China says Thai art show 'distorts' its policies on Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, Asia News
The exhibition, which opened on July 24, "promoted the fallacies of so-called 'Tibetan independence', 'the East Turkestan Islamic Movement' and 'Hong Kong independence'," distorted China's policies and "undermined China's core interests and political dignity", the foreign ministry replied to Reuters questions about the show.
Bangkok Arts and Cultural Centre, one of Thailand's top galleries, removed or altered artworks on Hong Kong as well as the Chinese government's treatment of ethnic minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang at the request of the Chinese embassy.
The foreign ministry neither confirmed nor denied that the Chinese embassy was behind the removal and alteration.
China has been building its influence in Southeast Asia, where governments tread cautiously as they balance co-operation with the regional economic giant against concerns over political sovereignty.
The Bangkok show, Constellation of Complicity: Visualising the Global Machinery of Authoritarian Solidarity, had a theme of authoritarian governments and featured multiple works by artists in exile.
The co-curator, the gallery and Thailand's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
"The fact that the relevant country took timely measures precisely shows that the promotion of the fallacies of 'Tibetan independence', 'East Turkestan Islamic Movement' and 'Hong Kong independence' has no market internationally and is unpopular," the ministry said.
China is against anyone "using the guise of cultural and artistic exchange to engage in political manipulation and interfere in China's internal affairs", it added.
[[nid:720984]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 minutes ago
- Straits Times
From Van Cleef to Vacheron, luxury gifts at center of probe into South Korea's former first lady
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Lavish items allegedly gifted to South Korea's former first lady Kim Keon Hee include a diamond necklace, a high-end watch and designer shoes. SEOUL – The special counsel investigation into former first lady Kim Keon Hee has turned the spotlight on lavish items allegedly gifted to her during her husband's rise to the presidency and his time in office, including a diamond necklace, a high-end watch and designer shoes. Among the most notable luxury items is a Van Cleef & Arpels diamond necklace, which Ms Kim wore while accompanying then-president Yoon Suk Yeol on their first overseas trip as the presidential couple to the Natosummit in June 2022. The Snowflake Pendant, crafted from 18K white gold and set with brilliant-cut diamonds, is currently listed on Van Cleef & Arpels' official website for approximately 83.5 million won (S$77,400), but at the time Ms Kim wore it, it reportedly sold for 60 million won. Yoon's office initially claimed that Ms Kim had borrowed the necklace from an acquaintance. However, in a written statement to prosecutors in May, Ms Kim said the necklace was a counterfeit. During questioning by the special counsel team on Aug 6, Ms Kim claimed she had purchased the fake in Hong Kong in 2010 as a gift for her mother and later borrowed it for the Nato trip. On Aug 12, the special counsel team revealed that it had obtained testimony from Seohee Construction confirming that the company had purchased the necklace and gifted it to Ms Kim. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Multimedia World Photography Day: Celebrating the art of image-making Business CDL H1 profit rises 3.9% to S$91.2 million; declares 3 cent per share special dividend World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story The investigators have also secured the necklace itself, they added. Also under scrutiny is a Vacheron Constantin watch. Investigators suspect that a Historic American 1921 model from the high-end brand, valued at approximately 54 million won at a Seoul boutique in September 2022, was allegedly delivered to Ms Kim by a businessperson surnamed Seo. He claimed to have purchased the watch at a discounted price of 35 million won through a 'VIP discount'. While Mr Seo claims he was simply running an errand for the former first lady, investigators suspect the luxury watch may have been given in exchange for a business favour. The main reason the special counsel team suspects a quid pro quo is the deal Mr Seo's company signed with the presidential office in September 2022, which was for a pilot program using robot dogs for security. It was found that the Presidential Security Service had allocated 800 million won to buy robot dogs — a plan that was scrapped after it was revealed by the local daily Hankyoreh. Raids on the homes of Ms Kim and her family have also uncovered other luxury items, including shoes from Chanel. The shoes are suspected of having been gifted by people related to the religious group Family Federation for World Peace and Unification. But questions remain over the shoe size, as the Chanel shoes allegedly intended for Ms Kim were size 39 (European), equivalent to about 245mm to 255mm. This is smaller than Ms Kim's reported shoe size of 260mm. Ms Kim was previously embroiled in controversy after accepting a luxury Christian Dior handbag , valued at 3 million won, from a Korean American pastor in 2022. Their meeting was secretly recorded on a hidden camera, and the footage was released by an online media outlet in November 2023. Prosecutors concluded there was no basis for a criminal charge in the case. THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Straits Times
2 minutes ago
- Straits Times
France, Germany, UK willing to reinstate sanctions on Iran, FT reports
France's President Emmanuel Macron and Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer meet with Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz (not pictured) on the sidelines of the two-day NATO's Heads of State and Government summit, in The Hague, Netherlands June 24, 2025. Ludovic Marin/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo France, Germany, and the United Kingdom have told the United Nations they are ready to reinstate sanctions on Iran if it does not return to negotiations with the international community over its nuclear programme, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday. The foreign ministers of the so-called E3 group wrote to the U.N. on Tuesday to raise the spectre of "snapback" sanctions unless Iran takes action, the report added citing a letter seen by the newspaper. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," the ministers said in the letter, according to the report. The E3's warning comes after "serious, frank and detailed" talks with Iran in Istanbul last month, the first face-to-face meeting since Israeli and U.S. strikes on the country's nuclear sites. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The UK, France and Germany governments did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
California says Trump sent military to ‘silence' LA protests
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox This comes as Mr Trump said he was taking the extraordinary step of deploying the National Guard to fight crime in Washington. LOS ANGELES - The US government's unprecedented use of National Guard troops in Los Angeles to protect officers carrying out President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown was illegal and should be ended, a lawyer for the state of California told a federal judge on Aug 12. The lawyer said evidence presented from the landmark trial that began on Aug 11 showed that soldiers had violated a 19th century law that bars the military from civilian law enforcement. 'The government wanted a show of military force so great that any opposition to their agenda was silenced,' said the lawyer, Ms Meghan Strong of the California Attorney General's Office. Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton countered that there was 'substantial violence' in Los Angeles meriting military intervention and that the troops were only there to protect federal agents and property. Mr Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June in response to days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids. California's Democratic governor, Mr Gavin Newsom, opposed the move and sued, alleging it violated prohibitions on the use of the military in law enforcement. US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will determine whether the government violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA). Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Multimedia World Photography Day: Celebrating the art of image-making World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Opinion Singpass use in dating apps raises difficult questions Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Judge Breyer will also hear arguments on Aug 13 on Mr Newsom's legal right to bring the case. The judge has not said when he will rule. The trial comes as Mr Trump said he was taking the extraordinary step of deploying the National Guard to fight crime in Washington and suggested he might take similar actions in other American cities. In the California trial, the administration sought to prove that the military was only used to protect federal personnel or federal property, which the administration said are permissible exceptions to the PCA. California, meanwhile, sought to convince Judge Breyer that troops crossed the line by setting up roadblocks, diverting traffic and making arrests, which Ms Strong described as prohibited policing actions. Government witnesses testified that although those actions are generally prohibited, there are exceptions when federal agents or property are in danger. Judge Breyer appeared sceptical at times of the government's assertion that Mr Trump had sole discretion to decide when troops were needed. The president said in June the protests amounted to a rebellion against federal authority. 'Is it a 'rebellion' because the president says it is a 'rebellion'?' Judge Breyer asked Mr Hamilton during the government's closing argument. Many of the troops have been withdrawn from Los Angeles, but California Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Aug 11 that 300 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state. The trial before Judge Breyer will have limited impact on Mr Trump's plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington. REUTERS
