
Children raised by strict parents do better at school, but is that you? Take our quiz to find out
While parents of baby boomers gave little thought to how to bring up their kids, modern families are bombarded with advice and philosophies on nurturing their youngsters in a world where rapidly evolving technology is making the job much harder.
But the raging debate about the best way to do it, fuelled by a vast industry where the parenting app market alone is estimated to be worth over £500m, could finally be settled.
A new UK study which has tracked nearly 6,000 children for more than a decade has provided solid evidence about what parenting style is associated with the best outcomes. And the answer is: 'authoritative'.
By plotting the progress of children since the age of two, the research has concluded that authoritative parenting, typified by high expectations, stricter limits on behaviour and warm relationships, is more likely to yield higher academic scores and better wellbeing.
Researchers at the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) discovered that the approach produced better outcomes than 'permissive' styles where parents are engaged but discipline is lacking, as well as 'authoritarian' styles, where warmth is in short supply.
A challenge to the 'gentle parenting' phenomenon
Children raised in a household with an authoritative parenting approach were more likely to reach the expected standard in the reading, writing and maths tests at the end of primary school, even after taking into account variables such as parents' educational level, according to the report, published this month by the Department for Education.
'At Key Stage 1 [children aged five to seven], higher parental limit-setting was associated with a greater likelihood of children achieving the expected level in Key Stage 1 reading, maths and science,' researchers say. 'An authoritative parenting style, characterised by high responsiveness and high levels of psychological control and clearer parental limit setting was also found to have a positive impact on Key Stage 2 [children aged seven to 11] attainment.'
The findings of the Study of Early Education and Development (SEED) appear to be a direct challenge to the 'gentle parenting' phenomenon that has taken the parenting world by storm in recent years.
Social media is awash with influencers pushing the approach, beloved of millennials, which teaches that the needs of the child must come first and that raised voices and the word 'no' are verboten.
Taken to extremes, the approach can seem outlandish. Actress Mayim Bialik's children went nappy-free as babies. Bialik, star of the hit TV series Blossom and The Big Bang Theory, practised something called 'elimination communication' that involved trying to read a baby's signals, and following them around with a potty. Fellow Hollywood actress Alicia Silverstone, of Clueless fame, posted a video of herself on YouTube in 2012 feeding her then 11-month-old son, Bear Blu, by chewing food and spitting it into his mouth.
According to gentle-parenting advocate Sarah Ockwell-Smith, misbehaviour is 'a cry for help... It is a sign that all is not well in the child's world. But most of the behaviour-control methods used today penalise the child for having a problem, rather than trying to help them solve it,' she says in The Gentle Parenting Book.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Sarah Ockwell-Smith (@sarahockwellsmith)
Ockwell-Smith and other devotees argue that gentle parenting is a form of 'authoritative' parenting, and insist that it does involve setting boundaries, just ones that 'validate a child's feelings and employ kindness, empathy and understanding'.
But as gurus preach the gospel of 'respecting' your child, exasperated mothers who have given gentle parenting a go are reporting that, in practice, it might only work with 'gentle children', and that more feisty offspring are running rings round them.
As one frustrated mother of a three-year-old puts it: 'It's a distressingly short journey from validating a child's feelings to letting them cause mayhem in a supermarket.'
Critics claim that whatever the good intentions, in a fast-moving world where parents have little time to endlessly negotiate with their toddler, the gentle parenting approach has morphed into a permissive free-for-all and is spawning a generation of spoilt, entitled children.
Katharine Birbalsingh, founder of the hugely successful Michaela Community School, in north London, and known as the UK's strictest headteacher, is one of them. She has attacked ' middle-class gentle parenting ' for creating a culture where parents are more interested in being friends with their children than holding them to account.
Teachers argue that the impact of this approach in schools is leading to chronic disruption and misbehaviour.
'Young people are more sensitive to simple things like being moved away from a friend for being too chatty in lessons, almost as though they aren't used to consequences at all. There's an unspoken sense of entitlement,' says Nadeine Asbali, a secondary school teacher in London. 'When we give young children the impression their own feelings are superior, we create teenagers and young adults who are selfish and inward-looking and who believe they are exceptions to the rules.'
'What children want are boundaries'
Prof Vivien Hill, psychologist and programme director at University College London's Institute of Education, agrees that the real-world application of gentler parenting styles can run into problems.
'That child is going to be entering the world of school where a teacher has to be able to control and teach 30 children. Nobody has the capacity to negotiate in that environment,' says the academic, who is also a member of the British Psychological Society's Division of Educational and Child Psychology.
'There is nothing more irritating to a teacher than giving a pupil a quick direction to keep somebody safe and they ignore you or want to have a 45-minute conversation about the pros and cons of their preferred course of action. There is something about how that style of parenting translates into wider communities and certainly the world of education and schooling.'
Scaled up, that lack of discipline can bring a school to its knees. School 21, a free school in east London founded in 2012 by Peter Hyman, Sir Keir Starmer's senior adviser for education from 2022-2024, and Oli de Botton, who has just been appointed by the PM in the same role, was initially upheld as a shining example of progressive education.
It opened with one year group and was given a glowing first Ofsted report. As it grew larger, however, the wheels began to fall off. In 2023, it was judged as 'requiring improvement' by Ofsted inspectors who found lessons were 'too often disrupted by poor behaviour'.
According to the new head, Moray Dickinson, who is turning the school around after joining in 2022, behaviour at the secondary school was 'really bad'. Despite this, suspension rates were 'extremely low' and there were no permanent exclusions.
'There was a huge amount of lost learning in class. Teachers were at times frightened and they were not happy in their jobs,' he said. 'There were fights. And as a result of that, the expectations for behaviour were very low.'
His top-down approach which has 'tightened things up significantly' has just been rewarded by a 'good' Ofsted rating.
The head is adamant that establishing clear structures and limits on behaviour do not have to come at the expense of good relationships with pupils. As the NatCen research confirms, with its findings on 'authoritative' parenting, the key ingredients of warmth and stricter limits do not have to be mutually exclusive – in families or in schools.
'What children want are boundaries, but you don't have to be authoritarian to operate boundaries,' says Prof Hill. 'It is about knowing when to give them freedom to explore and do their own thing, but also knowing when they need boundaries. That should be being developed from birth through early years but it becomes essential in adolescence when getting it wrong can be quite catastrophic.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Tool could help improve your fitness in just 30 minutes
An early trial suggests a small device that stimulates a major nerve connecting the heart and brain could help improve fitness. The device, clipped to the outer ear, sends gentle electrical pulses to increase the activity of the vagus nerve, which regulates heart function. Wearing the stimulator for just 30 minutes a day for a week increased oxygen intake during exercise by 4 per cent in healthy volunteers. The study, led by researchers at University College London and Queen Mary University of London, involved 28 healthy volunteers and was published in the European Heart Journal. While larger trials are needed, researchers hope the device could one day be used to improve fitness, reduce inflammation, and potentially aid people with heart conditions.


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists discover remarkable health impact of a daily 'fast walk'
Hitting 10,000 steps a day is a goal for millions of us—but we should be focusing on the pace not the paces, according to a new study. Research suggests that going on a daily brisk 15-minute walk could boost heart health and reduce risk of death by 19 per cent. US researchers, who studied more than 79,850 adults from low-income areas, found that a short brisk walk was more beneficial than walking at a slower pace for three hours, even when overall leisure-time physical activity levels were accounted for. Experts argued that the findings show that walking, particularly at a brisk pace, is an effective form of exercise—especially for those in low income areas— that could protect against heart disease. It comes as alarming data released last year revealed that premature deaths from cardiovascular problems, such as heart attacks and strokes, had hit their highest level in more than a decade. In the UK, around 420 people of working age die of as a result of heart disease each week, which works out as 21,975 people a year. In the current study, which analysed data from the Southern Community Cohort Study between 2002 and 2009, participants reported how many minutes they spent per day engaging in walking slowly and walking fast. Walking at work, engaging in light exercise or walking the dog were classed as 'walking slowly', whereas more dynamic activities such as climbing the stairs, brisk walking and exercise were considered fast. Over a follow-up of just under 17 years, the researchers discovered that walking fast for as little as 15 minutes per day reduced the risk of all cause mortality by nearly 20 per cent. Writing in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, they found the effect was most pronounced for cardiovascular disease. According to Professor Wei Zeng, lead investigator and expert in lifestyle factors and diseases, fast walking could reduce cardiovascular mortality by improving how efficiently the heart works and reducing obesity. This style of exercise has previously been shown to increase VO2-max —a measure of how much oxygen the body can process during exercise. A high VO2 max is associated with better physical fitness and lower risk of cardiovascular disease, indicating that the body is efficiently extracting and using oxygen from the blood. Prof Zeng concluded: 'Brisk walking offers a convenient, accessible and low-impact activity that individuals of all ages and fitness levels can use to improve general health and cardiovascular health specifically.' The experts, lead by Professor Lili Liu, lead author and trainee epidemiologist, are now urging health officials to encourage fast walking within all communities—especially those with limited access to healthcare—and address barriers to daily walking such as safety concerns. They added: 'Public health campaigns and community-based programmes can emphasise the importance and availability of fast walking to improve health outcomes. NHS data shows a rise in the number of younger adults suffering from heart attacks over the past decade. The biggest increase (95 per cent) was recorded in the 25-29 year-old demographic, though as numbers of patients are low even small spikes can look dramatic 'Individuals should strive to incorporate more intense physical activity into their routines, such as brisk walking or other forms of aerobic exercise.' The scientists, however, acknowledged that because physical activity data was only collected at the beginning of the study, changes in activity levels could not be considered. The paper also had some limitations, they said, including the fact daily walking levels were self-reported. Sedentary lifestyles in the UK, with Brits spending their workhours deskbound, then sitting in a train or car on their way home to sit down in front of the TV, have been estimated to kill thousands each year. The WHO puts the annual global death toll from physical inactivity at around 2million per year, making it in the running to be among the top 10 leading causes of global death and disability. Physical inactivity has been long linked to health problems like cardiovascular disease as well contributing to health problems like obesity, itself linked to an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and some cancers. Cases of heart attacks, heart failure and strokes among the under-75s had tumbled since the 1960s thanks to plummeting smoking rates, advanced surgical techniques and breakthroughs such as stents and statins. But now, other factors such as slow ambulance response times for category 2 calls in England — which includes suspected heart attacks and strokes — as well as long waits for tests and treatment have also been blamed.


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Government study to check pet dog and cat poo for superbugs
The UK government will soon be asking lots of cat and dog owners to collect and send their pet's poo for laboratory testing. Experts worry that some domestic animals might carry hard-to-treat superbugs - bacteria that have become resistant to common antibiotics. These can spread to people through close contact with pets, such as kissing and stroking, as well as handling poo, research many cases the bacteria do no harm, but some can lead to serious issues, including bloodstream infections or world-first study will monitor healthy pets, not just those that are ill. Poo samples Over half of UK adults own pets and live with them in a shared environment, meaning that bacteria, including resistant bacteria, can spread easily between animals and people, says the goverment's Veterinary Medicines studies have shown pets and owners can potentially swap pathogens, including the hospital 'superbug' Royal College will run the study over four years. Prof John Berezowski, who is one of the researchers, said they would work with pet owners and their vets to explore how best to collect all the poo samples."This initiative is critical for a better understanding of the transmission and maintenance of antimicrobial resistance in our pets," he said. The World Health Organization classes antibiotic resistance as one of the greatest public health threats facing humanity. Drug-resistant infections kill more than 1.2 million people a year globally, with the figure projected to rise to 10 million by 2050 if no action is taken, it says. To prevent transmission, experts recommend owners practise good hygiene, including washing their hands after petting their dog or cat and after handling their a pet is unwell, owners might consider isolating them in one room to prevent the spread of bacteria throughout the house, and clean other rooms thoroughly. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) arises when organisms that cause infection evolve ways to survive effective antibiotics, even minor surgery and routine operations, such as caesarean sections when giving birth, could become high-risk procedures if serious infections can't be treated.