Protesters lock Central govt. offices in Manipur
The civil disobedience campaign in Manipur's Imphal Valley intensified on Tuesday (May 27, 2025) with protesters fanning out to lock Central government offices.
The action was concentrated in the State's capital, Imphal, which straddles two of the five districts comprising the Valley.
The protest was announced by a Meitei organisation on May 24, alleging that the Central armed forces insulted the State's identity by masking the words 'Manipur State Transport' on a State-run bus on May 20. The protesters have been seeking Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla's apology for the incident.
Among the offices the protesters locked on Tuesday after overcoming resistance on the way from security personnel were the offices of the Geological Survey of India and the State's Chief Electoral Officer. One of the banners put up at these offices read: 'President's Rule must stop insulting Manipur's identity.'
Mr. Bhalla has been administering Manipur since the President's Rule was imposed on February 13, days after BJP leader N. Biren Singh resigned as the Chief Minister. He was a casualty of the ethnic conflict that broke out in the State on May 3, 2023, killing more than 250 people.
Governor's apology sought
The Coordinating Committee on Manipur Integrity (COCOMI), a Meitei organisation, had announced the civil disobedience movement after the expiry of a 48-hour deadline set for the Governor to apologise for the incident involving the bus carrying a team of media and State information officials from Imphal to cover the Shirui Lily Festival in the Naga-dominated Ukhrul district.
At a checkpoint about 25 km from Imphal, the Central armed forces allegedly made the passengers of the bus cover the words 'Manipur State Transport' displayed on the State-run bus. No reason was given, but Meitei organisations said the act 'undermined Manipur's identity, name, pride, and respect.'
Apart from continuing to seek an apology from Mr. Bhalla, the COCOMI-led protesters demanded the resignation of Chief Secretary P.K. Singh, Security Adviser Kuldiep Singh, and Director-General of Police Rajiv Singh, holding them responsible for the incident.
Also read | 48-hour bandh affects normal life in Manipur's Imphal Valley
Congress slams govt.
The Opposition Congress criticised the government over the incident. 'If we cannot use the word 'Manipur' within Manipur, where is our integrity? Who issued orders for the concealment of the signage? They should come out and apologise to the people of Manipur,' former Chief Minister and Congress leader Okram Ibobi Singh said.
He also said it was shameful that the Governor, the head of the State, could not travel seven km by road from Imphal's airport to the Raj Bhavan (lined by protesters) in the heart of the city on Monday and had to be airlifted. 'The incident indicates the total failure of the Centre because Manipur is now under the President's Rule,' he added.
Hundreds of protesters formed a human chain along the airport road on Monday in anticipation of the Governor's motorcade after his scheduled landing in a flight from New Delhi, where he attended an investment summit.
He was flown to the iconic Kangla Fort – Imphal's centrepiece – in an Army chopper to avoid the protesters. He travelled about 300 metres from the fort to the Raj Bhavan by road under tight security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Everyone should support whatever is in the national interest: Salman Khurshid
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader and former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, who was part of an all-party parliamentary delegation on an 'Operation Sindoor' diplomatic outreach mission, has said that anything done in the national interest should be supported by all, regardless of political affiliations. In an interview with IANS, Khurshid addressed criticism from within his party regarding the ongoing diplomatic initiative and emphasised the importance of unity when representing the country abroad. He said that if you have to go outside the country and speak for your nation, is it easy or difficult? And if someone is doing so, why should there be any objection? His remarks come shortly after his post on social media platform X on Monday, where he expressed dismay over domestic political divisions while he was abroad on a mission against terrorism. "When on a mission to carry India's message to the world in the fight against terrorism, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic?' he had posted during the delegation's visit to Kuala Lumpur. Excerpts from the interview: IANS: You were part of the all-party delegation. How successful do you consider the outreach? Salman Khurshid: I consider it very successful. The goal was to engage with multiple countries and urge them to go beyond expressing sympathy - to take concrete steps against terrorism. Terrorism affects not only India but also many other nations. We emphasised the need for global cooperation in fighting this menace, and the response was encouraging. IANS: What would you like to say about your post on X where you asked, "Is it so difficult to be patriotic?" What were you referring to? Salman Khurshid: That's exactly what I'm asking. And I'm not getting an answer. If someone has to go abroad and speak for the country, is that difficult or easy? If someone is doing it, why should there be a problem? I don't think it's a bad thing—I think it's a good thing. So, whatever is in the interest of the country, I believe everyone should support it. IANS: Despite calling the outreach a success, your own party has raised questions. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh said, "While terrorists are roaming freely, so are our MPs." How do you respond? Salman Khurshid: Jairam Ramesh is right - we were indeed travelling. But if we hadn't been travelling, we would have been sitting idle. I've already communicated our efforts and achievements to both my party and the government. Let me be clear: I was sent by the Congress; I didn't go on my own. I'm grateful for the opportunity and hopeful that the party will recognise the value of our work. IANS: You praised the abrogation of Article 370 during your speech in Indonesia. What do you want to say about this? Salman Khurshid: Why are you asking me about that? I don't live in Jammu and Kashmir, though I do visit occasionally. Whether it was right or wrong is a matter of ongoing public debate. However, there is a real issue of statehood, and elected representatives are demanding its restoration. If we can be united in supporting that demand, it would be better for everyone. IANS: What is your view on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's 'Narendra Surrender' remark? Salman Khurshid: Rahul Gandhi is absolutely right, and I support him. I am a member of the Congress party and take leadership directions from him. If others want to interpret my loyalty or position differently, they may do so. But I'm clear on where I stand. IANS: The BJP claims that Rahul Gandhi's "Narendra Surrender" comment is being used by Pakistani media to further anti-India propaganda. They argue that even Pakistan hasn't used such harsh terms. What's your take? Salman Khurshid: Frankly, I don't care what Pakistan says. I oppose everything they've done to promote terrorism. My only interest is in ensuring India gives a strong and clear message to Pakistan so that such behaviour is never repeated. I don't watch Pakistani TV—there are enough Indian news channels to keep me informed.
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP worker murder case: SC allows Karntaka Congress MLA Kulkarni to place additional documents
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday granted a day's time to Congress' Karnataka MLA and former Minister Vinay Kulkarni to place on record additional documents against the state government's plea for cancellation of his bail in connection with the murder of BJP worker Yogesh Gowda over allegations of witness-tampering. A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma turned down the request of Kulkarni's counsel to adjourn the hearing till next week for bringing certain documents which were filed before the trial court. After much persuasion, the Justice Karol-led Bench adjourned the hearing till Friday, and in the meantime, asked Kulkarni's lawyer to bring on record the additional documents. "It shall be open for the respondent (Vinay Kulkarni) to place on record any document either during the course of the day or hand over the same during the course of the hearing tomorrow," ordered the apex court. Earlier on Wednesday, the Justice Karol-led Bench restrained the trial court from examining any witnesses till further orders, and listed the matter for hearing on June 5. Kulkarni, presently the Chairman of the Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board, was accused of conspiring in the murder of BJP Zilla Panchayat member Yogesh Gowda in 2016. He was then a cabinet minister in the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government. Though his name came up, no action was initiated against him. The BJP made it an issue, and former Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa vowed at election rallies that he would send Kulkarni to jail if the BJP was voted to power. Later, the case was handed over to the CBI, and Kulkarni was arrested. He spent more than 9 months in jail and finally obtained bail from the Supreme Court. Last year, the Karnataka High Court had directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to complete the inquiry and questioning of witnesses in the case swiftly. Kulkarni, who is deemed close to Siddaramaiah, was elected from the Dharwad Assembly seat in the 2023 state polls, despite the court banning his entry into the constituency, and his wife and daughter campaigning on his behalf.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anthropic CEO says proposed 10-year ban on state AI regulation 'too blunt' in NYT op-ed
Dario Amodei instead called for the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies at a federal level, so that emerging risks are made clear to the people. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A Republican proposal to block states from regulating artificial intelligence for 10 years is "too blunt," Anthropic Chief Executive Officer Dario Amodei wrote in a New York Times ' opinion instead called for the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies at a federal level, so that emerging risks are made clear to the people."A 10-year moratorium is far too blunt an instrument. AI is advancing too head-spinningly fast," Amodei said."Without a clear plan for a federal response, a moratorium would give us the worst of both worlds - no ability for states to act, and no national policy as a backstop."The proposal, included in President Donald Trump's tax cut bill, aims to preempt AI laws and regulations passed recently in dozens of states, but has drawn opposition from a bipartisan group of attorneys general that have regulated high-risk uses of the a national standard would require developers working on powerful models to adopt policies for testing and evaluating their models and to publicly disclose how they plan to test for and mitigate national security and other risks, according to Amodei's opinion a policy, if adopted, would also mean developers would have to be upfront about the steps they took to make sure their models were safe before releasing them to the public, he said Anthropic already releases such information and competitors OpenAI and Google DeepMind have adopted similar incentives to ensure that these companies keep disclosing such details could become necessary as corporate incentive to provide this level of transparency might change in light of models becoming more powerful, he argued.
