
Map Shows How Much Each NATO Member Contributes as Trump Touts Increase
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday touted a plan for NATO member states to raise defense spending to 5 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) as a "monumental win" for the United States.
The agreement addresses Trump's long-standing concern about NATO members not carrying their weight. Newsweek reached out to the alliance for comment via email.
Why It Matters
NATO leaders committed increasing their defense spending on Wednesday following pressure from Trump, who for years has raised concerns that the U.S. was paying more than its fair share of spending. Under the plan, nearly every country in the military alliance will increase investments to the 5 percent by 2035.
Leaders wrote in a declaration that the agreement is reaffirmation to their "ironclad commitment to collective [defense] as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty," which states that an attack on one NATO member shall be treated as an attack against all.
The agreement was signed with a backdrop of a world dealing with crises. The yearslong war between Russia and Ukraine continues. World leaders have been trying, but struggling, for years to broker a deal to end the armed conflict. Meanwhile, tensions have flared up in the Middle East amid the battle between Iran and Israel, with Trump striking several Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. Iran has since retaliated against U.S. military bases, and Trump has pushed for a ceasefire.
What To Know
The agreement means many NATO countries will be dramatically increasing their defense investments over the coming years, as many are far from the 5 percent mark. The declaration states that the spending must be on "core defense requirements" as well as "defense-and security-related spending."
"Our investments will ensure we have the forces, capabilities, resources, infrastructure, warfighting readiness, and resilience needed to deter and defend in line with our three core tasks of deterrence and defense, crisis prevention and management, and cooperative security," the declaration reads.
At the moment, Poland is the NATO member state spending the most per GDP on defense investments, according to the latest data from the alliance, at 4.12 percent. Estonia follows with 3.43 percent and the U.S. places third with 3.38 percent. Conversely, Belgium, Canada, Italy and Spain each spend less than 1.5 percent.
Trump celebrated the declaration in remarks to reporters on Wednesday.
President Donald Trump speaks at a news conference in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25.
President Donald Trump speaks at a news conference in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25."In a very historic milestone this week, the NATO allies committed to dramatically increase their defense spending to that 5 percent of GDP, something that no one really thought was possible, and they said, 'You did it sir, you did it.' I don't know if I did it, but I think I did," Trump said.
The president said it will add more than $1 trillion per year to common defense. "This is a monument, really, to victory. But it's a monumental win for the United States because we were carrying much more than our fair share."
Spain Says It's Unable to Meet Spending Requirement, Sparks Trump's Ire
Some NATO member states have expressed concerns about whether it is realistic to increase defense spending so much over the next decade. Spain has already said it will not be able to do so, with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez describing the requirement as "unreasonable," the Associated Press (AP) reported.
He announced a deal earlier this week that would allow Spain to remain part of NATO without having to increase defense spending to 5 percent of its GDP.
"We must protect Europe. But we must also protect what makes it unique in the world: its welfare state and its commitment to diplomacy, development aid, and peace," he wrote in a post to X, formerly Twitter.
However, Trump expressed frustration. "I think Spain is terrible, what they've done. They're the only country that won't pay the full—they want to stay at 2 percent. I think it's terrible. And you know, they're doing very well. Their economy is doing very well. And that economy could be blown right out of the water with something bad happening," he said.
He added that he could make Spain "pay twice as much" as he negotiates a trade deal with Madrid.
What People Are Saying
NATO leaders wrote in their declaration: "We reaffirm our shared commitment to rapidly expand transatlantic defense industrial cooperation and to harness emerging technology and the spirit of innovation to advance our collective security. We will work to eliminate defense trade barriers among Allies and will leverage our partnerships to promote defense industrial cooperation."
United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer said, per the AP: "This is the moment to unite, for Europe to make a fundamental shift in its posture and for NATO to meet this challenge head-on."
What Happens Next
NATO members have until 2035 to increase their spending to comply with the declaration. How Trump's negotiations play out with Spain has yet to be seen.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Canada Steel Firms Say Weak Tariff Response Risks Wider Layoffs
A group of Canadian steel producers said the government's plan to restrict foreign steel imports isn't strong enough and warned that the industry is set to shed thousands more jobs because of US tariffs. Prime Minister Mark Carney's government introduced new tariff-rate quotas last week to limit imports of steel and said it may adjust tariffs on US steel products on July 21, depending on the status of trade talks with the Trump administration.

USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump's official account posts video featuring Usher's 'Hey Daddy'
President Donald Trump's official social media accounts posted a video set to Usher's song, "Daddy's Home." On Wednesday, June 25, a video montage of Trump attending the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands was posted on the official Instagram @whitehouse and @potus accounts with the caption "Daddy's home… Hey, hey, hey, Daddy." The caption draws lyrics from the R&B legend's 2009 hit song, from his "Raymond v. Raymond" album, that read, "When I walk in, all that I wanna hear is you say, "Daddy's home, home for me." The video features a recording of the song over the montage of Trump. In recent years, Usher's track has found newfound success as a popular sound on TikTok, used to score videos. During the full chorus, Usher sings, "And I know you've been waiting for this lovin' all day, You know your daddy's home and it's time to play, yeah; So you ain't got to give my lovin' away; So all my ladies, say, "Hey, hey, hey, daddy." Artists such as Beyoncé, Isaac Hayes' estate, Celine Dion and the estate of Sinéad O'Connor have all criticized Trump's use of their music in his promotional materials. 48 hours with Usher: Concert prep family time and what's next for the R&B icon The clip comes as Trump made an appearance at the NATO summit as global tensions escalate amid U.S. involvement the conflict between Iran and Israel. USA TODAY reached out to reps for Usher for comment. Last year, in September, Usher confirmed on an episode of "The View" that he was supporting Trump's opponent and former Vice President Kamala Harris in the November general election. "So you're supporting Kamala Harris in this election, I understand?" cohost Joy Behar asked to which Usher replied, "yes." The R&B singer — who appeared on the daytime talk show one day after the debate between Trump and Harris and pop star Taylor Swift's endorsement of the latter — didn't delve too deep into his own specific policy stances. 'You know what? I don't get too deep into politics. I didn't get a chance to watch the debate last night. I obviously have been watching like everybody else. I think voting is an individual choice," he told the panel, adding also that "how you highlight and how you choose to highlight it on whatever platform you have is your prerogative." Contributing: Isabel C. Morales, Jonathan Limehouse


CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court tees up blockbuster final day of term
The Supreme Court will hand down its final decisions of the term on Friday, including an expected high-profile ruling on whether President Donald Trump may enforce his divisive executive order curtailing birthright citizenship. As is tradition, Chief Justice John Roberts announced the final day from the bench. The schedule sets up a blockbuster last day at the Supreme Court in which the justices will hand down six opinions in some of the biggest cases of the year, including those dealing with Trump's birthright citizenship order, a challenge from religious parents who want to opt their children out of reading LGBTQ books in school and a First Amendment suit over a Texas law that requires people to verify their age before accessing porn online. Every year, the high court tries to finish its work by July, though it is unusual for the justices to bunch so many closely watched cases into the final day. Last year, the court handed down three opinions on the final day – including the decision granting Trump immunity from criminal prosecution. Two years ago, the court issued three opinions, including a ruling shutting down President Joe Biden's student loan relief program. Among the cases still pending: the court will decide whether a school district in suburban Washington, DC, burdened the religious rights of parents by declining to allow them to opt their elementary-school children out of reading LGBTQ books in the classroom. The court will also decide the fate of a government task force that recommends which preventive health care services must be covered at no cost under Obamacare. And it will decide a challenge over Louisiana's congressional districts that questions how far states may go in considering race when they draw maps to fix a violation of the Voting Rights Act. But by far the most significant decision is likely to be the one dealing with Trump's birthright citizenship order. The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to limit the scope of so-called nationwide injunctions that lower courts have issued with increasing frequency, slowing down aspects of the president's agenda. During oral arguments, several conservative justices signaled concern with nationwide injunction but also seemed uneasy letting the president temporarily enforce a policy that flaunts the 14th Amendment. The court did recently hand down one of its most important decisions. Last week, the court's conservative majority upheld a Tennessee law that banned gender-affirming care for trans minors. Roughly half of the nation's states have bans similar to Tennessee's.