
Sexual orientation question to appear on census for first time in 2026
Canadian residents will be asked about their sexual orientation in next year's national census, CBC News has learned.
While Statistics Canada has asked about sexual orientation in past surveys, next year will mark the first time the question will appear on the long-form census questionnaire that will go out to 25 per cent of Canadian residents in May 2026.
The questions will not be included in the short-form census that goes out to 75 per cent of Canadian residents.
The long-form census will also feature questions about homelessness and health problems for the first time.
The questions for the census, which is conducted every five years, were approved by Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet on June 13. Most of them touch on the usual census topics such as the ethnic background of respondents and their families, education, housing, employment, citizenship and languages spoken.
While Canadians are required by law to fill out the questionnaires, their answers remain confidential. They're used to produce statistics about Canada's population and often help inform where services are needed across the country.
The question will provide a more complete picture of where people of different sexual orientations live across the country, and their socioeconomic backgrounds.
The questions to be asked in next year's census include a respondent's sex at birth, with the option to select male or female. Respondents are also asked to provide their gender, with the option to choose man (or boy), woman (or girl) or write in their own answer.
The census questionnaire also provides a definition of gender to guide respondents.
"Gender refers to an individual's personal and social identity as a man (or boy), a woman (or a girl) or a person who is not exclusively a man (or a boy) or a woman (or a girl) for example, non-binary, agender, gender fluid, queer or two-spirit."
Gap in data identified
Question 36, which is only to be asked for those aged 15 years and older, asks directly about sexual orientation, explaining that the information is being collected "to inform programs that promote equal opportunity for everyone living in Canada to share in its social, cultural and economic life."
Respondents can choose between "heterosexual (i.e. straight), lesbian or gay, bisexual or pansexual" or write in their own answer.
Sébastien Larochelle-Côté, director general of socioeconomic statistics and social data integration for Statistics Canada, says the question of sexual orientation was identified as a data gap about Canada's population in consultations leading up to the census questionnaire.
"That's the primary reason why we are including sexual orientation in the census of population," Larochelle-Côté said.
He said this will also allow the census data to be paired with information about transgender and non-binary people in Canada that the agency has been collecting through separate surveys.
"We'll be able to get insights about the 2SLGBTQ+ population as a whole. And so that, in our view, is going to be providing very, very insightful information."
Larochelle-Côté said the answers will also help inform government decision-making.
"We know that sexual orientation has been identified as a motive of discrimination by the Canadian Human Rights Act," he said. "We know as well that there is a federal task force that recommended the 2SLGBTQ+ population as an equity group … we wanted to move with the times."
Larochelle-Côté said other countries like the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand also ask about sexual orientation in their censuses, but he said it has not yet been asked in the United States, which conducts a census every 10 years.
Health, homelessness questions added
Information about homelessness in Canada is another information gap that Statistics Canada is hoping to fill. It also comes as the federal government has vowed to increase home-building across the country.
Larochelle-Côté said Statistics Canada won't be able to reach those who are currently homeless on May 12, 2026, because the questionnaire is sent to homes and collective dwellings. But it will provide more information about people who have been homeless.
The first question will ask whether a respondent "stayed in a shelter, on the street or in parks, in a makeshift shelter, in a vehicle or in an abandoned building" over the previous 12 months. The second will ask whether a respondent has lived temporarily with friends, family or others over the previous 12 months because they had nowhere else to live.
Larochelle-Côté said the answers to those questions will shed light on where people are experiencing homelessness and can be cross-referenced with the socioeconomic characteristics of a respondent from the answers to other census questions.
"We'll be able to have a better understanding of who is most at risk of experiencing homelessness," he said.
Next year's census will also include new questions about the health of respondents, including whether the respondent has difficulty seeing, hearing, walking using stairs or using their hands or fingers. It will ask respondents if they have difficulty learning, remembering or concentrating, whether they have emotional, psychological or mental health conditions as well as whether they have other health problems or long-term conditions that have lasted or are expected to last for six months or more.
The census will include a general question about how the respondent rates their health.
This will help "better predict the demand for health-care services across the country, down to the lowest level of geography possible," said Larochelle-Côté.
While similar questions have been asked in other surveys, Larochelle-Côté said this will be the first time they are asked in the Canadian census.
Details of next year's census will be made public on July 4.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
36 minutes ago
- CBC
Edmonton climate policies drive up city building costs, report shows
The City of Edmonton is amending a key climate policy after a report showed building facilities like fire halls and recreation centres in Edmonton is higher due to its current standards than it would be if the city followed a basic design. Last November, city councillors asked administration for a cost-benefit analysis to see how much city policies were adding to the price of building capital projects, concerned that it generally costs less to build in neighbouring jurisdictions like Leduc. The city commissioned a third party, S2 Architecture, to compare two theoretical fire station models: one designed with the City of Edmonton's bylaws and policies and one designed to meet only the minimum code requirements. The findings show that building a fire hall under the city's current standards would cost just over $21 million, 58 per cent more than the $13 million estimated to build a station with a basic design. The case study factored in four city policies when building: the climate resilience policy, the fire rescue service delivery policy, City of Edmonton facility construction standard and the Edmonton Design Committee process. Council's new infrastructure committee discussed the report's findings at a meeting Wednesday. "Direct construction costs are increased by the application of city requirements," Pascale Ladouceur, the city's branch manager of infrastructure planning and design, told councillors. "The biggest cost driver is the climate resilience policy." The committee heard from several speakers, including Lindsay Butterfield with BILD Edmonton Metro, a real estate industry association, who asked councillors to review the policies. "Look at all the options and make trade-offs where they're necessary because we should be looking to minimize costs as well for the entire city's benefit," Butterfield said. But climate advocates, including Jim Sandercock with the Alberta Ecotrust Foundation, urged councillors to follow the current climate policy. "It's going to be really expensive in the future to retrofit buildings that were built to minimum code." Mayor Amarjeet Sohi introduced a motion directing administration to amend the climate policy and explore options for reducing costs while still meeting the goal of creating zero emissions. Committee agreed to the motion and administration is scheduled to present the proposed amendments next spring. "Absolutely, we cannot lose the intent of these policies," Sohi said. "They are there for a good reason, whether they're there for climate resiliency, whether they're there for the safety and protection and creating the right conditions for our front-line folks." 'Valid question' Ladouceur said the findings in the report are a springboard to reviewing the current rules. "I think it's a valid question for councillors to understand: Have we made decisions in the past, administration and council together, that impacts the cost of our infrastructure?" Ladouceur said in an interview Tuesday. The climate resilience policy requires the design to be emissions-neutral. The co-chair of the city's energy transition and climate resilience committee, Jacob Komar, argues that the report findings are inflated because the consultants used higher standards in the case study examples than what's actually needed to create an energy-efficient building. "The walls are probably to an insulation level that is double what is needed for a net-zero building," Komar said in an interview with CBC News Tuesday. Also an engineer who works on net-zero emissions projects, Komar said there's a diminishing return on insulation — the more you add, the less you get for it. "So the walls, the roof, the windows, the doors — there's over $2 million of extra cost that they've added." Ward sipiwiyiniwak Coun. Sarah Hamilton said the case study is an opportunity for reviewing and possibly revising policies, not setting a firm path for council to take. "The government has a role in terms of furthering climate resilience. We have a role in furthering design excellence. We have a role in furthering, I think even our own construction standards," Hamilton said. "We've heard over the decades that Edmontonians don't want something disposable. They want to be proud of the buildings that we're building with their money."

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Council votes to allow sixplexes in 9 Toronto wards, leaving suburbs to opt in
Following a long debate Wednesday, Toronto councillors compromised on whether to allow sixplexes across the city, voting to allow the multi-unit housing in only nine wards and giving other wards the chance to opt-in. Coun. Gord Perks, who was pushing for a city-wide adoption, ultimately introduced a motion "very reluctantly" to allow sixplexes in eight Toronto-East York district wards and Ward 23 (Scarborough North), where a pilot is already in place, saying he wanted to increase housing density in some capacity rather than none. "I've spent a considerable amount of time and effort working with my colleagues on council, trying to find majority support for doing what this council already committed to in 2023, which is city wide sixplexes," he said after hours of debate. "But I've been unable to find that." Along with Ward 23, the following wards will now allow sixplexes: Ward 4, Parkdale-High Park. Ward 9, Davenport. Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York. Ward 11, University-Rosedale. Ward 12, Toronto-St. Paul's. Ward 13, Toronto Centre. Ward 14, Toronto-Danforth. Ward 19, Beaches-East York. The motion allows councillors of the remaining 16 wards to make a request to the city's chief planner to opt in if interested in allowing sixplexes. It also directed city staff to make sure necessary neighbourhood infrastructure is available to support added density where sixplexes are built, including street cleaning, public realm maintenance and improvements. The vote follows a city staff report that recommended allowing low-rise sixplexes across Toronto as-of-right, so they could be built without special permission. That followed a decision to allow fourplexes across the city in 2023. Lengthy debate leaves councillors divided City staff noted that allowing sixplexes would be a "significant milestone" in meeting Toronto's commitments under the federal Housing Accelerator Fund to allow more low-rise, multi-unit housing development through as-of-right zoning bylaws in its neighbourhoods. Coun. Perks warned councillors that the city could be denied funding if it voted against approving sixplexes. But the issue remained divisive at council, with Coun. Stephen Holyday pushing back. "That is the definition of selling out the residents for money," Holyday said. "Why don't we just ask the people what they want?" he said. "They're not satisfied with ramming through sixplexes in communities that were never designed to house them." Parthi Kandavel, councillor for Scarborough Southwest, told reporters that adding sixplexes to wards like his would put pressure on community infrastructure, parking and property costs. "If you give more units the permissions, land value increases," he said. "This will have a tremendous impact for working and middle class families on the path to home ownership in the suburbs … and that's a primary part of our concerns." In a statement following the vote, Mayor Olivia Chow said the city needs to do more to address the housing affordability crisis, and she hopes all wards will soon allow sixplexes. "I am confident that, as more people see the benefits of missing middle housing, where average rent is $830 cheaper than condos and 65% of units are family-sized, more councillors will also opt in," she said.

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
60 leases signed through the two-year, $1.3 million Nova Scotia home-sharing contract
The Nova Scotia government says 60 tenants signed leases with landlords through a program that cost taxpayers $1.35 million over two years. The government first announced the program in August 2023 to help people find affordable housing. It partnered with a non-profit organization called Happipad that operates an online home-sharing platform. Happipad handled background checks, matched renters with homes, and collected rent. The provincial government has said its funding allowed the platform to waive user fees. It also paid for the costs of setting up the website and for marketing. But initial results show the program wound up costing more than $22,000 per lease, prompting criticism that the government has failed to help Nova Scotians find affordable homes. "The Happipad deal was always more of a gimmick than a real solution to address rising rents and a lack of affordable housing," said official Opposition NDP Leader Claudia Chender in a statement to The Canadian Press. "The Houston government has continued to ignore the very real challenges people face when it comes to affording their home." The Department of Growth and Development did not respond directly to questions from The Canadian Press asking whether it was pleased with the program's results. "The contract with Happipad has come to an end," spokeswoman Chloee Sampson said in an email. But overall, Sampson said 1,853 renters and about 956 hosts signed up on Happipad over two years. She also said Happipad tracked user data, indicating 400 people may have signed leases after connecting on the platform. When it launched the program in 2023, the government said that there were about 130,000 vacant bedrooms in the province. "We all have a role to play as we work together to overcome this housing crisis, and today's announcement is a call to action to all Nova Scotians who may have extra space in their homes," former provincial housing minister John Lohr said, at the time.