Ohio lawmakers want local governments to create cybersecurity plans
Ohio House lawmakers got a stark warning Tuesday from a leading cybersecurity firm: potential threats are changing 'dramatically' in terms of 'sophistication, speed and complexity.'
The presentation came on the heels of lawmakers introducing a bill requiring municipalities to develop their own cybersecurity policies.
House Bill 283 is a response to wave of cyber-attacks aimed at relatively low-level government agencies. The bill's co-sponsor, state Rep. Haraz Ghanbari, R-Perrysburg, explained in April last year, the state auditor reported at least 23 cyberattacks against government offices in the last 12 months.
'In Licking County,' Ghanbari added, 'just one attack resulted in the theft of more than $700,000.'
The measure directs local governments to review their systems and identity risks and detection strategies. The also have to develop training programs and create plans for repair, and response and in the event of an attack.
Ghanbari's co-sponsor, state Rep. Adam Mathews, R-Lebanon, said locals would have to inform state safety officials within seven days and the state auditor within 30.
'This will ensure prompt and accurate information is relayed to the proper authorities involved in the response,' he said.
The proposal also puts added pressure on local response to ransomware attacks. Under the proposal, Matthews said, municipal governments would be prohibited from paying a ransom unless it 'formally and out in the open' approved legislation to that effect.
'This requirement bolsters transparency and ensures constituents are both aware of the incident's occurrence and have an opportunity to provide feedback on the best use of their taxpayer dollars,' he said.
Thomas MacLellan from the cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks, told lawmakers that governments, agencies and businesses aren't defending against a random hacker.
'Ransomware is now a business,' he said. 'It is a business where they actually have help desks.'
And just as the sophistication of attacks has grown, so has the speed.
'In 2021, it took about nine days to exfiltrate data,' he said of bad actors removing information. 'In the latest attacks now leveraging artificial intelligence, it literally only takes hours.'
Beyond these kinds of ransom attacks, where an actor holds critical data or access hostage in exchange for money, MacLellan described several other threats, including attackers exploiting industrial control systems.
'Those are the things, the switches that turn on things that are connected to the internet,' MacLellan said, 'that turn on bridges and dams and traffic lights and hospital systems.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
In terms of preparing for attacks, he suggested state lawmakers get a security firm on retainer. 'You need a bat phone,' MacLellan said, 'to be able to pick up and say, we need some help, because we are overwhelmed, we've been hit by something.' Notably, Palo Alto Networks could be the one on the other end of that phone line.
He also argued the state needs to be aggressive about understanding and monitoring its exposure — what MacLellan termed 'attack surface management.' A computer, router or other piece of hardware running out-of-date software could be a vulnerability, he said, and organizations need to make sure to find and fix those problems.
MacLellan added that some states have begun developing joint security operations, effectively a state-run cybersecurity team to protect state and local governments in the event of an attack. He repeatedly argued the biggest challenge in cybersecurity is workforce; centralizing talent could allow for greater reach and impact.
State Reps. Ismail Mohamed, D-Columbus, and Ron Ferguson, R-Wintersville, asked HB 283's sponsors about a statewide approach to cybersecurity planning.
'Why isn't there a centralized place,' Mohamed asked, 'instead of requiring each subdivision to have their own cyber program?'
Ghanbari and Matthews said they would leave the finer points up to local governments to maintain local control and allow greater flexibility.
Highlighting a well-publicized cyberattack against Columbus last year, Rep. Christine Cockley, D-Columbus, asked about the cost prevention compared to the cost of response and recovery. She noted the city has faced significant costs investigating what happened and providing safeguards for people impacted by the breach.
MacLellan acknowledged he didn't have hard and fast numbers to offer, but said 'when you begin to look at the cost of remediation versus the cost of actually putting together a good system, the delta is pretty significant.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin Nears Record as Treasury Investors Boost Crypto Market
(Bloomberg) — Bitcoin (BTC-USD) rose to within striking distance of an all-time high as demand from institutional investors and corporate treasury buyers lifts the wider market for digital assets. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads A New Stage for the Theater That Gave America Shakespeare in the Park Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms The original cryptocurrency advanced as much as 3.2% to top $122,000, not far shy of a previous record set in mid-July. A weekend rally saw Ether surge to above $4,300, its highest level since Dec. 2021. The gains come on the back of mounting interest in cryptocurrencies among large investors. So-called digital-asset treasury companies — listed vehicles that pivot into accumulating cryptocurrencies — have to date amassed a Bitcoin stockpile worth $113 billion, according to data compiled by Coingecko. Equivalent vehicles for Ether have stockpiled some $13 billion of the token so far, according to data. 'Bitcoin's climb toward record highs is being supported by steady institutional inflows into corporate treasuries, US spot ETFs and a shift in sentiment following new US tariffs on imported gold bars,' said Rachael Lucas, a crypto analyst at BTC Markets. 'With gold facing supply bottlenecks and policy risk, Bitcoin's role as a borderless, tariff-free store of value is gaining traction among investors.' Eric Trump, son of US President Donald Trump, who has financial interests in several digital-asset entities, applauded the Ether rally in a post on X. Bloomberg News reported Friday that investors are being sounded out on a plan for World Liberty Financial, the Trump family-backed venture, to set up a public company that would hold its WLFI tokens. Ether options markets reflected the bullish sentiment with an overall put-call ratio 0.40. The highest concentration of call options with a December 26 expiry is at $6,000, according to Deribit data. Bitcoin and Ether positioning has been heavily skewed toward September and December calls in line with macro rate-cut timing and continued adoption by the traditional financial system, said Sean McNulty, derivatives trading lead of APAC at digital-asset prime brokerage FalconX Ltd. For Bitcoin, the next major milestone is the previous all-time high of $123,205, while support for the token can be found near $116,000 if momentum fades, Lucas added. (Updates throughout) The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie Digital Nomads Are Transforming Medellín's Housing It's Only a Matter of Time Until Americans Pay for Trump's Tariffs Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign up for the Yahoo Finance Morning Brief By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy


The Verge
3 minutes ago
- The Verge
AOL is finally shutting down dial-up
AOL dial-up is ending on September 30th according to a statement posted on the company's website. It marks the end of the service that was synonymous with the internet for many since its launch some 34 years ago. 'AOL routinely evaluates its products and services and has decided to discontinue Dial-up Internet,' reads the statement by the Yahoo-owned company. 'This service will no longer be available in AOL plans. As a result, on September 30, 2025 this service and the associated software, the AOL Dialer software and AOL Shield browser, which are optimized for older operating systems and dial-up internet connections, will be discontinued.' You might be surprised that the service was still operating. I'm not. At last count, a 2019 US census estimated that 265,000 people in the United States were still using dial-up internet, just a few years after I wrote this: As a septuagenarian, my father's story was typical of long-time AOL dial-up subscribers. His subscription was a security blanket. He was sure he didn't need the dial-up component, but he didn't want to risk losing access to his stock portfolio, investor forums, and email. His setup worked, and he could afford to keep paying the subscription he had dutifully paid for over a decade. With my help, we were able to migrate everything he used on AOL to the ad-supported and open internet that was already being delivered into his house via the broadband component of his cable package. Even after things were fully mirrored, he still felt trepidation when the time came to pick up the phone and terminate his dial-up account (despite AOL's best attempt to obscure and complicate the procedure). Months later he told me he felt silly for letting the ruse go on for so long. Reading that now and I'm struck to think that the end of AOL dial-up arrives at the same time as Google Zero and the end of the ad-supported from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Thomas Ricker Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Culture Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Entertainment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Internet Culture Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mortgage Calculator: Here's How Much You Need To Buy a $439,450 Home at a 6.63% Rate
Mortgage rates this week for a 30-year fixed loan decreased to a four-month low of 6.63%, down from 6.72% last week. So what impact does this have on your monthly mortgage payment? And what does this mean for homebuyers? Here's the monthly cost of purchasing a typical home today, according to the mortgage calculator. Monthly mortgage payment today with a 20% down payment The typical monthly payment on a median-priced $439,450 home at today's 6.63% mortgage rate is roughly $2,252. (That's assuming a 20% down payment and excluding tax and insurance.) Last week, a median-priced home at a 6.72% mortgage rate would have cost homebuyers $2,273 per month—$21 more than what buyers would pay today. Yet, if you examine the peak mortgage rate of 7.79% in October 2023 and then compare those payments with loan installments today, homebuyers are way better off now than they would have been then. In October 2023, buyers would have paid $2,528 monthly on a $439,450 home with 20% down, which means homebuyers today can save $276 a month—or $3,312 a year—compared with buying when rates peaked. Monthly mortgage payment today with a 3.5% down payment For most borrowers, FHA loans require a 3.5% down payment. Assuming a 3.5% down payment and excluding tax and insurance, the typical payment at today's 6.63% mortgage rate on a median-priced $439,450 home is roughly $2,717 per month. Last week, a median-priced home at a 6.72% mortgage rate would have cost homebuyers $2,742 per month—$25 more than what buyers would pay today. Nonetheless, mortgage payments at today's rates on a median-priced home are still a $333-per-month improvement over October 2023, when a median-priced home at a 7.79% mortgage rate would have cost homebuyers $3,050 per month. Long-term savings over 30 years When you multiply these monthly savings by 30 years, they add up dramatically. If you buy a $439,450 house at today's 6.63% rate with a 20% down payment, you'll pay a total of $810,806 over the life of a 30-year loan. If you'd bought that same $439,450 home with 20% down in October 2023, when rates peaked at 7.79%, that loan would end up costing you $910,204. Total savings over 30 years: $99,398. Now, let's turn our attention to FHA loans. If you put down 3.5% on a $439,450 house financed at 6.63% today, you'll pay $978,034 over the life of the loan. If you'd put down 3.5% on a $439,450 home in October 2023, when rates peaked at 7.79%, you'd pay $1,097,932. Total savings over 30 years: $119,898. Solve the daily Crossword