Misuse of AI risks harming public confidence in the justice system
Lawyers using generative AI tools to prepare material for court should be setting a shining example. But judges around the world, from Britain to the US, Canada and Australia, continue to be presented with arguments based on non-existent court judgments generated by AI. More needs to be done to prevent such abuses.
Hong Kong is not immune to the problem. Secretary for Justice Paul Lam Ting-kwok used a ceremony for three new senior counsel to sound a warning last weekend.
He said the city's legal profession faced the challenge of adopting new technology without compromising integrity. Lam then quoted from a UK court judgment delivered the previous day.
The court had warned that AI tools are 'not capable of conducting reliable legal research'.
Dame Victoria Sharp, one of two judges ruling in the case of Ayinde, pointed out that AI's 'apparently coherent and plausible responses' may be entirely incorrect or simply untrue.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
39 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Robotics' ‘ChatGPT moment' could come within 2 years, founder of China's Unitree says
The 'ChatGPT moment' for the robotics industry could arrive in as little as two years if powerful artificial intelligence technology develops to propel robots' movements, according to the founder of China's industry leader Unitree Robotics Wang Xingxing defined this moment as the first time a robot could perform a task, such as cleaning a room or bringing a bottle of water to a targeted person, in a venue that it had never been to before. 'If things develop fast, it could happen in the next year or two, or maybe two to three years', he said on Saturday at the World Robot Conference in Beijing. Although both robot hardware, such as dexterous hands, and training data were good enough to enable the feat, the crucial element of 'AI for embodied intelligence is completely inadequate', he said. He had 'doubts' about whether popular vision language action (VLA) models, which used a rather 'dumb' architecture, were up to the task, he said. Although Unitree also used such models, along with reinforcement learning to improve pre-trained VLAs in downstream tasks, the approach required a lot of optimisation, he said. Another approach, generating a video or interactive model based on text prompts and making robots follow this to perform tasks, could have a 'higher probability' of succeeding in robot motion control, Wang said. He cited Google's general-purpose Genie 3 'world model', which was launched on Tuesday and is billed as capable of generating models of dynamic worlds that include information on physical properties, as an example of technology development in this area.
The Standard
3 hours ago
- The Standard
InvestHK clinches Gold at Marketing Interactive DigiZ Awards
One North STEAM AI Summer: a catalyst for innovation and community engagement in the Northern Metropolis
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Malaysia's AI dreams: a victim of the US-China tech war?
When Malaysia unveiled its National Artificial Intelligence Roadmap in 2022, it promised a future of innovation and prosperity. But as geopolitical tensions mount, the country's aspirations risk being stifled by forces it struggles to control: tariffs, export bans and a global scramble for the chips that power tomorrow's technology. That road map for 2021 to 2025 placed particular emphasis on AI applications in supply chains; agriculture and forestry; medical and healthcare; smart cities and transport; and education and the public sector. Last year, the establishment of a National AI Office marked the government's renewed commitment to building out Malaysia's AI ecosystem, extending its focus to include micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Yet Malaysia's AI journey is only just beginning. As the minister of science, technology and innovation has noted, only 13 per cent of smaller companies have adopted AI – despite them comprising 97 per cent of Malaysia's businesses. The AI start-up scene is similarly nascent, with only a handful of fledgling firms harnessing machine learning, computer vision and robotics to create and commercialise new AI-powered solutions. An AI chip made by American multinational corporation AMD is seen on display at a convention centre in California. Photo: Reuters Crucially, both the road map and the National AI Office operate on the implicit assumption that Malaysia will continue to import AI chips, since the country's semiconductor industry is anchored in the assembly, packaging and testing stages, with no domestic manufacturing of AI chips. These chips are sourced from mainland China, Taiwan and the United States; Malaysia does not produce them locally. As such, US export restrictions, particularly on state-of-the-art Nvidia chips, threaten to stymie Malaysia's AI ambitions. Efforts to curb semiconductor diversion to China already appear to be under way. On July 5, Bloomberg reported that the US Commerce Department intended to require export licences for Nvidia's advanced AI chips bound for Malaysia and Thailand, aiming to block China from acquiring them through third countries or smuggling. To date, no formal rule has been issued, but the proposed ban follows allegations that a Chinese company attempted to train AI models in Malaysian data centres using Nvidia chips. While Malaysian authorities are investigating, Nvidia has been allowed to resume exports from the US to China since last month as part of a trade deal involving access to rare earth minerals. How long this arrangement will last is uncertain, as is its impact on US concerns about chip transshipment through Southeast Asian countries like Malaysia. US President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order at an AI summit in Washington on July 23. /AFP
