Iran says no chance of nuclear deal with US without clarity on sanctions relief
Iran and the US have held five rounds of talks since April, primarily mediated by Oman, to work out a new agreement, with Washington focussed on preventing Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
Iran says it's willing to negotiate but insists on a deal that guarantees lasting sanctions relief and respects its right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes, a key sticking point.
"I regret to inform you that the American side has not yet been willing to clarify this issue," a foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, said during a weekly press conference in Tehran.
"It must be clear to us how the oppressive sanctions against the Iranian people will be lifted to ensure that past experiences are not repeated. No agreement will happen unless we have clear and reliable assurances about the end of sanctions. So far, we haven't seen what we need to from the other side – only repeated waves of sanctions before each round of negotiations.'
Omani foreign minister Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi, who is mediating the talks, presented elements of an American proposal for a nuclear deal during a short visit to Tehran on Saturday.
US president Donald Trump, who ripped up the previous nuclear deal during his first presidency, recently said he envisioned an agreement with Iran that would let America 'blow up' any infrastructure, such as nuclear sites and labs, deemed a threat.
He said such a deal could be finalised in the 'next couple of weeks' and claimed talks had made 'a lot of progress'.
An advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said ' accessing Iran's nuclear sites and 'blowing up infrastructure' is a fantasy past US presidents shared'.
'Iran is independent, with strong defenses, resilient people, and clear red lines,' Ali Shamkhani added.
Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
He now wants to replace or modify it with a "stronger" deal, threatening military action if diplomacy fails.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Two men who despise each other, one hour that will change the world: Trump and Zelensky to face-off again as Europe furiously briefs Ukrainian on how not to upset the US President
Sir Keir Starmer is heading to meet Donald Trump today as part of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky 's entourage of European leaders. The Prime Minister will join France 's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Finland 's Alexander Stubb in the White House. NATO chief Mark Rutte and European Commission boss Ursula von der Leyen are also travelling to Washington DC to join the talks with Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky. The US and Ukrainian presidents are set to hold an hour-long meeting before wider discussions between Mr Trump and European leaders. They are expected to use those talks to urge Mr Trump not to cede to Vladimir Putin 's demands for Ukraine to surrender the whole of the Donbas region to Russia. The European leaders are being dubbed Mr Zelensky's 'back-up' following the Ukrainian President's previous acrimonious visit to the White House. In an astonishing spat in February, US vice-president JD Vance accused Mr Zelensky of not being thankful enough for American support in the face of Russia 's invasion. The public row resulted in US aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted and sparked fresh panic across European capitals that Mr Trump was siding with the Kremlin. Mr Zelensky and Mr Trump have since attempted to repair relations, including with talks in the Vatican on the sidelines of Pope Francis's funeral in April. But the US President infuriated Ukrainians by rolling out the red carpet for Mr Putin during their talks about a potential ceasefire in Alaska last week. Mr Trump also ratcheted up tensions ahead of Monday's talks by claiming Mr Zelensky 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to'. He also ruled out future NATO membership for Ukraine and said Crimea would not be returning from Russian annexation. In a post on his Truth Social website, the US President wrote: 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight. Remember how it started. 'No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!' In a follow-up post, Mr Trump said it was a 'great honour' to host a slew of European leaders in Washington. 'Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!! President DJT,' he wrote. Britain, France and Germany are said to have taken the lead on preparing Ukraine's delegation for Monday's meeting - including advice on how not to upset Mr Trump. Sir Keir met with Mr Zelensky in Downing Street on Thursday ahead of Mr Trump's talks with Mr Putin in Alaska. The Prime Minister and Mr Macron, the French President, also co-chaired a virtual meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' on Sunday. Following the talks, Mr Macron said Ukraine's allies would 'present a united front' to Mr Trump during Monday's meeting in the White House. 'If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and - make no mistake - they can impact us, too,' he added. Mr Zelensky is expected to face calls from Mr Trump to concede to full Russian control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two mineral-rich regions of Ukraine that are mostly occupied by Russia. In exchange for these demands, Mr Puting would reportedly withdraw his forces from other areas of Ukraine and accept a NATO-like guarantee that Ukraine would be protected from further incursion. European leaders have said it is up to Ukraine to decide how it wishes to end the war. Mr Trump has appeared to drop his calls for a ceasefire after his summit with Mr Putin in Alaska. The US President has instead said he wants to focus a long-term peace deal, although US secretary of state Marco Rubio has signalled a deal is 'still a long ways off'. There will be 'additional consequences' for Russia if it does not agree to a peace deal, Mr Rubio added, but he suggested fresh financial sanctions would be unlikely to force Mr Putin to the negotiating table. Ms von der Leyen suggested at a press conference on Sunday that both a ceasefire and a peace deal would have the same impact: to 'stop the killing'. Appearing alongside her, Ukraine's Mr Zelensky appeared to agree, though he also signalled his preference for a ceasefire. 'It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons. So it's necessary to cease fire and work quickly on a final deal,' he said. Government minister Stephen Kinnock this morning said Mr Zelensky must not be forced to accept a peace deal if he is not happy with its terms. He said Sir Keir had three objectives for when he meets Mr Trump at the White House alongside Mr Zelensky on Monday. He told Times Radio: 'The first of all is to make it absolutely clear that any decisions taken about Ukrainian territory must be taken with the agreement of the Ukrainian government and President Zelensky. 'The other is that the pathway for Ukraine to NATO and to security guarantees cannot be dictated to them by any other country. 'And the other is to send a very clear message that we the British people stand firmly shoulder-to-shoulder with the Ukrainian people as we showed when we opened our homes and our hearts to the Ukrainian refugees.'
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
US envoy says Israel should 'comply' with Lebanon plan to disarm militant groups
BEIRUT, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Top U.S. envoy Thomas Barrack said on Monday Israel should comply with a plan under which Lebanese militant group Hezbollah would be disarmed by the end of the year in exchange for a halt to Israel's military operations in Lebanon. The plan sets out a phased roadmap for armed groups to hand in their arsenals as Israel's military halts ground, air and sea operations and withdraws troops from Lebanon's south. Lebanon's cabinet approved the plan's objectives earlier this month despite Hezbollah's refusal to disarm, and Barrack said it was now Israel's turn to cooperate. "There's always a step-by-step approach, but I think the Lebanese government has done their part. They've taken the first step. Now what we need is Israel to comply with that equal handshake," Barrack told reporters in Lebanon after meeting Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. Barrack described the cabinet decree as a "Lebanese decision that requires Israel's cooperation" and said the United States was "in the process of now discussing with Israel what their position is" but provided no further details. Under phase 1 of the plan, which was seen by Reuters, the Lebanese government would issue a decision committing to Hezbollah's full disarmament by the end of the year and Israel would cease military operations in Lebanese territory. But Israel has continued strikes against Lebanon in the weeks since the cabinet approved the plan. In a written statement after his meeting with Barrack, Aoun said that "other parties" now needed to commit to the roadmap's contents. Calls for Hezbollah to disarm have mounted since a war with Israel last year killed 5,000 of the group's fighters and much of its top brass and left swathes of southern Lebanon in ruins. But the group has resisted the pressure, refusing to discuss its arsenal until Israel ends its strikes and withdraws troops from southern Lebanon. On Friday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem raised the spectre of civil war, warning there would be "no life" in Lebanon should the state attempt to confront or eliminate the group.
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Lebanon's inner turmoil over push to disarm Hezbollah
Huge crowds throng the streets of Beirut waving yellow and green flags, accompanied by a chorus of horns from passing cars showing their support. Chants ring out as they march in the Lebanese capital, invoking the name of a slain terror leader killed in an Israeli attack last year. Demonstrations have rocked Lebanon for a week in support of Hezbollah, the militant Islamist group whose chief, Hassan Nasrallah, was assassinated by the Israeli military in Sept 2024. People are taking to the streets throughout the country against a plan that would see the Iran-backed terror group lay down all weapons by the end of this year. Naim Qassem, Hezbollah's new leader, has vowed not to buckle under pressure and reiterated that arms are necessary to defend against Israeli aggression. 'The resistance will not surrender its weapons while aggression continues, occupation persists, and we will fight it… if necessary to confront this American-Israeli project no matter the cost,' Qassem said on Friday. But the Lebanese government is also digging in its heels, with Joseph Aoun, the president, telling a senior Iranian official that 'no party, without exception, is permitted to carry weapons and seek foreign support', a thinly veiled reference to Hezbollah. Whether the Lebanese government is able to fully defang Hezbollah remains to be seen. It is a prickly situation that continues to challenge Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, who, since the the Oct 7 terror attack by Hamas, has gone to extreme lengths to neutralise what he sees as the constant threat that Iran and its proxy groups pose to Israel. 'Israel isn't willing to tolerate Tehran or its proxies any longer, and events of the past year demonstrate that,' said Holly Dagres, an Iran expert and senior fellow at the Washington Institute, a US think tank that focuses on the Middle East. The 12-day war, which erupted when Israel launched surprise attacks on key military and nuclear facilities in Iran on June 13, has weakened Tehran's ability to prop up its 'axis of resistance', of which Hezbollah is a cornerstone. It also delayed Iran's nuclear weapons development programme. But the Iranian government is regrouping, and has continued to express support for Hezbollah, with Ali Larijani, the national security head, visiting Lebanon this week and meeting with both Lebanese and Hezbollah leaders. While Iran's support for Hezbollah may amount primarily to posturing and propaganda for now – a main supply route that ran through Syria has largely closed off as a new government has sought to keep the peace with neighbouring Israel – experts say the regime will continue to do what it can. 'Tehran isn't about to give up on rebuilding its crown jewel proxy, Hezbollah. But without its land bridge through Syria, that's going to be a lot harder,' said Ms Dagres. 'Still, as long as the group exists, Iran will keep supporting it – whether materially or financially – because it hasn't abandoned its mosaic defence strategy.' Iran has long adopted a decentralised, multi-layered approach, scattering assets, infrastructure and proxies across the region. Dismantling the regime and its power means hitting several targets on multiple fronts. Full disarmament of Hezbollah would represent a landmark change, as it is the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's civil war, which lasted from 1975 to 1990. The organisation has always asserted arms as necessary in its 'resistance' against Israel. 'There is no doubt that there is no one – not even the Lebanese army – who can protect Lebanon more than the weapons of Hezbollah,' said Zainab, a Lebanese woman whose relatives have been killed in Israeli strikes. A tough balancing act Enforcing the disarmament plan – proposed by the US and approved in early August by the Lebanese cabinet – is a tough balancing act for the Beirut government, with the country having been pulled into the broader Israel-Iran conflict because of Hezbollah's presence in the country. Failing to do so risks further Israeli incursions, as its military continues to hold positions along the disputed Israel-Lebanon border. At the same time, enforcing the plan risks unleashing civil war. 'Lebanon will face a lot of chaos if this happens; the roads will be filled with enraged people,' said Zainab. 'If there is no national unity, the country could face division and instability.' Neither outcome is favourable for the new Lebanese government – elected and installed in February after two years of an interim caretaker government – struggling to unify and rebuild the country after years of political and economic woes. Doubts persist that Israel will uphold its end of the agreement to withdraw its forces and halt attacks, as the military has continued to strike Hezbollah despite a US-brokered ceasefire agreed last November. Though disarming Hezbollah was part of that deal, there is growing resistance now because Israel has not stopped offensive operations. This week, the Israeli military said that 'since the ceasefire, over 240 terrorists have been eliminated and approximately 600 airstrikes have been carried out'. 'We are on the front line, we are striking proactively, and we are constantly thwarting threats,' said Eyal Zamir, chief of the general staff of the Israeli military, on a 'field tour' in southern Lebanon. 'Our proactive approach and initiative are central to our mission.' Many Lebanese people are worried Israeli fire will continue if Hezbollah's weapons arsenal is dismantled. 'There is no guarantee for Israel not to try to invade if they disarm, but there was never such a guarantee to begin with,' said Carl Khoury, 38, a manager at an e-commerce firm. 'If Israel is planning to take over Lebanon, they [will] plan years ahead and execute their strategy step by step,' he said. 'If they already have a plan, nothing will stop them.' 'The last Lebanese-Israeli war proved that Hezbollah's weapons are not a true deterrent to Israel, given the advanced capabilities that Israel possesses, and the support that it receives from the United States,' said Bashir Bitar, 40, a lawyer. 'There is no army strong enough to protect Lebanon against Israel, whose intelligence and military capabilities are far superior.' Disarmament, however, is a condition tied to loans and other aid that the Lebanese government desperately needs to begin reconstruction after infrastructure was heavily damaged by Israel strikes. There is also a practical issue when it comes to clearing Hezbollah's weapons stocks. Only a week ago, six Lebanese soldiers were killed in a blast at a weapons depot in the southern city of Tyre. Troops were reportedly removing munitions and unexploded ordnance left over from last year's war when the explosion occurred. Some Lebanese MPs have pushed back against Hezbollah, saying Qassem, its leader, does not have the country's best interests at heart. 'Threats and intimidation under the banner of weapons does not build a nation or protect stability,' said Adib Abdel Massih, a Lebanese MP. 'Lebanon is not run with the logic of [you're] either with us or in ruin, but through partnership and respect for the state and the law.' Dr Hassan Wazni, chairman of the Nabatieh Governmental Hospital, who has been treating those wounded in Israeli attacks, agreed: 'What Lebanon needs is unity and joint dialogue in order to prevent it from sliding into an armed conflict.'
