World leaders gather in the Netherlands for Nato summit
The allies are expected to endorse a goal of spending 5% of their gross domestic product on their security, to be able to fulfil the alliance's plans for defending against outside attack.
US President Donald Trump's first appearance at Nato since returning to the White House was supposed to centre on how the US secured the historic military spending pledge from others in the security alliance — effectively bending it to its will.
Nato secretary general Mark Rutte addresses an audience on the sidelines of the summit in The Hague (Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP)
But in the spotlight instead is Mr Trump's decision to strike three nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran that the administration says eroded Tehran's nuclear ambitions, as well as the president's sudden announcement that Israel and Iran had reached a 'complete and total ceasefire'.
Past Nato summits have focused almost entirely on the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte insisted that it remains a vital topic.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in The Hague for a series of meetings, despite his absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal the agreement to boost military spending.
It is a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to Nato membership.
In a joint tribune on the eve of this year's summit, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said they backed US peace efforts that should preserve Ukraine's sovereignty and European security.
'For as long as the current trajectory lasts, Russia will find in France and Germany an unshakeable determination. What is at stake will determine European stability for the decades to come,' they wrote in the Financial Times.
'We will ensure that Ukraine emerges from this war prosperous, robust and secure, and will never live again under the fear of Russian aggression,' the two leaders wrote.
Ahead of the official programme, Mr Zelensky is scheduled to meet Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof. Later in the day, Mr Zelensky will address the Dutch parliament.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Sky News issues major apology as Donald Trump unleashes swear-filled rant on air
President Donald Trump left Sky News gobsmacked when he unleashed a heated rant about the ongoing Israel and Iran conflict in the Middle East Sky News have been forced to apologise over Donald Trump's expletive outburst live on air. The US President was speaking to reporters outside The White House before heading to a NATO summit after Israel and Iran had both violated their recent ceasefire decision. Quizzed on reports that Israel and Iran violated their recent ceasefire agreement, Trump responded: "I'm not sure they did it intentionally. They couldn't reign people back. I don't like the fact that Israel went out this morning, and I'm going to see if I can stop it. As soon as I get away from you, I'm going to see if I can stop it." Speaking to the news crews, President Trump said: "Israel violated it too. Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and dropped a load of bombs. "The likes of which I'd never seen before, the biggest load we had seen. I'm not happy with Israel, you know when I say 'ok you have 12 hours,' you don't go out in the first hour and drop everything you have on them. I'm not happy with them, I'm not happy with Iran either. "But I'm really unhappy if Israel are going out this morning because of one rocket, that didn't land, that was shot. Perhaps by mistake, that didn't land. We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard, that they don't know what the f**k they're doing – do you understand that?" Seconds after the former reality star's outburst, a Sky News anchor could be heard saying: "We'll just apologise for that language from the US President, Donald Trump, who was speaking to reporters for that NATO summit and departing on Air Force One." Iranian officials have stated they will "decisively respond" after accusing Israel of breaching the ceasefire. The Supreme National Security Council have said the armed forces are ready. The two nations had only recently signed a ceasefire agreement, proposed by Trump, but Israel claimed that Iran violated it by carrying out missile strikes after it was put in place. Iranian military chiefs have denied this, but have faced new orders from the Israeli defence minister, Israel Katz. Iran has accused Israel of having carried out strikes on the country after the ceasefire came into effect. It claims Israel struck Iran in three stages up until 9am local time, according to Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya central military headquarters, the country's state TV said. Both sides accepted the agreement, but it is now unclear if it will hold. "Tehran will tremble," Israeli Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich warned on X, raising the spectre that the war might continue. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said Iran's "violation of the ceasefire" will not go unpunished, adding that he had ordered the Israel Defence Forces to "respond forcefully". He said they will be deploying " intense strikes against regime targets in the heart of Tehran". Following Trump's extraordinary comments, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he wants the ceasefire between Israel and Iran to continue. "The sooner we get back to that, the better," he said. "And that's the message that I'm discussing with other leaders today. We need to get back to that ceasefire, which is consistent with what I've been saying about de-escalation for quite some time now."
North Wales Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Omagh victims intend to use public inquiry to ‘heap shame' on Irish Government
The inquiry also heard that victims are 'sick and tired of platitudes, false assurances and broken promises' from Dublin over the bombing. The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is hearing opening statements from core participants. On Tuesday the focus moved to statements from the legal representatives of bereaved families. The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities. Barrister Alan Kane KC delivered a statement on behalf of the families of Omagh victims represented by solicitor John McBurney. These include the families of Debra-Anne Cartwright, Olive Hawkes, Julia Hughes, Philomena Skelton, Samantha McFarland, Alan Radford, Lorraine Wilson, who were all killed in the massacre, as well as several other people who were injured. He told the inquiry: 'It is important that we always keep in focus that it was republican terrorists under the name Real IRA who planned and planted the Omagh bomb. They alone are responsible for the loss and hurt caused by it. 'On hearing the accounts of so many at the commemorative hearings, it beggars all belief as to what else was intended other than murderous carnage by leaving a bomb in a peaceful town's main street on a busy sunny Saturday afternoon where so many innocent women, children and men were likely to be. 'The preventability of the murders and injuries was at all times within the absolute control of the Real IRA.' He added: 'Our clients are of the clear belief that whatever aspects of preventability may lie at the door of the UK state authorities, blame, to a greater or lesser extent, rests with the state authorities in the Republic of Ireland. 'Our clients again renew their call for a parallel inquiry to be immediately established by the Government of the Republic of Ireland, a call that they should not be required to repeat. 'Our clients remain greatly disappointed at the lack of any commitment of the authorities in the Republic of Ireland to meaningfully assist this inquiry. 'They regard the memorandum of understanding, agreed with the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Ireland as wholly unsatisfactory. 'Our clients wish to use this inquiry to heap shame on the Government of the Republic of Ireland for their failures.' Mr Kane said there was a 'moral, human and legal imperative' on the Dublin Government to set up its own inquiry. He said: 'As a country with a professed European inclination, it is extremely regrettable that the Republic of Ireland continues to be in breach of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights in failing to ensure there has ever been any effective investigation into the death of the people to whom they owe that duty. 'There are preventability issues which clearly arise from the territorial origin of the Omagh bomb, and the cowardly refuge which its perpetrators enjoyed within the boundaries of the Republic of Ireland.' The barrister said his clients had likened the work of the public inquiry to an MOT vehicle test. He said: 'To their disbelief, they are told only the engine can be inspected, all that exists beyond the engine, including the body, the suspension, the brakes, the contents of the boot, cannot be examined. 'Such an MOT would clearly be unfit for purpose. 'This inquiry can only examine the parts of the car made in the UK as it were, the preventability, it cannot examine the rest of the car where the terrorists sat, or the boot area where the deadly bomb was hidden. 'If this inquiry could examine the whole car then it would also be able to examine any preventability issues which fall on the Republic of Ireland state authorities and all the faults and defects in the vehicle could be identified.' The barrister referred to comments from former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern that no stone would be left unturned to bring those responsible for the 1998 atrocity to justice. He said: 'That is a promise which has significance only for the ignoring and disregarding of it which has taken place over the almost 27 years which has passed since the Omagh bombing.' Mr Kane added: 'I have the authority of those I represent to say they are sick and tired of platitudes, false assurances, broken promises and grand but empty words from the state authorities of the Republic of Ireland. 'Their resolute refusal to institute a parallel inquiry and their ongoing failure to provide real and meaningful cooperation with this inquiry speaks far louder than their words.' The barrister referred to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) agreed between the inquiry and the Irish Government to allow access to material held in Dublin. Mr Kane said the MOU is 'redundant' due to the terms of how it was drafted. He said: 'First because the assessment of relevance is in the power of the Republic of Ireland, secondly because it only relates to relevance concerning preventability by the UK state authorities. 'This is an unacceptable yet significant escape clause for the Republic of Ireland. 'Under the memorandum the Republic of Ireland state authorities, and therefore any information which reflects badly on them, could be determined by them to be irrelevant.' He added: 'This voluntary statement of participation by the Government of the Republic of Ireland lacks any degree of real commitment and does nothing to give our clients any degree of confidence in it.'
Glasgow Times
35 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
World leaders gather in the Netherlands for Nato summit
The allies are expected to endorse a goal of spending 5% of their gross domestic product on their security, to be able to fulfil the alliance's plans for defending against outside attack. Still, Spain has said it cannot, and that the target is 'unreasonable'. Slovakia said that it reserves the right to decide how to reach the target by Nato's new 2035 deadline. 'We are not living in happy land after the Berlin Wall came down. We are living in much more dangerous times and there are enemies, adversaries who might want to attack us,' Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte said ahead of the summit in The Hague. 'We have to make sure that we defend our beautiful way of life and systems and our values.' Ahead of the two-day meeting, Britain, France and Germany committed to the 5% goal. Host country the Netherlands is also on board. Nations closer to the borders of Ukraine, Russia and its ally Belarus had previously pledged to do so. 'It's a historic moment. It's probably one of the most consequential moments in this alliance's history,' US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker said. 'We're going to see a renaissance of our defence industries.' US President Donald Trump's first appearance at Nato since returning to the White House was supposed to centre on how the US secured the historic military spending pledge from others in the security alliance — effectively bending it to its will. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte addresses an audience on the sidelines of the summit in The Hague (Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP) But in the spotlight instead is Mr Trump's decision to strike three nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran that the administration says eroded Tehran's nuclear ambitions, as well as the president's sudden announcement that Israel and Iran had reached a 'complete and total ceasefire'. Ukraine has also suffered as a result of that conflict. It has created a need for weapons and ammunition that Kyiv desperately wants, and shifted the world's attention away. Past Nato summits have focused almost entirely on the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Still, Mr Rutte insists it remains a vital issue for Nato, and that the allies can manage more than one conflict. 'If we would not be able to deal with… the Middle East, which is very big and commanding all the headlines, and Ukraine at the same time, we should not be in the business of politics and military at all,' he said. 'If you can only deal with one issue at a time, that will be that. Then let other people take over.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in The Hague for a series of meetings, despite his absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal the agreement to boost military spending. It is a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to Nato membership. Security patrol around the perimeter of the venue ahead of the summit in The Hague (Patrick Post/AP) Mr Zelensky's first official engagement was with Dutch caretaker Prime Minister Dick Schoof at his official residence just across the road from the summit venue. But in a telling sign of Ukraine's status at the summit, neither leader mentioned Nato. Ukraine's bid to join the alliance has been put in deep freeze by Mr Trump. 'Let me be very clear, Ukraine is part of the family that we call the Euro-Atlantic family,' Mr Schoof told Mr Zelensky, who in turn said he sees his country's future in peace 'and of course, a part of a big family of EU family'. Mr Schoof used the meeting to announce a new package of Dutch support to Kyiv including 100 radar systems to detect drones and a move to produce drones for Ukraine in the Netherlands, using Kyiv's specifications. In a joint tribune on the eve of this year's summit, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said they backed US peace efforts that should preserve Ukraine's sovereignty and European security. 'For as long as the current trajectory lasts, Russia will find in France and Germany an unshakeable determination. What is at stake will determine European stability for the decades to come,' they wrote in the Financial Times. 'We will ensure that Ukraine emerges from this war prosperous, robust and secure, and will never live again under the fear of Russian aggression,' the two leaders wrote.
