Long live Indie Cinema!
Known for indie gems such as The Florida Project and Red Rocket, Baker spoke at length about the lack of artistic freedom in cinema and making independent films because of their worth and not to use them as a calling card to land studio projects. He touched upon casting issues, unreliable back-end revenue, and the difficulties in financial survival while working on one film for years on end.
Watching the American filmmaker reminded me of my conversation with Madari filmmaker Seraj us Salikin, whom I interviewed for a book published by Busan Asian Film School in 2023. "Independent filmmaking in Pakistan is like going on a never-ending war," he had told me.
Gearing up to release my directorial debut, Indus Echoes, a Sindhi language feature, later this year, I believe my war has just begun. From film financing to production and distribution, an indie filmmaker is supposed to cross all hoops and hurdles for years just to see his film play in cinemas. This is not a complaint; no one ever said filmmaking was easy. This is about the broken system in which an independent filmmaker is supposed to survive and keep making films.
Death of DVD
"Gone are the days of DVD sales that allow for greater risk to be taken on challenging films. That revenue stream is gone, and the only way to see a significant back-end is to have a box office hit with profits that far exceed what any of our films will ever see," continued Baker at the award show. "If you are a writer-director trying to break in right now, there's a good chance you're making a film for free or making next to nothing on production or sale. How do you support yourself with middle or no income for three years?"
Baker brings up multiple points here. With little support, indie filmmakers keep on keeping on. I, for one, write and teach and exploit all my skill sets. If I weren't able to leverage my parallel careers, it would've been almost impossible to finish making Indus Echoes. Ask Salikin and he'd tell you the same about Madari, and so will many other indie filmmakers.
Until recently, films which didn't have a banger opening weekend at the box office could still recover money and even make profits due to DVD sales. It took the pressure off, and that meant filmmakers could experiment and innovate, which benefited the entire industry in the long run. With streaming and a limited (if any) theatrical run, all the profits must be made right now. If not, a film is considered unsuccessful.
However, low and mid-budget indie films are equally important for a successful industry. If an industry only produces big budget spectacles, it's bound to crash and burn. Even in Pakistan, we tend to only focus on big-budget, star-driven romcoms or action comedies, and stubbornly refuse to offer anything new. And the result for the past decade has been a slow loss of audiences' trust in local filmmakers, which often results in even films with better storytelling, characters and production suffering at the box office.
Similar to what Baker remarked, landing a big studio project isn't the sole reason we make independent films. "Some of us want to make personal films that are intended for theatrical release with subject matter that would never be greenlit by the big studios," he said. "We want complete artistic freedom and the freedom to cast who is right for the role, not who's [been] forced to be cast, considering box office value or how many followers they have on social media."
In Pakistan, if a film isn't supported or distributed by a major TV network and doesn't include the top stars in the lead cast, it becomes even more difficult to finish and release. Recently, an interviewer asked me why I didn't cast well-known stars in Indus Echoes and opted for theatre actors like Vajdaan Shah, Ansaar Mahar and Samina Seher. My response was along the same lines. It has to do with the actors' abilities, and whether they fit the roles, and not how big their social media following is.
A need, not luxury
A successful film industry has room for all kinds of films, be it commercial blockbusters, mid-range dramas, and even arthouse and experimental cinema. To disregard indie cinema is a deadly sin that disrupts the entire ecosystem of the industry.
Independent cinema is not a luxury for filmmakers indulging in their own obsessions, it's essential to the growth and evolution of culture, for us to tell stories important to us and the people. Countless all-time great films, and entire film movements started off with independent films. The filmography of Jim Jarmusch, Charlie Kaufman, Noah Baumbach and many more would be quite different if they had chosen the popular path. And it's not far-fetched to say that a new kind of Pakistani cinema, a new film movement is taking its root in local indie films, despite or perhaps because of the quagmire of the mainstream industry. New, unique filmmakers like Seraj us Salikin, Ali Sohail Jaura, Kainat Thebo, yours truly and dozens more are gathering to build an indie film scene and showing up and showing out; it's up to the system now to expand and adjust accordingly to become sustainable.
"The system has to change, because this is simply unsustainable," Baker concluded. "We are creating a product that creates jobs and revenue for the entire industry. We shouldn't be barely getting by. Creatives that are involved with projects that span years have to begin getting much higher upfront fees, because back-end simply can't be relied upon any longer. We have to demand that. If not, indie films will simply become calling card films. I know that's not what I signed up for. So, let's demand what we're worth."
Long live indie cinema!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
26-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Hollywood vs censorville
A rude emoji was replaced with a politer one in F1: The Movie. Photo: File Film fans in India were outraged to learn that a 33-second kiss scene in Superman was shortened to just a few seconds by their country's censors. Despite the film's 13+ rating, India's Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) felt compelled to sanitise the embrace they described as "overly sensual." When it was created through the Cinematograph Act of 1952, the CBFC's official mandate was to certify films according to age categories, but it has since become notorious for its role as a censor. Recent examples of alterations in major Hollywood productions include replacing a middle-finger emoji appearing in F1: The Movie with a fist emoji. Swear words were muted in Marvel's Thunderbolts and Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning. In Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer (2023), the Indian board had Florence Pugh's nudity covered up with a digitally inserted CGI dress. "If a scene is meant for mature audiences, it should simply be placed in the appropriate category," argued writer Disha Bijolia in Indian online magazine Homegrown. "Instead, the CBFC repeatedly interferes with a filmmaker's vision — cutting into plots, disrupting emotional arcs, and flattening the intent behind entire narratives." Satisfying demand Along with the widespread censorship method of simply banning films, releasing alternate versions of movies is also well established in many countries beyond India. Authoritarian states know that even if a film is banned, it can still circulate illegally, which motivates them to distribute their own "more appropriate" versions of the works. Way before AI-created imagery became widely available, Iran had already equipped the country's censors with new digital technology by 2010, allowing them to tweak dialogues and images that didn't conform to Islamic modesty. The approach is detailed in an 2012 article in The Atlantic, which also shows stills comparing how the original scenes were retouched in the Iranian versions: Women simply disappear from the frame, or their neckline is covered up with a clunky vase. Even Will Ferrell's crotch is hidden behind a wall in the motorsports comedy Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby (2006). Drugs not okay Even though many major Hollywood studios no longer distribute their films in Russia since it launched its full-scale war on Ukraine in 2022, there are still some Western films appearing in the country's cinemas or on streaming platforms. One recent example of a film that circulated in an altered version was the award-winning US film Anora (2024). Censors simply zoomed into various scenes to crop out the depictions of characters using drugs, as shown by independent Russian-language news site Meduza. Meanwhile, the film's nude scenes featuring the stripper played by Mikey Madison were left untouched. A film like Anora would never air on Turkish television. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's conservative AKP government, around 95 per cent of the media landscape has been brought into line with their conservative guidelines. Broadcasters mainly avoid sex scenes and portrayals of LGBTQ+ characters. Historical topics seen as promoting "anti-Turkish rhetoric" can be particularly contentious. Cigarettes and alcohol are also blurred on TV, with some stations coming up with creative solutions to cover up the items. Meanwhile, some Hollywood studios have released their own self-censored versions to circumvent bans and blurs. Sony Pictures supplied an alternate version of Blade Runner 2049 to Turkey and other non-Western markets, removing or cropping scenes showing nudity, as film critic Burak Göral first noted. Turkey's Film Critics Association (S?YAD) issued an open letter condemning the censorship, noting that the cuts were "an insult to moviegoers in Turkey." Accessing China China is renowned for banning and shortening films, too. Official censorship guidelines prohibit, among other things, the "promotion of cults or superstition." The 2016 Ghostbusters reboot thus failed to be released in the country despite being retitled Super Power Dare Die Team. Surprisingly, Disney's Coco, which centers on the Mexican Day of the Dead, was authorised a year later. Major productions that have been altered by China's censors include the 2012 James Bond film, Skyfall. A scene in which a Chinese security guard is killed was completely cut out because it suggested that China is unable to protect its own territory from foreign agents. In other "controversial" scenes, the subtitles differed from what was actually been said on screen. In the famous portrait scene in James Cameron's Titanic 3D (2012), Kate Winslet was cropped up to her chin to hide her nudity. "Considering the vivid 3D effects, we fear that viewers may reach out their hands for a touch and thus interrupt other people's viewing," a Chinese official explained. In 2022, social media users widely mocked the censors' alternate ending for Minions: The Rise of Gru. In the original version, villains Gru and Wild Knuckles evade capture by authorities after the latter fakes his own death. But through a series of subtitled stills that were widely compared to a PowerPoint presentation for their poor quality, the Chinese version had Wild Knuckles arrested and imprisoned for 20 years; he starts a theater troupe in jail. Gru is portrayed as simply "returning to his family," with being a father becoming his "biggest accomplishment." Hollywood studios have also been releasing their own alternate versions of movies in China to avoid state censorship — and the PowerPoint slides. The country began allowing a limited number of Hollywood films per year into the country in 1994, and as major studios increasingly competed to gain access to the restricted and lucrative slots, they also started tailoring their stories to please a Chinese market of some 1.4 billion people. A 2020 report by nonprofit organisation PEN denounces the growing trend of producers willingly altering their films for Beijing's censors: Hollywood filmmakers "are making difficult and troubling compromises on free expression," it stated. Iron Man 3 (2013) is a prominent case highlighting this approach. While altered films typically lose runtime, four minutes of extra content were added to the Marvel blockbuster, with exclusive scenes featuring Chinese star Fan Bingbing and actor Wang Xueqi, as well as scenes promoting a local milk brand. In the Chinese version, the beverage helps Iron Man/Tony Stark recover from an injury.
Express Tribune
15-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Joe Don Baker dies at 89 after decades as action star, known for Walking Tall and James Bond films
Joe Don Baker, the Texas-born actor best known for his rugged performances in Walking Tall and several James Bond films, has died at the age of 89. His family announced that he passed away on May 7. Baker rose to fame in the early 1970s, first gaining attention for his role alongside Steve McQueen in Junior Bonner (1972) and as a menacing mob hitman in Charley Varrick (1973). However, it was his portrayal of real-life sheriff Buford Pusser in Walking Tall (1973) that cemented his place in cinema history. As Pusser, Baker depicted a relentless lawman who fought crime with a wooden club, resonating with audiences during the politically turbulent Watergate era. The film, made on a modest budget, became an unexpected box office success, grossing around $40 million — the equivalent of over $600 million today. Director Phil Karlson attributed its popularity to audiences' desire for a strong, moral figure to root for. Baker also made notable appearances in the James Bond franchise, playing the villainous arms dealer Brad Whitaker in The Living Daylights (1987), and later returning as CIA agent Jack Wade in GoldenEye (1995) and Tomorrow Never Dies (1997). He was also recognized for his role as CIA agent Darius Jedburgh in the acclaimed BBC miniseries Edge of Darkness (1985), which earned him a BAFTA nomination. Born on February 12, 1936, in Groesbeck, Texas, Baker studied business before pursuing acting. He trained at The Actors Studio in New York and appeared in Broadway productions before transitioning to film and television. Over his career, he starred in The Outfit (1973), The Natural (1984), Cape Fear (1991), Mars Attacks! (1996), and Mud (2012), among others. He also led the NBC series Eischied and made appearances in In the Heat of the Night and Fletch. Baker was married to Maria Dolores Rivero-Torres from 1969 until their divorce in 1980. He is survived by family members in Groesbeck, Texas. A funeral service is scheduled for Tuesday in Mission Hills, California.
Express Tribune
12-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Oscar winner Mikey Madison lines up first post-award project alongside Kirsten Dunst
Fresh off her Oscar win for Anora, Mikey Madison has lined up her first major project and it's already turning heads. While Demi Moore was heavily favored to win Best Actress at this year's Academy Awards, Madison shocked the industry by taking home the trophy instead. Following Anora's impressive haul of five Academy Awards and Madison's unexpected win, fans and insiders alike have been speculating about her next move. Many assumed she would follow the traditional path of joining a major franchise. In fact, Madison was reportedly offered a role in Shawn Levy's upcoming Star Wars: Starfighter, starring Ryan Gosling. The project, with its franchise pedigree and blockbuster potential, seemed like a natural next step for a rising star. However, Madison has instead chosen something more offbeat and personal: she will star in Reptilia, a psychological thriller co-starring Kirsten Dunst. As reported by Variety, Reptilia centers on a mysterious mermaid who lures a dental hygienist into the dangerous underworld of Florida's exotic animal trade. The film will be directed by Alejandro Landes Echavarría, whose 2019 feature Monos earned acclaim and won the World Cinema Dramatic Special Jury Award at Sundance. The script for Reptilia is co-written by Landes Echavarría and Duke Merriman, promising a unique and atmospheric entry into the thriller genre. This choice reflects Madison's inclination toward bold, character-driven films over formulaic blockbusters. While she has experience in franchise fare, appearing in 2022's Scream and the 2019 animated Addams Family, her standout work has come in more singular stories like Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood and Anora. By turning down a role in one of Hollywood's biggest franchises in favor of a smaller, visionary thriller, Madison is clearly signaling that she's choosing artistic direction over conventional star-making.
