Test Driving The New 2025 Polestar 3 Single Motor Model
Driving the Polestar 3 Single Motor on Mulholland Highway in Malibu may not sound like a good pairing. This road is known for laying bare how well a car does (or does not) handle, and this is a big, heavy electric SUV, right? Actually it's not that heavy. In fact weighs about 400 pounds less than the Dual Motor version, and because it doesn't have a front motor, most of that weight comes off the front of the vehicle.
Driving it on a road like Mulholland really illustrates the difference between the two models. But it's not just the handling that improves. You also get a much lower starting price of about $67,500, which is about $8,000 less than base Dual Motor version of the Polestar 3. And this one's also got the longest range: 350 miles. So you pay less and you get more range. I don't know anyone who buys an electric car that won't find that compelling.
This Polestar 3 with a single motor offers 299 hp and 361 pound feet of torque. This is just over half as powerful as the top line, most expensive Dual Motor model. But this one still has the same 111 kWh battery pack, which is why it goes 350 miles instead of the 315 miles offed by the Dual Motor. It also can charge at a rate up to 250 kW, which can recharge the battery from about 10 to 80 percent in around 30 minutes…assuming you can find a level three charger…which can be a big assumption.
As we know, even though this is now considered the base version of the Polestar 3 it still comes with a complete suite of driver assistance features, all the same driver-assist technologies included on the higher-end models. And it can still be had with things like a head-up display, and up to a 25 speaker Bowers and Wilkins audio system.
Polestar continues to lean on their heritage as a performance brand, and the way the automaker tuned this passive suspension reflects it. It's stiff enough to control body roll around corners, but it's not so stiff that it's uncomfortable when you're not driving aggressively. Polestar found the perfect balance. It's not an active suspension like the Dual Motor version, so this Polestar 3 can't change the ride height or offer as wide of range in terms of ride quality. But it's the best driver's version of this car.
All Polestars use the same Android-based Google operating system, and it's effective and intuitive. But the central touchscreen can be annoying. I have yet to ride in a Polestar and not be frustrated with trying to use the touchscreen. You basically have to punch the screen multiple times to initiate an action. I don't know if it's the design or the technology, but Polestar should probably work improving this aspect of its cars.
Touchscreen issues aside, this is the Polestar 3 you want if you're looking for an electric performance car with SUV functionality. It's not going to be as fast as the Dual Motor versions, with zero to 60 taking about 7.8 seconds. But it weighs around 400 pounds less, with most of that weight coming off the front wheels. I did not expect to be impressed by this vehicle's handling and driver engagement. But I was.
You're really getting a more pure experience because the passive, less sophisticated suspension also means less weight, less 'busy-ness' and less filtration between what's going on at each wheels and what's going on with the steering wheel. There are no computers trying to figure out what to do. There's just a properly-tuned suspension consistently delivering superior steering feel and more engaging driving dynamics.
If you're thinking about a Polestar model, you should seriously consider the Polestar 3 Single Motor version. Less weight, longer range, better driving experience. This is the one to get.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
The ‘godfather of AI' reveals the only way humanity can survive superintelligent AI
Geoffrey Hinton, known as the 'godfather of AI,' fears the technology he helped build could wipe out humanity — and 'tech bros' are taking the wrong approach to stop it. Hinton, a Nobel Prize-winning computer scientist and a former Google executive, has warned in the past that there is a 10% to 20% chance that AI wipes out humans. On Tuesday, he expressed doubts about how tech companies are trying to ensure humans remain 'dominant' over 'submissive' AI systems. 'That's not going to work. They're going to be much smarter than us. They're going to have all sorts of ways to get around that,' Hinton said at Ai4, an industry conference in Las Vegas. In the future, Hinton warned, AI systems might be able to control humans just as easily as an adult can bribe 3-year-old with candy. This year has already seen examples of AI systems willing to deceive, cheat and steal to achieve their goals. For example, to avoid being replaced, one AI model tried to blackmail an engineer about an affair it learned about in an email. Instead of forcing AI to submit to humans, Hinton presented an intriguing solution: building 'maternal instincts' into AI models, so 'they really care about people' even once the technology becomes more powerful and smarter than humans. AI systems 'will very quickly develop two subgoals, if they're smart: One is to stay alive… (and) the other subgoal is to get more control,' Hinton said. 'There is good reason to believe that any kind of agentic AI will try to stay alive.' That's why it is important to foster a sense of compassion for people, Hinton argued. At the conference, he noted that mothers have instincts and social pressure to care for their babies. 'The right model is the only model we have of a more intelligent thing being controlled by a less intelligent thing, which is a mother being controlled by her baby,' Hinton said. Hinton said it's not clear to him exactly how that can be done technically but stressed it's critical researchers work on it. 'That's the only good outcome. If it's not going to parent me, it's going to replace me,' he said. 'These super-intelligent caring AI mothers, most of them won't want to get rid of the maternal instinct because they don't want us to die.' Hinton is known for his pioneering work on neural networks, which helped pave the way to today's AI boom. In 2023, he stepped down from Google and started speaking out about the dangers of AI. Emmett Shear, who briefly served as interim CEO of ChatGPT owner OpenAI, said he's not surprised that some AI systems have tried to blackmail humans or bypass shutdown orders. 'This keeps happening. This is not going to stop happening,' Shear, the CEO of AI alignment startup Softmax, said at the Ai4 conference. 'AIs today are relatively weak, but they're getting stronger really fast.' Shear said that rather than trying to instill human values into AI systems, a smarter approach would be to forge collaborative relationships between humans and AI. Many experts believe AIs will achieve superintelligence, also known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI, in the coming years. Hinton said he used to think it could take 30 years to 50 years to achieve AGI but now sees this moment coming sooner. 'A reasonable bet is sometime between five and 20 years,' he said. While Hinton remains concerns about what could go wrong with AI, he is hopeful the technology will pave the way to medical breakthroughs. 'We're going to see radical new drugs. We are going to get much better cancer treatment than the present,' he said. For instance, he said AI will help doctors comb through and correlate the vast amounts of data produced by MRI and CT scans. However, Hinton does not believe AI will help humans achieve immortality. 'I don't believe we'll live forever,' Hinton said. 'I think living forever would be a big mistake. Do you want the world run by 200-year-old white men?' Asked if there's anything he would have done differently in his career if he knew how fast AI would accelerate, Hinton said he regrets solely focusing on getting AI to work. 'I wish I'd thought about safety issues, too,' he said.
Android Authority
42 minutes ago
- Android Authority
We went hands-on with Google Translate's Duolingo rival ahead of its launch (APK teardown)
TL;DR We managed to activate and use the Practice feature in Google Translate. This feature is effectively Google's take on Duolingo and lets you practice a desired language. The feature currently lets you practice French or Spanish in a variety of preset scenarios, but you can also create your own lessons. Earlier this year, we discovered evidence that Google was working on a new Practice feature in Google Translate. This would allow people to (surprise) practice a desired language. Now, we've managed to activate the feature and go hands-on with it. Telegram user Mehrad spotted the Practice option in their Google Translate app. We weren't able to see the feature initially, but we managed to enable it after digging into the latest version of the app (version 9.14.71.788519780.3-release). Check out the screenshots below and the video above. The first screen confirms that the Practice feature is in beta and creates personalized lessons. However, the screen also mentions that this is a 'trial period' with 'early and unlimited access.' This suggests that Google will eventually charge people to use the feature. It's unclear whether this would be a standalone fee or bundled in with the company's AI subscriptions. The second screenshot also confirms that you can display the UI language in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese. However, you can only practice in French or Spanish right now. Once you've picked your desired language to practice, you can then choose your level of proficiency (Just Starting, Basic, Intermediate, Advanced). However, the Just Starting level is greyed out at the moment. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. Google Translate then lets you choose from a variety of scenarios to practice (see the fourth and fifth screenshots). The listed scenarios include food and drink, greetings and introductions, and asking for directions. These scenarios are further divided into subtopics. For example, 'asking for directions' includes subtopics like getting lost near the hotel, finding a specific restaurant, and locating the train station. Not happy with these scenarios? Then you can tap Create your own practice scenario to come up with a brand-new plan. You can simply use a text prompt to describe your custom scenario, although Google Translate also offers suggestions like 'Ask for a vegetarian food option' and 'Passing immigration.' You can also choose whether this scenario is a listening or speaking session. What else to know about Google Translate's Practice feature? The app will then quiz you in a round-based format. You can also adjust the difficulty after each listening round. It's worth noting that this Practice feature keeps track of your specified goals and words learned. It also offers daily activities, ostensibly to keep you coming back (much like Duolingo). Finally, we spotted a settings page where you can change your proficiency level and language after the fact. This page also has an option to delete your practice history. Either way, our teardown shows that Google's take on Duolingo is effectively ready for release. Furthermore, the fact that a Telegram user spotted this in their app suggests that Google is already testing this in a limited fashion. ⚠️ An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. Follow
Android Authority
42 minutes ago
- Android Authority
I tested Preferred Sources, and it's one of the best Google Search features in years
Joe Maring / Android Authority When we talk about Google Search in 2025, it's usually not for a good reason. AI Overviews are more prevalent than ever, despite still not being particularly good. Google widely rolled out (the very flawed) AI Mode to users in May, and the traditional Google Search experience remains cluttered with ads and low-quality results. This has made me (understandably) hesitant when Google launches a new feature for Search, but the company's latest one — Preferred Sources — is incredible. After soft-launching Preferred Sources as a Search Labs feature earlier this year, Google has just rolled it out widely to all users in the US and India. Preferred Sources allows you to tell Google which websites you prefer reading, customizing your Search results so links from those preferred websites appear higher up and more often. On paper, it sounds almost too good to be true. However, after testing Preferred Sources myself, I'm here to tell you that it actually works, and it's kind of a game-changer. Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. How to get started with Preferred Sources Joe Maring / Android Authority Finding and using Preferred Sources is pretty simple, though if you don't know where to look, it can be easy to miss. To get started, open Google Search and search for any recent news topic. I'm using the Pixel 10 for this example, but it could be anything. Once you do this, simply do the following: After searching for a recent news topic in Google Search, tap the Preferred Sources icon to the right of the 'Top Stories' section. Tap the search bar and type the name of a website or the site's URL you want to add. Tap the check box next to your preferred site. Once selected, tap Reload results near the bottom of the screen. This will refresh Google Search with your Preferred Sources selection(s). As you can see in the screenshots above, the Android Authority Pixel 10 story is now the first result in the Top Stories carousel, which was previously a Forbes article, as shown in the first screenshot. And that's all there is to it! You can revisit the Preferred Sources tab at any time to add or remove websites as needed, and there's seemingly no limit to how many sources you can add. What it's like using Google Search with Preferred Sources Joe Maring / Android Authority That's how you set up Preferred Sources, but what's it like to use Google Search once you've configured the feature? I spent about two minutes customizing my Preferred Sources list, adding 10 websites that range from tech publications to general news sources and a few local news sites. In practice, Preferred Sources works exactly as I hoped it would. For example, a quick search for 'OnePlus 15' highlights an Android Authority article at the front of the Top Stories section (and is also marked with a Preferred Sources badge next to the website name). There are articles from other sites, too, but the Android Authority one is front and center. If you search for a topic with more buzz around it, your Preferred Sources are presented differently. Searching 'Pixel 10 news' once again shows the Top Stories carousel with an Android Authority article in it, though it's shown as the number three result rather than the first one. However, as you keep scrolling down, you'll find a dedicated 'From your sources' section with news articles exclusively from sites you've added to your Preferred Sources list. This doesn't always appear in search results, but when it does, it's a nice touch. Beyond tech news, Preferred Sources works just as well for other search queries. Searching 'Michigan news' shows articles from my preferred websites as the top three results in Top Stories, in addition to the From your sources section below it. I saw the same setup again when searching 'Detroit Lions.' The Top Stories carousel featured two articles from my Preferred Sources, once again accompanied by the From your sources tab. Preferred Sources doesn't only show you articles from websites you select, but it does consistently make them more visible. And in a world where Google Search results seem to get worse by the day, finally having some real control over what you see is mighty powerful. Do you like Google Search's Preferred Sources feature? 0 votes I love it! It's exactly what I've been waiting for. NaN % I think it's fine, but it's not amazing. NaN % I don't like it/It's not working for me. NaN % I don't have it yet. NaN % This is the Google Search feature I've been waiting for Joe Maring / Android Authority To be clear, Preferred Sources isn't perfect. While I've been able to add almost all of the websites I want, one of the local news stations I like to follow isn't a selectable option. Google notes that 'sources not updated regularly may be unavailable,' but considering the news station publishes articles daily, there's no reason why it shouldn't be available. I've also noticed that Preferred Sources can be finicky about displaying the From your sources section. For whatever reason, it appears just fine when searching 'Pixel 10 news,' but doesn't appear with a 'Pixel 10' or 'Google Pixel 10' search. And while it's easy enough to customize Preferred Sources as is, having to search for something first is slightly annoying; I'd love to see it added somewhere in the Google app settings, too. Joe Maring / Android Authority But even with those complaints, I'm still thrilled that Preferred Sources exists. With features like AI Overviews, AI Mode, and AI summaries in Google Discover, almost all of these features were created with the intent of limiting your interaction with real publications — instead making you rely on (often bad) AI writing from Google. Not only does Preferred Sources give you real and important control over your Google Search results, but it also shines a critical spotlight on reading articles from human writers and publications you trust. It's the exact opposite feature you'd expect to see from an AI-ified Google in 2025. Preferred Sources is rolling out now to Google Search users in the US and India. If you use Google and live in either of those countries, I can't recommend Preferred Sources enough. It really is one of the best new Google Search features I've seen in a while. Follow
