Five deputies to biggest British Jewish body suspended over Israel criticisms
Five elected representatives to the largest body representing British Jews have been suspended for two years after criticising the Israeli government's actions in Gaza.
All 36 signatories to an open letter published in April have been found to have breached the Board of Deputies' code of conduct after a two-month investigation.
The letter said 'Israel's soul is being ripped out' by military action that renewed in March, and that the signatories could no longer 'turn a blind eye or remain silent' on the issue.
It caused a furore within the UK's Jewish community amid growing divisions over the war and distress at the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza.
Statements from the Board of Deputies issued since the war began after the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7 October 2023 have been broadly supportive of the Israeli government's actions.
The board released the findings of its investigation on Tuesday evening. It said that 'many media outlets, individuals and other community stakeholders initially understood [the letter] to be a statement of the board'.
Its code of conduct required deputies not to misrepresent the position of the board and not to bring the institution into disrepute, it added.
The investigative panel unanimously found the 36 signatories to be in breach of the code.
After considering the panel's findings, the board's executive body decided to send a 'notice of criticism' to 31 of the 36 signatories.
But five deputies have been suspended from the board for two years and, where applicable, removed from elected positions. In three cases, the suspension may be reduced to six months 'by way of apology to affected parties', the board said.
Michael Wegier, its chief executive, said: 'We are a democratic organisation that welcomes debate, diversity and free speech. Managing diversity of opinion within our organisation depends on our code of conduct.
'That code ensures deputies do not create misunderstandings about the position of the board or its members, do not bring the institution into disrepute, and treat one another and the institution with respect.'
The letter, published by the Financial Times on 16 April and signed by about one in eight of the board's elected representatives, said: 'The inclination to avert our eyes is strong, as what is happening is unbearable, but our Jewish values compel us to stand up and to speak out.'
It added: 'We know in our hearts we cannot turn a blind eye or remain silent at [the] renewed loss of life and livelihoods, with hopes dwindling for a peaceful reconciliation and the return of the hostages.
'This most extremist of Israeli governments is openly encouraging violence against Palestinians in the West Bank, strangling the Palestinian economy and building more new settlements than ever … Israel's soul is being ripped out and we, members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, fear for the future of the Israel we love and have such close ties to.'
The signatories said: 'We stand against the war … It is our duty, as Jews, to speak out.'
The board launched its investigation after receiving an unspecified number of complaints about the letter.
Many of the complaints reportedly came from members of the United Synagogue, the largest communal denomination in the UK. Most of the letter's signatories belong to Reform, Liberal or Masorti communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
No alternative to higher defence spending amid Russian threat, NATO's Rutte says
THE HAGUE, June 25 (Reuters) - There is no alternative to higher defence spending in light of the ongoing threat from Russia, NATO chief Mark Rutte said on Wednesday. "Given our long-term threat of Russia, but also the massive build-up of the military in China, and the fact that North Korea, China and Iran are supporting the war effort in Ukraine, it's really important we spend more. So that will be number one on the agenda today,," Rutte told reporters before meeting with world leaders at the NATO summit in the Hague.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Number of Brits who see US as a global threat doubles since Donald Trump came to power
The number of Britons who see the US as a serious threat to global security has skyrocketed since Donald Trump entered the White House in January, new research shows. Even before the president bombed Iran at the weekend, almost three quarters of those asked — 72 per cent — named the US as a threat to world peace in the next decade. Researchers said the figure, which has doubled since last autumn, when it was just 36 per cent, was an 'all time high'. And it rivals China, on 69 per cent, Israel, on 73 per cent, and North Korea, on 77 per cent, although the highest was Russia on 90 per cent. In recent months, Trump has alarmed the international community on a number of occassions, including when he raised doubts about his willingness to defend European countries and when held a televised showdown with Ukrainian President Zelensky in the Oval Office. The latest British Social Attitudes (BSA) report, by the National Centre for Social Research, shows fears over the US' role in the world is split along political party lines. Labour and Green supporters are more likely — by 81 and 96 per cent — than those who back the Conservatives or Reform UK — 68 and 41 per cent — to consider the US a serious threat. The survey also shows that increased public concern over potential threats has led to a significant increase in support for defence spending. Almost one in ten — 9 per cent — believe defence should be the top priority for extra government spending, the highest figure ever recorded in the survey. Again, however, there are marked differences by party, with Conservative and Reform supporters more likely to be in favour than those who back Labour or the Greens. Gianfranco Addario, research director at the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), told The Independent the research did not go into the reasons why those who took part believe the US to be a significant threat, but said 'that would be very interesting to explore'. He added: 'The escalation of recent international conflicts is clearly reflected in the attitudes of the British population, who have never been so supportive of military spending and so concerned about serious security threats since the British Social Attitudes survey first addressed the subject in 1985. 'Perception of the US as a security threat has increased since the 2024 presidential elections and the first 100 days of the Trump administration, reaching an all-time high. 'The Labour government's approach to addressing these concerns, particularly in navigating internal party divisions while aligning with public sentiment, will be crucial in determining its success in managing the country's security and defence policies.' The British Social Attitudes survey has been conducted every year since 1983.
Metro
26 minutes ago
- Metro
Britain to buy 12 nuclear-carrying F-35A warplanes worth £700,000,000
Britain will buy a dozen F-35A warplanes – all capable of carrying nuclear weapons – from the US, following criticism from Donald Trump that Nato members are not spending enough on defence. Today, Sir Keir Starmer will tell a summit of Nato allies in The Hague that the new squadron will join an alliance mission that can be armed with US nuclear weapons. The prime minister is expected tp say: 'The UK's commitment to Nato is unquestionable, as is the alliance's contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure. 'But we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come.' Downing Street Biggest hailed the purchase as the 'biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation'. All eyes are now on Russia and China who will undoubtedly see this as an escalatory move. More Trending The jets, a variant of the F35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons, but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs. Each F-35A plane costs around £60 million for the latest production lots, so a dozen could set the UK back an estimated £700 million. The full details of the deal with the US were not immediately clear. Sir Keir said: 'Russia, not Ukraine, should pay the price for Putin's barbaric and illegal war, so it is only right we use the proceeds from seized Russian assets to ensure Ukraine has the air defence it needs.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump has a meltdown over 'failed' strikes on Iran that did not destroy nuclear sites MORE: 'Living Nostradamus' issues chilling warning on Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire MORE: Experts reveal real risk of WW3 — and what's at stake for anywhere that gets dragged in
