logo
I learned of RM12.5mil legal fees only after suit filed, Muhyiddin tells court

I learned of RM12.5mil legal fees only after suit filed, Muhyiddin tells court

Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin denied that he had met lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla in 2018 to discuss his legal fees.
KUALA LUMPUR : Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin told the High Court here today he only came to know of lawyer Haniff Khatri Abdulla's claim for RM12.5 million in legal fees for services rendered when a civil suit was filed.
Muhyiddin said he had 'presumed' Haniff's legal services rendered to Bersatu since the party's formation nine years ago were pro bono.
He said Haniff may have sent an invoice and subsequent reminders to Bersatu between January and March 2021 for the RM12.5 million, but 'I did not receive them'.
'At that time, I was busy managing the country and dealing with the (Covid-19) pandemic,' he said, adding that party matters are managed by the office bearers, namely the secretary-general and executive secretary.
Muhyiddin also acknowledged that Haniff represented Bersatu in several civil cases before the 2018 general election.
To a question by Haniff's lawyer, Nizamuddin Hamid, on whether he or any other Bersatu leader had objected to Haniff representing the party in court, the former prime minister said no objections were raised.
Nizamuddin: Haniff said you met him (in 2018) to discuss his legal fees. Did this meeting ever take place?
Muhyiddin: It never happened.
When Justice Akhtar Tahir asked Muhyiddin why Bersatu did not respond to Haniff's invoice, he said if the party had done so, it would appear as though it agreed that the legal fees needed to be paid.
'We thought his (Haniff) services were rendered pro bono. Suddenly, out of the blue, he issued a bill.
'We felt that we need not do anything, and let this court decide,' he said.
Haniff filed his lawsuit in 2021, seeking to recover RM12.5 million in legal fees from Bersatu, which he named as the first defendant, for services rendered.
He also named Muhyiddin, Bersatu deputy president Hamzah Zainudin and treasurer Salleh Bajuri as the co-defendants.
He alleged that before filing the suit, he had issued an invoice to the party for services rendered but received no response.
In its defence, Bersatu claimed that Haniff had provided his legal services on a pro bono basis from 2016 to 2020.
The hearing continues on June 3.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cools first M'sian to sign for J1 League side
Cools first M'sian to sign for J1 League side

Free Malaysia Today

time2 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Cools first M'sian to sign for J1 League side

Harimau Malaya captain Dion Cools has joined J1 League side Cerezo Osaka from Thai League club Buriram United. (Bernama pic) KUALA LUMPUR : Harimau Malaya captain Dion Cools has become the first Malaysian footballer to sign for a Japanese top-flight club. J1 League side Cerezo Osaka, currently eighth in the standings, today announced that they have signed the 28-year-old defender. 'Cools will bolster the squad as Cerezo Osaka prepare for the second half of the season,' said the club in a Facebook post. Cerezo Osaka last won major silverware in 2017, when they clinched both the Emperor's Cup and Cup. Cools joins Cerezo Osaka from Thai League side Buriram United, which he helped win multiple domestic titles and last season's Asean Club Championship. While Malaysians Luqman Hakim Shamsudin (YSCC Yokohama), Hadi Fayyadh Abdul Razak (Fagiano Okayama) and Wan Zack Haikal (FC Ryukyu) have played in Japan, they featured in lower leagues. In a post on X, said Cools has proven himself both at Buriram and with Harimau Malaya. 'Welcome to the To all our fans in Malaysia – don't miss this exciting new chapter in Japan!' it said.

Court to hear Muhyiddin's reference bid on August 28
Court to hear Muhyiddin's reference bid on August 28

Daily Express

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Express

Court to hear Muhyiddin's reference bid on August 28

Published on: Wednesday, June 04, 2025 Published on: Wed, Jun 04, 2025 By: Ho Kit Yen, FMT Text Size: Former prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin is accused of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election in Gua Musang, Kelantan, last year. (Bernama pic) Kuala Lumpur: The High Court here will hear Muhyiddin Yassin's bid to refer legal questions to the apex court on the validity of certain provisions under the Sedition Act on Aug 28. The former prime minister is accused of making seditious statements during the Nenggiri by-election in Gua Musang, Kelantan, last year. Justice Jamil Hussin fixed the date after lawyer Joshua Tay, appearing for Muhyiddin, told the court that the defence and prosecution had agreed on the date. The court then instructed the prosecution and defence to file their submissions by Aug 14. Deputy public prosecutor Razali Che Ani appeared for the prosecution. Muhyiddin allegedly said he was not invited by the then Yang di-Pertuan Agong to be sworn in as prime minister following the 2022 general election, despite having obtained the majority support of 115 MPs. If found guilty, the Perikatan Nasional chairman and Bersatu president will face a jail term that could extend to three years or a maximum fine of RM5,000. Muhyiddin was initially charged at the Gua Musang sessions court in August last year. On Nov 27, Justice Azmi Abdullah allowed his application to have the case transferred to the Kuala Lumpur High Court. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]
[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]

New Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

[UPDATED] High Court rejects Anwar's bid to refer constitutional questions to federal court [WATCH]

KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has failed in his bid to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court regarding the legal provisions on the immunity of a sitting prime minister. High Court Judge Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed the application, ruling that it did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA). "Having considered the affidavits, the eight proposed questions, and submissions of all parties (both written and oral), this court is not satisfied that the statutory threshold under Section 84 of the CJA is met. "The questions posed are speculative, not necessary to the disposal of this case, and do not concern the interpretation or validity of any constitutional provision," she said in her decision. Anwar's application is linked to a sexual assault lawsuit filed against him four years ago by his former research officer, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. The trial is scheduled to begin on June 16. Roz Mawar said the proposed constitutional questions failed to meet the statutory threshold under the section, and that not every question referencing the Federal Constitution warrants referral. "The Federal Court is not a forum for speculative advisory opinions. "Furthermore, the defendant (Anwar) has affirmed readiness to proceed with trial and there is no evidence that the suit impairs his ability to perform constitutional duties. "This court finds no special circumstances warranting a stay of proceedings," she said. Roz Mawar awarded RM20,000 in costs to Yusoff Rawther. She also ruled that the June 16 trial will proceed. After the proceedings, Anwar's lawyer Datuk Seri Rajasegaran Krishnan said they will file a notice of appeal at the Court of Appeal. On May 23, Anwar applied to the High Court to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, which included whether he possesses immunity from a civil suit filed by Yusoff. Anwar had sought the apex court to rule whether Articles 5,8, 39,40 and 43 of the constitution grant him qualified immunity from Yusoff's suit. Yusoff had filed the suit before Anwar became prime minister on Nov 24, 2022. Anwar had asked the court to decide whether Yusoff's suit would impair the effective discharge of his executive duties and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar had also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution. Previously, Anwar's senior political secretary Datuk Seri Shamsul Iskandar Mohd Akin had said there was no attempt in the application to seek absolute immunity. He said Anwar's application to the Federal Court is a lawful process to seek clarity from the court on his position in carrying out official duties when facing a civil suit based on claims that precede his appointment as prime minister. Shamsul Iskandar had said the issue is whether such civil action could interfere with the efficiency of a prime minister in carrying out the executive functions of the state. He had said it is a legitimate and lawful matter to be referred to the Federal Court, the highest judicial institution in the country, with the jurisdiction to interpret the constitution fairly and objectively.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store