
Experts: Lake Michigan's future in face of federal cuts may depend more on state and local resources
There are concerns about how federal funding cuts might hamper environmental enforcement in the Great Lakes region, but state and local governments along with volunteer organizations in recent years have proven they are willing to step up on such issues.
That was the picture presented by Joel Brammeier, CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes, who was the keynote speaker for Sail Away into Lake Michigan's Future held Thursday at the Indiana Dunes Pavilion. The League of Women Voters organizations from the Calumet Region, LaPorte County and Porter County co-sponsored the event.
It was a homecoming for Brammeier, who first visited the Indiana Dunes National and State Parks when he was a student at Valparaiso University. Brammeier, who lives in the Chicago area, renewed his acquaintance with the Dunes during the pandemic.
Brammeier leads the non-partisan organization with a team of professionals and a network of 15,000 volunteers dedicated to protecting clean water for the Great Lakes. He gave a balanced perspective of negative recent developments alongside positive strides that have been made in improving Lake Michigan's water quality.
A major concern is the proposed 65% cut in federal Environmental Protection Agency funds, along with how a reorganization of regional branches of the agency will impact enforcement efforts.
'Environmental protection is absolutely not a duty or obligation our government can abandon,' Brammeier said.
Brammeier also noted that there needs to be a greater investment in ensuring safe drinking water from the Great Lakes. There are $200 billion worth of identified infrastructure needs that include replacing crumbling sewage systems that discharge inadequately treated waste and lead-contaminated water lines.
The good news is the federal government in 2021 allocated $50 billion toward addressing some of these issues, Brammeier said.
'That's only a down payment on the challenge we have in front of us,' Brammeier said.
Invasive species that can potentially ruin the habitat of the Great Lakes are another issue. Brammeier said it is a good development that the federal government committed $1 billion toward building a barrier at the Des Plaines River in Joliet, Illinois, to prevent bighead carp and silver carp from entering Lake Michigan.
But there are concerns about whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will receive sufficient support to see the project through to the end, Brammeier said.
While there are plenty of reasons to worry about the future, Brammeier emphasized how much the water quality in the Great Lakes has improved during the last 15 years.
The improvement can be traced to the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative that invested nearly $4 billion toward the cleanup of some of the worst contaminated shoreland. Brammeier noted there is bipartisan support for the restoration initiative.
'The fact is, the Great Lakes ecosystem is getting better. It has been getting better for the past 15 years,' Brammeier said.
The federal Clean Water Act of 1972 was the first big step toward better water quality for the Great Lakes.
'In Northwest Indiana, you can literally see evidence of that,' Brammeier said.
Another positive point Brammeier cited was how state and local governments have become more vigilant in pursuing environmental issues. He said the state and local governments may have to assume greater leadership in ensuring that environmental issues are addressed.
Brammeier noted that the state of Illinois is close to banning the use of poly Styrofoam products as an example. The state of Minnesota also passed a law that holds plastic producers accountable for polluting the waters.
Research shows that 22 million pounds of plastics enter the Great Lakes every year. The discarded plastics break down, with the particles entering drinking water, Brammeier said.
One issue that might have to be addressed by state and local governments is the high water usage required for hyperscale data centers.
Brammeier said data centers have become an issue in the Great Lakes. Several data centers are being built in Indiana, and developers seek to build more. Brammeier said the question is whether this is a good use of freshwater resources.
'Recognition of how we use water in the Great Lakes is often the last thing we do after all those other decisions have been made,' Brammeier said.
Brammeier said that he has seen how state and local governments, along with volunteer organizations, have become stronger and key in protecting the Great Lakes.
'We're starting to see that if federal leadership backs away, they are going to find ways to step up and lead,' Brammeier said.
Victoria Wittig, the Urban Waters Partnership coordinator in Northwest Indiana, talked about the importance of collaboration with environmental groups and private funding sources to address environmental issues. She told the stories of how local groups have come together to make a difference.
'We've got a lot of strength in our region. We've got a lot of incredible talent. We've got a lot of incredible passion and a history that's deeply rooted in fighting for our environment,' Wittig said.
Wittig pointed to successes, like the reclamation of abandoned land in Gary along the West Branch of the Little Calumet River. Organizations that included the Wetlands Initiative, Audubon Great Lakes, Lake County Parks and Recreation, Indiana University Northwest and NIPSCO came together on the project.
As a result, sandhill cranes have returned to raise their babies on the restored wetland.
With teamwork from groups like the Northwest Indiana Paddling Association and Save the Dunes, downed ash trees were removed from the East Branch of the Little Calumet River. The East Branch also has the distinction of having the most ADA accessible ramps for kayak users, Wittig said.
'The power of partnerships is unstoppable,' Wittig said. 'Things we can do together is how we are going to thread the needle through the challenges we face.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota AG Keith Ellison says current executive overreach is new in country's history
Jun. 6---- Although state attorneys general and other agencies are currently prevailing in court rulings against what they argue is executive overreach by the administration, there is still a concern the targeted agencies and departments — created by — may be forever damaged by the administration's attempts to dismantle them. Minnesota Attorney General says he hopes that is not the case, but he does not know. "I don't think anybody really knows," Ellison told the West Central Tribune in an interview Thursday after a presentation he gave in Willmar. "Our country's never been through this. I mean, from (President George) Washington until now, we've never had a president who's decided, 'I'm going to wreck the administrative state. I'm going to persecute the press by suing them. I'm going to persecute law firms. I'm going to ignore the courts.' This is new." Since taking office on Jan. 20 through May 23, Trump signed 157 executive orders, compared to the 220 executive orders he signed during his entire first term in office, according to For further comparison, signed 162 executive orders during his four-year term, signed 277 executive orders in his eight years in office and signed 291 executive orders during his eight years in office. During Ellison's presentation Thursday at the League of Women Voter of the Willmar Area monthly "Hot Topics" event, he explained the constitutional way to accomplish what the Trump administration is trying to accomplish — by going through Congress. "It's true that you can change birthright citizenship if you change the 14th Amendment," Ellison said. Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, to end birthright citizenship for certain people born in the U.S., which is currently being challenged in the courts. "You can even abolish the Department of Education if you introduce a bill in the House and in the Senate, you go through the committee process and then the president signs that bill into law," Ellison continued. "But what you cannot do, and which it is absolutely not conservative to do, is to just get rid of the Department of Education through an edict or proclamation, also known as the executive orders. ... You've got to operate constitutionally." He said he is not aware of another time in American history when the head of state used unconstitutional action to dismantle every American institution, which he and 23 other attorneys general are working hard to prevent through lawsuits. Ellison gave numerous examples of the issues that have been caused by the Trump administration's executive orders, including chaos and confusion. One of the lawsuits brought forth by the attorneys general is against the Trump administration's tariffs. Ellison served in the U.S. House from 2007 to 2019, including 12 years on the Financial Services Committee. "I'm not 100% against tariffs," he said. "I think there are times to use tariffs, but you don't have them on again, off again, 50% today, 100% tomorrow, back down to zero, back up to 50%," Ellison said. "... That is the surest way to ruin the economy." The Trump administration has also been sued over placing conditions on federal funding if local law enforcement agencies do not enforce immigration laws. Ellison explained that local law enforcement has its own jobs to do and the federal government is responsible for enforcing immigration laws. "I will not interfere with (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) if you have a judicial warrant to arrest somebody and put them in removal proceedings," Ellison said. "I demand, as an American, that they have due process rights, but I'm not going to get in the way of it if that's the legal process." Another lawsuit making its way through the courts is regarding the impoundment of federal education funding for K-12 schools that are teaching diversity, equity and inclusion. He pointed out that Secretary of Education Linda E. McMahon was asked if teaching African American history would be a violation and she said that she did not know. "Well, of course, she doesn't know, because it's not defined in law anywhere," he said. "There is no working definition (of diversity, equity and inclusion) that you can apply across the board as to what they say you can't do." The Trump administration attempt to force voters to prove their citizenship before being allowed to cast a ballot will affect millions of eligible voters who may find it difficult to produce their birth certificate or or other needed documentation if they have changed their name. Ellison said he used to be an advocate for a nationwide voting system to ensure uniform voting throughout the country. "I now no longer think that's a good idea, because the saving grace of this moment is to have 50 different voting systems," he said. " ... In a way, this ended up being a strength, because he cannot just go to some federal voting agency and say, 'Do it my way.' It's state by state." The Trump administration is also being sued in relation to transgender rights, with which not everyone in the audience would agree, Ellison noted during his presentation Thursday. When U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi threatened to sue Minnesota over its law allowing transgender youth to play for the sports team with which they identify, Ellison sued first. He said he believes that youth sports is about hanging out with friends, learning sportsmanship and learning not to quit. "I believe sports are good for kids, and kids should get to play. That's where I'm coming from," he said. He is also suing the Trump administration over its threat to pull congressionally-approved federal funding for medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care.


Axios
5 days ago
- Axios
Effort to transform Colorado politics by 2030 takes shape
The question sounds innocuous: "When you think about having more courageous and representative politics in Colorado, what does that mean to you?" Yes, but: It's the precursor to much more. The organizers who asked the question just finished a statewide listening tour called Courageous Colorado, the start to an overhaul of the state's elections and campaigns to make them less partisan. The goal is to implement policy changes at the local or state level by 2030. The big picture: The effort is the outgrowth of Proposition 131, a failed 2024 campaign to institute all-candidate primaries and ranked choice voting. Unite for America, a national democracy reform group that pushed Prop. 131, paid in part for the tour, Axios Denver has learned. The League of Women Voters, CiviCO and Veterans for All Voters, all civic engagement groups, are co-hosts. Between the lines: A similar statewide listening tour ahead of the 2016 election led to a ballot initiative to roll back the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, known as TABOR. What they are saying: "We have to also transform the way campaigns are run," Landon Mascareñaz, the lead organizer of the tour told us, lamenting their "divisive nature." State of play: Courageous Colorado organized 20 town halls across the state through late May to spur the conversation and generate a 2030 agenda. At each stop, attendees — ranging from a handful to more than a dozen — discussed and ranked their support for 23 pre-generated ideas to boost "courage and representation." The list included overhauls of campaign finance, civic education, a citizens' assembly, minor party ballot access, term limits and new methods of voting. The top ideas from the tour, Mascareñaz says, were campaign finance reform, better civic education, open political primaries, ranked choice voting and term limits for local leaders. Inside the room: The stop in Boulder drew 10 people. Mascareñaz started the hourlong conversation by outlining how representation is short-cut in Colorado because of noncompetitive seats in the state Legislature and Congress — a parallel talking point from the Prop. 131 campaign. Attendees expressed cynicism about the ability to change the status quo, but Mascareñaz urged them to stay engaged. "We didn't get into this challenge overnight. We're not going to solve it in one listening session," he said. What's next: This week, organizers are hosting a retreat in Leadville for advocacy groups to evaluate the data from the listening tour and consider a path forward.


Chicago Tribune
31-05-2025
- Chicago Tribune
City council approves $117M bond request to assist Valparaiso University plan for financial rescue
The Valparaiso City Council agreed unanimously to be the gateway for struggling Valparaiso University to have access to up to $117 million in issued bonds to help refinance existing debt and finance new projects, including building renovations. Ordinance No. 9 2025 passed with a second reading during a special council meeting Friday. At the council's May meeting when the ordinance was first introduced, Valparaiso University officials emphasized the need for the city's support by the first week of June to allow time for the bonds to be purchased. Council members Diana Reed, 1st District, Robert Cotton, 2nd District, Barbara Domer, D-3rd, Jack Pupillo, R-4th, and Council President Ellen Kapitan, D-At-large, attended Friday's meeting in person and voted in favor of the ordinance, as did Peter Anderson, R-5th, who joined the meeting remotely. Council member Emilie Hunt, D-At-large, was not able to attend, and nor was Mayor Jon Costas or Clerk-Treasurer Holly Taylor. City Attorney Patrick Lyp opened the special meeting by recapping the discussion and direction of Wednesday's Economic Development Commission. 'It's the recommendation of the Economic Development Commission that the City Council support and pass this ordinance in the best interest of the community,' Lyp said. 'And as I have continued to emphasize, the City Council is only serving as the needed conduit in order for VU to have access to these bonds in this timely manner. There is not any financial obligation or impact from the bonds being issued which would affect the city or taxpayers.' Lyp and Valparaiso University officials have also emphasized it is likely that even though the window of funds can extend up to $117 million in general obligation bonds, the latest calculations indicate that it is around $55 million which will likely be used by the university for financial needs. Mark Volpatti, the university's senior vice president for finance and chief financial officer, once again represented the university at Friday's council meeting and fielded what were only a few follow-up general questions. When Volpatti attended the May meeting when the ordinance was first introduced, he announced the university has sold or is concluding the sale of the three paintings, a topic which has drawn much public debate and criticism about the fate of the valued works, including Georgia O'Keeffe's 'Rust Red Hills.' He said the university is moving forward with its freshman village, noting the renovation work was being done without taking on debt and through 'the proceeds from the artwork.' The other artwork being sold are 'The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate' by Childe Hassam and Frederic E. Church's 'Mountain Landscape.' Among those from the public to speak during the public hearing portion of Friday's meeting was Valparaiso University Senior Professor John Ruff, who has invested years caring for the collection of works at the Brauer Museum of Art at Valparaiso University. He presented the council with a letter with more than 50 signatures representing a stance against the sale of any artwork. Ruff admonished the university for keeping the sale of the O'Keeffe painting 'secret' until it was reported by the media in mid-May. Volpatti addressed Ruff's remarks. 'My thoughts do turn to Richard Brauer and John Ruff and I can't imagine the emotions they've had the past two years,' Volpatti said. 'I respect and admire them and their passion for their career. If more people had such passion for their careers the world would be a better place. We have two camps about whether the sale of artwork should be used for the purchase of new artwork or let's look at the university as a whole and use the sale's funds where they are needed at this time. This is a philosophical question and one that won't be answered today.'