Reflecting on Women's Day: Insights from South Africa's leading women
Image: Supplied
As South Africa prepares to mark Women's Day, several of the country's most prominent women leaders have reflected on the hard-won progress of women's rights — and the long road still ahead.
Women's Day, observed annually on August 9, commemorates the historic 1956 march when approximately 20,000 women gathered at the Union Buildings in Pretoria to protest against the apartheid regime's pass laws, which restricted the movement of Black South Africans.
The protest was led by iconic activists Sophia Williams-De Bruyn, Lilian Ngoyi, Rahima Moosa, and Helen Joseph.
In honour of their efforts, National Women's Day celebrations were instituted in 1994 and now take place annually.
Since then, not only is Women's Day used to commemorate their efforts, but it also allows South Africa to take stock of its progress and failures in not only ensuring gender equality, but also the high levels of femicide and gender-based violence that occur in the country.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Build One South Africa (BOSA) MP, deputy leader and co-founder, Nobuntu Hlazo-Webster.
Image: Supplied
Several women leaders share what their achievements mean to them in light of Women's Day, but also their challenges, who inspire them, and their hopes for the future.
Build One South Africa (BOSA) MP, Deputy Leader and Co-founder, Nobuntu Hlazo-Webster, said that Women's Day is deeply significant to her because it honours women who, despite having far fewer rights, resources, or recognition, were daring enough to confront an unjust system.
'The women of 1956 were not just protesting the pass laws. They were fighting for the right to live with their families for economic freedom and for the dignity of movement in a country that treated them as second-class citizens.
'Their march was not just about the pass laws. It was a cry for wholeness. Those women were resisting a system that separated mothers from children, denied them full participation in the economy, and criminalised their very existence.'
City of Cape Town Speaker, Felicity Purchase.
Image: City of Cape Town
City of Cape Town Speaker, Felicity Purchase, said Women's Day is a reminder of the grit and determination of women who stood up when it was difficult and dangerous to do so.
'It's not just a day of celebration — it's a call to action. The work isn't done. As a woman in leadership, my focus has always been to open doors, not just for symbolic representation, but for capable women who are ready to lead and deliver. I continue the legacy by ensuring that we don't just talk about equality — we show it in how we govern, who we appoint, and the standards we hold ourselves to.'
Economic Freedom Fighters National Chairperson and Chief Whip in Parliament, Nontando Nolutshungu, said Women's Day is also a day to reflect on how far the country has come and how much work remains.
'In 2025, the lived reality of many women still reflects deep inequality, poverty, and vulnerability. Gender-based violence remains widespread, and many women continue to face economic exclusion, poor access to healthcare, and limited opportunities.
'Even with these challenges, women continue to lead and shape society. We see them building communities, running businesses, holding families together, and leading in political spaces.'
Economic Freedom Fighters' (EFF) National Chairperson and Chief Whip in Parliament, Nontando Nolutshungu.
Image: Supplied
Speaker of the National Assembly Thoko Didiza highlighted that this year's Women's Day marks 30 years of the UN Conference on Women, known as the 'Beijing Conference'.
The conference came up with 12 critical areas of concern, which were and still are, poverty, education and training of women, health, violence against women, armed conflict, women and the economy, women in power and decision-making, human rights of women, women and the media, the environment, the girl child and institutional mechanisms.
'Women have always been part of societal struggles in several countries, be it liberation struggles, environmental struggles, etc. However, their role in decision-making and the exercise of power to build communities and resolve societal challenges has been underplayed nor acknowledged.
'This, from the women's perspective, has robbed our society of the potential to advance development. As we celebrate 30 years, we need to take stock of how far countries have gone in ensuring that the status of women has changed for the better in our countries and globally,' she said.
Didiza said that South Africa is fortunate to have a number of the aforementioned concerns raised in the Women's Charter for Effective Equality that was tabled in the first democratic Parliament.
'Today, South Africa has institutions that support democracy and ensure that women and gender issues are addressed by the government and the whole of society. We have the Gender Commission, we had the Office of the Status of Women that was located at the apex of government, and now, we have a Women's Ministry.'
Hlazo-Webster said that she is most inspired by the women in her lineage, such as her grandmother and mother, whose courage shaped who she is.
'My grandmother was a single woman raising three daughters in Nqutu, rural KwaZulu-Natal, at a time when being unmarried with children carried deep stigma. Despite that, she worked as a domestic worker in Durban and sent money home to build a future for her daughters. She endured hardship with dignity and quietly defied societal norms to ensure her family survived.
'My mother was born into that reality of poverty and patriarchy, and yet she rose to become a leader in her field and society, to this day. She was told girls didn't need education beyond learning how to write to their husbands. But she pushed through, completed matric and earned a Master's degree despite being raised in a home that didn't believe in educating daughters. Her life is proof that strength is not about loudness. It is about perseverance and purpose.'
Hlazo-Webster added that beyond her family, she is inspired by women she has seen lead up close, like Hannah Sadiki, the Group CEO of Bidvest Financial Services, and admires Patricia de Lille, the only female party leader currently in the National Assembly.
'In a country where we often celebrate the number of women in Parliament, we must also ask how many women are leading political parties. Very few. I know what it takes to lead in this environment. I am currently the only woman deputy leader of a party in the National Assembly. I honour women like Patricia for their staying power and their ability to lead through seasons of difficulty and change.'
Patricia de Lille, leader of the GOOD Party, and Minister of Tourism.
Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Media
Nolutshungu said: 'Women who remain committed to justice under difficult conditions continue to be a source of inspiration. These include women who organise in informal settlements, raise children in harsh conditions, challenge systems in workplaces, or support their families through informal trade.
'All of them contribute to the strength of our society. Mama Winnie Madikizela-Mandela stands out as one of the most fearless women this country has produced. Her role in the liberation struggle and her refusal to be silenced continue to inspire generations.
'There are also women like Mam'Silinga and Maphila from KwaLanga who never carried a dompas under apartheid. They refused to accept state benefits that came with oppression. Their choices were not easy, but they were principled and showed what real defiance looks like.'
Purchase added that she has always admired leaders who combine courage with results.
'Helen Suzman stands out — she was principled, consistent, and didn't back down, even when she was the only voice in the room. But inspiration doesn't only come from high-profile figures. I've worked alongside countless women in local government and community organisations who carry entire neighbourhoods on their shoulders — often with limited support and no recognition.'
Ultimately, Didiza said that she believes strengthening the women's movement is critical because it will continue to advocate for the attainment of these commitments that were made.
'For us as women, it is important to continue the struggle for the emancipation of all women in our society and globally and therefore solidarity with others remains important.'
theolin.tembo@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
Has South Africa achieved gender equality or is it a long way off?
On August 9 South Africa marks Women's Day, a public holiday rooted in one of the most iconic moments in the country's history: the 1956 march of more than 20,000 women to the Union Buildings in Pretoria, protesting against apartheid pass laws. These fearless women stood together and made it clear: ' Wathint' abafazi, wathint' imbokodo [if you strike a woman, you strike a rock]. ' Since then, Women's Day has become more than a commemoration. It's a day to reflect on how far South African women have come and how far we still have to go. Nearly 70 years later, women continue to fight for equality, safety and recognition, but for many South Africans the meaning of Women's Day has shifted. We would like to know what you think.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Wathint' Abafazi, Wathint' Imbokodo: Reigniting the spirit of resistance
Jubilant members of the ANC Women's League attend rally to welcome home Nelson Mandela at Orlando stadium in Soweto, February 12, 1990. It is no small indictment that, three decades into democracy, South Africa has yet to elect a woman president. It reflects a deeper resistance within the corridors of power to embrace gender equity fully, says the writer. Image: AFP Dr. Reneva Fourie In 1956, women were at the forefront of confronting deep-rooted injustices. Today, their legacy is visible, yet women's voices are increasingly diluted. The brave spirit that inspired nearly 20,000 women to march to the Union Buildings in Pretoria on 9 August of that year appears to be a distant memory. The march remains one of the most courageous acts of resistance in South Africa's history. It was not only a bold rejection of the extension of pass laws that criminalised Black men and sought to do the same to women. It was a direct challenge to the core of racial, gender and economic oppression. Nearly seventy years later, much of that radical spirit has been softened. While National Women's Day is widely commemorated, its original intent is often lost. Many of the spaces that once existed to elevate women have become watered down or tokenistic. Representation in Parliament and the Cabinet is commendable, but it falls short in a system that remains patriarchal and often unaccountable. Having women in leadership is not sufficient if they are not supported to act with boldness and autonomy. A seat at the table is meaningless if the table itself is designed to exclude, silence and contain. Too often, the very institutions that claim to support women are riddled with patriarchal dynamics. Women's leadership is still questioned. Safety in political spaces remains uncertain. The voices of working-class and rural women are often overlooked in policy debates. While not all women are silent, there is a clear and disturbing trend of suppression. Worse still is the way some women are pressured into silencing themselves. The progressive women's movement, once a powerful force for mobilisation and justice, is increasingly relegated to symbolic gestures at formal events or used as voting fodder at party conferences. The pressure to remain aligned with party structures and internal factional interests often stifles independent anti-patriarchal thought. It is no small indictment that, three decades into democracy, South Africa has yet to elect a woman president. This is not just a matter of symbolism. It reflects a deeper resistance within the corridors of power to embrace gender equity fully. Now, more than ever, we need to transform the table. We must reject a system where women are present but powerless. Furthermore, National Women's Day is increasingly framed as a day of appreciation rather than resistance. Commercial narratives celebrate women's strength and resilience while downplaying questions about why so many women remain poor, unsafe and unheard. The urgency of gender struggles has been stripped away and replaced with platitudes. National Women's Day is celebrated annually on August 9 to commemorate the 1956 march of 20,000 women to the Union Buildings in Pretoria to protest the apartheid regime's pass laws . Image: Independent Media Archives The Constitution promises equality, but that promise remains unfulfilled for too many. Many women, particularly Black, working-class and rural women, continue to face some of the harshest realities in the country. High levels of unemployment, persistent food insecurity, gender-based violence, limited access to land and housing, and failing public services define daily life for millions. Despite the promises of democracy, most women still struggle to access the opportunities they were supposed to have won in 1994. This persistent inequality cannot be separated from the general economic policies implemented in post-apartheid South Africa. Neoliberal approaches that prioritise markets, privatisation and austerity have failed to deliver justice. While a small elite has benefited, most people, especially women, remain on the margins. When state budgets are slashed and services are outsourced, it is often women who bear the brunt of the consequences. They are overrepresented in precarious and informal work and are expected to plug the gaps left by the state as unpaid caregivers and community safety workers. Their emotional labour is endless and unrecognised. Yet amid these injustices, women across the world are rising. A growing global wave of feminist organising is reshaping what resistance looks like. Women are at the centre of movements for climate justice, economic fairness and democratic renewal. Across the African continent and throughout the Global South, women activists are linking gender justice with broader social struggles. Their work insists that justice must be holistic and rooted in economic transformation, accountability and a rejection of oppressive systems.
Daily Maverick
16 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
We live in dangerous times of anti-gender ideology and democratic backsliding
Amid the tumult unleashed by the second Trump Administration that is global in its reach, its impact on the constellation of gender, LGBTQI and trans rights and justice has taken a back seat. Yet, any form of democratic backsliding needs to be viewed through a gender lens that will show that gender is, in fact, an important nodal point through which rising authoritarianism is channelled. This is something we should contemplate on this Women's Day, 2025. Anti-gender ideology is a part of the backlash against progressive politics and policies that have gained traction since the 1970s. This backlash is aimed at rolling back women's equality, the acknowledgement of LGBTQI identities, same-sex marriage, gender fluidity and transgender rights. It is an attack on equality norms (including racial equality) and gender justice, with a specific focus on policing and restricting women's reproductive rights and access to healthcare, as well as healthcare for transgender people and the restriction on information on gender relations. Some of Donald Trump's first executive directives in his first and second terms were to restrict women's reproductive rights, making abortion now nearly impossible to access in many American states. This backlash is also mirrored in the overturning of the landmark court ruling, Roe v Wade, that legalised abortion in the US in 1973. The concept 'gender ideology' was used for the first time by Pope John Paul II, who claimed that a misleading concept of sexuality and women's dignity and 'mission' is driven by ideology also called 'gender'. This concept was taken up by the Vatican, which has expressed itself on gender theory as a totalitarian ideology that is more oppressive and pernicious than the Marxist ideology, and that it corrupts young people. Anti-gender is more than a resistance against gender equality, or women's inclusion in politics, but is in fact a movement that is global. This rhetoric of 'anti-gender' has been taken up by evangelical/charismatic churches that have spread ideas in the name of anti-gender ideology that homogenise feminist theories and scholarship and delegitimise gender activism. It also appropriates gender concepts to use against feminists, such as pro-woman, or feminists for life (pro-life), or changing pro-choice into pro-abortion. The influence of evangelical churches supporting anti-gender ideology has also become pronounced in Latin America and Africa. The anti-gender movement consists of heterogeneous coalitions, including churches and rightwing political parties, but all with the aim to reverse gender equality gains made over the past few decades and to ensure a return to patriarchy, traditional family values and re-establishing the binary relationship between only two sexes (male and female). Anti-gender ideology focuses on concepts like gender identity as being distinct from biological sex, transgender rights, comprehensive sex education (that they want to remove from the curriculum), and LGBTQI+ inclusion policies. For this very reason, the Trump Administration has targeted diversity, equality and inclusion policies (DEI) at universities and other organisations for cancellation. It has also contributed to the delegitimisation of women's and gender studies programmes, and queer studies. The anti-gender movement can be viewed as a countermovement that is connected to certain conditions, such as the need to challenge power relations (women have too much power); feeling threatened by the values, successes and actions of the existing feminist movement; showing that it is having some policy success to obtain their objectives; and the ability to have political allies that can help in the provision of resources. The danger for democracy is the stigmatisation of legitimate areas of human rights as dangerous, rejecting gender education and research, as well as a scientific understanding of sexuality. It also curtails civil liberties such as freedom of choice and freedom of association. Where DEI programmes are targeted for closure or defunded (eg the US), it undermines or restricts academic freedom outright. In Scotland, the parliament ruled that there are only two biological sexes: male and female, dealing a blow to transgender people. The anti-gender movement has gained political traction in many countries in Europe, as well as in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, Chile and Peru. In Africa, the circulation of anti-gender ideas has stigmatised any deviation from heteronormativity as 'un-African'. Countries such as Uganda, Kenya and Zimbabwe have passed laws that have severe consequences for LGBTQI+ people. In Uganda, being gay can be penalised with the death penalty, and people who know about people with lesbian or gay sexualities will be viewed as complicit in covering up non-traditional gender identities and also penalised. Anti-gender activism across national borders has enabled anti-LGBTQI+ networks to collaborate transnationally with the aim of enforcing patriarchy and traditional family structures, confining women to traditional sex roles. It has politicised and weaponised homophobia in Africa. Two of the main organisations that are involved in re-establishing the 'natural family' through pro-family activism are the Family Research Council (WCF) and Family Watch International, with anti-gay and anti-feminist agendas, both based in the US. They establish transnational networks of conservative activists. The WFC launched an International Organisation for the Family in Cape Town in 2016. It focuses on the heteronormative nuclear family to the exclusion of other types of marriages and the stigmatisation of same-sex marriage as adulterous. Their campaigns are well funded. Their view of the African family is rooted in a nationalist view of the family that is seen as the building blocks of citizenship, and therefore is prescriptive of procreation for the purposes of nation building. Regional conferences were held by the WCF in Ghana, Nairobi, Kampala, Nigeria, Malawi and Cape Town (2017) on the theme of the African family and how strong families build strong nations. Democratic backsliding refers inter alia to the curtailment of civil liberties and weak commitments to democratic norms, as well as the toleration of violence. One factor that seriously undermines democratic rights in South Africa is gender-based violence, with some of the worst violence and rape happening in the heterosexual family. This situation will be compounded by anti-gender ideology. We have to expose this anti-feminist, anti-LGBTQI+ and anti-African movement for what it is — a danger to democracy. DM
