
Universal Credit change may 'penalise' people with 4 disabilities
Despite significant concessions to the Welfare Bill earlier this month, the Universal Credit changes that have been approved for the next stage of its journey through Parliament could still potentially slash hundreds of pounds from the budgets of disabled Brits.
Originally, the proposal would reduce the health component of Universal Credit from £97 to £50 per week and freeze it at that level for all claimants not in the Severe Conditions Criteria Group. As it stands now, the Bill will not affect current claimants with this change, only those applying after April 2026 will receive £47 less unless they are part of the Severe Conditions Criteria Group.
The Bill also states that this group will be exempt from future reassessments. The Government argues this will prevent people from being incentivised to classify themselves as unfit for work while protecting those who will never be able to work from having to undergo reviews.
To be eligible for the new £97 rate after 2026, individuals must be part of the Severe Conditions Criteria group, which demands they meet certain descriptors at all times, such as being unable to handle a 0.5-litre carton of liquid or struggling with basic tasks due to their condition.
Juliet Tizzard, director of external relations at Parkinson's UK, criticised the "appalling" new legislation approved by Parliament. Highlighting how it unfairly excludes people with varying symptoms, such as people with Parkinson's.
She said: 'The Bill clearly states that someone must be constantly unable to do certain tasks to qualify. This will penalise people with Parkinson's, whose symptoms come and go.
'Until we can be certain that people with fluctuating conditions will not be penalised, we'll continue campaigning for a fair system. We're thankful to the MPs who tried to stop the changes to Universal Credit, and for every campaigner who raised their voice.'
Diseases such as multiple sclerosis, severe mental illness, and muscular dystrophy also experience fluctuating symptoms and are therefore unlikely to fulfil the stipulations for the Severe Conditions Group. Potentially missing out on an extra £47 per week if they claim the health element post-2026.
Another proposal, that was left unchanged amid the concessions, will raise the eligibility age for Universal Credit's health element from 18 to 22. However, disability charities are voicing their concerns, warning the Government that this plan risks putting young people at a severe disadvantage.
James Watson-O'Neill, Chief Executive of the charity Sense, has expressed deep concern about the impact on disabled youth: "The government's decision to press ahead with its welfare reform Bill and make cruel cuts to Universal Credit payments is causing deep fear and distress among young disabled people with the most complex needs and their families.
'MPs have still voted to cut support for disabled people who are assessed as having the greatest barriers to work and apply for benefits after 2026, making them £47 a week poorer. Almost half of disabled people with complex needs are already in debt because their benefit payments don't cover the essentials.
'This proposal will create an unfair, two-tier system, where still more disabled people are pushed into poverty simply because they started claiming benefits later.
'We are calling on the government to reconsider these proposals and rule out plans to cut support even further for disabled people aged under 22. Disabled people should be included fully and from the start in any efforts to reform the welfare system."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Martin Lewis has urgent £80 message to Brits with a smart meter
Money saving expert Martin Lewis has welcomed new rules that will force energy companies to cough up cash compensation for Brits with faulty smart meters Fresh regulations compelling energy companies to compensate customers over defective smart meters have been praised by Martin Lewis. Companies will be required to pay £40 to customers who have faulty smart meters that aren't repaired within 90 days - or £80 if both gas and electricity meters are broken. Smart meters are intended to transmit automatic readings to companies, ensuring customers are only billed for the actual amount of gas and electricity they consume. These households will typically have digital displays in their homes, enabling people to monitor how much they are consuming. News come after Martin Lewis warns 'nothing to do with me' after complaints from money savers. According to Uswitch, there were almost 38 million domestic and non-domestic meters reported in UK homes. In 2024, three million smart and advanced meters were installed, however, this was a decrease of 15% compared to its previous year. Suppliers must estimate bills for those who don't possess smart meters. However, approximately one in five smart meters are believed to be defective. It's anticipated the threat of compensation will encourage energy firms to take swifter action, reports Birmingham Live. Reacting to the announcement, Martin Lewis said: "Broken smart meters were high on the list of issues I raised with Ed Miliband when he first became Secretary of State. He promised me he'd investigate, so I was pleased when they told me this announcement was coming." "Far too many smart meters, likely one in five, don't work as they should – a problem not just for all the homes with broken ones, but for the smart meter rollout. With so many dissatisfied customers, word-of-mouth is bad, so people tell their friends and neighbours not to get one." He added: "We need to shift firms' focus from just installing smart meters to promptly fixing those that are broken – not just meters that go into dumb mode, but crucially all elements, including in-home displays that stop working. That's the aim of this plan, and while it's taking a softer approach than we proposed, it is an improvement and we'll be monitoring to see if it delivers." Smart meters are free to install, and energy suppliers are responsible for providing and installing them at no extra cost. Its main purpose is to measure how much gas and electricity each household uses, with a mission to find ways to reduce its usage and therefore, the overall cost at the end of the month. But despite its many advantages, some customers have raised concerns about its accuracy and functionality. As per Martin Lewis' advice, it's best to double-check with your chosen energy supplier, as households can receive up to £80.


The Herald Scotland
15 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Coalition push for ministers answers after energy project summit snub
It comes after both Scottish energy secretary Gillian Martin and UK energy minister and Rutherglen MP Michael Shanks 'snubbed' an invitation to attend a summit in Inverness on Tuesday attended by around 300 people. Ms Martin's office told the convention in a letter that "in terms of the ministerial code, it would not be appropriate to discuss matters pertaining to live applications or proposals which could come before a live application for consent". A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero source said Mr Shanks had turned the convention down as planning of development was devolved to the Scottish Government, although the convention wanted to talk about policy. The convention's 'unified statement' calls for a pause on all major applications, " given the impact upon our communities which may hasten depopulation in some areas until a clear national energy policy is in place and an economic impact assessment is undertaken given that tourism is currently the backbone of The Highland economy". It opposes "unjust and unnecessary industrialisation of the Highlands" and says the Scottish Government should undertake an inquiry to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments. The group also called on elected members to urgent support and protect communities at national level "given that community consultation is inadequate and local democracy is being overridden..." The group of 11 MPs and MSPs have now signed off on an undertaking to move to secure parliamentary debates on the statement. There were estimated to be 700 live applications in the Highland Council area alone earlier this month ranging from wind and hydro projects to energy storage and transmission grid plans. The signed agreement (Image: Helen Crawford) Highland councillor Helen Crawford, who is chairman community council convention and is a former lawyer said parliamentary debates would force ministers to defend policies. "This is a way to get ministers to address the issues when they previously have not," said Ms Crawford. "Of course not everyone shares the same view, but this is a growing movement because people want this and need this conversation to happen. "The statement is not perfect. But it's a real attempt to address where the whole process has gone wrong and, let me be frank, this is not simply a local failure, it's a national failure to address what's going on.! She added: "This clearly needs to go to Westminster and it needs to go to Holyrood." Those signing off on the undertaking also included SNP MP Graham Leadbitter, Scottish Conservative MSPs Jamie Halcro Johnston, Edward Mountain, Tim Eagle and Douglas Ross as well as Liberal Democrat MPs Jamie Stone and Angus MacDonald and Independent MSP Fergus Ewing. Among the most controversial of the energy plans is a so-called 'super-pylon' proposal which was to run for over 100 miles across some of Highlands and Aberdeenshire's most picturesque areas to enable 'significant' growth of renewable energy and support transition away from fossil fuels. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks Transmission, which owns, operates and develops the high voltage electricity transmission system in the north of Scotland and islands unveiled the strategy three years ago which it says was a 'critical project of national significance' as it has been identified as 'essential' to deliver government targets for offshore wind. The project at that point was to involve building a new 400kV overhead line connection - or energy motorway - between Beauly, Blackhillock, New Deer and Peterhead to enable the transmission of renewable power into the network for onward transmission to 'areas of demand further south'. Mr Eagle said: "It really is well past time that ministers and other decision-makers in Holyrood started listening to people here in the Highlands. We have been ignored for far too long."


The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
New Zealand lawmaker who called opponents spineless over Gaza is ejected from Parliament a 2nd time
A New Zealand lawmaker who was thrown out of Parliament for calling her opponents spineless during a fiery debate about a Palestinian state was ejected again on Wednesday when she refused to apologize for the remark. Chlöe Swarbrick, co-leader of the left-leaning Green Party and part of the opposition bloc, was ordered to leave parliament on Tuesday over a speech in which she called for government lawmakers 'with a spine' to endorse her proposal for New Zealand to impose sanctions on Israel over the war in Gaza. She was hit with a three-day ban — lengthy by New Zealand parliamentary standards — but returned the next day only to be ejected a second time. Her censure came amid fraught scenes in Parliament in Wellington on Tuesday as opponents rebuked the government for not moving to recognize an independent Palestinian state, days after neighboring Australia pledged to do so. Countries including France, Britain and Canada are also expected to recognize a state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September. 'We are one of the very few countries in the world who so far refuse to acknowledge the absolute bare minimum,' Swarbrick said. Calling opponents spineless prompted the ejection The Green party lawmaker was abruptly ejected from the debating chamber when she urged government politicians to join her in a proposal to sanction Israel, which currently wouldn't have enough votes to pass into law. 'If we can find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' Swarbrick said, referring to other Members of Parliament. 'That is completely unacceptable to make that statement,' Speaker Gerry Brownlee interrupted. 'Withdraw it and apologize.' The Green politician refused. Brownlee told her to leave the debating chamber for the rest of the week. 'Happily,' Swarbrick said. The standoff resumed when Swarbrick took her seat again on Wednesday despite the ban and Brownlee asked again if she would apologize. Swarbrick declined and was ejected once more, yelling 'free Palestine' as she went. Brownlee took the serious step, rare in New Zealand's Parliament, of taking a vote to 'name' Swarbrick for her misconduct, a ruling that means a legislator is formally suspended with their pay docked. The vote passed, with all government lawmakers endorsing it. Opposition lawmakers claim double standards The measure provoked fresh debate in Parliament about punishments for unruly behavior. Government lawmakers voted in June to enact unprecedented lengthy bans of opposition Māori Party lawmakers who performed a haka chant to protest a controversial vote. On Wednesday, opposition politicians decried Swarbrick's penalty as unusually severe, with lawmaker Willie Jackson highlighting his own ban of just 30 minutes for calling one of his colleagues a liar, before he was allowed to resume his seat without an apology. In another recent example, a government politician used an eye-watering expletive without censure, supporters of Swarbrick said. Several others had escaped punishment in recent years when using the word 'spineless' about their opponents. Opposition leader Chris Hipkins said it was unprecedented for a lawmaker to be ejected from Parliament for a second day over the same offense. Brownlee, however, said he had drawn a line when Swarbrick directed a personal insult at all 68 government lawmakers — including him. 'We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament,' he said. 'If we don't change the behavior in here, nothing will change outside.' Pressure grows to decide Palestinian statehood question Meanwhile, the government continues to mull recognition of an independent Palestinian state. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon Wednesday made his most strident rebuke yet of Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the Israel leader 'has lost the plot' on the 'human catastrophe' in Gaza. 'I think Netanyahu has gone way too far,' Luxon told reporters. 'He is not listening to the international community and that is unacceptable.' While senior New Zealand officials, including Luxon, have said recognition of Palestine from their government was 'a matter of not if, but when,' his Cabinet has yet to endorse a change of position. A decision will be made in September after further consideration, Luxon said Monday.