Jozef Puska's brother denied telling someone to dispose of knife used to murder Ashling Murphy
JOZEF PUSKA'S BROTHER denied to gardaí that he told someone to dispose of the knife used to murder schoolteacher Ashling Murphy, the Central Criminal Court has heard.
The jury also heard that Lubomir Puska Jnr (37) denied that he had asked anyone to dispose of the clothes worn by his brother on the day Jozef Puska murdered Ms Murphy.
Jozef Puska (35) attacked Ms Murphy (23) on the canal towpath at Cappincur in Tullamore on 12 January 2022. She died having suffered 12 sharp force injuries to her neck, eleven of which were stab wounds.
Puska's brothers Lubomir Puska Jnr and Marek Puska (36) are charged with withholding information, knowing or believing that the information might be of material assistance in securing the apprehension, prosecution, or conviction of Jozef Puska for a serious offence involving loss of human life or serious personal injury to another.
Both men have pleaded not guilty to the offences, which are charged under the Offences Against the State, Amendment Act 1988.
Jozefina Grundzova (31), who is married to Marek Puska, and Viera Gaziova (38), who is married to Lubomir Puska Jnr, are accused of assisting in burning clothing between 12 and 14 January, without reasonable excuse, intending to impede the apprehension or prosecution of Jozef Puska, knowing or believing him to have committed the offence of murder or some other arrestable offence within the same category or of a similar nature.
They have pleaded not guilty to the offences, which are charged under the Criminal Law Act 1997.
All the accused have an address at Lynally Grove, Mucklagh, Tullamore, Co Offaly.
The jury previously heard that in his first statement to gardaí, Lubomir Jnr said he first saw his brother Jozef in the early afternoon that day. He seemed 'a bit sad, not in a good mood,' Lubomir Jnr said.
He told gardaí that he left the house at about 11.30 and did not see his brother again.
However, he later returned to the garda station and made a second statement, in which he apologised for lying and said that when Jozef arrived home on the night of January 12, it looked like he had been struck on the forehead.
Jury watch garda interview
The jury at the Central Criminal Court today watched video footage of Lubomir Jnr's interview with gardaí on 18 January 2022, in which he said he returned home on the day Ms Murphy was murdered to find his brother Jozef looking 'like he was beaten by someone'.
Through a Slovakian interpreter, Lubomir Jnr said that Jozef was 'swollen on the forehead' and his cheek was red like he had been scraped. He said his brother had 'a weird walk, kind of broken,' as though something had happened to him.
He told the gardaí that his brother, who was just out of the shower, opened the towel he was wearing to reveal three stab wounds.
Advertisement
'He looked drunk, but he wasn't drunk,' said Lubomir Jnr. He told gardaí that he asked Jozef what had happened to him, to which his brother replied that he had wanted to kill himself and he had done a 'horrendous thing'.
'He said when he was stabbing himself, there was a girl running or exercising, she went towards him,' the accused told gardaí. 'She said: 'What are you doing? Don't do it, you are too young.' He said to her, 'Leave me alone, it's my life, my business.''
The accused said that Jozef 'probably wanted to push her away to leave him alone', but he thought that Jozef 'cut her with the knife'.
After telling the gardaí this, the accused said it had been 'very heavy, very hard to say'.
'I never said anything like that in my life,' said the accused.
He told gardaí that he could not believe what his brother was telling him, so he asked him again what he had done.
'Don't make any secrets'
He said that Jozef told him: 'I don't know whether I hurt her so much, but I think I did… it must have been an accident, I didn't want to do this, but I just switched my hand as she was coming near me.'
The accused said he told his brother to tell their parents immediately what he had done, to which Jozef said that he would tell them but only after they brought him to Dublin. The accused said he told his brother to tell their parents everything and 'don't make any secrets'.
In a further interview, the accused told gardaí that he thought Jozef had his clothes in the bathroom with him. When asked if anyone removed those clothes, he said that he did not know.
Detective Garda Joanne O'Sullivan gave evidence to prosecution counsel Sean Gillane SC of the accused's next interview with gardaí, conducted on 26 January 2022.
In this interview, it was put to the accused that someone had asked his wife to move Josef's clothes and put them beside the bin.
'I don't know who it was, it wasn't me,' replied the accused.
In a further interview on 27 January 2022, it was put to the accused that when he knew Jozef had murdered Ms Murphy, he 'bundled him up and sent him to Dublin' before giving instructions to dispose of the clothes.
The accused denied this and also denied that he had asked anyone to dispose of the knife.
The trial continues tomorrow before Ms Justice Caroline Biggs and a jury of seven men and five women.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Mum campaigns for 'Francis' Law' in the sentencing of rapists
A mother has launched a campaign for new legislation — called 'Francis' Law', named after her son — to end the automatic reduction of sentences during mitigation in rape cases. Mitigation covers a range of factors — from pleas of guilty to the rehabilitation of the perpetrator — which can considerably cut the final term handed down. Kildare mother Georgina Tuohey recently had a third case of rape and/or sexual assault on three of her children finish in the criminal courts. She was left outraged at the length of sentence given to her former partner, Brendan Cornally, in the last case, concerning her son Francis, who has special needs, and the overall term Cornally will serve for all three sentences. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs sentenced the 51-year-old Offaly man to five years and nine months for the rape of Francis, which, when added to the two previous sentences, gives a total sentence of 17 and a half years. Speaking to the Irish Examiner, Ms Tuohey said the sense of injustice was compounded when she was informed by the Irish Prison Service that Cornally is due to be released on March 20, 2037 — 12 years from now. When she questioned did this jail term include the five years and nine months, she was told it did and that the release date factored in the standard '25% remission for good behaviour'. What this means is that the five years and nine months Ms Justice Caroline Biggs gave to Brendan Cornally for the rape and sexual abuse of my son, he will not serve one day. That's not justice. Our justice system is not fit for purpose and needs to change. She said this was why she was campaigning for 'Francis' Law', to remove the automatic reduction of sentences through mitigation. Francis Last March, Cornally was sentenced in the Central Criminal Court for the 'habitual' rape of Francis — a then 13-year-old boy with mild autism — during most of 2018. Francis has special needs, having been diagnosed as autistic and as having a mild learning disability as a child. Ms Tuohey told the court that despite these conditions he 'excelled' and lived an independent life and completed his Leaving Cert Applied. But the court heard how Francis descended into a 'catatonic state' during the second half of 2023 and before the pending trial in 2024, when he was 18, as he relived the trauma of the abuse. Ms Justice Biggs said the expert reports found it was 'highly likely' that the trauma of the sexual abuse Francis suffered at the hands of Cornally was 'activated' by the upcoming criminal process. Ms Tuohey, who in her victim impact statement described at length the impact on Francis, said she and her son will continue to live with the devastation Cornally left in his wake. 'Brendan Cornally brutalised him,' she told the Irish Examiner. 'Catatonia is known as the ultimate regression, where you are in an unspoken state. You can't eat, you can't dress, you can't go to the bathroom. This is a young man who two years ago did his Leaving Cert Applied — and now can't cross the road. He was very independent, now he has lost all forms of independence. Throughout Francis's case — as in the two previous cases — Cornally remained largely expressionless and stared blankly ahead of him most of the time. Ms Tuohey said her intention now was not to detail the impact on Francis, but to highlight the 'deficiencies' and 'injustices' of the legal system. Headline sentence In the sentencing, Ms Justice Biggs said the greatest aggravating factor was that Cornally knew of the boy's condition when engaging in 'habitually' raping him during most of 2018, saying he showed a 'remorseless attitude' during the abuse. Ms Biggs also said Francis was 'very young and vulnerable' and that the rape happened in a dark and filthy bedroom. She said '15 years to life' was for the most extreme of cases. She said counsel for defence, John Shortt SC, thought this was not appropriate and that 10-15 years was the proper range. Ms Biggs said this was the second highest category and said that she 'agreed' with Mr Shortt. She placed the headline sentence — in effect to maximum starting point — at 15 years. Ms Tuohey said: 'I understand from being in the justice system for so long the confines people in it work within. Ms Justice Caroline Biggs may be the boss but she works in a constrained environment. Unfortunately she found herself giving a reduced sentence because of the laws, despite this being the most serious of crimes, which can attract 15 years to life. But unfortunately Irish laws are so constructed that Ms Biggs found herself confined in the sentence she was able to give.' Early guilty plea Judge Biggs said that on December 2, 2024, the guilty plea was entered, based on sample counts. She said that while Cornally could have pleaded guilty earlier, she described it as 'very significant'. She said that had Francis been required to give evidence in a trial that the effects on him could have been 'catastrophic'. Accordingly, she reduced the headline sentence from 15 to 11, based on a 25% reduction for the guilty plea. Ms Tuohey is particularly angry at this: 'You would imagine an early guilty plea means that when someone commits a crime and is charged that they admit guilt early on — but in fact in our three cases the guilty plea is on the eve of trial.' She said: 'I am looking to change policy on early guilty plea that it is within one year of being charged. This will save a lot of trauma for victims and family waiting for trial.' Remorse Ms Tuohey said Cornally apologised for his rape through his barrister, but that it meant nothing to her or her son. She said: 'He said sorry through his barrister, he didn't say it himself. It was of no benefit to me or my son. Irish law gives him mitigation for just saying it, not meaning it.' Rapist Brendan Cornally is due to be released in 2037. Picture: Proportionate Judge Biggs stressed that she was required to apply a 'proportionate' sentence. This had to take into account the gravity of the offence, the impact on Francis, and Cornally's level of culpability. It also had to take in mitigating factors, such as the personal circumstances of Cornally and legal principles, including that rape and sexual violence are the most serious of crimes. The judge said she also had to ensure that the three separate sentences for offences against the three victims were not greater than if it was one sentence for all the three victims delivered at the same time. During his submission, Mr Shortt, defending, cautioned against a 'crushing sentence', and said any consecutive sentence should not be 'manifestly disproportionate'. Judge Biggs said that when the 11 years was added to the two previous cases — which totalled 11 years and nine months — the overall sentence would be 22 years nine months. She said Cornally was 'constitutionally entitled' to a proportionate sentence and said that if all three cases were dealt with at the same time it would be 20 years. She said she was 'duty bound' to reduce the sentence from 22 years nine months to 20 years. Ms Tuohey said: 'My understanding of a proportionate sentence is to balance the punishment for the severity of the offence with the personal circumstances of the offender. Brendan Cornally was himself sexually abused as a child, that was heard in court [Judge Biggs made reference to this in mitigation]. But the extent of his culpability and the gravity of the offence, I don't think Judge Biggs took that sufficiently into account in the sentencing. Francis had special needs at the time of the rape. Francis was left in a catatonic state. He's now like a three year old. 'He has no independence. Before, he was fully independent. He was looking forward to a life in college, a life of friendships, employment and a relationship. Brendan Cornally broke my son.' Rehabilitation Judge Biggs said she also had to bear in mind the requirement to enable rehabilitation for the perpetrator, noting previous submissions from Mr Shortt about Cornally's engagement in prison activities to date and a willingness to engage in therapy. Based on a Probation report, Judge Biggs said she was further reducing the 20-year sentence by two and a half years to allow for rehabilitation and supervision on release. It brought the final sentence to 17 and a half years. This meant the sentence for the rape of Francis was five years and nine months. In court, Ms Tuohey called this an 'absolute disgrace', saying her family had been 'destroyed' by Cornally and 'implored' the judge to change her mind. Ms Justice Biggs told Ms Tuohey that she was 'sorry' but that her job as sentencing judge was to take in a number of factors and said she had 'carefully considered them'. Speaking a couple of months on, Ms Tuohey told the Irish Examiner: 'I understand the need for rehabilitation, but for certain crimes — rape, child rape and child sexual abuse — there should be lengthier sentence. 'Because of the justice system, Ms Biggs is not able to give a lengthier sentence. It's not her fault, she is bound by the rules. I don't have any adverse feeling to her. I understand her restraints — but something has to change. 'When someone commits a crime of that depravity, where there should be a lengthier sentence, judges need to be given the opportunity and right and will to exercise that.' Civil action In addition to pushing for changes to the criminal laws, Ms Tuohey is also fighting a civil case to prevent Cornally selling his house. She has taken on a solicitor but has been told it will cost her €20,000 to pay for a barrister. 'Brendan Cornally has sole ownership of a house in Tullamore and money in his bank account,' she said. 'My son has been reduced to a two-to-three year old. He cannot make any decision for himself, he can't cook, he can't even decide to wash himself, he needs help with rehabilitation — that is going to cost money. 'Brendan Cornally is trying to sell his house and I am trying to get an injunction to stop him — that comes at a cost of €20,000 and I do not have that.' Ms Tuohey said that, as exhausted as she is, her fight to change the law on mitigation will continue. 'We are not finished,' she said. 'The law needs to change. I am doing this for Francis.' Read More Mother loses appeal against sentence of ex-boyfriend who raped her children


Sunday World
2 days ago
- Sunday World
Evil killer Josef Puska going to prison school ‘courtesy of the Irish taxpayer'
'It is ironic that Puska's victim, Aisling, a teacher by trade can't go to school because he took her life, but yet he can' Evil killer Josef Puska is going to school every day behind bars, we can reveal. The brute who stabbed primary school teacher Aisling Murphy to death in a frenzied attack while she was out jogging, is learning how to read, write and speak English. The 35 year old Slovakian is serving a life sentence for a crime that shocked the nation in the Midlands Prison. Prison sources say he has yet to admit his guilt or give any explanation why he did it. Yet he is now getting an education while in jail courtesy of the Irish taxpayer and it is costing thousands of euros every year. Teacher Ashling Murphy was stabbed to death A prison source said; "It is ironic that Puska's victim, Aisling, a teacher by trade can't go to school because he took her life, but yet he can. "Every day now he goes to school in the Midlands Prison and is learning to speak English, and to read and write in English, among other things. "Most lifers take a prison job - but he didn't. "However that is no surprise since he lived off Irish state handouts for years and hardly ever did a day's work in his life.' The education system in Irish jails is among the best in the world. Inmates can go to school every day and do exams from the Leaving Certificate to a University Degree. Quite often many prisoners who were born into a life of poverty and crime just do basics like learning to read and write. Aisling was killed in Tullamore, Co Offaly while out running on January 12, 2022. Puska had been living with his wife Lucia and their children in a house on the outskirts of the town. He pleaded not guilty even though he had confessed to the murder to the Gardai while recovering in hospital after trying to take his own life. His trial heard he had been cycling around Tullamore stalking other women on the day of the murder before singling out Aisling and stabbing her 11 times in an unprovoked attack. Jozef Puska being led in to Tullamore District Court in January 2022. Photo: PA The jury saw through his denials and convicted him in November, 2023. He has been detained in the Midlands Prison, Portlaoise not far from his home for most of the time since. He has launched an appeal against his conviction and no date has been set for it yet, but the speculation is it will be this Autumn. He claims his "confession" should never have been revealed at his trial in the first place because he was on medication, the painkiller Oxycodone and was recovering from surgery. Puska has been telling fellow inmates that he is confident of winning it and that he will be back on the streets free soon enough. Jozef Puska (centre) when he was charged with the murder of Ashling Murphy The killer is visited by his wife at the jail most weeks and she is firmly standing by him. He is being detained in a landing along with a number of other murderers who are serving life sentences. It is believed he decided to start going to school several months ago and is enjoying it. The prison source said; " He had no interest in doing a prison job like cooking and cleaning so going to school gives him something to do every day instead of dossing around the place. "He had to have a translator after his arrest and during the trial because he said he didn't understand English so maybe he will now understand the English language for his appeal." It currently costs 100,000 euros a year to keep a prisoner locked up in an Irish Jail. The prison source said Puska is likely to serve 30 years because no Independent Parole Board or Justice Minister will want to see him get released early. He added; "This fella is going to cost Irish taxpayers around 3 million euros for what he did, and then we are educating him as well." The Judge at the trial, Mr Justice Hunt, bemoaned the fact that he didn't have the power to impose a minimum jail time Puska must serve for what he did.


Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
How did Richard Satchwell get away with the murder of his wife Tina for eight years?
From the moment he reported her missing in 2017, Richard Satchwell stuck to his story that his wife Tina had run off. His many media appeals begged her to come home. But as the jury heard during his five-week trial in the Central Criminal Court for her murder, she was indeed home and she had been all along . Richard had killed her in 2017 , dug a hole under the stairs of their terraced Youghal home and buried her. The Garda did look for her – as a missing person – but ' red flags ' emerged soon after her disappearance were 'simply ignored' by gardaí, the court was told. READ MORE What were they? And why did it take until six years after her disappearance for a thorough search of the Satchwell house to take place? Irish Times legal affairs correspondent Mary Carolan tells In the News how the court case unfolded and what happens next. Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Declan Conlon and John Casey.