Should public school teachers be allowed to lead students in prayer? Here's what Americans think
Last week, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed a law requiring every public school classroom to display the Ten Commandments. Starting in September, every public school classroom in Texas will have to 'visibly display a poster sized at least 16 by 20 inches' with the Ten Commandments, according to the Texas Tribune. This law is part of a broader push by Texas lawmakers to reintroduce Judeo-Christian values into public education.
In May, the state legislature also passed a bill allowing schools to offer a daily period for prayer or religious study.
Similar efforts elsewhere have faced legal hurdles. In Louisiana, a Ten Commandments law was blocked by a panel of federal appellate judges, who ruled it unconstitutional.
And the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the launch of the nation's first religious public charter school in Oklahoma after a 4-4 split left a lower court ruling against the school in place.
When it comes to prayer in public schools, where do Americans stand on this question?
It depends where you go in the country, according to a new analysis from Pew Research Center. A slim majority of U.S. adults, 52%, say they support allowing teachers to lead their classes in prayers that mention Jesus, while 46% oppose the idea. But behind this breakdown are significant regional differences that point to deep divides among Americans on this question.
In states like Mississippi and Alabama, support tops 75%, reflecting the strong religious tradition in much of the South. In contrast, states like Oregon (65%), Vermont (64%) and California (56%) show majority opposition. Meanwhile, in states such as Virginia, Pennsylvania and Arizona, public opinion is so closely divided that no clear majority emerges.
In Utah, 45% favor prayer in class, while 54% oppose it, according to Pew. These findings are part of the latest Religious Landscape Study that took an expansive look at the religious shifts in the country.
The study also found that when it comes to the display of religious symbols, half of Americans — about 53% — support allowing cities and towns to display religious symbols on public property, with support especially strong among Christians. In contrast, much smaller shares of non-Christian groups support this idea, including 39% of Buddhists, 35% of Muslims, 31% of Hindus and 25% of Jews.
In some states, efforts to incorporate prayer and scripture into the school day have been met with opposition, as in Louisiana's effort to have the Ten Commandments displayed in classrooms, which was banned by a federal appeals court as unconstitutional.
'This is a resounding victory for the separation of church and state and public education,' said Heather L. Weaver, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, per the Associated Press. 'With (the) ruling, the Fifth Circuit has held Louisiana accountable to a core constitutional promise: Public schools are not Sunday schools, and they must welcome all students, regardless of faith.'
Supporters backing the introduction of prayer and scripture back into the classroom believe such measures reinforce moral values, reflect the country's religious heritage and give families more freedom to express their faith in public education.
'The Bible is a necessary historical document to teach our kids about the history of this country, to have a complete understanding of Western civilization, to have an understanding of the basis of our legal system — and is frankly, we're talking about the Bible, one of the most foundational documents used for the Constitution and the birth of our country," Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters said when he introduced the policy to the state's schools last year, per The Washington Post.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
a minute ago
- NBC News
Texas House reconvenes amid redistricting showdown
Watch live coverage as the Texas House of Representatives convenes amid a standoff over a new congressional map. Democratic lawmakers have left the state in order to block the redistricting effort, which has prompted Gov. Greg Abbott to threaten them with expulsion if they do not return to establish a quorum.


CBS News
a minute ago
- CBS News
Attorney General Kwame Raoul warns Texas politicians that police can't just come to Illinois to arrest Democrats
Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul issued a stern warning to Texas Governor Greg Abbott and other Texas Republicans who said they will send law enforcement to arrest Democrats who left the state over the GOP redistricting plan. More than 50 Texas state house Democrats have left the state to deny the Republican-controlled legislature a quorum for a special sessions in which they will redraw congressional districts in order to deliver five more Republican representatives to President Trump. The special session was supposed to provide disaster relief for the hundreds of victims of deadly Texas floods earlier this year. A significant number of those Democrats have come to Illinois, where their efforts have been supported by Governor JB Pritzker and Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton, along with other lawmakers. READ MORE: Gov. Pritzker says redrawing Illinois' congressional district map 'on the table' as response to Texas redistricting Abbott has vowed to take steps to remove the Texas Democrats from office when they return, and Texas House Speaker Dustin Borrows said he signed civil arrest warrants for the absent lawmakers. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has also called the Democrats cowardly, and said they should be found, arrested and brought back to Texas' capitol of Austin immediately. But Raoul was quick to shut down Paxton's and Burrows' threats. "In Illinois, the rule of law matters, and law enforcement must have a legitimate legal basis to arrest someone," Raoul wrote in a statement Tuesday morning. "Texas law enforcement officers have no authority to hunt down and make arrests of Texas legislators in Illinois based on a civil arrest warrant issued by the Texas House. The Texas House may have managed to issue civil arrest warrants without having a quorum, but those civil warrants carry no weight in Illinois." The Texas Democrats appeared at another news conference Tuesday morning alongside Pritzker, Stratton and Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, where they characterized this fight not as a Texas fight, but a fight for all Americans. "Right now, we are facing the voting rights fight of our lifetime," said Stratton, who is also running for Senate. "This is a new Democratic party," Martin said. "We are bringing a knife to a knife fight, and we are going to fight fire with fire." "They've decided the only way to save themselves is to cheat. To change the rules in the middle of the game," Pritzker said. "And what do MAGA Republicans do when Trump ignores his oath of office and theirs, and when they're taking it upon themselves to thwart the will of the American people? Well, they say, when Donald Trump calls them, they say, 'Yes, sir. Right away, sir. Happy to lick your boot, sir.'" The Democrats who traveled to Illinois said they are planning to hold out for the entire special session, which is scheduled to last two weeks.


Boston Globe
30 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Nebraska Republican is shouted down by a hostile crowd at a town hall on Trump's tax cuts
'More than anything I truly believe this bill protects Medicaid for the future,' Flood said, setting off a shower of boos from the audience of roughly 700 in the University of Nebraska's Kimball Recital Hall. 'We protected Medicaid.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up How voters receive the law, passed with no Democratic support in the narrowly GOP-controlled House and Senate, could go a long way to determine whether Republicans keep power in next year's midterm elections. Advertisement Flood was resolute on his position but engaged with the audience at times. During his repeated discussions of Medicaid, he asked if people in the audience thought able-bodied Americans should be required to work. When many shouted their opposition, he replied, 'I don't think a majority of Nebraskans agree with that.' Dozens formed a line to the microphone to speak to Flood, most asking pointed questions about the law, but many others questioning moves by the Trump administration on immigration enforcement, education spending and layoffs within the federal bureaucracy. Advertisement Q: "How much does it cost for fascism? How much do the taxpayers have to pay for a fascist country?" . — CSPAN (@cspan) Some came prepared to confront him. 'You said in Seward you were not a fascist,' one man stood in line to say. 'Your complicity suggests otherwise.' Flood shot back, 'Fascists don't hold town halls with open question-and-answer sessions.' Asked if he would block the release of files related to the sex trafficking case involving the late Jeffrey Epstein, Flood said he supports their release as a co-sponsor of a nonbinding resolution calling for their publication. Flood also said he supports requiring a deposition from Epstein's convicted co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, who argues she was wrongfully prosecuted. Flood also suggested he might have 'handled the situation differently' when he was pressed about Trump's firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner after her office reported slower July job growth than a year earlier. The president's decision to fire Erika McEntarfer came just hours after her office issued its monthly report showing job growth in July was just half as much as last year's average. Q: "Why are you covering up the Epstein files?" Rep. Mike Flood ( — CSPAN (@cspan) Flood's audience Monday was gathering more than an hour before the doors opened. And as people lined up in the warm August air, he sauntered by, introducing himself, shaking hands and thanking people, including retired Lincoln teacher and school administrator Mary Ells, for attending. 'I believe Congressman Flood listened in a socially appropriate way,' Ells said after expressing concerns to Flood about her grandchildren's future. 'I do not believe he listens in a responsive, action-oriented way for citizens in Nebraska that do not agree with the national playbook written elsewhere but being implemented here.' Advertisement Inside the hall, much of that decorum vanished. During Flood's discussion of his support of the law's tax provisions, which he argued would benefit the middle class, the audience exploded in a deafening chant of 'Tax the rich.' Other refrains included 'Vote him out!' and 'Free Palestine!' Hecklers often drowned out Flood, creating a rolling cacophony with only occasional pauses. Republican lawmakers' town halls have been few and far between since the bill passed early last month, in part because their leaders have advised them against it. Trump and others say the law will give the economy a jolt, but Democrats feel they've connected with criticism of many of its provisions, especially its cuts to Medicaid and tax cuts tilted toward the wealthy. Flood later downplayed the confrontation as 'spirited' but 'part of the process' during an impromptu press conference. 'It doesn't mean you can make everybody happy,' he said. 'But, you know, if you feel strongly about what you're doing in Congress, stand in the town square, tell them why you voted that way, listen to their questions, treat them with respect and invite them to continue to communicate.' Unlike dozens of other Republicans in competitive districts, Flood hardly has to worry, as Republicans brace for a challenge to their razor-thin majority in the House next year. Elected in 2022, Flood was reelected to the seat last year by winning 60% of the vote in a district that includes Lincoln in Democratic-leaning Lancaster County but also vast Republican-heavy rural tracts in 11 counties that ring the Omaha metropolitan area.