logo
The face looks familiar and the crime is all too real. However the evil killer mushroom chef in these videos is anything but - and the viral videos have sparked a furious backlash

The face looks familiar and the crime is all too real. However the evil killer mushroom chef in these videos is anything but - and the viral videos have sparked a furious backlash

Daily Mail​10-07-2025
Disturbing AI-generated videos have gone viral on TikTok, showing convicted triple-killer Erin Patterson preparing her deadly beef Wellington dish.
Erin Patterson, 50, was found guilty of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth on Monday after she laced their meal with death cap mushrooms.
Patterson's father-in-law and mother-in-law Don and Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson died following the lunch at her Leongatha home in south-east Victoria on July 29, 2023.
Heather's husband, Pastor Ian Wilkinson, was the sole survivor of the deadly meal.
The high-profile case drew global attention and developed a cult following online, spawning memes and satirical content.
Now, a TikTok account named Erin.the.chef has attracted widespread attention for its AI-generated videos depicting Patterson in a fictional cooking series.
The account, which uses the tagline, 'Just a Mum who loves making homemade meals for my family,' features a digital recreation of Patterson foraging for mushrooms and preparing the fatal dish.
In one video, the AI version of Patterson can be seen welcoming viewers: 'What's up guys, welcome to my cooking series.
'Today we're making beef Wellington, but first we need to find some special mushrooms.'
She then joked, 'The in-laws are going to love this,' while holding a mushroom.
Another clip showed her in a supermarket asking for a dehydrator 'for death cap mushrooms - I mean, beef,' followed by scenes of mushrooms drying in her kitchen.
'Not long now. If anyone knows a good place to dispose of evidence, let me know,' the AI character said in the fake footage.
The series continues with Patterson handing a dehydrator to a worker at a rubbish tip and cooking the dish while laughing about her 'special ingredient'.
'I'd hate to undercook it and make someone sick,' she quips, referencing trial details that she served her portion on a differently coloured plate.
In another video, the AI version of Patterson could be seen between the aisles of a supermarket asking a staff member what kitchen appliance she recommends for drying 'death cap mushrooms...I mean, beef'.
The video cut to a depiction of Patterson's kitchen, with the mushrooms inside a dehydrator on top of the bench.
'Not long now. If anyone knows of a good place to dispose of evidence let me know,' the AI Patterson said.
In the third episode of the series, the AI Patterson could be seen walking through a rubbish tip and handing a dehydrator to a worker.
Another video showed Patterson cooking the beef Wellington and laughing as she added her 'special ingredient'.
'I better cook this for an hour and I would hate to under cook it and make someone sick,' the AI Patterson said.
'Gotta make sure I don't get mixed up,' she added as she showed the camera a blue plate among red plates.
Her trial heard she served her portion on a differently-coloured plate from her guests.
The videos have sparked mixed reactions. Many viewers condemned the content as insensitive to the victims' families.
'People died. It's really not a joke,' one user commented. 'I laughed, then remembered three people died,' another added.
Others defended the videos as dark humour.
'This is kind of funny, like a twisted joke. I'm laughing so hard,' one person wrote.
'Please do vlogs from her in prison next,' another suggested.
One insisted: 'This is the best account I've ever come across,' while another fan said: 'This is fantastic.'
While some admitted they found the fake videos entertaining, others argued it crossed a line and trivialised a tragic event that devastated multiple families.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shopping centre machete attack victim relives the harrowing moment his arm was allegedly almost HACKED off in unprovoked eshay ambush: 'Don't know how I'll survive'
Shopping centre machete attack victim relives the harrowing moment his arm was allegedly almost HACKED off in unprovoked eshay ambush: 'Don't know how I'll survive'

Daily Mail​

timea few seconds ago

  • Daily Mail​

Shopping centre machete attack victim relives the harrowing moment his arm was allegedly almost HACKED off in unprovoked eshay ambush: 'Don't know how I'll survive'

A man who allegedly had his arm almost chopped off in a machete attack has spoken of his fight for life when a gang of eshays allegedly targeted him in a busy shopping mall. Saurabh Anand, 33, was allegedly set upon by five teenagers in the unprovoked attack in Altona Meadows, in Melbourne 's west ten days ago. As well as almost losing his hand and arm, Mr Anand was allegedly slashed and stabbed in the shoulder and back, and suffered a fractured spine, broken bones in his arm, and head injuries. Doctors initially thought they would have to amputate his left hand, but surgeons were able to reattach it by inserting screws into his wrist and hand during five hours of emergency surgery. 'I am completely broken, mentally, physically and emotionally,' he said on Monday. 'I don't know how I'll survive. I am in constant pain. It is the toughest time in my life - I wouldn't have wished this on my worst enemy.' Mr Anand was at Central Square Shopping Centre to pick up medication and was talking on the phone when the gang of youths allegedly pounced around 7.30pm. He said he had spotted five teenagers sitting on a bench near a cafe outside the shopping centre, but was quickly surrounded as he came out of the pharmacy. One teenager allegedly demanded his phone before another allegedly punched him repeatedly in the head until he fell, breaking his back as he hit the ground The gang then allegedly began punching and kicking him as he lay on the ground before a third teen then allegedly pulled out a machete and held it to his throat. 'He [allegedly] went for my neck, my throat,' he told The Australia Today Facebook page on Monday following his release from hospital after eight days. 'To save myself, I raised my hand up to protect my throat and my arm [allegedly] got completely sliced off - the machete cut all of the muscle, the tendons, the nerves. 'But if the machete had gone through my neck I would not be here today.' Mr Anand said he feared he would die in the alleged attack. He said the first cut allegedly sliced through his hand near his thumb before another almost hacked off his hand at the wrist. 'It wasn't just once, they [allegedly] did it repeatedly,' he said. 'They [allegedly] tried to kill me three or four times. 'My hand was literally hanging off. There was so much blood and so much pain. And he [allegedly] did not stop. He [allegedly] cut through both the bones in my arm. 'The bones were sticking out of my skin.' He said that as he lay on the ground in a pool of his own blood, his attackers then stood on his back and allegedly struck him again on his shoulders. 'I was just trying to survive,' he said. 'I was just tumbling around, half-concussed, half-conscious.' He said he lay there for around half an hour before emergency services arrived to help him. 'For 30 minutes, I kept rolling there, stumbling, trying to save myself, holding my hand and falling down,' he said. 'It was very scary.' He said he begged for help from bystanders but was ignored until one good samaritan finally stepped in to call police before he was rushed to hospital. Several teenagers have now been arrested in connection with the incident. A 14-year-old appeared at a Children's Court this week charged with a spate of offences including intentionally causing serious injury, recklessly causing injury, robbery and unlawful assault. He was remanded in custody until August 15. Two 15-year-olds were also charged with intentionally causing serious injury, robbery and unlawful assault. Police said the two were bailed and will face a Children's Court on August 11. Mr Anand says doctors still don't know how much movement he will have in his hand and arm once his wounds heal. 'There is no certainty about that at all,' he said. He says he now faces financial ruin as he tries to recover, with no income and no support despite having lived in Australia for seven years. 'I have invested in this country, paid my taxes, paid my bills - supported this country in every way, economically or supported the community,' he added. 'But today I am in such a situation as to have nothing to show that anyone or the government will help me. 'I need support and I hope the government will help me. Someone needs to hear the victims. 'It is very easy to defend [alleged] offenders, saying that someone is underage, someone has mental health issues. 'But what about my mental health right now? Who will take care of me at my home? 'I would really like to urge the government of Victoria and the government of Australia to please provide me with physical health support, a physical carer or a mental health support worker. 'I'm really scared to get out of my home. I have nowhere to go. I am completely injured, distorted, disoriented in my head and a completely broken man.' A GoFundMe fundraiser set up to help pay Mr Anand's medical bills has already raised more than $11,000 of a $26,000 target. The fundraiser contains images of Mr Anand in his hospital bed, with his arm in a sling. His friend Kanika, who organised the fundraiser, called on the community to rally behind Mr Anand. 'He's still struggling to come to terms with what a bad ordeal he had to go through,' she said in the appeal. 'In this time, I would urge the community to bring in generous support for him as this would help him to support his medical expenses, while covering for the loss of income from work and recover from his physical injuries and mental distress through rehabilitation. 'Your contribution would help him to recover better without him having to worry about his next dollar as the journey is going to be long to bring it back to normal considering the expenses required for ongoing therapy, counselling , medication and rental expenses are not easy.'

Law professor at centre of leaked email controversy claims University of Melbourne suspended him because of his political opinion
Law professor at centre of leaked email controversy claims University of Melbourne suspended him because of his political opinion

The Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Law professor at centre of leaked email controversy claims University of Melbourne suspended him because of his political opinion

A University of Melbourne law professor who claimed ''Blak' activists' were leading the prestigious institution to 'destruction' alleges he has been suspended because of his political opinion. Guardian Australia on Saturday revealed that Dr Eric Descheemaeker is suing Australia's top-ranked university for discrimination. The legal action comes after a 2023 email written by Descheemaeker to the then head of the Melbourne Law School (MLS) was leaked and posted around the university's Parkville campus last month. Descheemaeker alleged the University of Melbourne had taken adverse action against him by suspending his employment due to his 'political opinion', court documents show. Descheemaeker argued this is in contravention of section 351 of the Fair Work Act, which stipulates an employer must not take adverse action against an employee because of a range of attributes including a person's race, colour, sex, sexual orientation, religion or political opinion. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Descheemaeker alleged the university will terminate his employment because of his political opinion unless it is 'restrained from doing so'. The federal circuit and family court heard on Friday the university would not terminate Descheemaeker's employment or take any adverse action until his injunction application had been determined. Descheemaeker also alleged the university has breached section 340 of the legislation, which says a person must not take adverse action against another person because the other person has a workplace right or has, or has not, exercised a workplace right. Asked why the university has suspended Descheemaeker, a spokesperson referred to a previous statement by the dean of MLS, Prof Michelle Foster. 'Professor Descheemaeker is an employee of the university and it would be improper to comment on this employment matter,' Foster told Guardian Australia last week. Descheemaeker's leaked August 2023 email was sent in response to the announcement of an Indigenous cultural safety review at the university. MLS was 'celebrating the 'noble savage'', he wrote in the email, likening the law school to an 'ideological re-education camp'. Descheemaeker wrote that there was 'absolutely no end to where 'Blak' activists are meaning to take us – except destruction'. In an email sent to MLS staff last month, Foster said 'sensitive correspondence' from August 2023 had recently been posted on campus noticeboards and social media. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'I acknowledge that staff and students who read the notices may have been offended or upset by its contents,' Foster said in the email, viewed by Guardian Australia. Foster said the university had taken immediate steps to remove the correspondence and was investigating how it came to be posted on campus. 'I affirm my steadfast commitment to supporting a diverse, multi-cultural and multi-faith community.' She said she was committed to ensuring cultural safety at the MLS and supported the 'important work under way in this regard'. Last week, Descheemaeker's lawyer said their client was unable to comment at this stage. The interlocutory application will be heard on 9 September.

Aussies divided over infuriating road rule that many motorists want gone
Aussies divided over infuriating road rule that many motorists want gone

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Aussies divided over infuriating road rule that many motorists want gone

Drivers are up in arms about a road rule for P-platers in New South Wales that bans them from connecting their phones to their car's Bluetooth system. Sydneysider Yasmine, 19, posted a TikTok last month about her experience of being pulled over for a random breath test (RBT). She was warned that she was breaking the law by using her phone for music while it was connected via Bluetooth. Yasmine said she saw the traffic officer notice the music was connected to her phone. 'He's like, "You do know you can't have your phone connected to Bluetooth. You can lose your licence over that." And I was like, "Sorry. It connects by itself",' she said. The TikTok user said she swapped the music to a CD and she was then allowed to drive on. Transport for NSW rules state that Learner, P1, and P2 drivers must not use a phone while driving or stationary, even if stopped at lights or in traffic. 'This applies to mobile phones that are handheld, in a phone holder or hands-free, for example, via Bluetooth,' the website said. But Aussies were divided over the rule, with some arguing whether the law was even effective. 'Honestly though like surely it's worse to have the radio on with the worst songs ever made playing which is distracting as all hell,' one person said. 'I am more inclined to fiddle with the radio and CD trying to find a song that doesn't make me want to drive off a cliff than my own songs which I don't skip and let play mindlessly, never touching while driving,' another said. A third said: 'What about navigation? Are we supposed to use a paper map?' Others pointed out that the rule is to keep new drivers safe. 'It's your first year driving alone, you're very new to the road and need to have complete confidence and zero distractions, it's to keep y'all safe,' a user said. 'It's a safety issue. It's to prevent distraction,' another said. 'Everyone does it (myself included and I'm 33) but if you do, you need to be smart and not let it distract you and don't get caught or you can lose your licence.' The penalty for illegal phone use is a $387 fine and five demerit points. If someone with a learner or P1 licence is caught using their mobile phone, they will go over their demerit point limit and lose their licence on the spot. NSW drivers, including L and P-platers, are permitted to use their mobile phone to make a payment, redeem a voucher or coupon or access a specific area as long as the vehicle is stationary and off road, for example, in a car park, drive-thru, or driveway. The other exemption for drivers to use their phone in NSW when behind the wheel is if a police officer asks them to show a digital driver's licence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store