab Medical Registration Act and the National Commission Act.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Mother's Day wishes
,
messages
, and
quotes
!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wazahat Khan, the man who filed FIR against influencer Sharmistha Panoli, arrested in Kolkata
Wazahat Khan, the man who filed FIR against influencer Sharmistha Panoli, arrested in Kolkata

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Wazahat Khan, the man who filed FIR against influencer Sharmistha Panoli, arrested in Kolkata

Wazahat Khan, whose complaint led to influencer Sharmistha Panoli's arrest on May 30, was himself arrested on the night of June 9 from Kolkata's Amherst Street area. BJP MLA Agnimitra Paul had also registered a case against Mr Khan last week. Multiple FIRs were filed against Mr Khan, including one in Assam, for 'allegedly spreading hatred on social media and hurting religious sentiments,' according to Kolkata Police officials. The 29-year-old Wazahat Khan has been booked under Bhartiya Nyay Sanghita's Sections 196(1)(a)/299/352/353(1)(c). He was absconding for the past 10 days. He is set to produced in a city court on Tuesday (June 10). Police had conducted multiple raids at Digha and Howrah based on leads. But Mr Khan was finally arrested from the Amherst Street area in relation to a case registered with the Golf Green Police Station. When Wazahat was absconding, his father shared concerns that his son was under threat. 'He was getting multiple calls throughout the day. He left home and his phone is switched off. We have not been able to find him since then, we are really worried,' Sahadat Khan, Mr Wazahat's father said. Reacting to Mr Khan's arrest, BJP State president and MP, Sukanta Majumdar said that the Mamata Banerjee government 'orchestrated his arrest through her subservient Kolkata Police to ensure his safe and protected custody under the State's wing.' A team of Assam Police was also present in West Bengal looking for Mr Khan based on the case registered against him in Assam. There were social media rumours that the Kolkata Police was not cooperating with their Assam counterparts. 'Kolkata Police strongly refutes the misleading claim being circulated on social media suggesting non-cooperation with Assam Police,' the Kolkata Police officials said in a statement. 'Wazahat Khan's arrest, immediately following the departure of Assam Police from Kolkata, is nothing but a textbook example of Mamata Banerjee's age-old politics of appeasement,' Mr Majumdar wrote on social media handle X. He further accused that this was a blatant abuse of State machinery by the CM to protect notorious criminals. On Friday (June 6, 2025) afternoon, Ms Panoli was set free from Kolkata's Alipore jail. She was granted bail in the hate speech case by the Calcutta High Court on Thursday (June 5, 2025) for a bond of ₹10,000. The court also asked the police to offer her protection because her counsel stated that the young woman was receiving rape and death threats after her arrest. This came after Ms Panoli posted a video on social media and made communal comments and made claims about Operation Sindoor which the Kolkata Police noted as 'hate speech' and asked people not to confuse that with 'freedom of speech'. She did this as a reaction to the Pahalgam attack which left at least 26 people dead in Jammu and Kashmir.

Bombay HC overturns rustication of Pune student arrested over post about Operation Sindoor
Bombay HC overturns rustication of Pune student arrested over post about Operation Sindoor

Scroll.in

time4 hours ago

  • Scroll.in

Bombay HC overturns rustication of Pune student arrested over post about Operation Sindoor

The Bombay High Court on Monday overturned the decision of an engineering college in Pune to rusticate a 19-year-old student who was arrested in May over an allegedly objectionable social media post about Operation Sindoor, Bar and Bench reported. A bench of Justices MS Karnik and NR Borkar set aside the decision after finding that the student had not been heard before the rustication order was passed. The court, however, granted the college liberty to pass a fresh order after hearing the student, the legal news outlet reported. The 19-year-old is a second-year information technology student at Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, a private college affiliated to Savitribai Phule Pune University. On May 7, she had allegedly reposted material on Instagram from an account that criticised the Indian government. The post was related to military tensions between India and Pakistan after Operation Sindoor. After receiving threats online, she had deleted the post and apologised. However, following protests against her post, she was arrested on May 9. She was rusticated by the college on the same day. On May 27, a division bench of Justices Gauri Godse and Somasekhar Sundaresan criticised the 19-year-old's college for rusticating her for the social media post, saying that educational institutes need to help students rather than turn them into criminals. The High Court had also criticised the Maharashtra government for arresting the student. It had directed the student's counsel to file a bail petition, adding that it would be granted immediately. She was granted bail on May 27. The bench had also directed that the student not be summoned by the police during her exams and barred her from leaving Maharashtra without permission. It had added that she had missed her May 24 and May 27 papers while in custody, and allowed her to approach university authorities regarding those exams. The police had been instructed to provide her security during the exam and the college was given the option to arrange separate seating if needed.

RTI: 10 Karnataka institutes not paying stipends to med interns, NMC silent
RTI: 10 Karnataka institutes not paying stipends to med interns, NMC silent

New Indian Express

time5 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

RTI: 10 Karnataka institutes not paying stipends to med interns, NMC silent

NEW DELHI: Even as the National Medical Commission (NMC) continues to ignore the issue of medical colleges not paying stipends to their interns, states like Karnataka, Maharashtra, West Bengal, and Gujarat top the list of having the most institutes out of the 60 in the country that are not paying any compensation, a series of RTIs have revealed. Although 60 medical colleges - 33 government institutes and 27 private colleges - do not pay stipends, another 50 pay nominal stipends of less than Rs 5,000, some even Rs 2,000. An RTI filed by Dr K.V. Babu has shown that as many as 10 of the 60 institutes not paying stipends are in Karnataka, which includes six government and four private medical colleges. Karnataka is followed by Gujarat (three government and four private medical colleges), Maharashtra (six government and one private college), and West Bengal (six government and one private college). Telangana is not paying stipends in three private and two government colleges. Others are Andhra Pradesh (four government institutes), UP (three government colleges), Tamil Nadu (three private colleges), Assam (two government colleges), Madhya Pradesh (two private colleges), and Delhi (two private colleges), as per an RTI reply, dated April 29. The response was to an RTI filed by Dr Babu, who has been pursuing the issue since last year, and had sought the names of medical colleges not paying stipends to their interns. The Kerala-based RTI activist filed another RTI on April 2 seeking NMC's stand against such medical colleges, and was informed that 'NMC is the regulatory body which issues guidelines, regulations from time to time.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store